
Google Ordered to Pay Out Millions of Dollars to Californians
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A jury in San Jose, California, ruled that Alphabet's Google must pay more than $314.6 million to Android smartphone users in the state after it misused customers' cellphone data.
The verdict, delivered on Tuesday, found Google liable for collecting information from idle Android devices without user permission, sending and receiving data even when phones were inactive. Google has said it did nothing wrong and will appeal.
Newsweek contacted Glen Summers, the plaintiffs' attorney, for comment via email on Thursday outside regular office hours.
Why It Matters
The lawsuit has broader implications for the data usage of phones running the Android OS when they idle. A similar lawsuit representing Android users in the other 49 states is still pending in federal court in San Jose, with a trial scheduled for April 2026. According to tech news outlet Silicon, an equivalent verdict in this case could cost Google billions of dollars.
What To Know
The class action lawsuit was brought on behalf of an estimated 14 million California Android users, first filed in 2019. Plaintiffs argued that Google's actions imposed "mandatory and unavoidable burdens" for its own benefit, primarily using the data for targeted advertising and consuming users' cellular data at their expense.
The plaintiffs' legal team argued that phone users' data is their personal property under California law and that Google is thus liable for data used while customers' phones were idle dating back to 2016.
The exterior of Google's headquarters at 550 Washington Street in Hudson Square, New York, on January 9, 2024.
The exterior of Google's headquarters at 550 Washington Street in Hudson Square, New York, on January 9, 2024.
Michael M. Santiago/GETTY
Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda told Newsweek the company would appeal the decision, arguing that the ruling misunderstood how customer data was being used. Google told the court that users consented to data transfers via the company's terms of service and privacy policies and argued that no Android users were harmed.
Google is one of several major tech companies expected to reduce its headcount in July, according to Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act notices, which must be issued prior to layoffs. According to the Los Angeles Times, Google was one of a number of Bay Area companies to lay off employees in the first quarter of the year.
At the end of June, Google agreed to purchase 200 megawatts of power from Commonwealth Fusion Systems, a Massachusetts company, in what the companies called the "first direct power purchase agreement in history" involving a fusion energy company.
What People Are Saying
Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda told Newsweek: "We strongly disagree with today's decision and will appeal. This ruling is a setback for users, as it misunderstands services that are critical to the security, performance, and reliability of Android devices."
Glen Summers, the plaintiffs' attorney, said: "[The verdict] forcefully vindicates the merits of this case and reflects the seriousness of Google's misconduct."
What Happens Next
Google has already announced that it will appeal Tuesday's verdict. If the outcome is repeated in the larger Google data trial set for April 2026, it could cost the company billions of dollars in fines.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
More Than Half Remote Staff Work a Side Hustle While on the Clock
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Companies have long held concerns about remote work, fearing productivity declines, disconnected workforces and worsened team culture. However, a new study reveals there might be another problem for employers: the majority of remote employees are using their time on the clock to earn extra income on the side, according to a new study. The LendingTree study discovered that 51 percent of remote workers are earning additional income while working their primary job, and 58 percent have considered doing so. Male remote workers were significantly more likely to work for additional income while at their remote jobs, at 58 percent versus 42 percent. Why It Matters The survey's revelations add to a growing body of research documenting how economic pressures, changing job structures, and evolving expectations are reshaping how and when Americans work. With many employees facing distractions, juggling caregiving, and saving money on commuting costs, remote work continues to redefine the boundaries of productivity and accountability. Remote work has become increasingly popular since the coronavirus pandemic. While it was first seen as a necessity to curb the spread of the virus, it now has a strong hold on the larger workforce, and many top talent will not consider a job without remote work as an option. Nearly all, or 95 percent, of working professionals want some type of remote work, and 63 percent said it is the most important aspect of their job, even more important than salary, according to a recent FlexJobs report. However, employers continue to have looming concerns regarding productivity. File photo of a remote employee working from his bedroom. File photo of a remote employee working from his bedroom. ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images What To Know The LendingTree survey of 2,000 Americans, which included 450 remote workers, found there were many benefits to remote work on the employees' side. "One of the greatest appeals of remote work is the ability to have more flexibility within your own home," Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek. "However, that autonomy can lead some to go down the road of doing additional work, even for completely different professions, on the clock of their primary employer." Roughly 70 percent of remote workers reported getting more sleep, 66 percent felt more productive, and 90 percent said they had an improved work-life balance, according to the survey. However, remote workers were also likely to fear being let go if their company underwent layoffs, with 47 percent saying they were concerned about this. This may reflect the reality of today's workforce, as fully remote workers were 35 percent more likely to be laid off than in-office employees, according to a 2023 study by Live Data Technologies Inc. Even amid these fears, 45 percent of remote workers said they were opposed to returning to the office full-time, and 42 percent relocated after securing a remote job. What People Are Saying LendingTree chief consumer finance analyst Matt Schulz said in the report: "It can be tempting to try to generate some extra income while working remotely, but it comes with real risk, too. Splitting your focus that way can make you less productive. That's dangerous any time, but especially in a time of significant economic uncertainty in which many companies are already looking for ways to get leaner and more efficient. The last thing you should do is keep secrets from your employer." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "As appealing as the notion may be, it's important to understand the ramifications could be dire and include you losing your current role and potentially dooming other employees to return to the office if the employer feels like violations of their policies may be widespread." What Happens Next Beene said that if more employees take advantage of their employers' offering remote work, it could lead to these types of positions being less available in the future. "Remote work is a job feature many employees would love to have," Beene said. "Trying to take advantage of it ensures there will be fewer of those opportunities in the future." A previous national survey collected by found that 33 percent of remote employees are working two or more jobs. The reasons cited include the rising cost of living and the relative ease of managing remote roles. "Remote workers are increasingly working multiple jobs due to the rising cost of living in recent years. Additionally, many remote roles are relatively easy to manage, allowing workers to take on additional jobs without a noticeable drop in productivity," Kevin Thompson, CEO of 9i Capital Group, previously told Newsweek.


