logo
Gay Archbishop's Appointment Criticized by Christian Group

Gay Archbishop's Appointment Criticized by Christian Group

Newsweek2 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The appointment of Cherry Vann as the new Archbishop of Wales, the first woman and first openly gay person to hold the post, has triggered backlash from conservative Christian group Christian Concern, which accused her of contradicting core biblical teachings.
Christian Concern's Chief Executive, Andrea Williams, said Vann "is publicly living in deliberate rejection" of church doctrine because "she lives with her civil partner, Wendy, in a same-sex relationship."
The group's Head of Public Policy, Tim Dieppe, told Newsweek Vann is "openly defying the doctrine she has taken a vow to."
The Church in Wales, which has praised Vann's "rich diocesan experience and deep commitment to reconciliation" declined to respond to the criticism.
Why It Matters
The appointment of an openly gay leader to a major Anglican post has ignited a cultural and theological flashpoint within global Christianity, with the Church in Wales positioning itself as a more inclusive body compared to other Anglican provinces.
In the United States, similar shifts have played out. The Episcopal Church elected Gene Robinson in 2003 as the first openly gay bishop, leading to lasting tensions with the broader Anglican Communion. More recently, openly LGBTQ+ clergy continue to serve in several U.S. dioceses, including Bishop Bonnie Perry of Michigan.
What To Know
Williams said: Cherry Vann lives with her civil partner, Wendy, in a same-sex relationship. This directly contradicts the Church's historic and biblical doctrine that marriage is the lifelong union of one man and one woman, and that sexual relationships are reserved for marriage.
"As an ordained minister, and now Archbishop, Cherry Vann has sworn to uphold the teaching of the Church. Instead, she is publicly living in deliberate rejection of those very doctrines."
Christian Concern is a U.K-based conservative evangelical advocacy organization, known for supporting high-profile Christian freedom legal cases.
Cherry Vann was elected Archbishop of Wales on Wednesday, after securing support from two-thirds of an electoral college composed of clergy and lay representatives, according to British newspaper The Guardian. She is also the first LGBTQ+ person to hold the title in Wales.
Her civil partnership is permitted under current Church in Wales rules, which allow clergy to enter same-sex civil unions. While same-sex weddings are not currently performed in the church, a 2021 vote by its governing body authorized blessings for same-sex civil partnerships—a change supported unanimously by the bishops and passed by majorities in the clergy and laity, according to BBC News.
Under church law, clergy may opt out of conducting such blessings, but their availability is seen as a meaningful theological endorsement. "The Church in Wales has done the right thing under God for the LGBTQIA+ community," said Bishop Gregory Cameron, who introduced the 2021 bill.
Dieppe said that this amounted to a change in practice not doctrine meaning that, while he still this is a "contradictory position" for the church, Vann's appointment "is still against doctrine."
"She doesn't believe her own church's teachings," Dieppe told Newsweek. "Lots of people are out there thinking this is absurd."
Vann was elected to succeed Archbishop Andy John, who stepped down in June amid growing scrutiny of his leadership after two reports uncovered a culture of excessive drinking, bullying, and sexual misconduct at Bangor Cathedral. There was no suggestion the former archbishop had behaved inappropriately.
Though no allegations were made directly against John, he issued an "unreserved and unequivocal" apology, saying he accepted full responsibility for the church's failures under his leadership.
Vann herself is a patron of the Open Table Network, an ecumenical Christian community for LGBTQ+ people and allies.
She has spoken out against opposition to her role in the church before, telling local outlet Nation.Cymru: "There were a lot of unkind and unpleasant things said on both sides until the day where the General Synod eventually decided that this was the way the church should go."
"I remember being told myself that I couldn't possibly have a call to the priesthood because the church didn't allow it, as if that was a watertight argument," she said. "I think when you have that sense of call, it doesn't go away and it won't go away and we were left waiting."
She went on to speak about how she hid being gay for a long time.
"I have to confess that I hid it for a long, long time as a lot of gay clergy do, and as a lot of people sitting in the pews do," she said. "I hid it out of fear. It was a very fearful place to be, and it felt also quite disingenuous."
She added: "I believe that by simply being here as an out gay person with a partner, and my partner is accompanying me on some of my visits, and we've had nothing but welcome from everybody, I believe that is probably doing as much, if not more, than I would achieve if I were to be an open campaigner on the subject."
When Newsweek contacted the Church in Wales for a response to this criticism, it declined to comment.
But it went on to highlight some of the welcome Cherry had recieved, including from the Cytun, the ecumenical Christian body for Wales, which is made up of the Baptist Union of Wales, the Congregational Federation of Wales, the Union of Welsh Independents, the Presbyterian Church of Wales, the Methodist Church in Wales, the Salvation Army, the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers), the Roman Catholic Church, and the United Reformed Church.
It said: "With her rich diocesan experience and deep commitment to reconciliation let us uphold Archbishop-elect Cherry in prayer as she prepares to take up this historic ministry. May she be sustained by God's wisdom, compassion, and grace at this pivotal moment for the Church in Wales."
Official Church in Wales photo of Cherry Vann.
Official Church in Wales photo of Cherry Vann.
Church in Wales
What People Are Saying
Christian Concern's Chief Executive, Andrea Williams said: "That she was elected with a two-thirds majority of the Electoral College demonstrates that the Church in Wales has now institutionally turned away from biblical teaching on sexual morality.
"What is a church if it refuses to uphold the doctrines it professes to believe? What does the Church in Wales actually stand for, if not the gospel handed down through the centuries? This appointment marks a tragic moment, evidence that the Church in Wales is in open rebellion against God's Word. It is a clear sign of apostasy.
"No Bible-believing Christian can remain under the spiritual leadership of someone who so publicly rejects the clear teaching of Scripture. God will judge His Church for abandoning the gospel. As James reminds us, those who teach will be judged more strictly (James 3:1).
Following her election, Vann said: "I work to bring healing and reconciliation, and to build a really good level of trust across the church and the communities the church serves."
The Very Revd Ian Black, Dean of Newport said on behalf of the Diocese of Monmouth, where Vann has been a bishop for five years: "Cherry is the right person for this moment in the Church in Wales' life. She has the skills and vision that we need to restore trust following some very public failings. She has brought stability to the Diocese of Monmouth, managing the change to ministry areas with clarity and purpose, showing deep care for the clergy and people. This foundation will be a good base as she leads the Province over the next few years. She has a deep faith, which is also open to those who take a different view to her, and this has impressed those people enormously."
He added: "She has the skills and vision that we need to restore trust following some very public failings.
"She has a deep faith, which is also open to those who take a different view to her, and this has impressed those people enormously."
What Happens Next
The Church in Wales is expected to revisit its policy on same-sex blessings by next year, with a possible vote on allowing full same-sex marriage as early as next spring. Vann's leadership could prove pivotal in shaping that debate.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

