logo
Who is Dan Bongino? FBI deputy director in limbo over Epstein files

Who is Dan Bongino? FBI deputy director in limbo over Epstein files

The Guardian20 hours ago
The future of the deputy FBI director, Dan Bongino, is unclear after he stormed out of a meeting with Pam Bondi, the attorney general, and told friends he was considering quitting over the controversy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein.
Bongino, a former New York police officer and Secret Service agent who helped protect George W Bush and Barack Obama, appears on course to be the Trump administration's first casualty of the Epstein fallout, which is threatening to split the 'Make America great again' (Maga) movement
Having failed to appear for work on Friday and reportedly considering his future, it was unclear whether the former rightwing podcaster was at his desk in the bureau's Washington DC headquarters on Monday.
CNN reported that JD Vance had spent the weekend mediating an increasingly bitter feud involving Bondi, Bognino, Kash Patel, the FBI director – and many others.
It is not the first time Bongino has appeared unhappy in his work. In May he cried during a live appearance on Fox & Friends, lamenting that he 'gave up everything' to take the FBI role.
There is currently no word on whether Bognino would follow through on his threat to resign, although insiders suggested his position had become untenable given that Donald Trump had publicly thrown his support behind Bondi and made clear his displeasure over the public squabbling among his supporters over Epstein. The disgraced financier was found dead in his prison cell in 2019 after being arrested on federal charges of sex trafficking minors.
It is the lingering aftermath of this case that has put Bongino – by many measurements, an unlikely and controversial choice to be FBI deputy director – in the spotlight.
As a rightwing podcaster and media personality, Bongino was in the vanguard of pushing conspiracy theories about Epstein, suggesting that he had been murdered, rather than having taken his own life, and that he had a list of powerful clients who feared being unmasked as pedophiles.
Bondi, too, fueled the widespread Maga belief in the existence of a high profile client list when she told Fox News that it was 'sitting on my desk right now'. But both were accused of having oversold the story when a Department of Justice (DoJ) memo was published this month concluding that Epstein had indeed committed suicide and the storied client list did not, in fact, exist.
It was against this backdrop that the pair clashed last Wednesday, leaving Bongino 'out of control furious' in a meeting also attended by Patel, Susie Wiles, the powerful White House chief of staff, and deputy chief of staff Taylor Budowich.
Far before the fallout, critics warned that Bongino was unqualified for the post.
His appointment marked the the first time in the FBI's 117-year history that the second-in-command position had not been held by one of the bureau's former agents.
It was also seen as reinforcing fears - already ignited by the prior appointment of Patel - that Trump intended to use the bureau as an instrument of revenge against his enemies.
Sign up to First Thing
Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'Donald Trump just named far-right MAGA podcaster Dan Bongino, a notorious conspiracy theorist who promoted the lie that the 2020 election was 'stolen,' to serve as Deputy Director of the FBI. God help us all,' the Republicans Against Trump group posted on X at the time of his nomination in February..
Bongino, a former Fox News host who has written books about the supposed existence of the anti-Trump 'deep state', famously said in 2018 that 'my entire life right now is about owning the libs.'
Despite siding with Bondi, Trump told reporters over the weekendthat Bongino was 'a very good guy … He sounded terrific, actually … I think he's in good shape.'
Bongino has one powerful advocate in Laura Loomer, the far-right social media influencer who is often credited with having Trump's ear and who broke the news of his unhappiness last week.
'I'm told Kash and Bongino are furious with Blondi and the blowback she has caused them with her lack of transparency,' she posted. 'Kash Patel and Dan Bongino should call for Blondi's public resignation today to save themselves and to also push for full transparency into the Epstein files. Someone needs to be fired for this. Giving Blondi courtesy to resign is more than she deserves.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

One Republican sides with Democrats to release Epstein files
One Republican sides with Democrats to release Epstein files

