Fazl denies backing K-P govt ouster
Amid swirling rumours of a brewing "regime change" in the K-P, the JUI-F chief on July 12 threw his weight behind the idea of a political change in the PTI-led province, but with a caveat that the change must come from within the ruling party itself.
Dismissing the notion of backdoor manoeuvring, the Maulana had asserted that the legitimacy cannot be handed down by "boots" but must stem from the will of the people.
Speaking to the media during a visit to Charsadda, Fazl said he had not suggested a no-confidence move against the PTI government, but proposed a change within the province "not by breaking up parties or buying members, but by bringing new administration from within PTI itself".
He said he was not ending his disagreement with Imran Khan's party but did want to improve relations with it. "I want to keep the differences limited to the political level and reduce bitterness. I do not wish to respond to their aggression or indecency," he added.
Fazl stated that the current situation in the K-P could not sustain further political turmoil but reiterated the claim that the PTI was also imposed on the province through rigging in Feb 8, 2024 elections.
"Yes, the court has recognized the PTI government. The world is accepting itwe cannot change that. But history will judge whether our claim of a stolen mandate was right or wrong," he added. He condemned the PML-N's legal action against the JUI-F over a reserved seat in the K-P, asking as to how they could trust an opposition that kept aiding the provincial government.
"We practice moderate politics and show respect, but both the ruling party and opposition use abusive language against us and take us to court," he said, calling talk of a no-confidence move unrealistic.
The JUI-F chief also lambasted the establishment for its alleged failure to establish peace in the province in 40 years. "Why hasn't terrorism been eradicated in 40 years? State institutions are simply not serious about ending terrorism. They should not place the blame for their failure on the public."
Fazl said ensuring peace and security is the state's responsibility, and law enforcement agencies are obligated to protect the lives and property of citizens. "Terror incidents over the last four decades have mocked state institutions. The same state that claims it can bring India to its knees in four hours seems incapable of controlling domestic terrorism. This raises serious concerns about their intent," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1724919650-0%2FUntitled-design-(5)1724919650-0-640x480.webp&w=3840&q=100)
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Imran's release unlikely, sons won't come to Pakistan: K-P Governor
Listen to article Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) Governor Faisal Karim Kundi has said that the release of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan from prison appears unlikely, adding that his sons are also not expected to return to Pakistan. Addressing senior journalists in Peshawar on Saturday, Kundi dismissed speculation about the involvement of Khan's sons, Sulaiman and Kasim, in PTI's upcoming protest campaign. 'It is highly unlikely they will come back,' he said, reiterating that prospects of Imran Khan's release remain slim. Earlier this month, Khan's sister Aleema Khan claimed that both sons would join the party's anti-government protest movement, expected to begin in August. She had also stated that the former prime minister would lead the campaign 'from inside the jail'. Reports suggest that Khan's sons have held meetings with key figures in the United States ahead of their possible visit to Pakistan. However, Governor Kundi appeared dismissive of these developments, describing them as political optics rather than reality. On the broader political and administrative front, the governor stressed the need for a tribal jirga to address unresolved issues in the former Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA). He proposed that the jirga include tribal elders, ex-parliamentarians, and political stakeholders from the region. 'The merger of FATA with K-P cannot be undone without a constitutional amendment,' he said, urging the federal government to release the development funds that were promised at the time of the merger. Turning to the security situation in the province, Kundi painted a grim picture. 'The law and order situation is dire. Extortion is being collected openly — even in broad daylight — from traders, local leaders, and ordinary citizens,' he said. 'In Dera Ismail Khan, people avoid stepping out of their homes after Asr prayers due to fear.' He also criticised what he termed the federal government's Punjab-centric approach to national initiatives. 'Schemes like the laptop programme, youth development projects, and Daanish Schools have excluded the youth of K-P,' he said. Commenting on the state of sports infrastructure, Kundi described the renovation of Peshawar's Arbab Niaz Stadium as substandard and said the lack of quality sports facilities was one reason why Pakistan Super League (PSL) matches have not been held in the province. On PTI's internal politics, the governor claimed the party was facing deep factionalism in K-P. 'They cannot even bring out 20 vehicles for their planned protest on August 5,' he concluded.
Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Why are Thailand and Cambodia fighting along their border?
