Trump cannot prevent migrants from seeking asylum at US border, judge says
'The president cannot adopt an alternative immigration system, which supplants the statutes that Congress has enacted," US district judge Randolph Moss said in a 128-page opinion.
Trump, he added, does not possess "an extra-statutory, extra-regulatory regime for repatriating or removing individuals from the United States, without an opportunity to apply for asylum".
The American Civil Liberties Union, as well as a litany of other immigrant rights groups, brought the case against the government, arguing that preventing asylum seekers from a chance at protection in the US violates congressional mandates as well as international treaties.
"No president has the authority to unilaterally block people who come to our border seeking safety," Keren Zwick, director of litigation at the National Immigrant Justice Center, said in a press release shortly after the decision was announced.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"The courts have repeatedly sided with us on this issue, and we will continue to fight cruel policies, under any administration, that harm individuals and families who flee persecution," he added.
Javier Hidalgo, legal director at the immigrant advocacy organisation Raices, said the judicial branch "is what stands between us and anarchy".
"The Trump administration's prerogative is once again found to be unlawful. It is increasingly clear where the illegality lies, and it is not with the immigrant families upon whom this administration is inflicting unfathomable harm".
The Trump administration has two weeks to appeal the decision.
'Invasion'
Just hours after being sworn in on 20 January, Trump signed an executive order declaring a "national emergency" at the southern border and blocking migration north of Mexico.
This was necessary, he said, because of the "invasion" of migrants from "cartels, criminal gangs, known terrorists, human traffickers, smugglers, unvetted military-age males from foreign adversaries, and illicit narcotics that harm Americans, including America".
"America's sovereignty is under attack," the order said.
Trump authorised the Pentagon to deploy "as many units or members of the Armed Forces, including the Ready Reserve and the National Guard, as the Secretary of Defense determines to be appropriate to support the activities of the Secretary of Homeland Security in obtaining complete operational control of the southern border".
Additional funds were also allocated to construct physical barriers and deploy more surveillance drones along the border.
That executive order was followed by another one halting all refugee admissions to the US and ending federal funding for refugee programmes to help with resettlement, transportation, and education.
Trump has also moved to end birthright citizenship and is now prioritising a crackdown on naturalised immigrants who may have criminal or even civil violations dating back several years. Birthright citizenship is the legal right for people born in the US to acquire citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution automatically.
ProPublica, an investigative journalism outfit, has called the decisions to go after US citizens and lawful residents "unprecedented".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
3 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Elon Musk learns that bullies aren't your friends
Anita Chabria, Tribune News Service The thing about bullies is they don't have real friends. They have lieutenants, followers and victims — sometimes all three rolled into one. Most of us learn this by about third grade, when parents and hard knocks teach us how to figure out whom you can trust, and who will eat you for lunch. Elon Musk, at age 54 with $400 billion in the bank, just learned it this week — when his feud with our bully-in-chief devolved into threats that the president will have the South African native deported. Speaking about Musk losing government support for electric cars, Trump this week warned that Musk "could lose a lot more than that." "We might have had to put DOGE on Elon," Trump said, referencing Musk's cost-cutting effort called the Department of Government Efficiency. "DOGE is the monster that ... might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn't that be terrible?" Yes, I know. Schadenfreude is real. It's hard not to sit back with a bit of "told ya" satisfaction as we watch Musk — who has nearly single-handedly demolished everything from hurricane tracking to international aid for starving children — realise that Trump doesn't love him. But because Musk is the richest man in the world, who also now understands he has the power to buy votes if not elections, and Trump is grabbing power at every opportunity, there's too much at stake to ignore the pitiful interpersonal dynamics of these two tantrumming titans. What does it have to do with you and me, you ask? Well, there's a potential fallout that is worrisome: The use of denaturalisation against political enemies. In case you've been blessedly ignorant of the Trump-Musk meltdown, let me recap. Once upon a time, nine months ago, Musk and Trump were so tight, it literally had Musk jumping for joy. During a surprise appearance at a Butler, Pennsylvania, political rally (the same place where Trump was nearly assassinated), Musk leaped into the air, arms raised, belly exposed, with the pure delight of simply being included as a follower, albeit one who funnelled $290 million into election coffers. Back then, Musk had no concern that it