Concerns over government spending on outdated driving licence printing machine
Image: SUPPLIED
The Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) said it is concerned at how the government continues to spend millions of Rands maintaining its only driving licence card printing machine and the costs to catch up with backlogs.
The organisation said this is concerning because the government has been talking obtaining about a new licence card machine for the past 10 years.
This was after Transport Minister, Barbara Creecy, revealed that the machine had been out of service for 38 days since April 1, resulting in a backlog of 733,000 licence cards.
Creecy disclosed this in response to a written parliamentary question from Rise Mzansi leader, Songezo Zibi.
Zibi asked how many times the machine had broken down in the past three financial years, including since the start of the 2025/26 financial year.
He also wanted to know how much had been spent on repairs during this period and how much overtime had been paid to employees due to lost printing time as a result of the breakdowns.
Creecy revealed that the machine was broken for 26 days in the 2022/23 financial year. In 2023/24 it was broken for 48 days. It was also broken for 17 days in 2024/25.
The department paid R9,267,862 for the repair and maintenance in 2022/23. It paid R1,651,772 in 2023/24, R544,747 in 2024/25, and R624,988 so far, totaling R12,089,370,64.
The department also had to fork out R4.4 million for overtime payments between the 2022/23 and 2024/25 financial years.
Creecy said it takes four people to operate the machine.
She said she has directed that a declaratory order be sought from a competent court on the tender to acquire a new machine, in order to ensure that no further irregular expenditure occurs.
In March, Creecy announced that she had instructed her department to lodge a High Court application for a declaratory order regarding the licence machine tender -awarded to Idemia and Security South Africa.
Her decision was influenced by the findings from the Auditor-General (AG) report, which identified instances of non-compliance with the required procurement procedures.
Outa's chief executive officer, Wayne Duvenage, said the organisation was also concerned by the length of time it takes for the department to get the court to nullify the contract - riddled with irregularities and potential corruption.
'Why does it take so long to get this process done?' he asked.
'Lots of money spent on maintaining and overtime costs to catch up with backlogs. This is very concerning. The government has been talking about a new driving licence card machine for about 10 years now, with multiple tenders awarded and cancelled for the past 5 years and still, we are nowhere near resolving this issue. Incompetence and political interference at its best,' Duvenage said.
Department of Transport spokesperson, Collen Msibi did not respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
IRR warns Parliament against expropriating SARB
The Institute of Race Relations has made written and oral submissions to Parliament in opposition to the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) Amendment Bill. The Bill, tabled by Economic Freedom Fighters leader Julius Malema in 2018, is moving forward to a committee vote on 'desirability'. The IRR warned that it is undesirable, uneconomical, unfunded, unconsidered, and unconstitutional. To start, the Bill expropriates the shareholders of the SARB without compensation, which is a direct violation of constitutionally protected property rights. The shares are worth an estimated R20 million, so no one can seriously claim that the Bill would expropriate these shares without compensation to save the fisc money. Rather, the real purpose of such an exercise is to try to set a precedent that any shares in the country can be expropriated without compensation, including trillions of rands worth of stock and bond securities that depend on SARB's prudent monetary management. So extreme is the Bill's threat of expropriation without compensation that even the government and members of the ANC have voiced public opposition to it. Treasury official Christopher Axelson, representing the government, spoke out at length in opposition to this danger and other dangerous aspects of the Bill before Parliament. Says IRR Fellow Gabriel Crouse: 'The effort to expropriate rural landowners in the hinterland is death to property rights by a thousand cuts. Expropriating SARB shareholders without compensation poses the same threat, only faster, like an atom bomb.' SARB's 802 shareholders make very little money from those shares, with dividends limited to R1,000 per annum, but do get to elect seven of the SARB's 15 directors. This decentralised, minority input provides a public-private engagement mechanism that has helped implement the 'primary object' of the SARB, which is 'to protect the value of the currency', according to the Constitution. SARB is arguably the most successful government institution at hitting its target. Over the last quarter of a century, it has largely succeeded in maintaining inflation within the 3% - 6% target range that was nominated for it by the then-minister of finance back in 2000. Most of South Africa's thousands of other organs of state have, by stark contrast, been riddled with ongoing state capture, often taking them well beyond the point of bankruptcy. Most organisations where the state is the 'sole shareholder' are so badly off that President Cyril Ramaphosa's first, second, and third presidential terms have included repeated calls for 'reform' through 'public-private partnerships' that increase the role of the private sector. So why, in this local environment, would anyone want to make the same overburdened state the 'sole shareholder' of one of the only bastions of excellence, namely SARB? Malema, the Bill's sponsor, leaves no room for mystery about it. Malema openly calls for total nationalisation of the land, banks, and mines, which would be significantly easier if the SARB were captured, and forced to abandon its mandate temporarily by stocking rampant inflation. That sudden loosening of monetary policy would produce what luminary SARB Governor Lesetja Kganyago has warned would be a 'deep depression'. It would also create enough chaos to facilitate a deeper round of state capture. Crouse concludes: 'This is a test for the GNU. The MK, EFF, and Action SA signalled support for the Bill in Parliament. If the ANC joins those parties in keeping the Bill alive to spite its investment-friendly GNU partners, this will damage government unity. More importantly, it dangles a threat over everyone's prospects, and the lifesavings of those who have any.' Institute of Race Relations I Joburg
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
