Before hashtags and headlines: Students who fought for Mattoo
Priyadarshini Mattoo
barely rings a bell, but for those who know, it echoes with pain, injustice, and a haunting silence. Her case was not just about a brutal crime — it was about a nation's collective heartbreak.
It was the sheer emotions of many that fuelled the long, relentless battle for justice.
Priyadarshini was just 25 when she was found strangled in her home in 1996. A decade later, in 2006, a group of students — many still in school or college — came together to lead the 'Justice for Priyadarshini' campaign. They rallied together, knocked on doors, held vigils and demanded answers. They may not have known Priyadarshini personally, but her story felt personal. Their movement reignited public memory, and under growing pressure,
Delhi High Court
took up the case for day-to-day hearings.
"The brutality of the case sparked national outrage. But over the years, that outrage faded — overshadowed by new headlines and collective forgetting," said Vivek Raina, who was part of the campaign.
You Can Also Check:
Delhi AQI
|
Weather in Delhi
|
Bank Holidays in Delhi
|
Public Holidays in Delhi
Another member was Aditya Razdan, now working with an MNC, who still remembers the weight of the Mattoo family's pain. "They were Kashmiri Pandits, displaced migrants who built their lives back from scratch. They had no power, no influence.
But they believed in the system. They got their daughter into law school, thinking education would empower her. And then this happened. In her own home. In the capital."
For Dhruv Suri, then a law student and now a lawyer, the memory of Priyadarshini's father, Chaman Lal Mattoo, remains vivid. "His determination was the only reason the case stayed alive. Even when he was exhausted, he never gave up. He believed the judicial system existed for the common man.
He used to say, 'It must deliver justice.' But when the trial court acquitted the accused, despite acknowledging his likely guilt, he was devastated.
"
Despite this, Mattoo never stepped away. "Even in his old age, he would show up for every hearing, speak to the media, and meet activists like us," said Suri. "The public support gave him hope. People came out on the streets, and journalists ensured his voice was heard."
That year, HC overturned the trial court's acquittal and convicted Santosh Singh of rape and murder. A few months later, it handed down a death sentence. "That judgment mattered," said Raina. "It showed justice could be delayed but not denied. But then came the twist."
In 2010, Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment. "We were heartbroken," said Suri. "We connected with the family… it felt like justice slipped again.
Still, we took some comfort in the fact that a conviction was upheld."
Raina remembers meeting Priyadarshini's father once toward the end. "He was frail. His pain was unmistakable. I wasn't married back then. Now I have a daughter. Now I understand his desperation, his helplessness… What justice did he really get?"
Priyadarshini's family slowly withered away in the long, painful fight for justice. Her mother died first, then her father — without getting closure.
Her siblings, perhaps worn down by grief, remained distant from the struggle.
What remains of Priyadarshini today is not just a name in a legal file, but the memories her father clung to. Suri recalls how he always carried her photos, spoke of her smile, her dreams. "Her legacy was his only reason to live. And now he's gone too."
Aditya Razdan also met Mattoo during those years. "He barely spoke. He was just… broken. The system failed him."
As talk of the convict's potential release resurfaces, those who once led the charge are watching in disbelief. "Ask an 18-year-old today, and they probably haven't heard of Priyadarshini," said Raina. "What message are we sending if he walks free?"
Suri added, "He wasn't some misguided youth. He was a law student, the son of an influential man. What are we telling society — that such a person gets another shot at life while the girl he killed gets forgotten?"
