Six Palestinians to stand trial in a deadly 1982 attack on a Jewish deli in Paris
Attackers t hrew grenades and then sprayed machine-gun fire into the Jo Goldenberg restaurant on Aug. 9, 1982 in the deadliest antisemitic attack in France since World War II, which also injured 22 people. Two of those killed were Americans.
Though four of the suspects remain abroad and likely would be tried in absentia, investigating judges have issued an order for a trial, which could begin early next year, said David Père, who represents victims. The Paris-based court does not publish its orders publicly, and generally does not respond to journalists.
The suspects are believed to have been members of the Palestinian militant Abu Nidal group at the time of the attack.
The alleged ringleader, Mohamed Souhair al-Abassi, also known as Amjad Atta, is in Jordan where authorities have refused to extradite him. Three other suspects are believed to be in either the Palestinian territories or in Jordan: Mahmoud Khader Abed Adra, also called Hicham Harb; Nabil Hassan Mahmoud Othmane, also known as Ibrahim Hamza, and Nizar Tawfiq Moussa Hamada, also known as Hani.
One of the defendants, Walid Abdulrahman Abu Zayed, had emigrated with his family to Norway and was extradited to France in 2020. The sixth defendant, Hazza Taha, was detained more recently in Paris.
Père, who represents dozens of relatives of the victims and one direct survivor, said the trial is 'historic' for them. 'For them, this is not about the past but the present. It's a trial they intend to follow day by day," Père told The Associated Press.
The one survivor represented by Père wasn't injured in the attack but remains traumatized by it. 'He wants to see the suspects and try to understand,' Père said.
Jo Goldenberg, the owner of the Jewish restaurant and deli, recalled the horror of the lunchtime attack during an interview in 2002.
'They fired on everyone who was eating lunch - everyone,' Goldenberg said at the time. The place, which has since closed, was a centerpiece tourist attraction in the Marais neighborhood.
French authorities announced in 2015 — nearly 33 years after the attack — that international arrest warrants had been issued for the suspects.
The Abu Nidal faction, named after its leader, is considered responsible for nearly two dozen attacks that left at least 275 people dead, including assaults on El Al Israel Airlines ticket counters at the Rome and Vienna airports in 1985 in which 18 people were killed.
The notorious Abu Nidal himself was found dead in his Baghdad apartment in August 2002. Iraqi authorities said Abu Nidal, whose real name is Sabri al-Banna, died by suicide.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pitiful justice from the FCA: It took far too long to put Woodford in the stocks, says ALEX BRUMMER
How jolly good it is that financial justice has finally caught up with disgraced investment guru Neil Woodford and his irresponsible and deceitful management of the collapsed Woodford Equity Investment Fund (WEIF). There is satisfaction to be drawn from the ban imposed on Woodford from holding senior management roles and looking after retail investors' cash. Moreover, Woodford personally will have to cough up £5.8million in fines and his eponymous investment firm some £40million. Yet the process of delivering verdicts for Woodford savers (including this writer), which started when Andrew Bailey was chief executive of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), has been exasperating. It has taken six long years to reach this point, and one fears that there will be victims of Woodford's nefarious behaviour who will have missed out on seeing the regulator swing into action. And it is not over yet since Woodford, lawyered to the hilt, is taking the matter to the Upper Tribunal, the FCA's equivalent of the High Court. That means more delays. Much of the material in the voluminous decision documents relating to Woodford Investment Management and WEIF emerged at the time. It was known, for instance, that Woodford sought to cover up a lack of liquidity in his funds by transferring assets to the obscure Guernsey stock exchange. He also sought to shift the blame for what happened to corporate director Link. The FCA found them jointly culpable and Link, now controlled from Down Under, has already paid £230million in restitution for its error. The rules-based system under which the FCA operates needs to be preserved if retail investors and professionals, such as Kent County Council, are to be protected. What is intolerable is the bureaucratic faffing which has taken so long to put Woodford in the stocks. In the interim, Woodford still offers his services as a financial adviser. The FCA has also failed, thus far, to establish how it was that some 300,000 people who invested in Woodford funds were exposed through the Hargreaves Lansdown (HL) platform and its own fund of funds. HL is now owned by a consortium of private equity investors led by CVC. That is no excuse for escaping culpability and facing up to HL's responsibility for misleading savers. Musical chairs Often it is said that the main duty of the chairman is to fire the chief executive. At Diageo, Sir John Manzoni, who took over as chairman early this year, lost little time in disposing of one of the FTSE 100's small gang of women bosses, Debra Crew. Admittedly, at the time, Diageo's share price was in sharp retreat, falling by 30 per cent. Authoritative accounts suggest that Crew was ambushed. When she questioned the assertiveness of finance director Nik Jhangiani with Manzoni, she signed her own resignation letter. The latest results show that, were it not for the Trump tariffs – which cannot be blamed on Crew – the underlying picture was much better than thought with organic sales up 1.7 per cent at £15.1billion. The vital North American market was still robust with sales up 1.5 per cent. This is despite the trend of Gen Z turning away from alcohol. Where does this, one wonders, leave Murray Auchincloss, chief executive of BP, in another part of the corporate forest? New chairman Albert Manifold has ordered a review of the business and costs, and he hasn't even been seated. What that means for the sensible Auchincloss strategy, already under fire from activist Elliott, one shudders to think. Tech leakage No board of directors would dare turn down a bid premium of 104.9 per cent unless it came from the Ayatollah himself. So British scientific instrument maker Spectris has been able to sit back as private equity ghouls Advent and KKR fight it out for control, with the latter back in the driving seat. If the sharp minds at Advent and KKR were able to see the value, where were the British analysts and buy-side investors as Spectris languished in the lower reaches of the FTSE 250? And doesn't a Labour government, committed to a high-tech future for the UK, worry about the escape of British intellectual property overseas? It should do.
Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Undercover BBC reporters paid £1,200 to people-smuggler
Undercover BBC reporters paid more than £1,200 to a violent people-smuggling gang as part of an investigation. The broadcaster's Paris correspondent, who led the year-long investigation into the Channel trafficking operation, justified the payments as 'the only way' to gain access to the gang. The BBC's investigation claimed to have infiltrated one of the major gangs operating on the north coast of France, helping tens of thousands of people cross the Channel to Britain each year. It used undercover reporters and secret filming to show the gang's forest hideout outside the French port of Dunkirk as well as tracking their members across Europe. As part of the investigation, the corporation's reporter paid for a place on a small boat to cross the Channel, and met a member of the gang's network at Birmingham New Street station to hand over the payment. Handover filmed for report In secretly recorded footage, a reporter can be seen handing over an envelope containing £900 in cash to a gang member with a glass eye who then walks away. In the special report, which was aired on BBC News at 6pm on Tuesday, Andrew Hardy, the BBC's Paris correspondent, said: 'That's it. He's taken the money and left the station. 'You may well be asking why we would pay money to criminals. We believe it is the only way we can gain access to the gang and expose its network – not least its network here in the UK.' Another payment of £348 was made to a gang member in Dunkirk. The report aimed to highlight how people smuggling gangs were using sophisticated techniques to stay one step ahead of the authorities, changing names and phone numbers and having no social media profile. The gang was linked by the BBC to 12 migrant crossing deaths. The investigation by the BBC comes as the Government's 'one in, one out' deal to return migrants to France is set to begin. The treaty was laid in Parliament on Tuesday, and will take effect from Wednesday, with detentions expected in the coming days. The UK-France deal, which will also bring approved asylum seekers on a safe route to Britain, was agreed last month on the last day of Emmanuel Macron's state visit to the UK. Some 25,436 migrants have arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel this year – a record for this point in the year since data began being collected in 2018. This is up 48 per cent on this point last year (17,170) and 70 per cent higher than at this stage in 2023 (14,994), according to PA news agency analysis of Home Office data. At least 10 people have died while attempting the journey this year, according to reports by the French and UK authorities, but there is no official record of fatalities in the Channel. Ministers say they want to end the crossings because they 'threaten lives and undermine our border security'. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, has said smuggling gangs have been allowed to take hold along the UK's borders over the last six years, making millions out of the dangerous journeys.
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump administration cuts New York City's anti-terrorism funding days after skyscraper attack
The Trump administration said it would cut terrorism prevention funding for New York City, according to a grant notice posted days after a gunman killed four people inside a Manhattan skyscraper. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema) stated in a grant notice posted on Friday that New York City would receive $64m less this year from its urban area security fund. The amount was listed in a single line of an 80-page Fema notice on the grant program. The US Congress created the program to help cities prevent terrorist attacks. 'It makes absolutely no sense, and no justification has been given to cut NY's allocation given the rise in the threat environment,' a spokesperson for the New York state division of homeland security and emergency services said in a statement on Monday afternoon. Manhattan has been the site of two attacks on high-profile corporate executives in the last year. The most recent attack came from a gunman armed with an assault-style rifle in late July, who killed four people inside an office building that houses the headquarters of the NFL and several major financial firms. New York governor Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, highlighted the attack in her late July letter to the US homeland security secretary Kristi Noem, asking why the Trump administration had not announced the amounts each city would receive from the program this year. Fema is part of DHS. Noem's office did not respond to two messages from Reuters asking why the federal government cut New York's funding. In December 2024, the chief executive of insurance giant UnitedHealthcare, Brian Thompson, was gunned down on the street in Manhattan in a targeted attack. And security has been particularly tight in New York City ever since the al-Qaida terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, that killed almost 3,000 people in lower Manhattan when Islamist extremists flew hijacked passenger jets into the twin towers of the World Trade Center. Fema uses 'an analysis of relative risk of terrorism' to decide how much money cities will receive, according to the grant notice posted on Friday. The agency may change the amounts later, according to the notice. In 2023, the agency considered city visitor counts, population density and proximity to international borders, among other factors, to determine the totals, according to a report signed by then Fema administrator Deanne Criswell. Fema has been decreasing terrorism prevention money for New York City each year since at least fiscal year 2022. The drop is much more drastic this year at 41% year-over-year. The New York City police department has used the funding in the past to pay for the Domain Awareness System, a network of cameras, license plate readers and detection devices, according to a 2016 statement from the former mayor Bill de Blasio's office.
