Meet Leela Sahu, 22-year-old influencer who has local BJP rattled in Madhya Pradesh's Sidhi
The 22-year-old, who started making short-form content in 2022, initially vlogged about local fairs, travel, and her family's farming life. But from 2024, she switched to highlighting local issues, addressing Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union Minister Nitin Gadkari, and Sidhi MP Rajesh Mishra.
After she became pregnant last year, she and her family members met local politicians to construct a road from their village, but when things did not move forward, she made another video to highlight the issue. 'Only a survey was done. The rains came and went, then winter, then summer. Now it's raining again, and the road is yet to be made,' she said.
For residents of Khaddi Khurd, located in Sidhi district, basic healthcare is an 8-km tractor ride away, often on unpaved, broken paths.
BJP MP Rajesh Mishra, responding to her videos, courted controversy when he said arrangements would be made for transportation a week before the due date for women who are about to deliver. 'Every delivery has a due date. If she wants, she can get admitted early. We will provide all facilities, including food and water,' Mishra had said.
As his remarks came under criticism, he clarified, 'My comments have been misconstrued. We had sent the proposal to construct the road to the central government in 2024. The proposal has also been accepted. We had also informed the villagers that the road would be constructed in 17 months.'
PWD minister Rakesh Singh had chimed in, 'Till the time there are roads, there will be potholes. There may be a road with a life of 5 years and may have potholes in 4 years. But if there are roads which should not go bad in 4 years, and have potholes in 6 months, that is wrong.'
A Sidhi district official said that a recent survey by the Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority was undertaken, and a 5-km road plan under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana was submitted in March 2025. 'Work will start once it's approved at the state level,' said the official.
But Leela said the issue doesn't concern her alone: 'I am 9 months pregnant. My due date is fast approaching. My sister-in-law is also pregnant. There are six women in my locality who are approaching their due dates. It takes several hours to reach the hospital using this broken road. Now, we are hearing that they will undertake another survey. I will travel to Delhi after my delivery and try and meet Gadkari ji and urge him to make the road,' she said.
She has also faced backlash from some corners for having 'political ambitions' and chasing attention. 'I already have 50 lakh followers. I have no interest in politics. I only want to use this platform to raise local issues. I don't want politicians to airlift me. I don't want special treatment. I want our politicians to be held accountable,' she said. 'You are all living in 2025. We are living in the 1990s. We don't have proper roads. There is no running tap water. If I have to upload my video on Instagram, I have to walk 1 km to get an internet signal.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
24 minutes ago
- India Today
Zuckerberg's leadership questioned as Meta privacy trial gets underway
An $8 billion class action investors' lawsuit against Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and company leaders current and former begins Wednesday, with claims stemming from the 2018 privacy scandal involving the Cambridge Analytica political consulting allege in their lawsuit that Meta did not fully disclose the risks that Facebook users' personal information would be misused by Cambridge Analytica, a firm that supported Donald Trump's successful Republican presidential campaign in 2016. Shareholders say Facebook officials repeatedly and continually violated a 2012 consent order with the Federal Trade Commission under which Facebook agreed to stop collecting and sharing personal data on platform users and friends without their later sold user data to commercial partners in direct violation of the consent order and removed disclosures from privacy settings that were required under consent order, the lawsuit alleges. The fallout led to Facebook agreeing to pay a $5.1 billion penalty to settle FTC charges. The social media giant also faced significant fines in Europe and reached a $725 million privacy settlement with users. Now shareholders want Zuckerberg and others to reimburse Meta for the FTC fine and other legal costs, which the plaintiffs estimate total more than $8 first trial witness, privacy expert Neil Richards, testified Monday morning for the shareholders.'Facebook's privacy disclosures were misleading,' said Richards, a professor at Washington University Law later testimony, Jeffrey Zients, who served on Facebook's board from 2018 to 2020, testified that consumer privacy and user data were priorities for both management and the he supported settling with the FTC as it investigated potential violations of the 2012 consent order, so the company could move forward.'It was difficult because this was a lot of money, but I think it was better than the alternative,' Zients if the board considered making its founder a party to the settlement, he said Zuckerberg was 'essential' to running the Zients, who served in both the Obama and Biden administrations, said, 'there was no indication that he had done anything wrong.'The case is expected to run through late next week and include testimony from both Zuckerberg and former Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg. Other witnesses expected in Delaware Chancery Court, where Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc. is incorporated, include board member Marc Andreessen and former board member Peter Thiel. The judge is not expected to rule for several had hoped the Supreme Court would dismiss the case. Justices heard arguments in November before deciding they should not have taken it up. The high court dismissed the company's appeal, leaving in place an appellate ruling allowing the case to go forward.- EndsTrending Reel
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
