Russia doubts possibility of new US nuclear pact amid ‘ruined' bilateral ties as START Treaty nears end
Russia thinks chances are fading for agreeing on a new pact to replace the last nuclear arms control treaty with the US, which expires early next year, a top arms control official said.
The main obstacle to any agreement is the state of US-Russian ties, which are 'in ruins,' said Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov in an interview published with the state-run Tass news service on Friday.
'There are no grounds for the full-scale resumption of the New START treaty under the current circumstances,' Ryabkov said, according to Tass. 'Considering that the treaty is reaching the end of its life cycle in approximately eight months, any discussion about the realism of such a scenario is becoming increasingly meaningless.'
Russian President Vladimir Putin in February 2023 suspended participation in the New START nuclear treaty though Moscow pledged to continue complying with its terms until the accord's expiration. Russia in April said it continues to respect the pact's limits on nuclear arsenals, which restricts each side to 1,550 deployed strategic warheads.
Then-US President Joe Biden extended the treaty by five years to 2026 as one of his first acts upon taking office in 2021 shortly before it was due to expire. Putin had pressed President Donald Trump during his first term without success to agree to a deal.
The end of the treaty would mean the US loses access to inspections and monitoring data about the number of deployed Russian nuclear warheads, as well as the land- and sea-based vehicles used to launch them.
The potential loss of the nuclear arms control mechanism comes amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, now in its fourth year, which has sparked the worst tensions with the West in decades. Trump's efforts to resolve the conflict have met with no success so far, though his administration has started talks with Moscow on restoring diplomatic operations after contacts were all but cut off following the start of the war.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
How can a new regime in Iran be in India's interest? Yet Delhi said little: Bruno Maçães
Bruno Maçães A former secretary of state for European Affairs in Portugal, Bruno Maçães wears many hats — he advises global corporations on geopolitical and technological risk, is a member of the European Council on Foreign Relations , and has written books on the new world order as well as China's belt and road strategy. In an interview with Sunday Times , he argues that India must take a more proactive approach to securing its strategic interests. A truce has been called with the US, Israel and Iran all claiming victory. How do you assess these competing narratives? Israel was fundamentally interested in bringing the regime down. US president Trump showed considerable ability in how he avoided being dragged into a prolonged war most of his supporters were against. At the same time, no fundamental problem was addressed. Iran may even feel this is the right moment to pursue a nuclear weapon. The main obstacle in the past was political and may have been removed now that Ayatollah Khamenei has lost influence. He has consistently opposed a final decision on weaponising nuclear power. Regime change could lead to a military dictatorship in Iran and that would move it much closer to China. For India, this might well be a disaster and my conversations with friends in Delhi actually showed there was some awareness of the risk. But India needs to be more active in pursuing its strategic interests. In this multipolar world, India has had to do a balancing act with the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the Middle East. How successful has this strategy been? India needs to develop a vision on what kind of principles and priorities it has and then apply those principles to ongoing crises. I consider India a civilization state but a civilization state needs to offer an organising theory of world order. How can it be in India's interest for Iran to be destroyed or for a new regime aligned with China and Pakistan to take root there? And yet we heard very little from Delhi in opposition to the wild adventures that were openly being discussed in Israel and Washington. On Russia's invasion of Ukraine, India, a country without territorial ambitions of its own, should be more critical of territorial invasions. I would have liked a stronger position and a stronger role against the return of the old European imperialism as represented by Russian president Putin . You have described the Israel attack on Iran as 'neoconservatism on steroids.' Can you explain? The old neoconservatism was about regime change. I think this is a more radical form of neoconservatism where the goal is regime destruction or collapse but there is no vision of what will replace it. Over the past two decades, Israel and the US have created a landscape of destruction in West Asia, all the way from Egypt to Pakistan. Syria is only now starting to recover, and a lot depends on whether it manages to get back on its feet and the wider region starts to recover. Unfortunately, Israel seems to believe the best future for itself is to become a fortified garrison amidst a landscape of destruction. There is no future in this vision, not even for Israel itself. I n your latest book 'World Builders', you argue that geopolitics is no longer about controlling territory but about technology. How do you see China's DeepSeek, and the fears in Europe that Trump could