Daily Mail​

time17 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

One Republican sides with Democrats to release Epstein files

A lone Republican has risked President Donald Trump's ire after voting with Democrats in a bid to release the Jeffrey Epstein files. California Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna pushed an amendment to upcoming crypto legislation that would have forced Attorney General Pam Bondi to release all Epstein-related documents. Bondi would have to share the files on a 'publicly accessible website' within 30 days of passage. However, the effort was foiled, failing five to seven, during a Monday night vote by the House Rules Committee, a group of lawmakers that generally sign off on legislation before it gets a final vote on the House floor. The sensational files, which Trump promised to release while campaigning, will remain under lock and key at the Justice Department - for now. The president, if he's caught wind of the nail-bitting legislative maneuver, may be unhappy with how close this effort was to succeeding as he and his Cabinet members have worked to delegitimize calls for transparency in the high-profile case. South Carolina Republican Ralph Norman, a conservative member of the House Freedom Caucus (HFC) and a member who, at times, ruffles GOP leadership's feathers, stunningly sided with Democrats to release the file. And another Republican decided not to vote at all, apparently wanting to avoid flak from constituents eager to see who was implicated in the deceased sexual offender's affairs. Texas Republican Chip Roy opted not to vote on the measure. Even if he had sided with his fellow HFC member Norman and Democrats the amendment still would've failed by one vote. 'Rules voted 5-7 to block the full House from voting on my amendment to have a FULL release of the Epstein file,' Khanna wrote on X following the failed vote. 'People are fed up. They are fed up. Thanks ⁦@RepRalphNorman⁩. Need to put the American people before party!' The Republicans who voted against the amendment to release the Epstein files include: Rules Chairwoman Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., Michelle Fischbach, R-M.N., Chip Roy, R-Texas, Erin Houchin, R-Ind., Nicholas A. Langworthy, R-N.Y., Austin Scott, R-Ga., H. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., Brian Jack, R-Ga. Some MAGA devotees feel betrayed by Republican's sudden and puzzling reversal on the release of the deceased banker and his 'client list.' Attorney General Pam Bondi said earlier this year that the 'client list' was on her desk, but last week the DOJ and FBI said there is no list at all - an admission clearly at odds with the Cabinet member's past comments. 'America deserves the truth about Jeffrey Epstein and the rich powerful elites in his circle,' firebrand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., posted on X after the vote. 'The line is drawn with anyone who abuses children and vulnerable innocent people.' 'When George Santos is going to prison for 7 years but Epstein only served 13 months, our justice system is CORRUPT!!!' Greene said, noting how a the former Republican congressman will soon go to jail for fraud and identity theft. Trump during his campaign he would release additional files on the disgraced financier if he was elected. But last week he appeared to downplay the importance of the scintillating Epstein saga. 'Are people still talking about this creep? That is unbelievable! I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein,' the 79-year-old president responded to a reporter inquiring about the case last week. Trump also ridiculed Epstein in a post on his Truth Social app over the weekend. 'We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening. We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein,' he posted. Earlier this year, the White House hosted influencers over to review files on Epstein, but the documents they triumphantly paraded out with were later found to be previously released files - they were duped.

The sole rebel Republican who voted to release Epstein files in bold move defying Trump's administration
The sole rebel Republican who voted to release Epstein files in bold move defying Trump's administration

Daily Mail​

time31 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

The sole rebel Republican who voted to release Epstein files in bold move defying Trump's administration

