
Oakley Meta HSTN Limited Edition review: a polarizing choice
So I was taken aback when a suave artiste walking a French bulldog stopped me, pointed to the Oakley Meta HSTN Limited Edition sunglasses on my face, and said, 'Yo, those are siiick — do you love them?!'
They proceeded to rattle off some questions. I was flabbergasted to realize this person was genuinely curious and eagerly wanted to hear my impressions. I managed a 'Just got them! I think they're cool?' before scuttling away like the awkward turtle I am.
My flabbers were even more gasted when I realized this was the first time anyone had ever noticed that I was wearing a pair of smart glasses.
6
Verge Score
I've been thinking about that interaction a lot while testing the Oakley glasses. After so many years as a smart glasses skeptic, it's wild to see how successful Meta's been with the Ray-Bans — the Oakleys' predecessor. EssilorLuxottica said in its earnings results earlier this week that sales have tripled year over year. And not just among techies. Among regular people. Just the other day, a friend sent me a TikTok with footage from a Stray Kids concert recorded by the Ray-Ban Meta glasses. Shoulda done this for our show, they'd texted. A quick search showed that someone at our exact show, seated not that far from us, actually had.
When I first reviewed the Ray-Ban Meta glasses, I knew something had shifted. But it's mind-boggling that under two years later, Meta has launched multiple limited editions and a Super Bowl commercial, let alone an option from another brand to reach new audiences.
Where Ray-Bans are classic and versatile, Oakleys conjure images of Olympic cyclists or Coach Taylor from Friday Night Lights. The young'uns have also glommed onto the brand as Y2K fashion is all the rage again.
Stylistically, the Oakleys are more polarizing. Not just because they have PRIZM lenses, either. Both my spouse and bestie scrunched their noses at the concept of white sunglasses. Multiple friends and coworkers pointed out the slanted area by the nose bridge, asking, 'Why the hell does it do that?' (The answer is that Oakley's regular HSTN glasses do that. It's an Oakley thing.) Anyone can rock these, provided they bring a bit of swagger. Many people won't feel comfortable with such a bold look.
Ironically, the Oakley case is much more boring and feels cheaper in your hand than the Meta Ray-Bans case. It's also much harder to get the glasses out. I was afraid I'd break the charging contact while pulling them out.
The main differences are a bump up in video resolution from 1080p to 3K, roughly double the battery to eight hours on a single charge, and Oakley's PRIZM lenses on the limited edition. The extra battery is nice, since that's one of the main complaints about Meta glasses for power users. Meanwhile, the PRIZM lenses enhance contrast and certain colors. It sounds like a marketing spiel, but I don't think I'd truly experienced green until I saw the way trees and grass look through these glasses. The kicker is that all these things make the Oakleys more expensive. The standard Oakleys will start at $399, compared to $299 for the Ray-Bans. This limited edition version costs $499.
That's hard to swallow. I understand boosting 3K video resolution and battery life. Oakleys are more likely to appeal to outdoorsy folks. Those are the kinds of updates that crowd would want. But photo quality is identical. 3K videos are noticeably sharper, and you'd get decent action footage if you can figure out framing. (Once again, I was foiled by the corner of my baseball cap, my bangs, and a tendency to tilt my head.) Filming in 3K is a battery guzzler. Recording three 2.5-minute 3K videos of my cat and uploading them via Wi-Fi to my phone ate a whopping 20 percent of my battery.
Our supervising video producer, Vjeran Pavic, copped a pair for himself and had the same issues with framing, but he adds that everything has a 'very HDR look.' That's not a bad thing. It's the right move as everything needs to pop, be simple, and have consistent exposure. The benefit is hands-free, point-of-view convenience. It's never going to trump the quality of a high-end phone or action cam.
The Ray-Bans and Oakleys have the same number of mics and placement, but may fit your face differently. I sound clearer on calls from the Ray-Bans. The glasses have different nose pads, so because of my low nose bridge, I ended up sounding muffled on the Oakleys. You can fix this, however, in the mic troubleshooting settings.
I know what I'd say now if I could travel back in time to that street corner in Williamsburg.
I don't love these glasses, Mr. Ludicrously Stylish Brooklyn Man. A more accurate answer is, I appreciate them. While they fit more easily into my life than I'd anticipated, they're more a 'nice to have' than a 'must have.' As a runner, nothing will quite beat my Shokz OpenRun Pro 2 for open-ear audio, but I've enjoyed using these on my summer runs when the sun is punishingly bright. But the real question, sir, is how much do you like AI? How much do you trust Meta?
