logo
Does D.C. have the worst traffic? Not so fast.

Does D.C. have the worst traffic? Not so fast.

Washington Post2 days ago
Federal travel data is often used to rank cities on such metrics as 'best for new drivers' and 'most dangerous for going out at night.' Consumer Affairs, an online review platform, last week declared that the District has the worst traffic in the country.
Using surveys collected by the Census Bureau, probe data from the Federal Highway Administration and fatal crash data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the platform ranked cities using a combination of their average daily commute times, average length of daily congestion and annual rate of fatal crashes.
Consumer Affairs isn't the first to call D.C. out on its congestion — D.C. regularly ranks highly, if not always at the top, on 'worst traffic' lists. With more people commuting and returning to in-office work this year, D.C. traffic is trending back toward pre-pandemic levels. But here's why you should take the report's numbers with a grain of salt.
The report says D.C. topped the list of cities with the longest commute times, with the average being 33.4 minutes. The city with the second-longest commute time was Los Angeles, which had an average time of 30.5 minutes.
However, that data is from a 2023 Census Bureau survey. Since the census relies on surveys that take time to compile and analyze, the agency is always a little behind.
In 2023, we also wrote that commutes were miserable, and that people were driving more and often doing so outside the traditional rush hour. Cellphone data analyzed by the University of Maryland found that average travel time between thousands of neighborhoods in D.C., Virginia and Maryland had increased about 20 percent between 2019 and late 2022. The trajectory suggests commute times may be worse now. (Consumer Affairs did not respond to a request for comment on its report.)
The report also used older data on fatal crashes, showing sharp increases in D.C. and New York in 2023. But in both cities, police data indicates that fatal crashes have actually been far lower in 2025.
For congestion, the Consumer Affairs report does use more recent numbers collected from vehicle probes by the Federal Highway Administration from January to March of this year. The District ranks badly on that metric, at 6 hours and 35 minutes a day. Congestion has been trending upward and is now close to its 2019 height of 6 hours and 51 minutes.
Average commute times are also not a perfect representation of traffic, because they don't account for distance. A commute from far away is going to take more time than a closer one, regardless of how many other cars are on the road. That's why cities with large, sprawling suburbs tend to top these lists.
At the time this data was collected, the District (alongside other cities) was seeing a sharp rise in 'super-commuting' — traveling 75 miles or more to get to work, with average travel times of more than two hours. That contributes to a higher average commuting time overall. Cities cited as having less traffic than before, such as Columbus, Ohio, are also seeing their numbers change quickly and dramatically this year as more people work in person.
The data firm INRIX uses in-car technology to track actual travel lengths and speed to and from 'major employment centers within an urban area from surrounding commuting neighborhoods.' Its analysis ranks D.C. in the top 25 cities worldwide for traffic delays as of January, but below eight other major U.S. cities including Boston, Los Angeles and New York.
Consumer Affairs does note that 'congestion is oftentimes a sign of economic prosperity.' The cities that fare best on traffic measures tend to have shrinking populations and struggling economies.
'It's not news that a successful metropolitan region like the D.C. region has a lot of traffic,' said Stewart Schwartz of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, a nonprofit that advocates for denser urban areas with less need to drive. Concentrating future growth near transit, he said, 'is the best way for our region to grow without choking on traffic.'
Congestion pricing, which charges for access to thin out demand, can also improve traffic. New York recently implemented the practice in downtown Manhattan and saw travel times drop significantly; Virginia has engaged in a form of congestion pricing through tolled express lanes.
Finally, in some cases transportation planners are intentionally trying to slow down traffic for safety reasons. The Federal Highway Administration measures free-flow speeds as the 85th percentile of observed speeds without traffic signals and other vehicles on the road. Bike and bus lanes, roundabouts, and speed cameras all can keep vehicles from going at the speed of free-flowing traffic — and all these measures are implemented in parts of the D.C. area.
Every three years, the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, a federally mandated regional planning group, does an in-depth survey of local commute times. It looks at commute length and time, where people are commuting from and to, and how they commute. The most recent data collection period just ended, and the report should be out late this year or early next year. Several hundred thousand surveys were issued, and about 8,000 were returned.
The group's last report, released in 2022, reflected the pandemic shifts to remote work and more car trips taken alone. The commuting times found in that survey are generally higher than the census data — 37 minutes each way, which was a drop from 43 minutes in its 2019 survey. A key difference is that the Census Bureau considers a much larger and more rural area as part of the D.C. region, stretching out to Shenandoah National Park in Virginia and Harpers Ferry in West Virginia.
Anecdotally, Daniel Sheehan of the council said that it is seeing far more interest in its Commuter Connections program, which helps people carpool or take transit to work. 'There are some people here in this region that started three or four years ago, and it's the first time they're regularly going to their office,' he said. What the council doesn't know and hopes to learn from the data is to what extent commuters are taking transit more often because of congestion.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Overturned big rig leaking fuel creates massive traffic backup on 14 Freeway in Agua Dulce
Overturned big rig leaking fuel creates massive traffic backup on 14 Freeway in Agua Dulce