BANGKOK: Thailand and Cambodia are engaged in their worst fighting in over a decade, exchanging heavy artillery fire across their disputed border, with at least 16 people killed and tens of thousands displaced. Tensions began rising between the Southeast Asian neighbours in May, following the killing of a Cambodian soldier during a brief exchange of gunfire, and have steadily escalated since, triggering diplomatic spats and now, armed clashes. What is the current situation? Clashes broke out between the two countries early on Thursday along a disputed area abutting an ancient temple, rapidly spilling over to other areas along the contested frontier and heavy artillery exchanges continuing for a second straight day. Thailand recalled its ambassador to Phnom Penh on Wednesday and expelled Cambodia's envoy, in response to a second Thai soldier losing a limb to a landmine that Bangkok alleged had been laid recently by rival troops. Cambodia called that accusation baseless. Both sides accuse each other of firing the first shots that started the conflict on Thursday, which have so far claimed the lives of at least 15 civilians, most of them on the Thai side. Cambodia has deployed truck-mounted rocket launchers, which Thailand says have been used to target civilian areas, while the Thai armed forces despatched US-made F-16 fighter jets, using one to bomb military targets across the border. Thailand, Cambodia exchange heavy artillery as fighting rages for a second day Some 130,000 people have been evacuated from border areas in Thailand to safer locations, while some 12,000 families on the Cambodian side have been shifted away from the frontlines, according to local authorities. Where does the dispute originate? Thailand and Cambodia have for more than a century contested sovereignty at various undemarcated points along their 817 km (508 miles) land border, which was first mapped by France in 1907 when Cambodia was its colony. That map, which Thailand later contested, was based on an agreement that the border would be demarcated along the natural watershed line between the two countries. In 2000, the two countries agreed to establish a Joint Boundary Commission to peacefully address overlapping claims, but little progress has been made towards settling disputes. China says it is 'deeply concerned' over Thailand-Cambodia clash Claims over ownership of historical sites have raised nationalist tension between the two countries, notably in 2003 when rioters torched the Thai embassy and Thai businesses in Phnom Penh over an alleged remark by a Thai celebrity questioning jurisdiction over Cambodia's World Heritage-listed Angkor Wat temple. What were previous flashpoints? An 11th century Hindu temple called Preah Vihear, or Khao Phra Viharn in Thailand, has been at the heart of the dispute for decades, with both Bangkok and Phnom Penh claiming historical ownership. The International Court of Justice awarded the temple to Cambodia in 1962, but Thailand has continued to lay claim to the surrounding land. Tension escalated in 2008 after Cambodia attempted to list the Preah Vihear temple as a UNESCO World Heritage site, leading to skirmishes over several years and at least a dozen deaths, including during a weeklong exchange of artillery in 2011. Two years later, Cambodia sought interpretation of the 1962 verdict and the ICJ again ruled in its favour, saying the land around the temple was also part of Cambodia and ordering Thai troops to withdraw. What's behind recent troubles? Despite the historic rivalry, the current governments of Thailand and Cambodia enjoy warm ties, partly due to the close relationship between their influential former leaders, Thailand's Thaksin Shinawatra and Cambodia's Hun Sen. But nationalist sentiment has risen in Thailand after conservatives last year questioned the government's plan to negotiate with Cambodia to jointly explore energy resources in undemarcated maritime areas, warning such a move could risk Thailand losing the island of Koh Kood in the Gulf of Thailand. Tensions also rose in February when a group of Cambodians escorted by troops sang their national anthem at another ancient Hindu temple that both countries claim, Ta Moan Thom, before being stopped by Thai soldiers. An effort by then Thai premier Paetongtarn Shinawatra, Thaksin's daughter, to de-escalate the situation in a call last month with Hun Sen spectacularly backfired after a recording of the conversation was initially leaked and later released in full by the Cambodian leader. In the call, the 38-year-old prime minister appeared to criticize a Thai army commander and kowtow to Hun Sen, drawing public fury and a complaint from a group of senators, which led to her suspension by a court order on July 1. Have there been any resolution efforts? After the May 28 clash, both countries quickly promised to ease tension, prevent more conflict and seek dialogue via their joint border commission at a June 14 meeting. The neighbours have issued diplomatically worded statements committing to peace while vowing to protect sovereignty, but their militaries have been mobilising near the border. Cambodia, meanwhile, said existing mechanisms were not working and it planned to refer disputes in four border areas to the ICJ to settle 'unresolved and sensitive' issues that it said could escalate tensions. Thailand has not recognised the ICJ's rulings on the row and wants to settle it bilaterally. Since Thursday's clashes, Cambodia has written to the United Nations Security Council, urging the body to convene a meeting to stop what it describes as 'unprovoked and premeditated military aggression' by Thailand. Thailand, on the other hand, wants to resolve the conflict through bilateral negotiations but says talks can only take place after Cambodia ceases violence.
Business Recorder
10 hours ago
- Business Recorder
‘Legal due process has no exceptions', Dar compares Aafia, Imran's arrests
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar has made comparison between incarceration of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan and Aafia Siddiqui to underscore his point about legal accountability. 'I think we should not politicise anything,' Dar stated, speaking at an event organised by the American think tank, Atlantic Council, in Washington on Friday. 'For example, Aafia Siddiqui is here (in the US) for decades and going to be (here) God knows till when,' he said, adding it would be unfair to hamper the legal process. If the 'due process of the law has resulted in that action, the same applies to everybody, so there's no exception,' he maintained, drawing parallel between arrest of Imran and Aafia. The deputy PM's statement kind of deviates from Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's assurance that he gave to Aafia's sister, Dr Fowzia Siddiqui, a day ago. PM Shehbaz on Friday met with Dr Fowzia and assured that the government would continue to provide all possible legal and diplomatic support in the matter of Dr Aafia Siddiqui. 'The government is in no way negligent regarding the case of Dr Aafia,' the prime minister said. The meeting had taken place days after the Islamabad High Court (IHC) issued contempt notices to the prime minister and the federal cabinet in a petition filed by Dr Fowzia, seeking the repatriation, health status, and release of her sister, Dr Aafia, who is imprisoned in the United States of America. Fowzia has consistently maintained that the US court's conviction of Aafia for alleged attempt to murder US military personnel in Afghanistan, for which she is serving an 86-year jail sentence, is unfair. Govt in no way negligent about Dr Aafia, says PM Shehbaz In response to a query regarding the government's crackdown on the former prime minister and his party, the foreign minister shed light on the May 9 events in Pakistan, which saw attacks on military installations. He said that even he, who played the role of a 'reconciliator' between the PTI and government, could not intervene in such a situation. Recalling his role in resolving the 2014 sit-in in Islamabad by Imran Khan's party, which he said 'hampered the economic growth and caused a lot of loss,' for 126 days, Dar noted that he had played his party in what he called a 'political ceasefire.' However, he distinguished this from the violent events of May 9. 'You see, when you pick up arms and you do things that happened on May 9, unfortunately a man like me even cannot do anything,' Dar said. He emphasised that the 'due process of the law has to take place, which is a progress.' Dar concluded his statement, saying, 'If you are a popular political leader, it doesn't give you license to pick arms to provoke public to go and attack the military installations of the country.'
