Brussels march urges EU to act over Budapest Pride ban threat
The march followed a law passed in Hungary in March that bans LGBT Pride events and allows facial recognition to identify organisers, a move widely condemned by rights groups and EU officials as an attack on civil liberties.
"We have come to sound the alarm," Viktoria Radvanyi, the chair of Budapest Pride, said while standing on a platform at the event.
"What is really alarming is that we have not seen the (European) Commission take any legal action in two months," said Radvanyi, who wore a rainbow-coloured necklace.
Although she met some Commission representatives on Friday, she accused the EU executive of being "complicit" with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban through its inaction
"Do your job," she said, waving a Hungarian flag -- a slogan immediately taken up by the crowd, who held signs reading "Protect your children from Orban".
"I think it's really important that we keep turning out for every pride as long as there are people in the world facing discrimination," said Migiel Moens, 39, who was in the crowd with European flag sticking out of his pink shorts.
Roland Papp, a 35-year-old journalist who attended Budapest Pride for years, described a "horrible time".
"People tend to think that once you have your rights, they're not going to be taken away. That's not true," he said.
"Budapest pride had been going on for 30 years and now it's really going back to the horrible times," he said, vowing to be in the Hungarian capital on June 28 for the event.
Budapest mayor Gergely Karacsony, welcomed on stage by two drag queens, vowed that the parade would go ahead.
"Budapest Pride cannot be banned, for the simple reason that love and freedom cannot be banned," said Karacsony, inviting supporters from across Europe to join what organisers hope will be the "biggest, most colourful and most international" pride event ever seen.
cjc/jca/srg/rmb
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Trump's Trip to Scotland Echoes an Earlier Visit, When He Applauded Brexit
On a sunny June morning eight years ago, Donald J. Trump arrived at his golf resort in Scotland, the day after Britain voted to leave the European Union. At that time, he took credit for predicting Brexit and said it foretold victory in the insurgent presidential campaign he was mounting back home. On Friday, a second-term President Trump returned to that resort, Trump Turnberry, with a good part of what he said in 2016 now a reality. He had correctly claimed that the political forces that drove Brexit went beyond a single country. Five months after that visit, Mr. Trump captured the White House, having played to anxieties about immigration in ways that echoed the 'Vote Leave' campaign. Yet in Britain, history has diverged from Mr. Trump's vision in important respects. Polls show that close to 60 percent of Britons now believe Brexit was a mistake. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has made mending relations with the European Union one of the priorities of his Labour government. The populist wave that Mr. Trump predicted would wash across Europe has ebbed and flowed, leaving a fragmented political landscape with a handful of populist leaders whose fortunes are mixed. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni of Italy is on the rise, but Prime Minister Viktor Orban of Hungary is struggling. 'Populism is still a relatively limited phenomenon,' said Kim Darroch, who was Britain's ambassador to the United States during Mr. Trump's first term. 'Brexit happened, but it's very hard to argue, even by its most ardent proponents, that it has been anything other than a comprehensive disaster.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
EU's Sluggish Economy Faces Moderate Growth Slowdown from US Trade Tensions
A US-EU deal appears increasingly likely. The recent trade agreement between the US and Japan has increased pressure on the EU and other trading partners to pursue a similar arrangement. Ongoing negotiations suggest that a 15% levy on most EU exports to the US might be introduced, with EU officials pushing to have this rate applied to certain sectors, including automobiles. Steel and aluminium imports above a certain quota might face the current higher levy of 50%. President Donald Trump has persisted with his policy of imposing higher tariffs on trading partners, so the EU faces a potential 30% tariff without an agreement, up from the 20% tax imposed in April and then paused, although still below the 50% rate threatened in May. The EU has avoided direct retaliation to date. Scope Ratings (Scope) expects this cautious approach to continue, even as the EU prepares possible counter-measures. Nevertheless, the approach risks growing tariff asymmetries particularly if US levies on EU goods rise more quickly than EU levies on US exports. Scope's model-based estimates suggest that the implementation of a 15% US tariff would trim euro area and EU growth within a year by increasing the effective US tariff on EU exports by around 16pps, excluding the proposed across-the-board 30% rate (Figure 1). This estimate assumes threatened levies on pharmaceutical exports go into effect. The most-exposed EU economies are those with a large trade surplus and/or significant trade with the US, such as Germany and Ireland, with the impact of higher tariffs also felt indirectly through their effect on global supply chains. Among the EU's four largest economies – Germany, France, Italy and Spain – Germany and Italy are the most vulnerable, each facing an estimated short-term output loss of 0.4pps. The higher tariffs will reduce Spain's output by a moderate 0.3pps in the medium run. France is expected to experience a more modest cumulative reduction in output of 0.2pps in the medium term. Trade tensions underpinned the reduction last month of Scope's forecast for euro area growth for 2025 by 0.5pps to 1.1% though growth is expected to improve to 1.5% next year, lifted by fiscal stimulus in Germany and higher defence spending across the EU. Figure 1. US tariff rises set back growth in the largest EU economies Cumulative impact on real output (percentage-point change) assuming a 15% levy on EU exports Threatened 30% Levies Would Raise Economic Costs for the EU Economy Alternatively, if the US goes ahead with the threatened imposition of 30% tariffs