CBS News

time13 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Overturned big rig leaking fuel creates massive traffic backup on 14 Freeway in Agua Dulce

An overturned big rig leaking fuel on the 14 Freeway in Agua Dulce created a massive traffic backup on Sunday. The crash happened just before 5 p.m. on northbound lanes near the Agua Dulce Canyon Road offramp, according to the California Highway Patrol. It's unclear what caused the crash, but as of 8 p.m. there were no reports of arrests. No injuries were reported in the incident. A SigAlert was issued at around 6 p.m., shutting down all northbound lanes until the road could be cleared and hazardous materials teams could respond to investigate the fuel spill. This is a developing story. Check back for details.

Bubba Wallace Refuses To Apologize For His President Trump Comment
Bubba Wallace Refuses To Apologize For His President Trump Comment

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bubba Wallace Refuses To Apologize For His President Trump Comment

Bubba Wallace Refuses To Apologize For His President Trump Comment originally appeared on The Spun. Bubba Wallace is a NASCAR Cup Series race champion. The 23XI Racing driver, who drives the No. 23 Toyota, took home the checkered flag at the Brickyard 400 at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway on Sunday afternoon. Wallace bested Kyle Larson, Denny Hamlin, Ryan Preece and Brad Keselowski on way to his victory on Sunday. Wallace had a one-word reaction to his victory on Sunday, too: "Unbelievable!" It was Wallace's first win in 100 races. His last win came at the Kansas Speedway in 2022. But the streak ended on Sunday evening, taking home the win at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway. We'll have to see if President Trump, who spent the weekend golfing in Scotland, has a comment on Bubba Wallace's victory on Sunday evening. It's probably unlikely. Wallace, after all, has previously made his opinion on President Trump extremely clear. He made his thoughts on President Trump attending the Daytona 500 earlier this year extremely clear. While other NASCAR drivers spoke out in support of President Trump, Wallace made it clear he wasn't a huge fan of it. The 23XI Racing driver said that he "couldn't care less." "We're here to race," Wallace said at the Daytona 500. "Not for the show." President Trump had previously called out Wallace following the garage noose incident in 2020. Wallace, meanwhile, chose the high road in response. "Always deal with the hate being thrown at you with LOVE!... Love should come naturally as people are TAUGHT to hate. Even when it's HATE from the POTUS," he said. While much of the sports world is congratulating Bubba Wallace on his win on Sunday evening, it's unlikely that he'll be receiving a message from the President of the United States. Bubba Wallace Refuses To Apologize For His President Trump Comment first appeared on The Spun on Jul 27, 2025 This story was originally reported by The Spun on Jul 27, 2025, where it first appeared.

