logo
Kaladan Project To Be Ready By 2027, Will Benefit Northeast: Union Minister

Kaladan Project To Be Ready By 2027, Will Benefit Northeast: Union Minister

NDTV07-07-2025
Guwahati:
The distance between Mizoram's Aizawl and West Bengal's Kolkata will be shortened by 700 km by 2027, as India with the help of Myanmar will be able to operationalise the Kaladan Multi Modal Transit Transport Project (KMMTTP) by then, Shipping Minister Sarbananda Sonowal said on Monday.
The KMMTTP will be India's alternative to the 'Chicken's Neck' - a small strip of land in Bengal's Siliguri that connects India's northeast region with the rest of the country - and help bypass Bangladesh.
Mr Sonowal said the Shipping Ministry has invested Rs 1,000 crore in developing the waterways of the project, while other agencies are taking care of the rest.
"There is no transformation without transportation," Mr Sonowal said. "Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Transport Project is the result of India Myanmar Friendship Treaty. This is a strategic initiative to enhance connectivity between India's northeast and Myanmar. It is set to be fully operational by 2027."
He said that under the visionary leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the northeast stands at the heart of Bharat's development agenda.
"Empowered by Modi ji's transformative 'Act East' policy, this once landlocked region is now poised for direct and shorter access to international sea routes. The swift execution of the Sittwe port in Myanmar is a testament to this commitment," the Union minister said.
Once fully operational, the region will unlock new trade opportunities not just for northeast India, but also for Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, and Myanmar by connecting them with Southeast Asia, Mr Sonowal added.
The Kaladan River is 159 km till Myanmar's Paletwa and from there it is another 110 km by road to Mizoram, Mr Sonowal said, adding the road is under construction and will be completed by 2027.
Sittwe port and the Kaladan project will also immensely benefit Tripura by way of significant reduction in transportation time and logistics cost. Major cargo for export for Sittwe port i.e. exports from Myanmar include rice, timber, fish, seafood, petroleum products, garments and textiles.
The major cargo for import for Sittwe port i.e. imports by Myanmar include construction material such as cement, steel and bricks, among others.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Delhi govt.'s move to amend labour laws will strip lakhs of workers of their rights, say experts
Delhi govt.'s move to amend labour laws will strip lakhs of workers of their rights, say experts

The Hindu

time14 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Delhi govt.'s move to amend labour laws will strip lakhs of workers of their rights, say experts

Trade union leaders and experts have criticised the Delhi government's move to amend at least two labour laws as part of its 'Ease of Doing Business' policy, saying the amendments will strip lakhs of workers in the city of several rights. The first pertains to changing the applicability of the Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954, to establishments with 10 or more employees. Currently, the Act, which includes several safeguards for employees, such as leaves, weekly holidays, and a month's notice for dismissal, is applicable even to establishments with one employee. The government is also planning to amend the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which protects workers in cases of lay-offs and closure of units employing 100 or more workers, by raising the minimum threshold of employees to 300. Directions were issued to senior officials at a review meeting on June 30, chaired by Lieutenant-Governor V.K. Saxena and attended by Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, to make these changes, said a source. However, the government is yet to release any official statement on the matter. 'No protection' Anurag Saxena, CITU general secretary (Delhi), said introducing a threshold in the law will leave employees working in smaller establishments without any protection. 'Right now, if a person working at a small bakery or garment shop is fired illegally, he or she can file a complaint under the Act. Once the minimum threshold is increased to 10, workers at thousands of establishments with fewer than 10 employees will be placed outside the ambit of the law and left without any protection,' he said. A senior Delhi government official said once the four Labour Codes, which were passed in Parliament in 2019 and 2020, are implemented, workers in smaller establishments will be provided with 'some level of protection'. However, Mr. Saxena said, 'The labour codes could provide protection to employees in case of wages, but there is no safeguard for workers at a small establishment who are fired illegally.' Concurrent List The government is also looking to make changes to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which applies to commercial units across the country, as labour is part of the Concurrent List, which includes subjects over which the Union and State governments share legislative responsibilities. Currently, the Act provides protection to workers in the event of retrenchment and closure of firms employing 100 workers or more, as prior permission is required from the government or notice is to be given for such actions. The Delhi government plans to amend the Act to cover only establishments employing 300 or more workers. Professor Surajit Mazumdar at the Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, Jawaharlal Nehru University, said an employee's rights do not depend on the size of the establishment. 'As things stand, many labour laws meant to protect employees are not enforced properly. And now if you remove the workers from the ambit of the law itself, the workers won't be able to even fight for their rights,' he said. The threshold in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has already been raised to 300 by the Bharatiya Janata Party governments in Gujarat (2021) and Assam (2018). The same change has also been proposed in the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, which is part of the four labour Codes, which have not been implemented amid resistance from labour unions across the country. Mr. Mazumdar said raising the threshold to 300 would be a way of introducing the labour Codes 'through the back door'. Gujarat had also amended the Gujarat Shops and Establishments (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 2019 (the equivalent of the Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954) six years ago to cover units employing only 10 or more workers. 'The total number of employees in establishments with less than 10 workers in Delhi, who will be affected by the change in law, will be in the range of 7 to 20 lakh and the actual figure will be closer to 15 lakh,' said Mr. Mazumdar. He used the data from the Economic Census, 2013-14 and Delhi Economic Survey 2023-24 to arrive at the conclusion. Brijesh Goyal, chairman of Chamber of Trade & Industry, said the figure will be around 18-20 lakh workers, and Sucheta De, AICCTU national vice president, said the figure will be around 15-17 lakh workers. 'The entire practice is to keep most workers outside the scope of any legal protections,' Ms. De said. When reached out, the CM's office did not offer any comment.

