
Last 50 Years Of Nelson Council Go Down In History
For its 50th and 100th anniversaries, the council had commissioned histories of the preceding 50 years.
In 2023, the council agreed to write a third to mark its sesquicentenary – or 150th anniversary.
That latest instalment, Welcome to Whakatū Nelson City Council 1974–2024, was launched on Thursday afternoon at the Elma Turner Library.
Written by local historian Dr Paul Christoffel, the book covers everything from the council's acceptance of Melrose House as a gift in 1975 to the public consultation on its controversial housing intensification in 2024.
It was Christoffel's first foray into documenting the history of local government and he said it was 'bloody hard work'.
'When I came into this, I thought, 'oh, it's only 50 years, that won't be such a big deal'. But what I gradually discovered was the enormous amount of stuff that councils do, it's just quite phenomenal.'
It took him about 18 months to write – 'quite a short space of time' in terms of history books – and he said 'an awful lot' had to be left out.
One such piece of information that wasn't featured in the book, but had captured Christoffel's attention, was one radio segment featuring then-council officer Pat Dougherty, who would, years later, become the council's chief executive.
Dougherty had gone on the radio to defend the council's plans to build Tantragee Water Treatment Plant from callers opposed to the plan when he heard a familiar voice.
'He said: 'is that you, Peter?'' Christoffel said.
'He recognized his voice, even though he didn't say who he was, and it was the former mayor, Peter Malone!'
Though once controversial at the time, the construction of the water treatment plant is one such achievement lauded within the history book and was a key highlight for Mayor Nick Smith.
'The most striking feature for me on this issue is just how much our city has progressed over the last 50 years,' Smith said.
He reflected on how, in 1974, the city's water was rationed and regarded as some of the worst in the country.
However, with the construction of the Maitai Dam and the water treatment plant, Nelson's water was now 'some of the best and most secure in the country', Smith said.
'[The book] is actually an important reflection on the people, the projects, and the progress that our city has made.'
However, he added that the book had nearly not happened, with it being deemed 'hardly a priority' following the August 2022 storm event.
Had it not been for the advocacy of the Nelson Historical Society and the City of Nelson Civic Trust, Smith wouldn't have renewed the idea which was eventually unanimously supported by the council.
Councillor Mel Courtney, who also sat on the council during its centenary celebrations 50 years ago, thought it was important to chronicle the past.
'Documenting council's rich history gives us a sense of who we are, where we came from, and where we're going,' he said.
About $175,000, including $20,000 from the City of Nelson Civic Trust, went towards the council's anniversary commemorations, with most of the funds contributing to the book.
Welcome to Whakatū Nelson City Council 1974–2024 is available for issue at Nelson's public libraries or to purchase from local independent bookstore Page & Blackmore, and will be made available as an ebook.
'It inspires the next generation to make good decisions, to further build the city's unique character, and make sure that Nelson is the best little city, in the best little country, in the world,' Smith said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Polytech bail-outs lie ahead, Te Pūkenga warns
PHOTO: ODT FILES Te Pūkenga's managers have warned MPs the government will have to bail out struggling polytechnics despite its reforms. Meanwhile, Nelson's mayor Nick Smith appealed to the government to save the region's polytechnic from inclusion in a federation of weak institutions. Appearing before the Education and Workforce Select Committee the mega-institute's chief financial officer James Smith said the changes, which included disestablishing Te Pūkenga, would leave in place a volume-based funding system. He said that would lead to the institutes making the same poor investment decisions that prompted the creation of Te Pūkenga as a means of ensuring their long-term viability. "The system remains a simplistic, inefficient volumetric system with no ability to adjust price based on scale. We expect that these issues will persist under the structural changes enabled under the bill. We also expect because of this that the government will be relied upon for further ad hoc financial support for ITPs (Institutes of Technology and Polytechnics) in the future," he said. Smith said "unhealthy race to the bottom behaviour" was likely to re-emerge and polytechnics needed stronger incentives to collaborate with one another. He said the government's Education and Training (Vocational Education and Training System) Amendment Bill also watered down institutions' obligations to underserved learners such as Māori and Pacific communities. "This tempering of obligations, along with reductions in targeted funding for these learner groups from 2026 will maintain or worsen the current education disparities that exist in the tertiary education system," he said. Drew Mayhem from the Tertiary Education Union also cast doubt on the long-term viability of the government's plan. "Splitting out the work-based learning component and putting it in direct competition with the polytechnics that you're trying to stand alone, that's not sustainable," he said. Nelson mayor Nick Smith told the committee the creation of Te Pūkenga had been bad for the region's local polytechnic, the Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology (NMIT). He said his greatest fear was that NMIT would be among the former polytechnics placed into a federation rather than being allowed to stand-alone after Te Pūkenga was disestablished. Smith said he had heard that NMIT was "on the margins" of inclusion in the federation and wanted government to consult with mayors and iwi before making that decision. He said he was not expecting NMIT would emerge with all of the $20 million in cash reserves that it took into Te Pūkenga, but understood about $9m remained. Smith said that money should be transferred to the re-established institution.


