Latham hears of tweet fallout via video link
The former Labor leader has faced days of controversy following allegations he abused his former partner, Nathalie Matthews, and sent her sexual messages from the parliament chamber.
The member of the NSW upper house has strenuously denied Ms Matthews' allegations, which are untested and contained in an application for an apprehended violence order (AVO) filed in the local court.
He not been charged with any criminal offence.
Mr Latham's injury was revealed in the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal on Tuesday.
Greenwich, an independent Sydney MP, has brought NCAT proceedings against the maverick MP, alleging he was subjected to homosexual vilification and workplace sexual harassment over a graphic tweet by Mr Latham.
Mr Latham, through his solicitor Zali Burrows, is contesting the case.
Mr Latham did not appear before the tribunal in Sydney on Tuesday, with Ms Burrows telling the court that he had a fractured knee and could not travel.
Instead he beamed into the courtroom via video link.
The NCAT case is centred on a tweet by Latham, as well as comments made by the former One Nation MP in newspaper and radio interviews.
The same tweet was the subject of Federal Court defamation proceedings in which Latham was ordered to pay $140,000 to Greenwich.
Federal Court Justice David O'Callaghan ruled in favour of Greenwich during the defamation proceedings, finding that the tweet conveyed the meaning that Greenwich 'engaged in disgusting sexual activities' and that it was defamatory.
He also rejected Latham's defence of honest opinion and qualified common law privilege.
Greenwich has now launched NCAT proceedings against Latham and his counsel has argued that each of the statements amounted to unlawful homosexual vilification and sexual harassment and that Latham breached the Anti-Discrimination Act.
Alexander Graham, who works in Mr Greenwich's office as an electorate officer, told the tribunal the office was inundated with messages in the wake of the Latham tweet.
Under cross examination from Ms Burrows, he was asked if Greenwich's office received negative communications at other times, including during the anti-abortion bill debate.
Mr Graham said while Greenwich's office did receive letters and emails from people disagreeing with the amendments there wasn't anything 'directly disparaging of Alex'.
He told the court the only time he could recall police being called was as a result of the fallout from the Latham tweet.
The tribunal heard that some of the abusive calls came from private numbers.
'The abusive phone calls from private numbers, you cannot ascertain they were from genuine haters,' Ms Burrows asked.
Greenwich's barrister Prue Bindon objected to the question.
Mr Graham later told the tribunal the office received a 'barrage' of hateful letters, emails and phone calls.
He said some were written with letters which had been cut from magazines and newspapers.
'There were ones that directly threatened Alex … talking about throwing homosexuals off the bluff,' Mr Graham said.
He described some of the communications as 'bizarre' and 'threatening' and that Greenwich's staff began using gloves to open mail.
Ms Bindon previously told the tribunal the elements of homophobic vilification alleged in the case hinge on the public act, claiming Latham's comments had incited hatred, contempt or severe ridicule.
She said the sexual harassment allegations were in relation to unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature in circumstances where a reasonable person would've anticipated it to cause humiliation or intimidation.
Ms Bindon also previously said she anticipated the defence would claim Greenwich's reputation was to some extent not damaged.
The matter will return to court next month.
The hearing followed Labor deciding to keep his portrait in the Labor's Parliament House party room with a note saying he was 'banned for life' from the party in 2017.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Independent Braddon MP Craig Garland won't sign confidence and supply agreement with Liberals
Tasmanian independent MP Craig Garland has ruled out signing a confidence and supply agreement with Premier Jeremy Rockliff, making the Liberals' return to power more difficult. The Liberals have won at least 14 seats following the July 19 election, four short of the 18 seats needed to govern in majority. Mr Garland, who was re-elected in the seat of Braddon, was one of several crossbenchers who the Liberals had been negotiating with to secure their support to govern in minority. But in a statement released on Friday morning, Mr Garland said he had no faith in Mr Rockliff. "In the previous parliament, I supported the no-confidence motion brought forward by Labor leader Dean Winter for a range of reasons — chief among them the premier's mishandling of the proposed Macquarie Point stadium and the disastrous, wholly unsustainable budget delivered by his treasurer. "Since calling the election, the premier and his party have refused to acknowledge our dire financial situation or the deeply flawed way they have attempted to push through the stadium project — ignoring community concerns and seeking to bypass scrutiny by the Independent Panel." Mr Garland said the government's handling of the Marinus Link decision, including last-minute, confidential briefings for crossbenchers about the project, was unacceptable. "While the premier promised to do things differently after the election, the recent handling of the Marinus Link decision tells a different story. "It was rushed, secretive and emblematic of a government that has learned nothing. "The same arrogance, lack of transparency, incompetence and dishonesty continue to define this administration, with the energy minister on behalf of the government, signing Tasmania up to yet another multi-billion dollar — behind closed doors — deal, without a mandate and without proper scrutiny, that will cost Tasmanians." Mr Garland said these were not "traits of a government" that he could support. "I will not waste my time or Mr Rockliff's by entering into any formal negotiations with him, which is why I called him this morning to tell him as much. I also believe it is important to be up-front with the Tasmanian people about this." His decision gives Labor a better chance of forming a minority government, even though it has only secured 10 seats, with a chance of picking up an 11th seat in Bass. "I look forward to continuing discussions with Mr Winter." In a subsequent interview on ABC Mornings, Mr Garland confirmed he would support a motion of no confidence in Mr Rockliff, if one is moved when parliament returns.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Northern Territory domestic violence prevention minister condemned by legal associations for criticism of coroner