A lone Republican has risked President Donald Trump 's ire after voting with Democrats in a bid to release the Jeffrey Epstein files. California Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna pushed an amendment to upcoming crypto legislation that would have forced Attorney General Pam Bondi to release all Epstein-related documents. Bondi would have to share the files on a 'publicly accessible website' within 30 days of passage. However, the effort was foiled, failing five to seven, during a Monday night vote by the House Rules Committee, a group of lawmakers that generally sign off on legislation before it gets a final vote on the House floor. The sensational files, which Trump promised to release while campaigning, will remain under lock and key at the Justice Department - for now. The president, if he's caught wind of the nail-bitting legislative maneuver, may be unhappy with how close this effort was to succeeding as he and his Cabinet members have worked to delegitimize calls for transparency in the high-profile case. South Carolina Republican Ralph Norman, a conservative member of the House Freedom Caucus (HFC) and a member who, at times, ruffles GOP leadership's feathers, stunningly sided with Democrats to release the file. And another Republican decided not to vote at all, apparently wanting to avoid flak from constituents eager to see who was implicated in the deceased pedophile's affairs. Texas Republican Chip Roy opted not to vote on the measure. Even if he had sided with his fellow HFC member Norman and Democrats the amendment still would've failed by one vote. 'Rules voted 5-7 to block the full House from voting on my amendment to have a FULL release of the Epstein file,' Khanna wrote on X following the failed vote. 'People are fed up. They are fed up. Thanks ⁦@RepRalphNorman⁩. Need to put the American people before party!' The Republicans who voted against the amendment to release the Epstein files include: Rules Chairwoman Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., Michelle Fischbach, R-M.N., Chip Roy, R-Texas, Erin Houchin, R-Ind., Nicholas A. Langworthy, R-N.Y., Austin Scott, R-Ga., H. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., Brian Jack, R-Ga. Some MAGA devotees feel betrayed by Republican's sudden and puzzling reversal on the release of the deceased banker and his 'client list.' Attorney General Pam Bondi said earlier this year that the 'client list' was on her desk, but last week the DOJ and FBI said there is no list at all - an admission clearly at odds with the Cabinet member's past comments. 'America deserves the truth about Jeffrey Epstein and the rich powerful elites in his circle,' firebrand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., posted on X after the vote. 'The line is drawn with anyone who abuses children and vulnerable innocent people.' Surveillance footage of Jeffrey Epstein's cell dated August 9, 2019, with a time stamp of 12 General Pam Bondi on Tuesday sought to tamp down outrage on the right over the Justice Department's recent memo on disgraced financier Jeffrey Justice Department and FBI released a roughly 11-hour video Monday recorded outside Epstein's prison cell door to dispel claims Epstein did not die by suicide. Some on the far right have seized on time stamps in the video, which skip from 11:58 p.m. to midnight. 'When George Santos is going to prison for 7 years but Epstein only served 13 months, our justice system is CORRUPT!!!' Greene said, noting how a the former Republican congressman will soon go to jail for fraud and identity theft. Trump during his campaign he would release additional files on the disgraced financier if he was elected. But last week he appeared to downplay the importance of the scintillating Epstein saga. 'Are people still talking about this creep? That is unbelievable! I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein,' the 79-year-old president responded to a reporter inquiring about the case last week. Trump also ridiculed Epstein in a post on his Truth Social app over the weekend. 'We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening. We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein,' he posted. Earlier this year, the White House hosted influencers over to review files on Epstein, but the documents they triumphantly paraded out with were later found to be previously released files - they were duped.

Trump's ex-national security adviser defends use of Signal months after group chat leak
Trump's ex-national security adviser defends use of Signal months after group chat leak

The Guardian

time43 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump's ex-national security adviser defends use of Signal months after group chat leak