India-US Trade Deal: Aug 1 Deadline Nears... Will The Deal Be Sealed In Time? Piyush Goyal Shares Major Update
New Delhi: A small group of Indian trade negotiators has landed in Washington this week. Their task is urgent. They must try, once again, to untangle the long-pending India-U.S. trade deal that has seen too many rounds, too many delays and now stares down a hard deadline, August 1. The clock is ticking. U.S. President Donald Trump, now in his second term at the White House, has already fired off tariff letters to a long list of countries. Japan, Brazil, South Korea, Thailand and Cambodia, each has received a note – explaining in clear terms why new tariffs are coming. India has not received one. That is only because New Delhi and Washington are still talking. But if there is no deal before the deadline, the letter could arrive. Where Are The Talks Stuck? Washington wants India to lower its tariffs on American agricultural and dairy goods. Milk, wheat, poultry and genetically modified soy, all are on the table. New Delhi, however, is not moving. India's position has been clear. Its farm sector, dairy cooperatives, food security architecture, they cannot take a hit. Union Minister for Commerce and Industry Piyush Goyal has said any agreement must benefit both sides. Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan has echoed that line. No pressure. No compromise on farmers. No backdoor trade-offs. So far, India has kept these sectors out of most trade deals, including with the United Kingdom and Australia. The same applies here. Indian Team Lands in Washington Led by Special Secretary Rajesh Agarwal, the Indian delegation is back in the U.S. capital, hoping to break the deadlock. The goal is to find a formula, something that can be signed off before Trump's August 1 deadline kicks in and the United States begins slapping tariffs across the board. Goyal says talks are moving 'at speed'. Speaking to reporters, he confirmed that the Indian side is focused on crafting an agreement that works for both countries. There is still time. Barely two weeks. But the message is that the window will not stay open for long. Trump's Tariff Playbook Trump is playing hardball again. Twenty-five countries have already been hit with his new tariff regime. Canada was slapped with 35 percent. Others have seen higher. But in India's case, the U.S. president has dropped a telling hint. While speaking about his global tariff strategy, he said that 'key trading partners' may see lower tariffs, around 15 to 20 percent. And not every country will get a formal letter. It is a signal that if India clinches the deal, it may escape the harshest penalties. Why India Won't Budge On Dairy & Agriculture Behind India's tough stance lies a deeper concern. According to a recent report from the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), any wide-scale entry of subsidised U.S. dairy or poultry goods could damage India's rural economy. Not only small farmers but food security itself could be hit. The report warns against opening the gates to American grain or genetically modified soybeans. Once these products enter Indian markets, they could displace local produce and crush pricing structures. This is not only about trade margins, this is about the long-term sustainability of Indian agriculture. Can A Deal Still Happen? If all goes well in Washington, negotiators may stitch together a limited package. It will not be a full-blown foreign trade agreement (FTA). But it could be enough to avoid Trump's tariff stick. Enough to show progress. Enough to keep the trade lanes open. A senior official said that a breakthrough is still possible before August 1. But it depends on what each side is willing to give, and what each insists on keeping off the table. Until then, all eyes remain on the U.S. capital.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
State govt, Bawankule behind ink attack: Pravin Gaikwad
1 2 3 Pune: Politician Pravin Gaikwad who is associated with the Sambhaji Brigade alleged on Wednesday that the recent attack where ink was thrown on him was preplanned and supported by the BJP-led state govt. He said revenue minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule has close links with the attackers and was the mastermind. On Sunday, Gaikwad was in Akkalkot in Solapur district to participate in a function, when local BJP members threw ink on him. They alleged that his organisation was disrespectful in its use of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj's name. Solapur police registered an FIR against a group of people, including BJP member Deepak Kate. On Wednesday, Gaikwad alleged that Kate and others attacked him as they had support from Bawankule. He also played old videos during an interaction with reporters in Pune. "In the past, Bawankule has openly praised Kate and spoken of supporting him. There is no doubt the attack was preplanned and the minister was the mastermind," he said. You Can Also Check: Pune AQI | Weather in Pune | Bank Holidays in Pune | Public Holidays in Pune Equating the attack with murders of rationalists Narendra Dabholkar, Govind Pansare, MM Kalburgi and Gauri Lankesh, Gaikwad alleged that the BJP-led govt is trying to silence all activists who speak of progressive ideologies. "I do not want to make the incident political, but the attack was govt sponsored. Even police were reluctant to register an immediate FIR. The state follows a regressive thought and it is their attempt to silence all who are progressive," Gaikwad added. Responding to the allegations, Bawankule said he would never support any act of violence. He said, "I have already condemned the incident. There may be ideological differences and we can have a debate on it, but it does not mean that one will take the law into their own hands." Speaking about his alleged connection with Kate, who was arrested in the incident, the revenue minister said, "It is true that when Kate joined BJP two-and-half years ago, I went for the event as the state party chief. We usually speak words of encouragement when anyone joins the party. It does not mean I support the act. Neither our govt nor BJP will ever stand for violence. All people involved in the attack must be punished. "