Scoop
7 days ago
- Scoop
Nelson Pre-Election Report Released As Nominations Open
Open for business, fiscally responsible and a good custodian of our environment, Nelson City Council has outlined its position to potential candidates and voters in the 2025 Local Elections in its Pre-Election Report released on Monday, 7 July. Nominations for the 2025 election opened on Friday 4 July and close at noon on 1 August 2025. People who want to stand as Mayor or as a Councillor need to fill out the forms linked below. Chief Executive Nigel Philpott says Council must evolve to ensure it meets the expectations of its community now and in the future. 'As a city, and as a Council, we are open for business—not just in what we say, but in how we operate,' he says. 'We're actively working to reduce barriers in support of growth and innovation and create an environment where enterprise and community can thrive in a sustainable way. At the same time, we need to take a leadership role in our community's drive to reduce climate change emissions and make sound choices about some important investment decisions.' The report sets out Council's financial and strategic position, along with the opportunities and challenges that are anticipated in the next triennium. 'I encourage you to read this report—whether you're considering standing for Council, preparing to vote, or simply interested in Nelson's future – as its purpose is to set out an accurate picture of Council that can inform political debate in the election run-up.' The election will take place while Council staff continue work to deliver our Shaping Our Future programme. Shaping Our Future is about Council doing things differently—ensuring that our services and processes work effectively for Nelson — not just for today, but for the years ahead. As part of this, we are looking at how we can create a future-proofed Council that is more efficient, adaptable, and focused on delivering the best possible services to our community. 'As Council has grown into a large and complex organisation managing more than $2.5 billion of assets, so too has the expectation placed upon it,' says Nigel. 'Council's role is to act as a good custodian of our existing assets, providing value for money and excellent services. We will invest in our city where there is a strong strategic need to do so, but we will also seek to improve and maintain what we already have while maintaining a particular focus on keeping our costs under control.' One of the most significant investment decisions on the horizon is how Council addresses the condition of Elma Turner Library and Civic House. Both buildings are vital public assets that are at the end of their lives, making them increasingly more expensive to maintain. 'These buildings have inherent limitations compared to modern facilities and are no longer fit-for-purpose in their current form,' says Nigel. 'Elma Turner Library—originally a repurposed car showroom made up of an assortment of extensions, some dating back to the 1950s—has required costly interim strengthening works,' says Nigel. 'If ageing systems in Civic House or the Library were to fail this would result in large unbudgeted capital expenditure at short notice and the buildings would not be able to be occupied until systems were restored. 'The solutions aren't straightforward, but they are achievable. Public consultation will be a key part of determining how we respond to these legacy infrastructure challenges in a way that balances cost, risk, and long-term value for our community.' To do this most effectively, Council is considering a new approach for the next Long Term Plan that would cap our planned budgets and place greater emphasis on maintaining and renewing the assets we already have to ensure we develop an achievable and affordable ten year work programme. Forms required to stand for Mayor or as a councillor in the 2025 election. To find out everything you need to know about standing as an elected member or voting in the 2025 Local Elections please visit our website:


The Spinoff
03-07-2025
- The Spinoff
Echo Chamber: Youth parliament is even better than the real thing
A cohort of kids willing to challenge democracy prove they're more than ready to replace the adults. Echo Chamber is The Spinoff's dispatch from the press gallery, recapping sessions in the House. Columns are written by politics reporter Lyric Waiwiri-Smith and Wellington editor Joel MacManus. A walkout in the House, claims of censorship and rogue MPs on rogue press conferences: youth parliament didn't need long to prove it can be as much of a circus as the one meant for adults. Tri-annually, pint-sized progressives and tories in the making (as well as their young peers in the fourth estate) spend three days in parliament (following a four-month training programme) to learn up close what democracy is – although if you asked this year's cohort of teens, they