Update: Date: 2025-07-15T15:47:58.000Z Title: Mike Waltz Content: , Trump's nominee to become the UN ambassador, says use of Signal 'not only authorized, it was recommended' Shannon Ho (now) Lucy Campbell and Tom Ambrose (earlier) Tue 15 Jul 2025 17.47 CEST First published on Tue 15 Jul 2025 11.52 CEST From 5.38pm CEST 17:38 Finally, is asked by Democratic senator Chris Coons whether he was investigated for his disclosure of sensitive operational information on Signal and his expansion of the group chat to (mistakenly) include a journalist. Waltz says that use of Signal was 'not only authorized, it was recommended' for government and personal devices. Pressed to clarify whether Signal was recommended for disclosure of sensitive military information, Waltz says there was no classified information disclosed. Pressed again on whether or not he was investigated, Waltz says the White House conducted an investigation and, to his understanding, the Department of Defense was still conducting one. Asked if any disciplinary action was taken, Waltz says no. Asked if he spoke to the US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, about his decision to share details of an imminent military strike, Waltz says they only spoke about the 'highly successful mission'. Coons says he was hoping to hear some level of regret from Waltz about sharing sensitive information on a commercially available app, to which Waltz insists again that no classified information was shared. Updated at 5.42pm CEST 5.47pm CEST 17:47 Democratic senator Tim Kaine also brought up Signal during his time to question . The former national security adviser again claimed that no classified information was shared. Waltz cited testimony from defense secretary Pete Hegseth claiming the same assessment of their Signal group chat. 'I'm sure secretary Hegseth says he didn't share any classified information but the fact of the matter is there are two investigations going on at the Pentagon precisely to determine in an objective and independent way whether classified information was shared,' Kaine said. 5.38pm CEST 17:38 Finally, is asked by Democratic senator Chris Coons whether he was investigated for his disclosure of sensitive operational information on Signal and his expansion of the group chat to (mistakenly) include a journalist. Waltz says that use of Signal was 'not only authorized, it was recommended' for government and personal devices. Pressed to clarify whether Signal was recommended for disclosure of sensitive military information, Waltz says there was no classified information disclosed. Pressed again on whether or not he was investigated, Waltz says the White House conducted an investigation and, to his understanding, the Department of Defense was still conducting one. Asked if any disciplinary action was taken, Waltz says no. Asked if he spoke to the US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, about his decision to share details of an imminent military strike, Waltz says they only spoke about the 'highly successful mission'. Coons says he was hoping to hear some level of regret from Waltz about sharing sensitive information on a commercially available app, to which Waltz insists again that no classified information was shared. Updated at 5.42pm CEST 5.04pm CEST 17:04 Just an observation that we're an hour into this hearing and the Signal group chat leak hasn't come up yet. 4.57pm CEST 16:57 If confirmed as ambassador, would arrive at the United Nations at a moment of great change, writes the Associated Press. The world body is reeling from Trump's decision to slash foreign assistance – affecting its humanitarian aid agencies – and it anticipates US funding cuts to the UN annual budget. Under an 'America first' foreign policy realignment, the White House – in line with the remarks we've just heard from Waltz at the hearing – has asserted that 'some of the UN's agencies and bodies have drifted' from their founding mission and 'act contrary to the interests of the United States while attacking our allies and propagating antisemitism'. With the US being the largest UN donor, cutting American funding to the UN budget would greatly impair operations. Facing financial instability, the UN has spent months shedding jobs and consolidating projects while beginning to tackle long-delayed reforms. It is also facing growing frustration over what critics describe as a lack of efficiency and power in delivering on its mandate to end conflict and prevent wars. John Bolton, a former US ambassador to the UN who was also national security adviser during Trump's first term, was critical of the current state of the UN. 'It's probably in the worst shape it's been in since it was founded,' Bolton, now an outspoken Trump critic, recently told the AP. Updated at 5.03pm CEST 4.54pm CEST 16:54 In his opening remarks, was critical of the United Nations' approach to China and what he called 'antisemitism' at the organization. He said the UN had drifted from its original peacemaking goals and should return to its founding principles – 'peacemaking, not nation-building'. Waltz added: I'm confident under this president's leadership, we can continue to spread peace and prosperity, and I'm confident we can make the UN great again. 'Countering China, absolutely, Senator Shaheen, is critical,' Waltz said. If confirmed, he said, he would work with the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio (who also replaced him as national security adviser), to challenge China's growing influence at the UN. He also highlighted the large number of UN resolutions against Israel compared with other countries, without offering any context as to why that might be. Updated at 5.02pm CEST 4.44pm CEST 16:44 True to her comments in my last post, the ranking member on the Senate foreign relations committee, Jeanne Shaheen, focused her opening remarks at 's confirmation hearing on critiquing the US's retreat from its role on the global stage, highlighting the Trump administration's slashing of budget and staff related to international relations. When the US pulls back, China benefits, she said. They continue making long-term investments at the United Nations and international