weaponise the tech dominance of the US? Europe has fallen behind. We need to realise technology is not above geopolitics. We are becoming more dependent on the US and that comes at the cost of our prosperity and independence. Regulation is not enough. In order to regulate technology, you first need to create it. We made a mistake 30 years ago to think it did not matter whether the main internet platforms in Europe were American or European. That was a tragic mistake. China did not make the same mistake, and now they have strong indigenous capabilities as shown by DeepSeek. Now, we find ourselves in a position of extreme dependency. Did you see how Nato's secretary general, who is European, referred to Europeans as 'they'? It reminded me of those nawabs in India who were so aligned with the East India Company that they referred to Indians as 'they'. In both cases, military dependence led to a kind of mental dependence. How do you think India will fare in this race for technology? Already, India is the only real rival to China in the race to control and deploy solar energy. Europe and America are out of this competition. I suspect in other areas too the contest for technological dominance will increasingly be between China and India. Right now, I think India is looking for a model. American-type financialisation will not work for India, but neither will the party leadership system of China. When you need to move fast in developing ideas and implementing them, the most important thing is a political model that fits your circumstances. Ultimately, India needs a political model that aligns with its culture and history which is the topic of my next book. A model is also necessary to organise discovery. What will be the technologies of the future? No one knows. But we know that it all starts with organised discovery. We already know that whoever masters solar energy and artificial intelligence will rule the world, but the details will decide everything. Can you tell us what your impressions were after your recent India visit, and what your next book will be focusing on? I spent two months this year visiting Ayodhya, the Mahakumbh and other places in India, as well as meeting many people and having intense discussions. My book will deal with the revival of Hindu civilization. I am spending a lot of hours reading the complete works of Vivekananda , Aurobindo, Coomaraswamy. These are writers of unmatched power but also complexity. I want to discuss the terms of this revival and also, what the Indian case can teach us about the fundamental political entity of the future: the civilization state, that is a state that is neither liberal nor national but based on a distinct civilization, a view about human life and society. I hope to be able to travel for several months across India next year to present these ideas.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Utterly insane: Elon Musk slams Senate draft of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'
Billionaire and Tesla chief Elon Musk on Saturday slammed the latest Senate draft of President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill, dubbed the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' as 'utterly insane and destructive,' warning it would inflict 'immense strategic harm' on the United States.'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' he wrote on X (formerly known as Twitter).advertisement'It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future,' he latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future. Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 28, 2025 The 940-page proposal, backed by Senate Republicans racing to meet Trump's July 4 deadline, combines deep spending cuts to programs like Medicaid and food stamps with tax breaks and increased funding for defence and has instructed Republicans, who currently hold the majority in both the House and Senate, to skip their holidays and deliver his sweeping tax-and-spending bill before July 4.A key component of the bill is Trump's USD 350 billion border and national security plan. This includes USD 46 billion for expanding the US-Mexico border wall, USD 45 billion to fund 100,000 migrant detention beds, and aggressive hiring for immigration enforcement, including 10,000 new ICE officers with USD 10,000 signing initiative is central to Trump's promise to launch the largest mass deportation effort in US history, targeting the removal of nearly 1 million people per leaders are using their Senate majority to push the bill past Democratic objections, but some GOP senators worry about cutting programs like Medicaid and food stamps. The bill now returns to the House for a final vote, with a heated debate over its economic and political effects.- EndsMust Watch
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
India-US trade talks need political push for final leg