might be more likely to tell you what it isn't. General debates held on Tuesday and Wednesday gave all 123 youth MPs a chance to highlight the issues that matter most to them, whether that's mental health and the environment, or boy racers and 'backing the farmers' – some of these teens are already so entrenched across party lines you might expect some kind-of Scooby-Doo mask-off to reveal it was Grant McCallum all along. Youth MPs are supposedly non-partisan and aren't expected to parrot the belief of the parties they've been mentored under, but when in Rome, act like the emperor. There were claims of censorship and 'fear-based control' from some youth MPs (who are also part of the advocacy group Make It 16), but in the end, everyone got their say – even if some teens felt others should have had more vetting in the end. As was the case for Jermaine Del Mondo, youth MP for Winston Peters, whose challenge in the House to look past race – much like his mentor might say – caused a partial walkout (although no one could really leave, you see). The drama continued on Wednesday morning, with Karen Chhour's youth MP Jerry Wei having his three-minute speech last for 10 thanks to the opposition MPs raising multiple points of order in an attempt to shut him up. There was supposedly a walkout planned for him, but the progressive youth MPs felt it would just give him the satisfaction – clearly the youth parliament works, because it didn't take them long to learn the fine art of politicking. Suffice to say, some potential future leaders have already made themselves heard. Nate Wilbourne, youth MP for Labour's Damien O'Connor, had one of the strongest speeches on Wednesday morning after going off-script and directly calling out ministers Penny Simmonds, Tama Potaka and Shane Jones for putting 'profit over papatūānuku'. Later, Terangitukiwaho Edwards, youth MP for Te Pāti Māori Mariameno Kapa-Kingi and son of Ngātiwai chairman Aperahama Edwards, earned a standing ovation for his impassioned speech on prioritising mokopuna-led solutions in state care. The mock question time kicked off just before midday, with National MP Barbara Kuriger as the speaker, and only a handful of ministers – James Meager, Penny Simmonds, Louise Upston, Casey Costello and Chris Bishop – taking oral questions. This activity seemed to provide two learning points: for the government youth MPs, how to pass off patsies to your colleagues to ensure good PR, and for the opposition youth MPs, how to argue back. When Vashika Singh, youth MP for Helen White, asked RMA minister Bishop how he planned to incorporate the Treaty into the Planning Act and Natural Environment Act, she was told straight up by the minister that he had no commitment to doing that. Bishop wasn't a popular man that session – his answer to a question on housing targets from Esha Ram (youth MP for the Greens' Steve Abel) caused a few youths to rustle in their seats and attempt supplementaries, which the speaker denied. Sam Allen (youth MP for National's Hamish Campbell) then offered to 'guide' Kuriger through the speaker's rulings, which she ignored for time purposes. 'We are not having supplementary questions, and that's the last point of order I'm going to take on that issue,' Kuriger declared, before the voice of Thomas Brocherie, youth MP for the Greens Lan Pham, popped up for the hundredth time: 'Point of order, Miss Speaker …' Bishop was next questioned by Louis McSporran, youth MP for NZ First's Jenny Marcroft, on how he would 'incentivise and support' the revitalisation of rural areas through infrastructure, and a rebel youth MP in the Labour benches held up a note to the House in protest. 'DISSAPOINTED IN NAT' it read, causing Wei to raise a point of order: would the speaker consider removing the member from the House? Later, outside the chamber, a group of NZ First Youth MPs – and friends from other branches of the coalition – held a last-minute press conference on the parliament steps. They weren't happy with the narrative playing out in the media about censorship – we're not being censored, nor would we like the right to vote, they told reporters. It was 'dangerous' to let a minority group (as in, the youth MPs from Make It 16) purport to speak for the nation, an Act Party youth MP claimed. Their attempt at winning back the narrative was immediately stifled, as the press conference spurred an off-the-cuff argument from the Labour and Greens-aligned youth MPs walking past. It was probably the debate the teens would have liked to have had in the House – with each other, in verbal fisticuffs, and no expectation to be non-partisan. Parliament is a place that often feels like a high school simulator – and for three days this week, it was the real thing. Even if half of these teens still think they shouldn't have the right to vote until they're a bit older, they're already perfect for the role of politician.