France reaffirms determination to recognize State of Palestine
Ammon News - French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot stated has affirmed that France is "determined to recognize the State of Palestine," emphasizing the urgent need for international action in light of the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza.
In an interview with France's LCI news channel, Barrot condemned the killing of hundreds of Palestinian aid seekers by Israeli forces in Gaza, calling it "a disgrace and an affront to human dignity."
According to Barrot, at least 500 Palestinians were killed and around 4,000 injured in May alone while trying to access food aid in the besieged Strip. He affirmed that both France and the European Union are ready to support safe and fair food distribution efforts in Gaza.
Barrot sharply criticized Israel's current approach, saying that, outside the oversight of the United Nations and international organizations, Israeli forces—supported by the United States—have carried out a limited aid distribution plan since May 27, during which soldiers have reportedly opened fire on Palestinians waiting for food. He noted that this tactic effectively forces civilians to choose between 'starvation or being shot.'
Medical sources report that since May 27, at least 549 Palestinians have been killed and more than 4,066 injured while attempting to collect humanitarian aid near distribution points.
"There is no justification for the continued Israeli attacks on Gaza," Barrot said. "We are committed to recognizing the State of Palestine, and this will happen as part of a joint initiative that encourages all parties to create the necessary conditions for the establishment of that state."
Barrot's remarks come amid a growing wave of international support for Palestinian statehood. On May 22, 2024, Norway, Ireland, and Spain officially announced their recognition of the State of Palestine, effective May 28. Prior to this, eight European Union member states—including Sweden, Poland, and Hungary—had already extended formal recognition.
To date, 149 out of 193 United Nations member states officially recognize the State of Palestine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ammon
an hour ago
- Ammon
Oil eases on expectations of more OPEC+ supply, tariff fears
Ammon News - Oil prices edged down on Tuesday, weighed by expectations of an OPEC+ output hike in August and concerns of an economic slowdown driven by prospects of higher U.S. tariffs. Brent crude fell 30 cents, or 0.5%, to $66.44 a barrel by 0430 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude edged lower 33 cents, or 0.5%, to $64.78 a barrel. "The market is now concerned that the OPEC+ alliance will continue with its accelerated rate of output increases," ANZ senior commodity strategist Daniel Hynes said in a note. Four OPEC+ sources told Reuters last week that the group plans to raise output by 411,000 barrels per day in August, following similar hikes in May, June, and July. If approved, this would bring OPEC+'s total supply increase for the year to 1.78 million bpd, equivalent to more than 1.5% of global oil demand. OPEC and its allies including Russia, together known as OPEC+, will meet on July 6. A 12-day war that started with Israel targeting Iran's nuclear facilities on June 13 pushed up Brent prices. They surged above $80 a barrel after the U.S. bombed Iran's nuclear facilities and then slumped to $67 after Trump announced an Iran-Israel ceasefire. Reuters
Ammon
2 hours ago
- Ammon
Al-Abbadi Deconstructs the Concept of 'Semitism' and Replaces It with the 'Thamudic-Arabic-Jordanian Identity'
Ammon News - In a bold and unconventional historical and scientific endeavor, Jordanian thinker and historian Dr. Ahmad Oweidi Al-Abbadi presents a profound critical reassessment of the concept of 'Semitism' in his newly released book 'The Nabataean Kingdom of Jordan (500 B.C. – 130 A.D.)'. In it, he proposes replacing the fabricated Orientalist term with a more accurate and historically grounded identity: the 'Thamudic–Arabic–Jordanian'. In the introduction to his book, Dr. Al-Abbadi examines the origins of the term 'Semitic,' explaining that it emerged from European Orientalist discourse when the German scholar August Ludwig Schlözer coined it in 1781. Schlözer based his classification on biblical narratives, particularly the division of the sons of Noah—Shem, Ham, and Japheth—despite this classification having no basis in the Qur'an, epigraphy, or historical anthropology. Al-Abbadi describes this as a mythical linguistic-ethnic fabrication, inconsistent with the Qur'anic account, which mentions only one son of Noah who disbelieved and drowned in the flood, as in the verse: "And Noah called out to his son, who had kept himself apart, 'O my son, come aboard with us and do not be with the disbelievers!'