Russia Will Soon Fire 2,000 Drones a Day: ISW
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Russia's drone production has expanded so much that within months, it might be able to launch up to 2,000 of the devices in a single night, according to a report.
Moscow fired another barrage of drones and missiles on Ukrainian cities overnight Sunday. Ukraine's Air Force said Moscow launched 450 drones and missiles targeting Kyiv and the cities of Ivano-Frankivsk and Kharkiv.
But Ukrainian and German officials have raised the alarm that Russia's production of Shahed-type drones had grown to such an extent that strike packages four times bigger could be possible by November.
Newsweek has contacted the Russian defense ministry for comment.
Ukraine's emergency services tackle a fire after a mass Russian drone and missile attack on Kyiv July 4, 2025 in Kyiv, Ukraine.
Ukraine's emergency services tackle a fire after a mass Russian drone and missile attack on Kyiv July 4, 2025 in Kyiv, Ukraine.Why It Matters
Moscow continues to step up its drone bombardment of Ukrainian cities as Russian President Vladimir Putin ignores calls for a ceasefire.
Moscow's forces initially relied on Iranian-made Shahed or "kamikaze" drones to wreak havoc in strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure but is now using the technology to produce its own devices in its own factories across Russia.
Reports by German and Ukrainian officials about this increasing capacity will raise alarm about Moscow's intentions come winter when it could use the colder months to target the Ukrainian population.
What To Know
Russia has been stepping up its Shahed-type strike drones and decoy drones in overnight strikes with the largest attack so far including 728 drones taking place on July 8.
But Moscow is boosting drone production capacity with the aim of launching 2,000 drones in one overnight strike package by November.
That is according to the head of the German Ministry of Defense's Planning and Command Staff, Major General Christian Freuding, reported by Ukrainian outlet Suspilne citing comments he made to the a German military podcast.
In reporting the comments, the Institute for the Study of War said current growth in Russia's drone production and usage makes this number achievable in that time frame although such a strike package would not be sustainable every night.
This is a double the estimate to one made July 4 by commander of the Ukrainian Unmanned Systems Forces Major Robert Brovdi who said increased production and stockpiles means Russia could launch 1,000 drones in a single strike package.
This figure is also a marked increase from the assessment on June 9 of Ukraine's Main Military Intelligence Directorate (GUR) that Russia plans to increase production capacity to 190 drones per day, by the end of 2025.
Freuding said Saturday that Ukraine and its allies must look at cheaper ways to counter this threat because traditional air defense methods, like Patriot interceptors, are not best suited to defend against drones.
It comes as Russia showcased a drone factory near Kazan in the Tatarstan region which is producing drones, including the Geran-2 which is also an Iranian design.
In a propaganda video, teenagers are seen assembling the devices for use against Ukraine at the facility at the Alabuga industrial park.
the Russian Defense Ministry's television channel it produces a 5,200 Shahed-type strike drones and decoy models a month as of May and will make thousands of Geran drones at the "largest plant in the world."
What People Are Saying
German Major General Christian Freuding: "The Russian army plans to launch up to 2,000 drones over Ukraine at one time."
Institute for the Study of War on Sunday: "Russia may be able to launch up to 2,000 drones in one night by November 2025, should this current growth trend in drone usage continue."
Timur Shagivaliev, CEO of the Alabuga Special Economic Zone, told Russian defense ministry outlet Zvezda the drone factory in Tartastan is "the largest such plant in the world and the most secret...the plan was to produce several thousand (Geran drones) — now we are producing nine times more than planned."
What Happens Next
Russia is likely to continue its drone attacks on Ukraine which Freuding said Kyiv could counter by striking drone production sites and lowering interception costs.