on the EU on 1 August, equivalent to a rise in the effective US rates by around 26pps in aggregate this year, and the EU adopts counter-measures, the adverse effect on growth in the EU would clearly be more significant. For illustrative purposes, if both the 30% levies imposed by the US and EU counter-measures come into force on or shortly after 1 August and hypothetically stayed at the higher rates in the years ahead, Scope estimates suggest an aggregate output loss of 0.6pps by 2028 for the euro area and 0.5pps for the EU economy (Figure 2). Figure 2. EU, euro area economies are vulnerable to the imposition of much higher US levies Cumulative effect on real output (percentage-point change) in a scenario of 30% US tariff, EU countermeasures Averting this potentially damaging trade outcome for Europe depends on the negotiations underway in which the EU, even as the world's largest and most-open trading bloc, is at a disadvantage partly due to the greater importance of the US for its exporters than vice versa (Figure 3). The EU is seeking to bolster trade co-operation with other trading partners. Figure 3. US market more important for EU exporters than vice versa %; the dot sizes represent the dollar value of exports to the US, 2024 US-EU Preliminary Agreement Probable Considering this, it appears likely that the US and EU will achieve some form of a framework agreement even if this involves average US levies of above 10%. A preliminary agreement by 1 August remains firmly possible. Nevertheless, given the seesawing US trade policies of the recent months, the White House might in an alternative scenario firstly impose the 30% levies, potentially temporarily, as leverage in negotiations before settling on an agreement after 1 August. Any preliminary agreement is likely to contain many caveats and carve-outs – with limited enforceability – serving only to avert further worst-case escalation and act as the starting point for further negotiations. The EU has several ways to retaliate in the scenario of a worsening trade war, from the newly introduced but yet-to-be-used anti-coercion mechanism to possible tariffs on American exports and the imposition of export controls, though Scope expects any such retaliation to remain gradual. Related material: Report: Scope's 2025 mid-year global economic outlook Presentation: Scope's 2025 mid-year economic and credit outlook For a look at all of today's economic events, check out our economic calendar. Dennis Shen is the Chair of the Macro Economic Council and Lead Global Economist of Scope Group. The rating agency's Macroeconomic Council brings together the company's credit opinions from multiple issuer classes: sovereign and public sector, financial institutions, corporates, structured finance and project finance. Arne Platteau, analyst in Credit Policy at Scope Ratings, contributed to this research. This article was originally posted on FX Empire More From FXEMPIRE: S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 Analysis: Golden Cross, Golden Opportunity France: Multi-year Budget Plan Supports Fiscal Outlook but Great Uncertainty Remains Has the U.S. Dollar Found Support? Some Gains for the Aussie Dollar After the RBA Unexpectedly Holds Navigating China's Economic Challenges: A Q&A with Scope Ratings' Dennis Shen Buy Like Big Money: Carpenter Technology Soars
New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump's tariff plan seems to be working — proving all the naysayers wrong
For all the 'sky-is-falling' cries over President Donald Trump's tariffs, it looks like his strategy may be working — just as his Aug. 1 deadline nears. In the past week, the Trump folks struck deals with Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines — and may be on the verge of a deal with Europe: On Friday, the prez cited a 50-50 chance of reaching an agreement with the European Union. These developments — on top of previous deals with Vietnam, the United Kingdom and a framework on rare-earth exports and tech restrictions with China — go a long way toward standing up Trump's vision for the international economy, with better terms for America. And at least so far, no catastrophic fallout. Heck, the nation looks poised to benefit enormously on several fronts. Trump's deals in Asia, for starters, reopen US access to cheap markets, sidestepping China, our greatest economic and military rival. Indonesia and the Philippines will pay 19% tariffs on their exports to the United States and levy 0% tariffs on more than 99% of US goods. Japan will see 15% tariffs and invest more than half a trillion dollars into the US economy. Washington will also slap fewer restrictions on Indonesian, Filipino and Japanese goods, everything from cars and clothes to electronics and rubber. And now EU officials are signaling their support for a deal that would mirror the one Trump made with Japan — reciprocal tariffs of 15%. Notably, the EU includes 27 countries in a shared common market, representing the largest singular trading bloc for the United States. The EU deal would clearly benefit US consumers looking to buy, say, French wines or German cars, and also US producers seeking wider access to the European markets. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Meanwhile, the resolution of trade issues with so many countries will calm markets and bring confidence and stability to the business community. As for the predicted inflation, it's nowhere to be seen: June's consumer price index came in at a reasonable 2.7%. Recall it hit 9% under Joe Biden. That's partially because corporations, unsure of whether high tariffs will remain permanent and nervous about hiking prices, have absorbed most of the tariffs' costs, at least for now. More good news: The tariffs brought in $64 billion in revenue for the government in just the first three months since Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement. He's suggested issuing 'rebates' based on that haul, but far better to use the new revenue to pay down the runaway national debt. Yes, there's plenty more to do: Team Trump needs to finalize agreements with Canada, India and Mexico, along with the EU, and numerous smaller countries, before the president's across-the-board reciprocal tariffs hit Aug. 1. So considerable uncertainty remains. But clearly the signs are good, at least so far — despite all the doomy predictions.