2026 Toyota RAV4 Vs. 2026 Honda CR-V: 5 Major Differences
2026 Toyota RAV4 Vs. 2026 Honda CR-V: 5 Major Differences

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

2026 Toyota RAV4 Vs. 2026 Honda CR-V: 5 Major Differences

2026 Toyota RAV4 Vs. 2026 Honda CR-V: 5 Major Differences originally appeared on Autoblog. The compact crossover war is about to heat up The immensely popular compact crossover segment has seen a lot of action in recent months. Toyota unveiled the all-new RAV4 and Mazda finally showed us the all-new CX-5. We've already compared these two, but the RAV4's biggest competitor on the sales charts doesn't come from Mazda—it comes from Honda with the CR-V. Ahead of the RAV4's arrival, let's take a look at the most significant differences between it and the CR-V.1. Honda Plays It Safe, Toyota Looks Sharper View the 4 images of this gallery on the original article The CR-V has never been an excitingly styled crossover, not that it needs to be. Many buyers appreciate neat, inoffensive styling, and the latest CR-V looks good without being polarizing in any way. Models like the Sport Hybrid and TrailSport Hybrid do appeal more with their larger wheels and sportier details, though. Toyota has taken a bolder approach with the RAV4. Its wraparound headlights and tall hood look aggressive, while options like a black roof and more visual distinction between the trims work well. The GR Sport, for instance, gets a functional Matrix grille and front/rear wing-type spoilers. At 184.8 inches in length, the CR-V is longer than the RAV4 (up to 181.8 inches), although the top RAV4 trims are marginally wider and most are taller than the Honda. Both these SUVs look good, but we'd give the edge to the newer RAV4. 2. RAV4 Goes Hybrid-Only, Honda Still Offers Gas-Only Power Perhaps the biggest difference between the two is that the CR-V still comes with a non-hybrid powertrain as standard. It's a 1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine with 190 horsepower and 179 lb-ft of torque, and it directs power to the front or all four wheels. Above this is a CR-V Hybrid with 204 hp combined and an EPA rating of up to 40 mpg combined. The RAV4 range now starts with a conventional hybrid using a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine. It produces 226 hp with FWD or 236 hp with AWD, so it's comfortably more powerful than the base CR-V. The big news is the upgraded plug-in hybrid RAV4, which also uses a 2.5-liter four-pot but now makes 320 hp. Not only is the RAV4 PHEV quicker than any CR-V, but it can be driven for up to 50 miles on electric power alone. In terms of performance, it looks like an easy win for the 2026 RAV4. 3. Only The CR-V Has A Plug-In Hydrogen Model View the 3 images of this gallery on the original article The CR-V does have one trick up its sleeve and it comes in the form of the e:FCEV derivative, or what Honda calls America's first plug-in hydrogen fuel cell EV. This CR-V is equipped with an electric motor producing 174 hp and 229 lb-ft of torque. It has a much smaller battery than a normal EV at 17.1 kWh, but that's because there are two hydrogen tanks, giving this CR-V a range of up to 270 miles. It also takes very little time to refill the hydrogen tanks, a distinct advantage over a normal EV. Unfortunately, the CR-V e:FCEV is only sold in California, and while it's a great showcase for hydrogen powertrains, it's not available widely enough to give the CR-V range a significant advantage over the RAV4, which has no equivalent powertrain. 4. The RAV4 Can Tow More If you need to do any serious towing, you'll need a pickup truck or a bigger SUV. However, there's a clear leader here in terms of towing. The CR-V can tow up to 1,000 lbs in hybrid guise or 1,500 lbs for the non-hybrid model. For all RAV4 FWD variants and the LE AWD, the towing capacity is 1,750 lbs. On several AWD models, that rises significantly to 3,500 lbs. Items like pop-up campers, single-horse trailers, and larger U-Haul trailers will all benefit from the superior towing capacity of the Toyota. 5. Bigger Displays In RAV4 View the 4 images of this gallery on the original article Few things demonstrate the gap in age between two similar vehicles as well as the infotainment interfaces. While the Honda is still competitive in this regard, the new RAV4 has already moved the game along. In the CR-V, all models get a nine-inch touchscreen. A seven-inch TFT meter display is equipped to lower trims, while pricier ones have a 10.2-inch fully digital instrument cluster. In the new RAV4, a 10.5-inch touchscreen and 12.3-inch digital gauge cluster are standard, and you can upgrade to a larger 12.9-inch touchscreen, have wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, but the base sound system in the Toyota has six speakers, as opposed to the Honda's four. A nine-speaker JBL sound system is available for the RAV4, while the top CR-V trim has a 12-speaker sound system. The 2026 RAV4 has Toyota's latest Arene software, which includes a more responsive voice assistant. Honda, meanwhile, offers Google built-in, but only for the top CR-V trim. Once we've driven the RAV4, we can make a final call on whether its fresh infotainment system is actually easier to use than the Honda's. Final Thoughts While we expect the CR-V to remain popular when the RAV4 arrives later this year, the Toyota appears to have a clear edge in the powertrain department. Whether you're after efficient electric-only driving, maximum performance, or decent towing, the RAV4 leads in all areas. Toyota has also given the RAV4 an attractive design update, inside and out, and it includes a rugged Woodland trim to match the CR-V TrailSport. Not reflected in this on-paper comparison are the CR-V's excellent road manners and spacious cabin, but we can only cast judgment on how they match up once the RAV4 arrives. Pricing will also play a crucial role, but we don't know how much the 2026 RAV4 will cost yet, and the Honda starts at $30,920. The Honda CR-V will undoubtedly have its hands full when the new RAV4 arrives. 2026 Toyota RAV4 Vs. 2026 Honda CR-V: 5 Major Differences first appeared on Autoblog on Jul 27, 2025 This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Jul 27, 2025, where it first appeared.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store