Ukraine has also increased its domestic drone production with President Volodymyr Zelensky saying Kyiv can produce up to 8 million drones annually but it needs more foreign funding.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
16 minutes ago
- Axios
Iran worries U.S. will use nuclear talks as pretext for new attacks: Senior official
Iran is willing to return to the negotiating table with the U.S., "the sooner the better," but must be convinced the talks aren't cover for further military action, Tehran's nuclear negotiator Kazem Gharibabadi said on Wednesday. The big picture: U.S. officials were discussing the dates for future talks with Tehran last month while simultaneously coordinating war plans with Israel, Gharibabadi said. While Tehran knows it needs to negotiate with the U.S. to get sanctions lifted and avoid new ones, he said bluntly that "we don't trust the U.S." Driving the news: Iran and the "E3" — France, Germany and the U.K. — will hold talks in Istanbul on Friday on the issue of "snapback" sanctions. The European signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal could impose those harsh sanctions for Iranian non-compliance, though Tehran denies that such a move would be legitimate. Gharibabadi, Iran's deputy foreign minister and lead nuclear negotiator, said Friday's talks were "important" but not "decisive," because even if an agreement is not reached "we still have time." Between the lines: The U.S. and the E3 jointly settled on the end of August as a deadline to impose the harsh snapback sanctions if no U.S.-Iran deal is reached by then. But Gharibabadi suggested that was a soft deadline, noting that the E3 had also called Iran's foreign minister to express their desire to come to an arrangement. The power to impose snapback sanctions expires in October, but the Europeans are expected to raise the possibility of extending that deadline. In return, they want Iran to take steps toward resuming the work of UN inspectors in its nuclear facilities and possibly move its 60% highly enriched uranium to another country. Gharibabadi said it was "premature" to discuss an extension. What he's saying: Speaking to reporters in New York on Wednesday, Gharibabadi said it was now incumbent on Iran to negotiate over snapback with the Europeans and over the broader nuclear issue with the U.S. But he made clear just how difficult that would be. The last time around, he argued, the U.S. repeatedly changed its positions in talks — making it difficult to make progress — and then turned around and bombed Iran. Gharibabadi said a military operation may always have been the true U.S. intention — something U.S. officials deny — and that could be the case once again. Concerns about future attacks are one reason Iran want assurances on the Trump administration's seriousness before returning to the table, he said. State of play: Gharibabadi said Iran had invited a technical team from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to visit Tehran in the next few weeks, but not to visit the country's nuclear sites. Iran suspended its cooperation with the IAEA due to the Israeli and U.S. attacks. Gharibabadi criticized IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi for declining to condemn those attacks, suggesting he had political motives. But he said Iran was willing to discuss "a new modality" for cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, including access to the nuclear sites that were not attacked and also those that were. The IAEA has not yet requested access to the three bombed nuclear facilities, Gharibabadi said, noting that it would be very dangerous for inspectors to enter them. The intrigue: When reporters repeatedly asked about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities and material after the strikes, Gharibabadi joked that rather than asking him they should trust President Trump's insistence that they were "totally destroyed." What to watch: The U.S. has continually proposed a resumption of talks since the war, and there have been several discussions in Tehran about the terms on which to resume them, Gharibabadi said. He insisted that any talks would be "indirect," conducted through mediators, despite the U.S. desire for "direct" talks. Asked why, he said "we don't trust the U.S." and don't think the process has reached a stage where direct talks are appropriate. Gharibabadi didn't lay out a timetable for the resumption of talks with the U.S., but suggested Friday's talks in Istanbul would be a factor.