wasn't his own dazzling presence that got him invited places. By January, Musk had transitioned to lieutenant, making up DOGE, complete with cringey swag, like a lonely preteen dreaming up a secret club in his tree house. Only this club had the power to dismantle the federal government as we know it and create a level of social destruction whose effects won't be fully understood for generations. Serious villain energy. But then he got too full of himself, the No. 1 sin for a lieutenant. Somewhere along the line, Trump noticed (or perhaps someone whispered in the president's ear) that Musk was just as powerful as he is — maybe more. Cue the fallout, the big "see ya" from the White House (complete with a shoving match with another Trump lieutenant) and Musk's sad realisation that, like everyone else in a bully's orbit, he was being used like a Kleenex and was never going to wind up anyplace but the trash. So Musk took to his social media platform to start bashing on Trump and the "Big Beautiful Bill," which passed in the Senate on Tuesday, clearing the way for our national debt to skyrocket while the poor and middle class suffer. "If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day. Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE," Musk threatened, conjuring up a new political party the same way he ginned up DOGE. Musk even promised to bankroll more elections to back candidates to oust Trumpians who voted for the bill. "And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," Musk wrote. Presumably before he leaves for Mars. It was those direct — and plausible — threats to Trump's power that caused the president to turn his eye of Sauron on Musk, flexing that he might consider deportation for this transgression of defiance. It might seem entertaining if Musk, who the Washington Post reported may have violated immigration rules, were booted from our borders, but it would set a chilling precedent that standing up to this president was punishable by a loss of citizenship.
Gulf Today
3 hours ago
- Gulf Today
The unique candidate
The Democratic party's candidate for New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani could face three rivals in the November election. In addition to uninspiring Republican candidate Curtis Silwa, two veteran Democrats have declared they are running as independents: incumbent Eric Adams and former New York state governor Andrew Cuomo. While Adams has fought off federal indictments for bribery, fraud, and seeking illegal foreign campaign donations, Cuomo was compelled to resign in 2021 after 11 women charged him with harassment. Mamdani is not burdened with such negative baggage and is unique on the US political scene. At 33, he is much younger than his rivals. He is the first South Asian to win a major party primary. As a foreign-born Muslim, Mamdani would be New York's first Muslim mayor if elected. He is a socialist and has a pro-Palestinian record in politics. He does not shy away from his record. He is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, of the nine-member 'State Socialists in Office' bloc in the in New York assembly and of the Muslim Democratic Club of New York. His record appears to be free of corruption. For decades US citizens have been fearful of socialists who are falsely regarded as Communists and enemies of sacrosanct capitalism. US citizens pay a high price for such beliefs. During the 1950s, the country was plagued by a Communist witch-hunt led by Republican Senator Joe McCarthy. His successors lurk in today's Republican party ranks and leadership. Erratic, explosive Donald rump calledMamdani a '100 percent Communist lunatic.' For decades US citizens have rejected sensible federal and state policies on a variety of issues. For example, by refusing as 'socialist medicine,' they do not enjoy coverage by a national health system and are forced to rely on insurance companies which exact huge premiums to cover the high costs of expensive medical treatment. To make matters worse, the Trump administration seeks to defund Medicare and Medicaid and there are fears that social security, adopted in 1935, may not be able to meet the needs of pensioners who have paid into the system during their working lives. After al-Qaeda's 2001 attacks on New York and Washington, there has been widespread suspicion and antagonism towards Muslims. This has been exacerbated and exploited by Trump. During both his terms in office, he sought to ban citizens of majority Muslim states from entering the country by claiming that some might be planning to harm the US. Mamdani has won the support of young voters by being honest. He refused to renounce his support for the Palestinians and for the Boycott, Divest and Sanction (BDS) movement which seeks to punish Israel for its anti-Palestinian policies and actions. Sociology professor at New York's City University, Heba Gowayed told Al-Jazeera, 'The fact that he refused to back down from his position on Palestine is huge.' Furthermore, she added that he did this in 'an atmosphere where we've been told that holding that position is politically disqualifying [and] insisted on taking this position.' She remarked, 'The old guard personified [by Cuomo] was beaten by a democratic socialist, a young, pro-Palestinian brown Muslim kid who had 1 per cent name recognition as of February. It is phenomenal and remarkable.' While Mamdani has adopted a pro-Palestinian stand, he has visited Jewish temples and social centres to reassure voters among the 2.1 million Jews in New York City that he intends to serve their interests. In