The Verge
35 minutes ago
- The Verge
Here are the letters that convinced Google and Apple to keep TikTok online
A Freedom of Information Act request has produced letters that the US Department of Justice sent to Google, Apple, Amazon, and several other companies in order to assuage their concerns about breaking a law that banned US web services from working with TikTok. The documents — obtained by Zhaocheng Anthony Tan, a Google shareholder who sued for their release earlier this year — show Attorney General Pam Bondi and her predecessor Acting Attorney General James McHenry III promising to release companies from responsibility for violating the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, which required US companies to ban TikTok from app stores and other platforms or face hundreds of billions of dollars in fines. The law was intended to force a sale of TikTok from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, due to national security concerns. Additionally, the letters say the Justice Department will step in to prevent anyone else from attempting to enforce penalties, a promise that includes filing amicus briefs or 'intervening in litigation.' McHenry apparently sent the first round of letters on January 30th, ten days after Trump signed an executive order delaying enforcement of the law, which took effect the day before his inauguration. A series of follow-up letters were sent by Bondi, including a round dated April 5th, just after Trump extended the delay on enforcing the law to mid-June. The letters' existence was known, but until now, their text had not been released. The full list of recipients includes the operators of app stores, cloud hosting services, and more: Trump has since issued a third extension, which expires in mid-September, while promising a sale of TikTok by ByteDance to a non-Chinese owner remains underway. It is unclear whether any of the orders have a valid basis in law.


Newsweek
39 minutes ago
- Newsweek
COP30 CEO Calls for 'Realistic' Expectations for UN Climate Talks
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The CEO for this year's COP30 climate talks in Brazil used an appearance at a Newsweek London Climate Action Week event to manage expectations for the highly anticipated United Nations gathering in her country in November. "We need to be realistic [about] where the geopolitics are at the moment, and the geopolitics are definitely not helping," COP30 CEO Ana Toni said in a Climate Conversation interview last week produced by Newsweek and partners at Hi Impact and London Climate Action Week. "We have several military wars, unfortunately, we have trade wars happening." Brazil will host COP30 in Belém, the capital of the state of Pará, at the mouth of the Amazon River. It will be the first UN climate negotiations convened in the Amazon, highlighting the connections between climate change and nature conservation. The talks also mark the 10th anniversary of the landmark Paris Climate Agreement and countries in the agreement are due to update their national plans for meeting greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets. COP30 CEO Ana Toni in a Newsweek "Climate Conversation" interview during London Climate Action Week. COP30 CEO Ana Toni in a Newsweek "Climate Conversation" interview during London Climate Action Week. Courtesy of Hi Impact Despite strong global growth in renewable energy, EVs and other clean technologies, global emissions have reached a record high, and scientists documented that the past two years were the world's warmest on record. That combination of factors makes COP30 an especially urgent gathering. However, the global political atmosphere does not bode well for climate progress, Toni said. In addition to wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, President Donald Trump has imposed steep tariffs against major trade partners around the world, undermining other multilateral talks. Trump is also undoing federal policy on climate change and announced that the U.S. will withdraw from the Paris agreement, as he did in 2017 during his first term as President. Toni cautioned against hopes for a dramatic outcome from Belém. "I know there is a lot of temptation to imagine that any one meeting will solve our problems, unfortunately this is not the case," she said. "The work will not finish at COP30, it's just a very important moment." Toni is the national secretary for Climate Change at Brazil's Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva announced in January that she will be CEO of the COP30 talks along with André Corrêa do Lago, secretary for climate, who will be COP30 president. The host nation officials for UN climate talks typically play an important role in setting the agenda for the event and guiding negotiations toward a final agreement. She said she wants the Belém gathering to promote efforts to finance nature conservation and nature-based climate solutions. "We need to talk much more about nature finance," she said. "We talk very little about how the financial sector, the private sector, can help with that preservation." Toni said COP30 will also focus on the important role cities have to both reduce emissions and adapt to the growing impacts of climate change. "When we are getting into implementation, the topics, perhaps they are less flashy, but they are perhaps more important," she said. "Many people are suffering heat waves, fires, flooding." Newsweek's Climate Conversation also featured interviews with climate policy leader Jennifer Morgan and noted climate scientist Jim Skea. Morgan, the special envoy for international climate action for Germany's Federal Foreign Office, echoed Toni's call for greater attention to climate adaptation and the effects of climate-driven extreme weather events. "The costs are just extraordinary," Morgan said, noting that Germany's central bank is documenting the costs to GDP from climate change. "I don't think it's right to have a certain group of wealthy fossil actors have the power to destroy the earth, to make the lives of poor people and vulnerable people much worse." While costs from climate impacts are growing, so are the global investments in clean energy solutions. According to the International Energy Agency, global energy investment this year will hit a record $3.3 trillion, and clean energy and electrification projects are drawing twice the investment of fossil fuels. Sir Jim Skea, a professor emeritus at Imperial College London, chairs the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Skea said the surging investment in clean technology comes as the costs of renewable energy and energy storage are rapidly falling. "In many parts of the world it is now cheaper to produce electricity from wind and solar than it is from fossil fuels," Skea said. "When the financial incentives and the moral incentives—you know, reducing emissions—go in the same direction it is a very, very powerful message."