German Economy Minister Reiche says social systems under pressure
German Economy Minister Reiche says social systems under pressure

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

German Economy Minister Reiche says social systems under pressure

German Economy Minister Katherina Reiche believes that social security systems in Germany are under pressure. The Christian Democrat (CDU) politician said after a company visit in the western city of Essen on Thursday that a comprehensive - and critical - review of Germany's social systems is due in the autumn. "They must deliver what the citizens expect from them: security and reliability. But we also know that reforms are needed," Reiche said. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has spoken of a "reform autumn." "There is really nothing to add to that," she said. "Tipping point" The coalition has agreed to set up various commissions after the lower house of parliament, the Bundestag, returns from its July-August break, not only to examine the social security systems but also to develop reform proposals, said Reiche. She added that the reform of the social systems and the demographic imbalance is not solely an issue for the current government. "The challenge we are facing is that the so-called tipping point is getting closer, and we must therefore actively address the question of how we can combine different employment histories, labour demand, and immigration into such a good concept that we can maintain labour productivity at a high level in the future," she said. When asked whether the planned expansion of the mother's pension is still timely, Reiche said, "Measures that further burden the social security systems are indeed a challenge for our system." However, she noted that it is also primarily about individual workers. Criticism of pension proposal Reiche had sparked a broad debate with statements about increasing Germans' working life. German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil said on Wednesday that it was very clearly set out in the coalition negotiations that there would be no increase in the retirement age. He stated that calls "from the sidelines" do not help. Reiche on tour The minister visited the medium-sized family business Agathon in Essen, a world-leading manufacturer of chocolate moulds for large-scale industrial production. The company relocated its headquarters from Bottrop to Essen at the beginning of the year and invested €15 million ($17.2 million) in the construction of a new production hall. Prior to this, Reiche visited German polyurethane and polycarbonate producer Covestro in Leverkusen. Solve the daily Crossword

US envoy visits aid site in Gaza run by Israeli-backed group that has been heavily criticized
US envoy visits aid site in Gaza run by Israeli-backed group that has been heavily criticized