Boston Globe
16 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Gabbard releases new documents targeting Obama administration
The Obama administration, Gabbard wrote, was 'promoting the LIE that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Gabbard has won praise from Trump for her investigation into the intelligence findings and spoke at length about how the 2016 assessment was part of a witch hunt against him. Trump has been under sharp criticism for his handling of documents related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, and his attacks on the Obama administration appear to be part of a distract-and-deflect strategy. Advertisement Gabbard reiterated her assertion that the intelligence assessment was intended to undermine Trump's presidency. 'In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people,' she wrote, 'working with their partners in the media to promote the lie, in order to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump, essentially enacting a years-long coup against him.' Advertisement The House report found that most of the judgments made by the intelligence community in 2016 were sound. But it argued that the work was rushed, as a recent tradecraft analysis by the CIA also found. The assessment that Putin had favored Trump did not follow the 'professional criteria' of the other findings, the House report said. The findings were at odds with a bipartisan series of Senate reports that later affirmed the work of the CIA and the other intelligence agencies on the 2016 assessment. The judgment about Putin's preference, the report said, was based on a single source who was biased against the Russian government. The raw intelligence was fragmentary and lacked context, the report added. The overall view of the House Intelligence Committee was well known, and members frequently took issue with the finding. But the full report with details of the CIA's work on the 2016 intelligence assessment has not been released. Trump administration officials have maintained that the 2016 intelligence review was tainted by unverified information in a dossier prepared by a former British intelligence officer, Christopher Steele. The so-called Steele dossier was mentioned in a classified annex to the report, but former officials said the CIA did not take it seriously and did not allow it to influence their assessment. Few if any of the claims in the dossier about Trump have been verified in the ensuing years. Attacking the conclusions of the 2016 assessment that Russia sought to denigrate Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee, and boost Trump has been a hobby horse of some of the president's supporters. Republicans have long taken particular aim at the idea that the Kremlin favored Trump, arguing instead that Russia was simply trying to sow chaos or undermine democratic institutions. Advertisement The attacks on the documents have intensified in recent weeks as first the CIA and then Gabbard's office have raised questions about the effort. Bipartisan Senate reviews have validated the CIA's work in 2016, and John H. Durham, a special prosecutor appointed by Attorney General William Barr during Trump's first term, also failed to find any evidence undermining the intelligence agencies' conclusions. While Trump's Republican supporters criticized the assessment during his first term, Trump focused much of his ire on Robert Mueller, the former FBI director appointed to investigate any ties between the Trump campaign and Russian officials. Since Trump's return to office, the CIA and Gabbard have tried to sow doubts about the assessment. Gabbard has contended that the intelligence work in 2016 was not just flawed but also amounted to a conspiracy against Trump. On Friday, Gabbard issued a report that she said exposed a 'treasonous conspiracy,' claiming senior Obama administration officials had pressured the intelligence committee to change its views on Russian meddling. The documents presented showed that the Obama administration was eager to quickly complete its work but not that the intelligence agencies altered their conclusions. Trump has praised Gabbard, after criticizing her work just weeks earlier. Referring to Gabbard's report, Trump said Tuesday that while in office, President Barack Obama 'was trying to lead a coup.' Gabbard has said she wants to end the weaponization of intelligence. She has condemned politicians for what she sees as the use of selective bits of intelligence against their opponents. While she has portrayed the release of the documents as a corrective to the errors and missteps of the Obama administration, former officials and even some allies of Gabbard have said her effort to throw a lifeline to Trump is an example of the very politicization she has vowed to stamp out. Advertisement This article originally appeared in .
San Francisco Chronicle
16 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
A former security guard at the US Embassy in Norway is accused of spying for Russia and Iran
OSLO, Norway (AP) — A former security guard at the U.S. Embassy in Norway has been indicted by prosecutors there on suspicion of espionage after he allegedly spied for Russia and Iran, state broadcaster NRK said Wednesday. The Norwegian man, whose name has not been made public, was arrested last November on suspicion of having damaged national security. He is accused of handing over details about the embassy's diplomats, its floor plans and security routines, among other things, NRK reported. His defense attorney, Inger Zadig, said her client acknowledges the indictment's facts but denies any criminal guilt. 'At its core, this case concerns legal interpretation — specifically, whether, and to what extent, the information in question was 'classified' under the law, and whether it was capable of harming fundamental national interests,' she wrote in an email to The Associated Press. 'If not, then sharing the information is not a criminal offense. Our client did not hold a security clearance, and his access to information that could threaten vital national interests was more or less non-existent. These issues will be thoroughly addressed in court.' The broadcaster reported that America's ties to Israel and the war in Gaza prompted the man to contact Russia and Iran. At the time of his arrest, the man had been studying for a bachelor's degree in security and preparedness at Norway's Arctic University, UiT. It is a second such case at UiT in recent years, according to NRK. One of the people the West swapped with Russia in a major prisoner exchange last year was a UiT guest researcher who claimed to be a Brazilian named José Assis Giammaria, arrested on espionage allegations in 2022. The police revealed him to be Russian, Mikhail Valeryevich Mikushin. Norway has a 198-kilometer (123-mile) long border with Russia in the Arctic. Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Norway has heavily restricted entry for Russian nationals.