These smart glasses now connect to the Meta AI app instead of the Meta View companion app. Meta purposefully calls these AI glasses, so you can rest assured that association isn't going anywhere. There are now privacy stipulations where you can't opt out of voice recordings being stored in the cloud, among other things. That feels… dystopian, but for the blind and low-vision community, this might be relatively small potatoes. These glasses and their Live AI features have empowered them to live more independently. For content creators, the camera and livestreaming capabilities open new creative avenues.
If that sounds appealing, go for the Ray-Bans, because they're more versatile for indoor and outdoor wear and are $100 to $200 less. That is, unless you're much more of an outdoorsy or content creator type. In that case, the 3K resolution and extra battery life make more sense.
Now, you'll have to excuse me, Mr. Unreasonably Chic for a Heat Wave. I'm going to power-walk back to AC, put my reviewer hat back on, and ponder this conversation and what it means that you could tell I was wearing smart glasses. Hey, Meta, can you tell me where the nearest bodega is?
(Spoiler: It could not.)
Every smart device now requires you to agree to a series of terms and conditions before you can use it — contracts that no one actually reads. It's impossible for us to read and analyze every single one of these agreements. But we started counting exactly how many times you have to hit 'agree' to use devices when we review them since these are agreements most people don't read and definitely can't negotiate.
To use the Oakley Meta smart glasses, you'll need a Meta account and the Meta AI app downloaded onto your phone. A Meta account works across platforms like Meta, Instagram, and Quest and comes with its own Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. If you want to partake in early access programs for beta AI features, that will also come with its own terms. Should you decide to integrate with services like WhatsApp, Instagram, and Spotify, you also agree to those terms and privacy policies. You may also be asked to give permissions related to Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, location services, and voice data. If you choose to get a pair of prescription lenses, you may also be asked to share that information with Lenscrafters.
The smart glasses also come with supplemental terms of service and privacy policies / notices, including:
You can also view all the associated AI glasses legal and privacy documentation here.
Final tally: Two mandatory agreements, six supplemental agreements and notices, and several optional agreements.
Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All by Victoria Song
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Accessory Reviews
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All AI
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Gadgets
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Meta
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Reviews
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Tech
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Wearable
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Woman in Fight with Roommate Over Whether a Home Needs Both a Roomba and a Regular Vacuum
'Most of the time, it just bonks around like a lost toddler at IKEA until someone takes pity on it and turns it around,' the woman saidNEED TO KNOW A woman moved into a shared apartment with two roommates who agreed to share cleaning responsibilities However, she was left unimpressed when one of her roommates began using a Roomba instead of a regular vacuum cleaner 'It doesn't have a hose, can't clean corners or high surfaces, and doesn't work for any kind of mess,' she saidA woman who recently moved into an apartment in Boston with three other PhD students is unsure if she 'overstepped' after buying a vacuum cleaner without discussing it first. On Monday, July 28, the woman explained in a post on Reddit's "Am I The A--hole" forum that she is living with two other women in their mid-twenties, whom she didn't know before moving in. She said they all discussed splitting up the responsibility of keeping the apartment clean prior to the arrangement. However, she was unaware that the vacuum one of her roommates would be bringing was a Roomba. The woman said robot vacuums are ideal for light maintenance if used frequently, but are unsuitable for vacuuming the entire apartment. 'It doesn't have a hose, can't clean corners or high surfaces, and doesn't work for any kind of mess,' she explained. Complaining about her roommate, the woman continued, 'She also only wants to run it every other week, which doesn't really keep up with the dust and dirt of three people. 'The Roomba also hasn't mapped the apartment well due to its infrequent use,' she said. 'Most of the time, it just bonks around like a lost toddler at IKEA until someone takes pity on it and turns it around.' The woman said that when she tried to discuss her concerns with her roommate, the Roomba owner disagreed on the need to have a separate regular vacuum cleaner. In an attempt to avoid an argument, the woman said she bought her own regular vacuum that had a bag and an allergy filter to use in her bedroom and shared areas. 'When I brought it home, she was annoyed and said I had gone behind her back and broken our agreement,' the woman said of her roommate. 'I didn't see it that way, and shared that I'm not asking anyone else to use it or share costs. I just wanted to be able to clean the apartment to a level that works for me." 