... But he was among the drowned." [Hud: 42–43]. Dr. Al-Abbadi poses a provocative and essential question: 'How is it that the biblical narrative is exalted and granted taxonomic authority over human origins and languages, while the Qur'anic text—which never once refers to the three sons of Noah—is neglected? Is this not a methodological rupture that demands a thorough reevaluation of the foundations we often accept without scrutiny?' He further argues that the concept of "Semitism" has been deliberately used as a linguistic smokescreen to support colonial agendas, particularly the justification of the Zionist entity's existence as a supposed 'natural return' to the ancestral land of the so-called 'Semitic peoples'—a claim devoid of scientific, linguistic, or scriptural credibility. As an alternative, Dr. Al-Abbadi offers a rigorously substantiated and evidence-based identity: the Thamudic–Arabic–Jordanian civilization, grounded in archaeological findings, epigraphic records, and the environmental geography of the region. He asserts that this identity better represents the peoples of the region—the Thamud, Edomites, Moabites, Ammonites, Nabataeans, Lihyanites, Safaites, Qedarites, Bashanites, and the people of the forgotten Jordanian Kingdom of Perea—all of whom contributed to the development of the Arabic language through local inscriptions and scripts. Al-Abbadi emphasizes that the land of Jordan was historically home to the people of Thamud, memorialized in the Qur'an in the verse: 'And [with] Thamud, who carved out the rocks in the valley.' [Al-Fajr: 9]. He points to their inscriptions and architectural remains in Tayma, Al-Hijr, Al-'Ula, Madain Salih, and the eastern mountains of Jordan, all of which serve as testimony to a once-thriving Arab civilization. Contrary to colonial narratives, which portray early Arabs as mere nomads, these findings reveal their role as city builders and cultural pioneers. In a detailed historical context, Al-Abbadi reconstructs the development of the Arabic language, clarifying that what is now known as the Arabic script is not a continuation of the fictitious 'Semitic' model, but rather the result of organic linguistic evolution through the Thamudic, Nabataean, and Safaitic scripts that originated in the heart of ancient Jordan. He calls for a reclassification of the Arabic script to reflect its authentic local roots rather than its association with misleading terminologies. Dr. Al-Abbadi concludes with an earnest appeal to Arab and Islamic research institutions to rebuild historical and linguistic consciousness on the basis of solid evidence—from the Qur'anic text to field inscriptions and scientific analysis—rather than relying on inherited biblical tales authored in eras of political and religious captivity. It is worth noting that 'The Nabataean Kingdom of Jordan' stands as one of the most significant intellectual publications of the past decade. It masterfully bridges Jordanian national identity with its deep linguistic and civilizational roots, restoring dignity to long-neglected local civilizations—from Thamud to the Nabataeans, from Ammon to Petra—and challenging dominant global narratives that have historically marginalized the true Arab contributions to human heritage.
Ammon
2 hours ago
- Ammon
What happened in the Middle East is a play or a remedy for the situation
Eng. Mohannad Abbas Haddadin This month, the world witnessed a regional war in the Middle East that almost brought the region to the unknown, as it began with a sudden attack by Israel on Iran coordinated by the United States in light of negotiations that were being held at the table between the United States and Iran, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu had convinced US President Trump of this strike, which will lead to the collapse of the Iranian military system, so that Iran would then go to the US round of negotiations surrendering to all demands, namely the destruction of nuclear facilities and the ballistic missile program, but things were not as Israel had planned, even without an alternative plan, as Iran woke up from that the strike began with an exhausted ballistic missile attack Israeli defenses during the 12 days, until Israel appealed to the United States as a result of the ferocity of the Iranian strikes and their increasing intensity day by day and the loss achieved, not to mention the penetration of Israeli interceptors intercepting Iranian ballistic missiles, which estimated the maximum period of time a week to run out, the mission was not achieved by Israel, the most important of which was the elimination of Iranian nuclear facilities, which necessitated the intervention of the United States. The United States most likely held hidden consultations with the Iranians and Russians before the intervention, because the message from Iran reached the United States that if it interferes, All US interests in the Middle East Economic and military region will be jeopardized, and this means the United States will enter into a long war with Iran, and everyone will lose in that war, especially the United States, as all its military bases in the region will be targeted and two major Straits will be closed, the Strait of Hormuz and the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, and this will pose great challenges to US President Trump, and it has become a nightmare that he cannot get out of, so what will he do under the involvement of Netanyahu for him. There is always the