Leading legal representatives have condemned the Northern Territory's minister for domestic violence prevention for what they have labelled a "bizarre and unwarranted attack" on the NT coroner in parliament. In handing down the NT government's response to a landmark coronial inquest into the domestic violence deaths of four Indigenous women, Robyn Cahill on Wednesday said Coroner Elisabeth Armitage's report "failed dismally to hit the mark" and called her recommendations "uninspiring". She also criticised Judge Armitage's "protracted" approach to the inquest, saying it led to "lengthy reports delivered in a manner seeming to lack the humility one might expect from an officer of the court". Ms Cahill said only a "small proportion" of the coroner's recommendations would result in a "new and innovative approach", claiming 24 of 35 recommendations were already in place. The NT has the highest rates of family and domestic violence in Australia, with a rate of intimate partner homicide seven times the national average. Domestic violence prevention advocates have already criticised the minister's comments, calling them hurtful, disappointing and distressing. In a statement, the NT Bar Association said Ms Cahill's comments amounted to a "bizarre and unwarranted attack" on the coroner and were "undermining of the independence of the role". "Such attacks by government ministers necessarily impact a coroner's ability to do their job without fear or favour and are destructive of public confidence," the association said. "Inquest findings and recommendations are made on the basis of the evidence given, much of which would have come from the relevant government departments." The Bar Association said ministers and governments were "always free to disagree" with a coroner's findings and could appeal to the Supreme Court, which was not done for this inquest. "However, for a Minister of the Crown to undermine the judiciary and the coroner in the way that occurred in parliament this week, violates the rule of law and ultimately does nothing to protect Territorians from domestic and family violence," the statement said. The Criminal Lawyers Association for the NT (CLANT) said it was "appalled" by Ms Cahill's comments in parliament "attacking the integrity and conduct" of the coroner. "This was not fair criticism. It was a personal, politically charged attack on a judicial officer who is unable to defend herself publicly," CLANT said in a statement. "These remarks represent a profound violation of the principles of judicial independence and the separation of powers which are fundamental to our democracy and enshrined in the Australian Constitution. "Judicial officers must be free to perform their duties without fear of reprisal or intimidation from the executive branch of government." On Friday, Ms Cahill defended her parliamentary comments and said she did "not accept" that they undermined the judiciary process. "The whole point of a coronial report, they are given to government for comment," she said. "So, I could say, 'If you don't want us to comment on it, don't give it to us and don't ask for a comment.'" Ms Cahill said she was disappointed with the coroner's recommendations, rather than the content of the report. "The recommendations don't actually reflect the evidence that's in that report." In an interview on ABC News Channel, Australia's Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commissioner Micaela Cronin said Judge Armitage's investigation had involved "great integrity and a very systematic approach". "What I observed was the deep respect with which she did engage with those communities and families and the respect with which she was held by them," Ms Cronin said. Speaking about the inquest's length, which was more than two years, Ms Cronin said it was an "unusual and complex piece of work" that examined the deaths of four Aboriginal women. "[It's] an examination of where there have been failures in deaths and what we can learn from them," she said. "So the timeliness of it is not quite as important as it is to really learn deeply from what's happened."
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Glenn Thexton: Sentencing delayed for Melbourne lawyer found guilty of groping teenager
A Melbourne lawyer who groped a teenager while on a night out has delayed his criminal case after hiring legal representation at the last minute. Glenn Thexton, 46, was found guilty earlier this year of sexually assaulting a 17-year-old girl by grabbing her buttocks outside a kebab shop in the city's CBD on September 25, 2019. Thexton, who had self-represented in court, beamed into the Melbourne Magistrates' Court from what appeared to be a home office on Friday morning when he was due to be sentenced. But magistrate Andrew Waters said he'd been made aware an adjournment would be sought now that Thexton had hired legal representation. Barrister Victor Androu told the court that he'd only received instructions from Thexton 'last night or yesterday afternoon' and requested a short delay to file written submissions. Mr Androu told the court that he was only instructed to represent Thexton on the single issue of whether he would be registered as a sex offender. The move was opposed by prosecutor Matt Fisher, who said there'd been 'ample time' for Thexton to make arguments on the issue. 'It's a discrete point, it's relatively straightforward,' he said. 'It's a matter that continues to be protracted even if just for a short period of time.' Mr Walters told the court that he was 'well aware' of the history of the case, including that Thexton had been charged 'some 6 years ago now'. The magistrate said while he wanted the matter dealt with, the issue of sex offender registration was 'clearly of significant consequence' to Thexton. 'He has now only recently obtained lawyers to represent him on that discrete matter,' he said. 'I'm minded to give him the opportunity to have lawyers address the point.' Thexton's lawyers were given until August 6 to make written submissions and the matter is expected to return for judgment and sentence two days later. The former prominent legal figure claimed he had no memory of the incident and had previously flagged that he intended to appeal the conviction, The Herald Sun reported. Thexton was suspended from legal practice in October 2020, according to the Victorian Legal Services Board.