The fine print of a preliminary trade deal between India and the US has mostly been worked out by negotiators from both sides but the ball is now in the court of the political leadership to break a stalemate, people aware of the parleys told HT, disclosing two of the topmost sticking points that remain. Trade experts said an interim trade deal between India and the US is possible by July 9, provided both respect practical and political sensitivities of each other. (AFP File) According to these people, these issues are: an unequivocal assurance that New Delhi seeks from Washington that all punitive levies will be repealed, and a freer access to India's politically sensitive agriculture sector that the American side has sought. 'The two-day deliberation that started in Washington on Thursday will likely stretch over to next week,' one of these people, who has direct knowledge of the talks, told HT. Both sides are in a sprint to announce a breakthrough, which will be a preliminary deal covering some portion of the trade between two nations, with a larger bilateral trade deal expected to be signed by October. Once the deal is done, India wants America to withdraw all existing and potential retaliatory tariffs, including the 26% reciprocal tariff — this comprises a 10% baseline tariff imposed from April 5 and an additional 16% country-specific levy set to trigger from July 9. India also wants the US to revoke all safeguard duties disputed at the World Trade Organisation—50% on Indian steel and aluminium and 25% on automobiles and auto parts—and to reciprocate New Delhi's move by proportionately slashing its most favoured nation tariffs. 'Washington has not yet given any unequivocal commitment on these matters, which are crucial for Indian interests,' another person said. American negotiators have been suggesting India replicate the US-UK Economic Prosperity Deal model, where Britain accepted continued 10% baseline tariffs on most goods while securing relief from additional sectoral tariffs. However, Indian negotiators have rejected this approach. The other sticking point is the US insistence on India opening its agriculture and farming sector. While the American side is open to tariff rate quotas (TRQ) — a mechanism under which concessional duty or duty-free access of any specified item applies to a limited quantity — their insistence on some sensitive sectors is a challenge. 'The problem lies in wanting India to also open its sensitive sectors. Dairy imports are restricted for two reasons. First, India's dairy farming is at a subsistence level with one or two cows or buffaloes. The livelihoods of millions of farmers are at stake as they could not compete with America's commercial-scale dairy farms. Secondly, the US cattle feed includes non-vegetarian products, something against religious sentiments of Indian consumers,' a third person said. Similarly, India is unable to accept the US demand to allow unrestricted access to American agricultural items such as corn and soybean because Indian law does not permit genetically modified crops. 'America is unwilling to accept an institutional mechanism which would certify that its India-bound agriculture produce are not genetically modified, saying there is a practical problem in segregating GM and non-GM products,' this person said. This person added that solving such issues now require a political directive from the highest levels of the government. 'While majority of issues have been resolved with near consensus, including on removing tariff and non-tariff barriers on most of the items of interest for both countries, certain sensitive matters require political directives from the two leaders. An interim India-US trade deal, mainly involving goods, is possible to conclude before July 9, depending on political resolution of the stalemate,' the second person said. The Indian negotiating team could extend its stay in Washington next week and the two parties would discuss contentious issues, depending on any political directive, according to the first person. The Indian negotiating team led by chief negotiator and special secretary-commerce Rajesh Agrawal was still in Washington on Saturday, indicating that talks may extend into next week. Trade experts said an interim trade deal between India and the US is possible by July 9, provided both respect practical and political sensitivities of each other. Global Trade Research Initiative founder Ajay Srivastava outlined a likely scenario: 'The more likely outcome is a limited trade pact—styled after the US-UK mini trade deal announced on May 8. Under such a deal, India is expected to cut MFN tariffs on a wide range of industrial goods, including automobiles, a persistent demand from Washington. In agriculture, India may offer limited market access through tariff reductions and TRQs on select US products such as ethanol, almonds, walnuts, apples, raisins, avocados, olive oil, spirits, and wine.' 'However, India is unlikely to budge on sensitive sectors. No tariff cuts are expected for dairy products or key food grains like rice and wheat, where farm livelihoods are at stake. These categories are politically and economically sensitive, affecting over 700 million people in India's rural economy,' he added. Srivastava warned that 'the talks may collapse' if the US continues to insist on opening India's core agriculture sectors or allowing entry of GM products. The prudent move for Washington would be to respect Indian sensitivities and forge a deal for stronger strategic cooperation in future, he said, noting that 'agricultural goods account for less than 5% of US exports to India.' Another expert working in a multinational consulting firm said: 'Now it is the time for America to act as India has already given several concessions, making its intent clear for stronger and everlasting economic cooperation with the US.' After a week where tariffs took a back seat to the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities and the massive tax and spending bill in the US Congress, the Trump administration's trade negotiations have picked up. News agency Reuters reported Washington had sent a new proposal to the EU on Thursday and held talks with Japan on Friday. Both India and Japan are in advanced negotiations.