Boston Globe

time4 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

US envoy visits aid site in Gaza run by Israeli-backed group that has been heavily criticized

Advertisement Hundreds of people have been killed by Israeli fire while heading to such aid sites since May, according to witnesses, health officials and the United Nations human rights office. Israel and GHF say they have only fired warning shots and that the toll has been exaggerated. In a report issued on Friday, the New York-based Human Rights Watch said GHF was at the heart of a 'flawed, militarized aid distribution system that has turned aid distributions into regular bloodbaths.' This handout photo from US Embassy Jerusalem shows White House special envoy Steve Witkoff (center) and US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee (center let) visiting a food distribution site run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. David Azaguri/Associated Press Witkoff says he's working on a new Gaza aid plan Witkoff posted on X that he had spent over five hours inside Gaza in order to gain 'a clear understanding of the humanitarian situation and help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza.' He did not request any meetings with U.N. officials in Gaza during his visit, U.N. deputy spokesman Farhan Haq told reporters. U.N. agencies have provided aid throughout Gaza since the start of the war, when conditions allow. Advertisement Chapin Fay, a spokesperson for GHF, said the visit reflected Trump's understanding of the stakes and that 'feeding civilians, not Hamas, must be the priority.' The aid group says it has delivered over 100 million meals since it began operations in May. All four of the group's sites established in May are in zones controlled by the Israeli military and have become flashpoints of desperation, with starving people scrambling for scarce aid. More than 1,000 people have been killed by Israeli fire since May while seeking aid in the territory, most near the GHF sites but also near United Nations aid convoys, the U.N. human rights office said last month. The Israeli military says it has only fired warning shots at people who approach its forces, and GHF says its armed contractors have only used pepper spray or fired warning shots to prevent deadly crowding. Palestinians carried sacks of flour taken from a humanitarian aid convoy en route to Gaza City, in the outskirts of Beit Lahiya, northern Gaza Strip, on Friday. Jehad Alshrafi/Associated Press Dozens killed near aid sites Officials at Nasser Hospital in southern Gaza said Friday they received the bodies of 13 people who were killed while trying to get aid, including near the site that U.S. officials visited. GHF denied anyone was killed at their sites on Friday. The Israeli military said its forces had fired warning shots hundreds of meters (yards) away from the aid site at people it described as suspects and said had ignored orders to distance themselves from its forces. It said it was not aware of any casualties but was still investigating. Another 23 people were killed and dozens wounded near the Israeli-run Zikim Crossing, the main entry point for aid to northern Gaza, according to Dr. Mohamed Abu Selmiya, the director of Shifa Hospital, which received the bodies. He said the vast majority of injuries were from gunfire. Advertisement The Israeli military said it struck several armed militants in northern Gaza but that the strike 'was not conducted near the passage of the humanitarian aid trucks and no damage was caused to them.' The Palestinian Red Crescent emergency service said 11 people were killed at another aid distribution point in Gaza City. There was no immediate comment from the military on those deaths. Humanitarian aid was airdropped to Palestinians over Khan Younis, in the Gaza Strip on Friday. Abdel Kareem Hana/Associated Press HRW slams Israeli-backed aid system Human Rights Watch said in its report that 'it would be near impossible for Palestinians to follow the instructions issued by GHF, stay safe, and receive aid, particularly in the context of ongoing military operations.' It cited doctors, aid seekers and at least one GHF security contractor. Building on previous accounts, it described how how thousands of Palestinians gather near the sites at night before they open. As they head to the sites on foot, Israeli forces control their movements by opening fire toward them. Once inside the sites, they race for aid in a frenzied fee-for-all, with weaker and more vulnerable people coming away with nothing, HRW said. Responding to the report, Israel's military accused Hamas of sabotaging the aid distribution system, without providing evidence. It said it was working to make the routes under its control safer for those traveling to aid sites. GHF did not immediately respond to questions about the report. The group has never allowed journalists to visit their sites and Israel's military has barred reporters from independently entering Gaza throughout the war. Israeli occupation forces demolished the home of Ibrahim Ziada, in the village of Wadi Rahhal, south of Bethlehem in the occupied West Bank. MOSAB SHAWER/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images Top German diplomat condemns settler violence in the West Bank Germany's foreign minister visited Taybeh in the occupied West Bank, a Palestinian Christian village that has seen recent attacks by Israeli settlers. Johann Wadephul said Israel's settlements are an obstacle to peace and condemned settler violence. He also called on Hamas to lay down its arms in Gaza and release the remaining hostages. Advertisement Germany has so far declined to join other major Western countries in announcing plans to recognize a Palestinian state. Palestinians in another nearby town laid to rest 45-year-old Khamis Ayad, who they say suffocated while extinguishing fires set by settlers during an attack the night before. Witnesses said Israeli forces fired live rounds and tear gas toward residents after the settlers attacked. Israel's military said police were investigating the incident. They said security forces found Hebrew graffiti and a burnt vehicle at the scene but had not detained any suspects. There has been a rise in settler attacks, as well as Palestinian militant attacks on Israelis and large-scale Israeli military operations in the occupied West Bank since Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023 attack on Israel out of Gaza that triggered the Israel-Hamas war. Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, that day and abducted 251 others. They still hold 50 hostages, including around 20 believed to be alive. Most of the others have been released in ceasefires or other deals. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians and operates under the Hamas government. The U.N. and other international organizations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties. Metz reported from Jerusalem and Frankel from Tel Aviv, Israel. Associated Press writer Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations contributed to this report. Advertisement