Razdan said Priyadarshini's father feared this exact moment. "He knew once he was gone, the case would slowly be forgotten. And here we are."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘How do we earn a living?': On strike, Karkardooma Court lawyers oppose shifting of digital courts
Protesting the decision to shift the judges of 34 digital NI Act (Negotiable Instruments Act) courtrooms that hear cheque bounce cases from six court complexes in Delhi to the Rouse Avenue court complex, lawyers at the Karkardooma Court complex decided to abstain from work for a fifth day straight on Friday. The lawyers have been on a hunger strike for the last two days. 'First, our labour courts were shifted, now our cheque bounce courts have been shifted…we are not fancy lawyers. How do we earn a living?' advocate V K Singh, president of the Shahdara Bar Association (SBA), told The Indian Express. 'All the lawyers in our courts are people residing in the Trans Yamuna (areas). Some of us barely get Rs 20-30,000 for an entire case. Many of us are dependent on cheque bounce cases. Is this justice at your doorstep? Things were running smoothly… but now we are all anxious,' Singh said. Of the 34 courtrooms, nine are from Dwarka, seven from Tis Hazari, six from Saket, five from Karkardooma Court, four from Rohini, and three from Patiala House Court. While the judges of the respective courtrooms will be shifted to Rouse Avenue Court, the court staff (readers, ahlmads and stenographers) will continue to operate from their respective districts. The rooms for the 34 judges have been allocated on the seventh floor of the Rouse Avenue court complex, which is situated near the ITO Metro station in Central Delhi. Earlier, the coordination committee of all district court bar associations had decided to abstain from work. On June 7, however, they called off their strike after the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court assured them in a meeting that all digital courts would function strictly as digital platforms only and that all the remaining proceedings and judicial work would be conducted exclusively in the regular local courts. In a May 30 notification, the Delhi High Court, which is behind the move, cited 'optimal utilisation of available infrastructure and resources' and 'inadequate space' to justify the shift of digital cheque bounce courts. 'The remaining arrangement, including support staff deployment and recording of evidence from the respective District Court Complexes, shall continue as per the previous directions/practice until adequate and permanent space is made available in the District Courts concerned to which these Digital NI Act Courts ultimately belong,' the notification dated May 30 read. 'However, these Courts shall continue to be under the administrative control /supervision/ jurisdiction of the districts concerned to which these courts belong. The readers, ahlmads, and judicial records of these Digital NI Act Courts would also continue to function from their original districts so as to avoid any inconvenience to the litigants, lawyers, and stakeholders,' the notification added. This notification was not enough to quell the anxiety of the lawyers in Northeast Delhi's Karkardooma Courts. 'Shifting of digital courts for lack of infrastructure violates the territorial jurisdiction jurisprudence,' said advocate Paras Jain, who practises in Karkardooma Court. 'If any litigant or advocate wants to report anything of emergent nature physically to the judge, they will not be able to communicate this…there is still confusion as to how evidence will be recorded before the judge sitting at Rouse Avenue Court,' he added. 'Lack of virtual facilities also creates gaps between the judges and litigants.' In a notice dated July 4, the lawyers of SBA decided to abstain from work on Saturday. 'It has been unanimously resolved by the Executive Committee of Shahdara Association (Regd.)., to abstain from work on 04.07.2025 in Karkardooma Courts, Delhi,' the notice read. 'It is further resolved that the Executive Committee of Shahdara Bar Association (Regd)., and its members shall continue the Hunger Strike from 05.07.2025 near Facilitation Center as a mark of protest against shifting of Digital Court, N.I. Act,' it added. 'Hence, all lawyers are requested to Co-operate & not to appear before any court either physically or virtually. In case any lawyer is found appearing physically or virtually in any court strict action shall be initiated against him/her,' the notice stated with a request urging judges to cooperate and not pass any adverse orders. Of the 15 lakh pending cases—2 lakh civil and 13 lakh criminal—across the capital's lower courts, 4.5 lakh, or over 30 per cent, are cheque bounce claims.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
SC to decide validity of Madras HC stay on Tamil Nadu law on University VC appointments