IRR warns Parliament against expropriating SARB
So extreme is the Bill's threat of expropriation without compensation that even the government and members of the ANC have voiced public opposition to it. The Institute of Race Relations has made written and oral submissions to Parliament in opposition to the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) Amendment Bill. The Bill, tabled by Economic Freedom Fighters leader Julius Malema in 2018, is moving forward to a committee vote on 'desirability'. The IRR warned that it is undesirable, uneconomical, unfunded, unconsidered, and unconstitutional. To start, the Bill expropriates the shareholders of the SARB without compensation, which is a direct violation of constitutionally protected property rights. The shares are worth an estimated R20 million, so no one can seriously claim that the Bill would expropriate these shares without compensation to save the fisc money. Rather, the real purpose of such an exercise is to try to set a precedent that any shares in the country can be expropriated without compensation, including trillions of rands worth of stock and bond securities that depend on SARB's prudent monetary management. So extreme is the Bill's threat of expropriation without compensation that even the government and members of the ANC have voiced public opposition to it. Treasury official Christopher Axelson, representing the government, spoke out at length in opposition to this danger and other dangerous aspects of the Bill before Parliament. Says IRR Fellow Gabriel Crouse: 'The effort to expropriate rural landowners in the hinterland is death to property rights by a thousand cuts. Expropriating SARB shareholders without compensation poses the same threat, only faster, like an atom bomb.' SARB's 802 shareholders make very little money from those shares, with dividends limited to R1,000 per annum, but do get to elect seven of the SARB's 15 directors. This decentralised, minority input provides a public-private engagement mechanism that has helped implement the 'primary object' of the SARB, which is 'to protect the value of the currency', according to the Constitution. SARB is arguably the most successful government institution at hitting its target. Over the last quarter of a century, it has largely succeeded in maintaining inflation within the 3% - 6% target range that was nominated for it by the then-minister of finance back in 2000. Most of South Africa's thousands of other organs of state have, by stark contrast, been riddled with ongoing state capture, often taking them well beyond the point of bankruptcy. Most organisations where the state is the 'sole shareholder' are so badly off that President Cyril Ramaphosa's first, second, and third presidential terms have included repeated calls for 'reform' through 'public-private partnerships' that increase the role of the private sector. So why, in this local environment, would anyone want to make the same overburdened state the 'sole shareholder' of one of the only bastions of excellence, namely SARB? Malema, the Bill's sponsor, leaves no room for mystery about it. Malema openly calls for total nationalisation of the land, banks, and mines, which would be significantly easier if the SARB were captured, and forced to abandon its mandate temporarily by stocking rampant inflation. That sudden loosening of monetary policy would produce what luminary SARB Governor Lesetja Kganyago has warned would be a 'deep depression'. It would also create enough chaos to facilitate a deeper round of state capture. Crouse concludes: 'This is a test for the GNU. The MK, EFF, and Action SA signalled support for the Bill in Parliament. If the ANC joins those parties in keeping the Bill alive to spite its investment-friendly GNU partners, this will damage government unity. More importantly, it dangles a threat over everyone's prospects, and the lifesavings of those who have any.' Institute of Race Relations I Joburg
The Citizen
8 hours ago
- The Citizen
Sapref unveils ambitious plans after R1 sale
THE Central Energy Fund (CEF), which bought South Africa's biggest former oil refinery, Sapref, for just R1 last year, said it plans to expand the refinery's capacity as part of a broader energy transition strategy. CEF is a government-owned company under the Department of Mineral Resources. Also read: eThekwini Municipality hopes to see Sapref revived Sapref, located in Prospecton, was previously owned by BP South Africa and Shell South Africa. At its peak before the 2022 floods, it produced 180 000 barrels of fuel per day, about 35% of the country's refining capacity. After it stopped production and shifted to importing fuel, the facility has handled about 70% of South Africa's petroleum fuel supply. Speaking at a recent conference in Cape Town, CEF's acting group CEO, Dr Tshepo Mokoka, said the need to increase capacity comes amid the country's rising demand for fuel. He said CEF aims to increase capacity to between 400 000 and 600 000 barrels per day. 'We want to address demand by processing the hydrocarbons that we have in South Africa as well as those in neighbouring countries,' said Mokoka. Hydrocarbons are organic compounds found in fossil fuels like crude oil, natural gas, and coal. Hydrocarbons are known for their combustibility, making them a primary energy source. Mokoka added that the CEF is striking a balance between renewable energy and hydrocarbons, which aligns government's broader strategy to implement a just energy transition from fossil to renewable energy. A University of South Africa professor, however, has questioned the R1 sale of Sapref to the government, saying it could have been designed for Sapref to evade its social and environmental liabilities. Llewellyn Leonard, of the university's Environmental Science Department, said decommissioning the refinery would have meant that Sapref was liable for the costs of restoring the site to its original state. 'Selling the refinery to the South African government, instead of decommissioning it, suggests that Sapref will not be held accountable for historical environmental liabilities and social injustices,' said Leonard. Over the years, Sapref was at loggerheads with nearby communities over air pollution and oil pipeline leaks. The acquisition of Sapref by CEF was approved by the Competition Commission in September 2024. For more South Coast Sun news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. You can also check out our videos on our YouTube channel or follow us on TikTok. Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and get news delivered straight to your inbox. Do you have more information pertaining to this story? Feel free to let us know by commenting on our Facebook page or you can contact our newsroom on 031 903 2341 and speak to a journalist. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