Donald Trump's Effort to Overturn Birthright Citizenship Struggles in Court
Donald Trump's Effort to Overturn Birthright Citizenship Struggles in Court

Newsweek

time5 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump's Effort to Overturn Birthright Citizenship Struggles in Court

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A three-judge panel in the Boston-based appeals court expressed deep skepticism about arguments from President Donald Trump's Department of Justice as the administration seeks to overturn birthright citizenship, according to Reuters. Why It Matters Trump's executive order, signed on Inauguration Day in January, seeks to restrict birthright citizenship and could potentially affect the rights of millions of U.S.-born children. The order directs U.S. agencies to refuse citizenship to children unless at least one parent is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. The crux of the issue sits in the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which will determine whether the constitutional guarantee of citizenship for children born on American soil to non-citizen or undocumented parents remains intact. The case has already gone before the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which last month ruled that the order is unconstitutional, upholding a lower-court decision that blocked nationwide enforcement. A stock photo of a new USA passport. A stock photo of a new USA passport. Stock Photo - Getty Images What To Know The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday grilled Justice Department lawyer Eric McArthur over the core arguments of the administration's position on birthright citizenship, who reiterated Trump's argument that the 14th Amendment was only meant to extend citizenship to the children of former slaves—not the children of immigrants in the country either temporarily or unlawfully. The judges, all appointed by Democratic presidents, pointed to the Supreme Court's ruling in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, which guaranteed citizenship to any child born in the country to non-citizen parents. Chief U.S. Circuit Judge David Barron mused that the judges "aren't free to disregard" the Supreme Court's previous ruling. Shankar Duraiswamy, a lawyer for New Jersey, argued before the court that the Supreme Court has "repeatedly recognized children born to individuals who are here unlawfully or who are here on a temporary basis are nonetheless birthright citizens." While the Supreme Court in June ruled in favor of limiting nationwide injunctions, it allowed certain exceptions within the limits of a certified segment of people for class-action lawsuits to retain that power. U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin of Massachusetts in July ruled that a previously granted nationwide injunction against Trump's order could stay in place, even in light of the new Supreme Court restrictions, because "no workable, narrower alternative" would give the plaintiffs relief. A New Hampshire court in the same month also acted within the new ruling to certify a nationwide class of plaintiffs, which included all children born on U.S. soil. The Trump administration has sought to appeal this ruling alongside Sorokin's. What People Are Saying Judge Patrick Bumatay, who dissented in the 9th Circuit's ruling, wrote: "We should approach any request for universal relief with good faith skepticism, mindful that the invocation of 'complete relief' isn't a backdoor to universal injunctions." Former Palm Beach County State Attorney Dave Aronberg via X, formerly Twitter, to Newsweek in July: "Easy decision. If President Trump wants to eliminate birthright citizenship, he needs to change the Constitution. But he can't repeal the language of the 14th Amendment via executive order." Representative Claudia Tenney, a New York Republican, posted to X on Wednesday: "Birthright citizenship was never meant to be a reward for breaking our immigration laws. The Constitutional Citizenship Clarification Act makes it clear: No citizenship for children born to illegal aliens, foreign spies, or terrorists." What Happens Next Legal experts and state attorneys general anticipate that the Supreme Court's possible review will provide a landmark ruling on the meaning of the 14th Amendment—a decision that may reshape the rights of children born on U.S. soil and the future of American immigration policy. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store