military, political and media front, the military front will lose everyone, especially since Iran has a ballistic missile force, and on the political front, how Will Trump save face for the United States, especially since it pledged to defend Israel, and what about the Western media and its criticism, as the specter of the Russian-Ukrainian war still haunts the US people. Here it was necessary to resort to a play in the language of the peoples or an undeclared agreement in the language of the countries, where the United States, apparently in coordination with Russia and Iran, carried out a strike on the three nuclear reactors one day in advance, and then Iran responds to this strike, and then that war is ended, and back to square one. To assess the situation for Iran, it considered itself victorious because its nuclear reactors were not destroyed in such a way as to prevent it from continuing enrichment, as all the advanced IR6 reactors and centrifuges are all inside the real reactors under the mountains at depths ranging from 100 to 400 meters, what was bombed with 30 tons of GBU-57 B2 bombers on the three reactors and 30 Tomahawk missiles destroyed the old surface reactors and the United States needs weeks of successive strikes to destroy those reactors in addition, Iran managed to smuggle 400 kg of enriched uranium, the enrichment rate of which reached 60%, not to mention that it was Iran that ended the war on Israel with its latest painful blow, in addition to hitting the US base in Qatar. As for the United States, US President Trump came out on the media as a hero of this war by stopping it with a knockout blow by destroying the three Iranian reactors, Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow, and that he restored the Iranian nuclear program back decades, without giving any party an opportunity to verify this, and stood at the same distance from Israel and Iran by expressing this war to support his secrecy and his prior agreement before Iran and Russia to stop the war. For Israel, it did not achieve the desired from the first strike, despite relying on the advanced technology it possesses, from artificial intelligence and cyber warfare, from its agents inside Iran, and from its assassinations of military leaders and scientists, as its Air Force was lost inside the vast Iranian territory and large targets that exhausted its aircraft, it was not decisive within days, and the pressure on it increased with the dragging the United States into a long war in the region, as Netanyahu wanted from this After his failure in the Gaza war to take back the prisoners, he should completely destroy the nuclear facilities in order to remain in power for years to come and to cancel all the cases filed against him. What is the situation now? President Trump realized that Netanyahu had implicated him and should not implicate him again, and realized that the reason for his involvement was the trials at home that would convict Netanyahu, which prompted President Trump to try to intervene in ending Netanyahu's trials, fearing that he would implicate him in the future with any uncalculated war. The first concern after stopping Israel's war with Iran is to stop the Gaza war in exchange for ensuring that Netanyahu is not prosecuted, after which the US economic plan in the Middle East and its first steps will begin normalization between Arab countries and Israel, regardless of the Iranian nuclear program, which is no different from the Pakistani program, the neighboring country of Iran, where Trump wants to reprogram Iran by integrating it economically in the region, and this will benefit both parties, and Trump will another axis It will be a full-time transit gateway to China in the coming days. As for Israel, it is living in fear in terms of the horror of the Iranian nuclear program, which does not yet know what the coming days have in store for it, it knows that the United States will not sacrifice all its interests in the region for this fear. Therefore, the next stage will witness Israeli pressure on the United States to strip Iran of any nuclear rights, whether through negotiations or military empowerment, but Iran will not miss this opportunity and will soon announce that it possesses ballistic missiles loaded with radioactive uranium from that stockpile that has been hidden, in order to deter Israel from carrying out any unilateral military operation against it. As for the US-Iranian negotiations, Trump will try to entice Iran to gradually lift the blockade from it and release frozen funds, economic support and Western investment without regime change, and offer it, in agreement with Russia, to make new nuclear reactors for peaceful purposes, and the United States will work with Russia's help by controlling the 400 kg of enriched uranium, and all this will probably take a period of time in which Goodwill prevails on both sides, everything that Israel wants will not be at the expense of the United States, Trump's slogan : "America First", as well as: "Let's Make America Great Again". Engineer Mohannad Abbas Haddadin, is a GM of Jobkins Center for Strategic Studies and Expert, strategic and economic analyst.