organizations, not only through contributions, but by placing more Chinese nationals in key roles. Mr Waltz, I urge you to take this threat seriously. I know you do. Updated at 4.57pm CEST 4.04pm CEST 16:04 Former national security adviser (remember him?) is due to have his confirmation hearing before the Senate foreign relations committee shortly, giving lawmakers their first opportunity to publicly question him over the Signalgate controversy – which saw him inadvertently add a journalist to a high-level Signal group chat about US military strikes in Yemen. Trump removed Waltz from his role as national security adviser in May, weeks after the scandal, and nominated him to the position of United Nations ambassador. Waltz had actually been on thin ice for weeks before Signalgate in large part due to strained working relationships in the White House, but he had also found himself under pressure for being seen as a war hawk and at odds with Trump's 'America first' agenda. The demoted Waltz, who has been meeting with senators on Capitol Hill in recent days, will appear before the committee today alongside John Arrigo and Christine Toretti, two other Trump nominees for ambassadorships to Portugal and Sweden respectively. He is largely expected to be confirmed unless anything major comes up – and get a second go in the Trump administration. The top Democrat on the committee, Jeanne Shaheen, told NBC News she is 'sure' Signalgate will come up, 'but what I want to know from Mr Waltz is whether he supports the UN, continued American presence at the United Nations, how he intends to make that case, and what he sees as the role of our UN ambassador'. I'll bring you any key lines from the hearing here. Updated at 5.05pm CEST 3.51pm CEST 15:51 Donald Trump has said that Democratic senator Adam Schiff 'has engaged in a sustained pattern of possible mortgage fraud' and 'needs to be brought to justice'. In a post on Truth Social this morning, Trump said Schiff, who holds a seat in California, had listed his primary address in Maryland 'to get a cheaper mortgage' from 2009 until 2020, when he listed the property as his second address. Updated at 4.00pm CEST 2.57pm CEST 14:57 Lauren Aratani Inflation shot up in June as the impacts of Donald Trump's tariffs slowly started to show in US prices. Business leaders have said for months that the high, volatile rates of Trump's tariffs will force companies to raise consumer prices. Prices remained stable in the spring, particularly as many of Trump's highest tariffs were paused; however, they started increasing in May and have continued to rise in June. Annual inflation rose to 2.7% in June, up from 2.4% in May, according to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which tracks the prices of a basket of goods and services each month. Core CPI, which leaves out energy and food prices, ticked up slightly to 2.9%, compared with 2.8% in May. Inflation remains far below the price peaks seen three years ago, when price increases reached as high as 9%, and even a year ago, when increases were closer to 3%. But tariffs have appeared to halt inflation's downward path. According to the Yale Budget Lab, Americans now face an average tariff rate of 18.7% – the highest rate since 1933. That includes 30% tariffs on China, a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum, 25% on auto parts and a universal 10% tariff on all imports. The levies currently in effect do not include those Trump is threatening to impose on other large US trading partners. Over the weekend, Trump threatened the EU and Mexico with 30% tariffs and Canada with a 35% tariff. Brazil is set to face 50% tariffs as punishment for the trial of Trump ally Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil's former president, who is facing charges of attempting a coup. Prices will likely be pushed up much higher should these tariff rates go into effect, but it's unclear if and when that could happen. Trump initially set negotiation deadlines to 9 July, but pushed it forward to 1 August as the date approached. Trump's trade advisers have said they aim to end negotiations by Labor Day at the beginning of September. As prices remain volatile, the Federal Reserve appears unlikely to adjust interest rates anytime soon, despite cutting rates three times in the fall. Fed officials, including the central bank's chair, Jerome Powell, have said that price increases are expected to continue in the summer, drawing away from the Fed's 2% inflation target. 2.29pm CEST 14:29 Luke Harding in Kyiv and Artem Mazhulin Ukrainians are celebrating Melania Trump on social media in a series of memes, after Donald Trump suggested the first lady played a part in his apparent change of heart over Russia. Speaking at a meeting in the White House on Monday with the Nato secretary general, Mark Rutte, Trump said his wife had played a key role in pointing out Vladimir Putin's duplicity. 'My conversations with him [Putin] are always very pleasant. I say, 'Isn't that a very lovely conversation?' And then the missiles go off that night,' Trump said. 'I go home, I tell the first lady: 'I spoke with Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.' She said: 'Really? Another city was just hit.'' Slovenian-born Melania, who grew up in the former Yugoslavia, has previously appeared to be a bigger supporter of Ukraine than the sceptical US president, who in February this year called Volodymyr Zelenskyy a dictator. Shortly after the 2022 full-scale Russian invasion, she appealed to her social media followers to donate to the Red Cross, saying it was 'heartbreaking and horrific to see innocent people suffering'. Agent Melania Trumpenko After Trump's Oval Office comments on Monday, one social media user posted a photo of 'Agent Melania Trumpenko' wearing a blazer with a Ukrainian trident insignia. Her face is half-shaded with a big hat, giving the impression she is working undercover inside the White House, to Kyiv's benefit. The magazine Business in Ukraine observed that 'there is a lot of love on social media tonight for Melania Trump' after the announcement that the US would send Patriot air defence systems to Ukraine. It reproduced a