'Our other roommate said she doesn't really have a preference and doesn't care, so it seems like she is currently steering clear of this,' she continued. 'There's no blame or fault to be found in her at all; I totally understand why she might want to stay neutral." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. 'I don't want to be the problem roommate, but now I'm wondering if I overstepped. AITA [am I the a--hole?],' the woman asked. Responses to the post reassured the woman that her views on the Roomba were fair. One person said her roommate was 'acting like a child,' while another argued there should be no issue with the addition of the vacuum because the Roomba can still be used. 'This is absurd. You are allowed to buy whatever you want for your shared apartment. Roommate sounds like a problem now and future,' someone else chimed in. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rod Stewart Shows A.I Images of Ozzy Osbourne In Heaven With Dead Music Icons During Concert Tribute
British singer-songwriter Sir Rod Stewart caused a stir at his concert on Aug. 1, when he projected A.I. images of the late Ozzy Osbourne posing next to deceased musicians in heaven. Ever since Osbourne's death on July 22, Stewart has been dedicating his hit song 'Forever Young' to the Black Sabbath frontman at shows along his 'One Last Time' tour. Conventionally, Stewart would sing the sentimental ballad with images of Osbourne projected behind him in an affectionate tribute. More from Variety Ozzy Osbourne Funeral: Sharon Osbourne and Family Pay Tribute With Peace Signs as Thousands of Fans Chant 'Thank You Ozzy' in Emotional Procession Ozzy Osbourne's Legacy (And Many Goofy Faces) Celebrated In New Photo Collection, Featuring Never-Before-Seen Pics Ozzy Osbourne Posthumously Scores 10th Top 10 Album With 'The Essential Ozzy' According to NME, Stewart's Aug. 1 concert at the Ameris Bank Amphitheater outside Atlanta, Ga. took the tribute in a different direction. While the song's accompanying images started as standard shots of Osbourne, they eventually evolved into A.I. generated visuals of the rocker posing with the likes of Prince, Tina Turner, Bob Marley, Freddie Mercury, Kurt Cobain, George Michael and Amy Winehouse, all standing on cloudy and celestial backdrops to suggest a heavenly afterlife. The show also featured A.I. videos of Osbourne next to late controversial figures such as Michael Jackson and XXXTentacion. According to Rolling Stone, at a show in Charlotte, N.C. a few days prior, Stewart ended the song, saying, 'Very sad. A lot of those people died 'cause of drugs… I'm still here, though!' Stewart's audience appeared understandably puzzled at the performance, with several of the concertgoers sharing their baffled reactions on social media. On the day of Osbourne's death, Stewart posted on Instagram, stating, 'Bye, bye Ozzy. I'll see you up there— later rather than sooner.' The singer is yet to make a statement regarding the controversial images, as his tour continues across the United States through early October and then heads to Europe. Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week What's Coming to Disney+ in August 2025 What's Coming to Netflix in August 2025
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jesse Metcalfe Regrets Skipping ‘Entourage' Audition: 'I Blew That One'
Although Jesse Metcalfe made his TV heartthrob debut on ABC's Desperate Housewives in 2004, he missed a chance to break out that year on HBO. The actor recently recounted 'auditioning for Adrian Grenier's role' as movie star Vincent Chase in the hit 6x Emmy-winning Doug Ellin series Entourage, which ran for eight seasons from 2004 to 2011 before culminating in a 2015 big screen offshoot. More from Deadline Rom-Com 'You, Always' Wraps Production In Queensland, Stars Adrian Grenier & Jessica De Gouw 'Boris Is Dead': Steven Bauer, Cam Gigandet, Thomas Dekker, Jesse Metcalfe, Martin & Jesse Kove Among Cast Additions To Indie Movie 'The Yogurt Shop Murders' Director On Revisiting The Tragic Case After More Than 30 Years: "It Was Just Such A World Of Darkness" 'I had an audition for Entourage, and I read the pilot episode, and I was like, 'This is stupid,' and I didn't go to the audition,' he admitted to People. 'Obviously, I had no idea what I was talking about,' added Metcalfe. 'That ended up being an iconic show that I absolutely love, and definitely wish I was a part of.' Entourage ultimately starred Grenier as Vincent, a newly-minted Hollywood star who migrates west from Queens, NY with his brother Drama (Kevin Dillon), best friend E (Kevin Connelly) and pal Turtle (Jerry Ferrara). The foursome acclimates to LA life with help from Vincent's agent Ari (Jeremy Piven). The series was a pre-The Studio hit that took frequent shots at the industry with help from a laundry list of Hollywood cameos and guest stars that include Martin Scorsese, EP Mark Wahlberg, Tom Brady, Pharrell Williams, Scarlett Johansson, Matt Damon, Jamie-Lynn Sigler, James Cameron, LeBron James, Mandy Moore, Jessica Alba, Christina Aguilera, Bob Saget, David Arquette, Seth Green, Mike Tyson, Mark Cuban, George Takei, Kelsey Grammer, Liam Neeson, Armie Hammer and Emily Ratajkowski. 'I blew that one,' Metcalfe lamented. 'Sometimes you gotta say no, but that was the wrong one. It taught me that I don't know everything.' The John Tucker Must Die star explained that he's since become 'absolutely' more 'likely to audition' for roles ever since that misjudgment. 'I've been auditioning for what it feels like is everything lately,' said Metcalfe. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Emmys, Oscars, Grammys & More