Favouritism? GNIDA's Rs 241-crore trash tender under Allahabad high court scanner
Favouritism? GNIDA's Rs 241-crore trash tender under Allahabad high court scanner

Time of India

time28 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Favouritism? GNIDA's Rs 241-crore trash tender under Allahabad high court scanner

Noida: Greater Noida Authority's move to appoint a private agency for waste collection in Greater Noida West has come under scrutiny from Allahabad high court. The contract — pegged at over Rs 241 crore — pertains to integrated mechanical sweeping, manual sweeping, door-to-door collection and transportation of waste in Zone 1 and 2 of Greater Noida (West). The HC has restrained Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) from finalising any contract under the latest tender until further orders. You Can Also Check: Noida AQI | Weather in Noida | Bank Holidays in Noida | Public Holidays in Noida The court is examining allegations that the bidding process was repeatedly cancelled and modified in a manner designed to favour one particular bidder and exclude others. As an interim measure, a division bench of Justices Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Prashant Kumar ruled, "Although the tender process pursuant to RFP dated June 18 may proceed, no final decision shall be taken or contract awarded without leave of this court." GNIDA has been granted two weeks to respond to the allegations and explain the rationale for cancelling previous RFPs and altering eligibility norms. The matter will next be heard on Aug 11. The court observed the allegations, if true, raise serious questions about the transparency of public procurement and compliance with judicial orders. The allegations pertain to the RFP and eligibility criteria. The court, while hearing a petition filed by two private agencies on July 17, observed, "The allegations raised by the petitioners, if found to be true, have serious implications upon fair competition, transparency in public procurement and compliance with judicial orders." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cargo Ship Meets Pirates - Watch What the Captain Does Next! Tips and Tricks Undo The court also took note of serious allegations that the Authority issued the request for proposal (RFP) five times in the span of a year, particularly the clause concerning consortium participation and financial eligibility criteria. These changes, the petitioners allege, were arbitrary and appeared designed to disqualify them while giving undue advantage to a preferred bidder. The first RFP was floated on July 2, 2024 and later modified through a corrigendum on Aug 24, allowing consortium bids. However, it was cancelled due to only two bidders participating. A second RFP was issued on Nov 6 with an expanded scope of work but without the provision for consortiums and was also later withdrawn. A third RFP was floated on Jan 13, 2025 with the same project scope and again disallowing consortium bids. Petitioners challenged this in the HC, seeking inclusion of consortiums, but the HC disposed of the petition after GNIDA informed it that it opened the technical bids and the tender process was in the final stage of finalisation. However, on May 2, GNIDA issued the same RFP for the fourth time. The two companies submitted a joint bid as a consortium, seeking that their application be accepted and considered on merits. When the Authority did not address their submission, they again approached the HC. On May 17, the HC directed the development authority to examine the prayer of the petitioners and take an appropriate decision. However, the Authority once again cancelled the fourth RFP on June 3 without addressing the petitioners' concerns. The matter was again brought before the court, prompting the HC to seek clarity from GNIDA on June 9 regarding compliance with its May 17 directive. However, the Authority issued a fifth RFP on June 18, again excluding consortiums and slightly altering the eligibility criteria. For instance, the required average turnover was increased from Rs 42.25 crore to Rs 44.10 crore — a change the petitioners allege lacks any rational justification and was intended to disqualify them. "The eligibility conditions in the RFPs have been tinkered with in a manner that appears to be tailored to suit a particular bidder, to the exclusion of others. These minor, odd increases in financial turnover thresholds, without any rational basis or objective justification, appear to be made solely to render the petitioners ineligible and to favour another bidder. The figures are not rounded off, nor are they explained through any financial model or policy rationale, which strongly suggests that the changes are deliberate, artificial and discriminatory in nature," the petitioners said in their latest plea filed earlier this month. Defending its actions, GNIDA informed the court that tendering was a matter of policy and administrative discretion.

Techie loses Rs 1 crore in online trading fraud
Techie loses Rs 1 crore in online trading fraud

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Techie loses Rs 1 crore in online trading fraud

Pune: A 35-year-old software engineer from Wakad lost Rs 1 crore to cybercrooks in share trading fraud between April and June this year. The victim lodged a complaint on Saturday with the Pimpri Chinchwad cyber police. Senior inspector Ravikirnan Nale of the Pimpri Chinchwad cyber police, who is investigating the case, told TOI that cybercrooks added the techie to a group of investors in April this year. "They provided him with details about the stock market and offered good profits on his investments in stocks through them. The crooks also sent the victim a link to download their firm's app to make investments and monitor the profit," Nale said. You Can Also Check: Pune AQI | Weather in Pune | Bank Holidays in Pune | Public Holidays in Pune The techie, between April and June 21, transferred Rs 1 crore to nine bank accounts. "The techie could see a profit of Rs 4 crore on his investments in the app. However, when he tried to withdraw his money, the crooks took additional money from him by citing various reasons," the officer said. "When he started pursuing the suspects for his money, they deleted the app. After realising that he was duped, the techie lodged a complaint," he said. Nale said the techie not only exhausted his entire savings but also obtained a personal loan from the bank and transferred it to the crooks to earn more profit. "We have sought the details of these bank accounts," Nale said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store