his view, local politics should have nothing to do with the foreign Palestine-Israel conflict. He has been adopted by two influential mainstream Jewish Democrats Chuck Schumer and Jerry Nadler as well as Democrat leftist Alexandra Ocasio Cortez and Independent Bernie Sanders who is also Jewish. The progressive Jews for Racial and Economic Justice declared they were 'thrilled' by his nomination. However, during the campaign, Mamdani encountered racist attacks from New York City councilwoman Vickie Paladino and Congressman Randy Fine, both Republicans. After Mamdani won, conservative Islamophobe Republican Congressman Andy Ogles called for Mamdani to be deported and denaturalised. On Palestine-Israel, Mamdani stated, 'There are millions of New Yorkers who have strong feelings about what happens overseas. Yes, I am one of them. And while I will not abandon my beliefs or my commitments, grounded in a demand for equality, for humanity, you have my word to reach further, to understand the perspectives of those with whom I disagree, and to wrestle deeply with those disagreements.' Mamdani was born in Uganda to Indian parents and immigrated to the US when he was seven years old but did not become a naturalised US citizen until 2018, presumably, after deciding on a political career. He earned a bachelor's degree in Africana studies from Bowdoin college and worked as a housing counsellor for non- white homeowners faced with eviction. He was a hip-hop musician before being elected to the New York state assembly in 2020, 2022, and 2024. His work on housing has prompted him to make affordable housing, as well as police reform and prison reform, a major issue in his campaign. He is married to Syrian American artist Rama Duwaji and the couple lives in an apartment in the Astoria neighbourhood. Mamdani shadowed Cuomo for much of the campaign although once ballots were counted, was ahead by 43.51 per cent to Cuomo's 36.42 per cent. Although they had raised similar funding, Cuomo relied on traditional 'fat cat' donors while Mamdani appealed to a wide range of small contributors whose donations committed them to vote for him. His campaign strategy involved creating a movement, recruiting mainly young volunteers through social media and, ahead of voting day, he asked them to 'knock on a million doors.' This is not a new strategy as it was used in 2008 by the presidential campaign of Barack Obama. Mamdani 's primary victory was an upset, an upset for traditional power brokers, for anti-Asian racists, anti-Muslim sectarians, and conservatives. They argued he was not a realist and too inexperienced a politician to manage New York's huge bureaucracy and deal with the city's mountain of problems. Nevertheless, New York is a Democrat city and unless he loses votes to Democrat rivals Adams and Cuomo who are running as independents, Mamdani is likely to defeat Republican Silwa in the November election. Photo: TNS
Gulf Today
3 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Immigrants weigh health coverage against deportation risk
Claudia Boyd-Barrett, Tribune News Service For months, Maria, 55, a caregiver to older adults in California's Orange County, has been trying not to smile. If she opens her mouth too wide, she worries, people will see her chipped, plaque-covered front teeth. An immigrant without legal status, Maria doesn't have health or dental insurance. When her teeth start to throb, she swallows pain pills. Last summer, a dentist said it would cost $2,400 to fix her teeth. That's more than she can afford. 'It's so expensive,' said Maria, who often works 12-hour days lifting clients in and out of bed and helping them with hygiene, medication management, and housework. 'I need money for my kids, for my rent, for transport, for food. Sometimes, there's nothing left for me.' KFF Health News connected with Maria through an advocacy organisation for immigrant workers. Fearing deportation, she asked that only her first name be used. Maria is among what the federal government estimates are 2.6 million immigrants living in California without legal status. The state had gradually sought to bring these immigrants into its Medicaid programme, known as Medi-Cal. But now, facing a state enrolment freeze, low-income California residents in the US without legal permission — along with the providers and community workers that help them — are anxiously weighing the benefits of pushing forward with Medi-Cal applications against the risks of discovery and deportation by the federal government. Seeking to close a projected $12 billion budget deficit, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, signed a balanced state budget on June 27 that will end new Medi-Cal enrollment in January 2026 for those over 19 without legal status. Meanwhile, federal immigration raids — which appear to have targeted at least one health clinic in the state — are already making some people afraid to seek medical care, say immigrant advocates and health providers. And the recent news that Trump administration officials are sharing Medicaid enrollee data, including immigration status, with deportation authorities is expected to further erode trust in the program. US Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson Andrew Nixon said the agency, which oversees the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, had the legal authority to share the data to address 'unprecedented systemic neglect under the Biden-Harris administration that allowed illegal immigrants to exploit Medicaid while millions of Americans struggle to access