NEW DELHI: The on Friday entertained Tamil Nadu's petition questioning reasonableness of Madras HC's order staying its legislation, which gave the state government, instead of the governor, the power to appoint University vice-chancellors, but refused M K Stalin government's plea for suspending the HC order to re-operationalize the law. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now TN fielded a team of senior advocates – A M Singhvi, Rakesh Dwivedi and P Wilson – to argue that the HC had without considering the urgency to appoint vice-chancellors to universities, recommendations to which effect has been put in cold-storage by the Governor, stayed the legislation. The law giving state govt the power to appoint VCs to universities was stayed along with nine other laws, Bills for which were reserved for the President's consideration by the governor but were regarded as deemed to have been approved by President in a controversial unprecedented ruling by a two-judge SC bench on Apr 8. Three days after the 'deemed to have been approved' ruling by the SC, which now is subject to a Constitution bench's opinion on a Presidential Reference questioning the use of Article 142 power of the SC to virtually obliterate roles assigned by the Constitution to President and Governors on Bills passed by Assemblies, the TN govt had notified the nine bills as laws. The bench refused to stay the HC order but asked the UGC and the public interest litigation petitioner before the HC to respond to TN's petition in four weeks. For UGC, solicitor general Tushar Mehta said the law is palpably contrary to the UGC Regulations which empower only governors to appoint VCs to the universities. When the senior advocates pleaded that they would argue before the HC for vacation of the stay, Mehta said that in that case the TN must withdraw its petition seeking transfer of the PIL from Madras HC to the SC. 'The state cannot have both options open at the same time and be permitted to argue before the HC that the SC is considering transfer of the PIL to itself,' he said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Wilson sought expunging of certain 'harsh remarks' against him by the HC merely because he was pointing out the SC's 2-J bench order. Justices Narasimha and Mahadevan said this request would be considered by the SC during the final hearing on the TN's petition. One of the Acts, notified on Apr 11 by the state related to vesting in the state govt the powers of the Governor, as Chancellor, to appoint vice-chancellors of universities in the state. A vacation bench of the HC on May 21 granted stay on this amending provision, holding that UGC Regulations, 2018, would prevail over the state legislation by virtue of doctrine of repugnancy. The state said it had raised the objection to the delay in filing of the PIL but the division bench of the HC 'did not even call for an explanation from the Registry of the HC or the Petitioner but proceeded to hear the case in a tearing hurry.' The HC 'showed undue haste', did not even give a week's time to the state to file its counter affidavit, and passed the stay order 'for extraneous reasons', it said, adding that the impugned order is replete with personal attacks on the senior counsel who appeared for the state.
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
NGT: Better river flow mgmt required to prevent fish kills
Kochi: The (NGT) has stated that preventing future fish kills requires better management of river flow, strict industrial waste regulation and control of any kind of pollution from industrial sources. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Disposing of a batch of petitions, including three suo motu cases filed by the principal bench and the southern bench on the mass fish kill that occurred downstream of the Periyar River on May 21-22, 2024, it directed the Kerala state pollution control board (KSPCB) to submit all the detailed reports filed before the bench to the Kerala High Court. "Since the High Court of Kerala is already seized of the matter, which addresses the same issues involved in the Original Applications (OA) pending before us, it would be appropriate to leave it to the decision of the HC to pass appropriate orders," the bench said. The PCB, in its report to the NGT, stated that a HC-appointed committee of officials, comprising (i) the secretary, Directorate of Environment and Climate Change, (ii) the regional director, Central Pollution Control Board, Bangalore, and (iii) the chairman, PCB, along with the amicus curiae, visited all the affected places and the petitioners and submitted a report. The committee's report before the NGT recommended curbing the Periyar pollution in two folds. One set of recommendations was directed to the departments concerned, namely the industries department, irrigation department and PCB. Remediation of Kuzhikandam Thodu has to be initiated as per the detailed project report (DPR) prepared and recommended for administrative sanction, the bench said. The NGT noted that the Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (Kufos), which is a party respondent in all the above petitions, constituted an expert committee to prepare a report on the fish kill incident in the Periyar River and downstream of Pathalam regulator bridge. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The expert committee also provided a report with recommendations, including an AI-assisted system for displaying and alerting stakeholders downstream before opening the shutters. These are also to be submitted before the HC along with all the other reports filed in the case. The tribunal stated that since the HC is already seized of the matter and further orders are awaited, based on the recommendations given by the committee to the industries situated in the Eloor–Edayar Industrial area and the various departments, the bench was disposing of the petitions.