longstanding meme featuring three creatures wearing an army helmet and military caps. The image is used to denote a western politician or celebrity who supports or is friendly to Ukraine. The creatures give Melania a hat decorated with a Ukrainian flag. Another meme shows the first lady standing behind her husband in the Oval Office, while he signs a presidential decree. The caption reads: 'Sisters Melania of the Bene Gesserit' – a reference to the powerful, secret and politically influential sisterhood from Frank Herbert's science fiction book Dune. Updated at 2.40pm CEST 1.43pm CEST 13:43 Oliver Milman A group of Republican lawmakers has complained that smoke from Canadian wildfires is ruining summer for Americans, just days after voting for a major bill that will cause more of the planet-heating pollution that is worsening wildfires. In a letter sent to Canada's ambassador to the US, six Republican members of Congress wrote that wildfire smoke from Canada has been an issue for several years and recently their voters 'have had to deal with suffocating Canadian wildfire smoke filling the air to begin the summer'. 'Our constituents have been limited in their ability to go outside and safely breathe due to the dangerous air quality the wildfire smoke has created,' the group of House of Representative members from Wisconsin and Minnesota wrote on 7 July. 'In our neck of the woods, summer months are the best time of the year to spend time outdoors recreating, enjoying time with family, and creating new memories, but this wildfire smoke makes it difficult to do all those things.' The lawmakers urged Canada to take 'proper action' to reduce the smoke and noted the historic friendship between Canada and America, without mentioning Donald Trump's repeated demands for Canada to be annexed and become the 51st state of the US. 'Our communities shouldn't suffer because of poor decisions made across the border,' Tom Tiffany, a Republican congressman from Wisconsin and one of the letter's authors, wrote on X. Updated at 2.30pm CEST 1.17pm CEST 13:17 Stephen Starr A Biden-era plan to implement a gas-powered blast furnace at a steel mill in Ohio, which would have eliminated tons of greenhouse gases from the local environment year over year and created more than a thousand jobs, has been put on hold indefinitely by the Trump administration. Experts and locals say the setback could greatly affect the health and financial state of those living around the mill. For 13 years, Donna Ballinger has been dealing with blasting noises and layers of dust from coal and heavy metals on her vehicles and house, situated a few hundred yards from the Cleveland-Cliffs-owned Middletown Works steel mill in south-west Ohio. 'I've had sinus infections near constantly. I have COPD [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease],' she says. 'When they've got the big booms going, your whole house is shaking.' So when two years ago, the steel mill successfully trialed a hydrogen gas-powered blast furnace, the first time the fuel had been deployed in this fashion anywhere in the Americas, she was delighted. It cost an estimated $1.6bn, and the Biden administration, through the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), coughed up $500m to help cover the cost of installing the technology. Replacing a coal-powered furnace would have eliminated 1m tons of greenhouse gases from the local environment every year, according to Cleveland-Cliffs. It would also have saved the company $450m every year through 'efficiency gains and reduced scrap dependency', and created 1,200 construction and 150 permanent jobs in the town of 50,000 residents who have struggled for decades with manufacturing losses. Updated at 2.31pm CEST 12.56pm CEST 12:56 The US Senate will begin voting as soon as Tuesday on president Donald Trump's request to slash $9.4 billion in spending on foreign aid and public broadcasting previously approved by Congress, the latest test of Trump's control over his fellow Republicans. Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the chamber's Republican majority leader, said he hoped the first procedural votes would take place on Tuesday, but he did not know whether he had enough votes for the measure to pass without amendments. 'I don't know the answer to that at this point. We got a lot of feedback. And I know there are folks who would like to see at least some modest changes to it,' Thune told reporters. The Senate has until Friday to act on the rescessions package - a request to claw back $8.3 billion in foreign aid funding and $1.1 billion for public broadcasting - or the request will expire and the White House will be required to adhere to the spending plans passed by Congress. The amounts at stake are small in the context of the sprawling federal budget, which totaled $6.8 trillion in the fiscal year ended 30 September. Yet they have raised the hackles of Democrats and a handful of Republicans who see an attempt to erode Congress's authority over spending. Democrats say the programs in Trump's crosshairs are foreign aid initiatives. These include support for women and children's health and the fight against HIV/AIDS, programs that have long had strong bipartisan support. Democrats also oppose cutting funds supporting broadcasting they view as essential communications in rural areas. 12.39pm CEST 12:39 Trump said he was 'disappointed, but not done' with the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, hours after he announced a military deal with Nato countries to arm Ukraine. His announcement, alongside the Nato secretary general, Mark Rutte, in the Oval Office, has been viewed in Europe as an important shift from Washington. When asked if he was done with Putin, the president replied: 'I'm disappointed in him, but I'm not done with him. But I'm disappointed in him. 'We had a deal done four times and then you go home and you see just attacked a nursing home in Kyiv. And so what the hell was that all about?' Asked if he trusted him, he said: 'I trust almost nobody, to be honest with you.' He also said he believed there was a newfound respect for him among world leaders – now he had twice won the presidency. 