care, particularly in states like California.' Further complicating matters, the Trump administration has threatened to withhold funds from states that provide health coverage to people without legal status. Currently, about 1.6 million people in the country without authorization are enrolled in Medi-Cal. In 2016, California began opening Medi-Cal to low-income people lacking legal status, starting with children, then gradually expanded it to young people, older adults, and — in January of this year — those ages 26 to 49. The state Department of Health Care Services, which oversees Medi-Cal, partnered with community health clinics to help get eligible people enrolled. It's too early to tell what impact the latest state and federal developments are having on enrollment numbers, since data is available only through March. But many health care providers and advocates said they expect a chilling effect on immigrant enrollment. Seciah Aquino is executive director of the Latino Coalition for a Healthy California, which supports community health workers — also called promotores — who help spread awareness about Medi-Cal's expansion to adults lacking legal status. Just over half of public health insurance recipients in California are Latino, compared with just 30% of Medicaid enrollees nationwide. Aquino said her coalition will tell promotores to disclose data-sharing risks so community members can make informed decisions. 'They take it very personally that advice that they provided to a fellow community member could now hurt them,' Aquino said. Newsom condemned the data sharing, calling the move 'legally dubious,' while US Sens. Adam Schiff and Alex Padilla, both Democrats, have demanded that the Department of Homeland Security destroy any data shared. California's Department of Health Care Services announced June 13 that it is seeking more information from the federal government. The agency said it submitted monthly reports to CMS with demographic and eligibility information, including name and address, as required by law. Medicaid enrollee data from Illinois, Washington state, and Washington, DC, was also reportedly shared with DHS. Jamie Munks, a spokesperson for the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services, the state's Medicaid agency, said the department was 'deeply concerned' by the news and that the data was regularly passed along to CMS with the understanding that it was protected. In Sacramento, Democratic lawmakers found themselves in the uncomfortable position of rolling back health benefits for low-income residents with unsatisfactory immigration status, including people without legal status, people who've held green cards for under five years, and some others who are in the process of applying for legal status or have statuses meant to protect them from deportation. In addition to the Medi-Cal enrolment freeze for immigrants 19 and older in the country without authorisation, all enrolled residents with unsatisfactory immigration status from 19 to 59 years old will be charged $30 monthly premiums starting in July 2027. 'What I'm hearing on the ground is folks are telling me they're going to have a really hard time making these premium payments,' said Carlos Alarcon, health and public benefits policy analyst with the California Immigrant Policy Center, an advocacy group. 'The reality is most people already have limited budgets.' The legislature rejected a proposal from the governor to bar immigrants with unsatisfactory immigration status from receiving long-term nursing home and in-home care through Medi-Cal but went along with eliminating dental benefits starting in July 2026. Health care providers said that without Medi-Cal coverage, many immigrants will be forced to seek emergency care, which is more expensive for taxpayers than preventive and primary-level care. Sepideh Taghvaei, chief dental officer at Santa Cruz County's Dientes Community Dental Care, saw this play out in 2009 when the state cut adult Medi-Cal dental benefits. Patients came in with swollen faces and excruciating pain, with conditions so advanced that they required hospital treatment. 'It's not cost-effective,' she said. State Sen. Roger Niello, a Republican who serves as vice chair of the Senate budget committee, said he believes California shouldn't be funding Medi-Cal for people who lack legal status, particularly given the state's fiscal challenges. He also said he worries that coverage of people in the country without authorization could encourage others to move to California. 'If we maintain that expense to the noncitizen,' he said, 'we're going to have to cut someplace else, and that's undoubtedly going to affect citizens.' Californians, too, are going through a change of heart. In a May poll conducted by the Public Policy Institute of California, 58% of adults opposed the benefit. For Maria, shifting health care policies have left her feeling paralysed. Since she arrived here five years ago, the caregiver's focus has been on earning money to support her three children, whom she left with her parents in her home country, she said. Maria didn't learn she might be eligible for Medi-Cal until earlier this year and hadn't yet found time to complete the paperwork. After a friend told her that the state could freeze enrollment in January, she began rushing to finish the sign-up process. But then she learned that Medi-Cal data had been shared with immigration authorities. 'Disappointed and scared' was how she described her reaction. Suddenly, she said, enrolling in Medi-Cal doesn't seem like a good idea.