'When you do it twice, it's the big difference. I also think that over the years, they've gotten to know me, this is not an easy crowd to break into,' he said. 'These are smart people heading up very, very successful … countries, you know, they're Germany and France, Spain and, yeah, big.' Asked if he felt world leaders were being too obsequious and deferential, Trump said: 'Well, I think they're just trying to be nice.' Updated at 2.13pm CEST 12.17pm CEST 12:17 Donald Trump also reflected on the attempted assassination of him, which the BBC journalist Gary O'Donoghue witnessed at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, last July. Speaking to BBC News, he said: We had 55,000 people, and it was dead silence. And so, you know, I assumed that they expected the worst. And so I had to let them know I was OK, which is what I did. That's why I tried to get up as quick as possible. They had a stretcher ready to go. I said: 'No, thank you.' I actually had a big argument with them. They wanted me on a stretcher. And I said: 'Nope, I'm not doing that.' Trump said he did not like to spend time thinking about that day – but acknowledged it could affect him deeply if he started to dwell on it. He said: I like to think about it as little as possible. I don't like dwelling on it, because if I did, it might be life changing. I don't want it to be that. 12.03pm CEST 12:03 In that BBC interview, president Donald Trump said that he was convinced the UK would come to the US's aid if it were at war. He said: I think they would be, I don't think a lot of the other countries would be. It's a special relationship. Look, that's why I made a deal with them … for the most part in terms of your competitors and in terms of the European Union, I haven't made a deal. Now the UK is very special … they have been a really true ally. Trump, who has previously been a key advocate of Brexit, also suggested he did not think the potential had been fulfilled – but said Starmer was making progress: No, I think, I think it's been on the sloppy side, but I think it's getting straightened out. I really like the prime minister a lot even though he's a liberal, I think he's, you know, he did a good trade deal with us. 11.52am CEST 11:52 Good morning and welcome to our live coverage of US politics amid the news that 'America's students will be the best, brightest, and most highly educated anywhere in the world,' according to Donald Trump as he welcomed the supreme court's decision to allow him to resume dismantling the Department of Education. In a late night post on Truth Social, the president said: The United States Supreme Court has handed a Major Victory to Parents and Students across the Country, by declaring the Trump Administration may proceed on returning the functions of the Department of Education BACK TO THE STATES. Now, with this GREAT Supreme Court Decision, our Secretary of Education, Linda McMahon, may begin this very important process. The Federal Government has been running our Education System into the ground, but we are going to turn it all around by giving the Power back to the PEOPLE. America's Students will be the best, brightest, and most Highly Educated anywhere in the World. Thank you to the United States Supreme Court! The three liberal justices on the court dissented over the decision which will allow McMahon – a founder of World Wrestling Entertainment – to lay off nearly 1,400 staff. McMahon said it's a 'shame' it took the supreme court's intervention to let Trump's plan move ahead. 'Today, the supreme court again confirmed the obvious: the president of the United States, as the head of the executive branch, has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organization, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies,' McMahon said in a statement. A lawyer for the Massachusetts cities and education groups that sued over the plan said the lawsuit will continue, adding no court has yet ruled that what the administration wants to do is legal. 'Without explaining to the American people its reasoning, a majority of justices on the US supreme court have dealt a devastating blow to this nation's promise of public education for all children. On its shadow docket, the Court has yet again ruled to overturn the decision of two lower courts without argument,' Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, said in a statement. Read the full story here: Also overnight, Trump said he was 'disappointed but not done' with Vladimir Putin in comments to the BBC's journalist Gary O'Donoghue. It followed yesterday's Oval Office meeting with Nato's chief, Mark Rutte, in which Trump promised a new weapons deal for Ukraine and threatened to impose 'severe' sanctions on Russia if the war does not end within 50 days. The interview also touched on the assassination attempt against him, how he is looking forward to his state visit to the UK and his immigration and tax policies and we will bring you some major lines shortly. In other news: will face questioning from lawmakers for the first time since he was ousted as national security adviser. Trump has nominated him to be US ambassador to the United Nations, and he's set to appear before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for his confirmation hearing today. Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, thanked Trump for saying that European nations, led by Germany and Norway, could purchase US-made Patriot missile air-defense systems on Ukraine's behalf, to help defend the country against aerial bombardment by Russia. Trump continued his attacks on Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell, calling the central banker a 'stupid guy' and a 'knucklehead' as the president called for interest rates to be lowered to 1% or less. As Trump faced blowback from supporters over his administration's decision to not release more information about the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, more attention was being paid to the president's evasive answer on the subject during a portion of an interview with Fox News last year that was not broadcast. Updated at 1.41pm CEST

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store