logo
TMC, BJP race to polarise with eye on 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections

TMC, BJP race to polarise with eye on 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections

India Today24-04-2025
(NOTE: This article was originally published in the India Today issue dated April 28, 2025)Nowhere did the ripples of discontent over the recently passed Waqf Amendment Act spread as viciously as they did in West Bengal. The unrest was particularly intense in the Muslim-majority districts of Murshidabad and Malda, as well as in Bhangor, in South 24 Parganas. What began as simple protests soon escalated into a violent conflagration on April 11–12, once again exposing the deep communal fault lines that run through the state. Three people died, more than 200 arrests were made, and paramilitary forces were deployed. The crisis is a grim reminder of Bengal's shifting political landscape, where the two leading parties—the ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC) and the main Opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)—are striving to outdo each other in their bid to corner the Hindu vote, creating discontent among the state's large Muslim population, a year before the 2026 assembly election.advertisementThe initial spark in Murshidabad was lit in Dhuliyan, in Samserganj block, on April 11. Protesters torched police vehicles and clashed with security forces. In nearby Suti, Ejaz Ahmed was allegedly shot dead by the police. Just a few kilometres away in Samserganj, Hargobindo Das, 70, and his son Chandan, 40, were killed in their own home. The police arrived four hours later. Ironically, the very next day, the police allowed a Ramnavami procession to pass through the area. Some of the marchers allegedly made incendiary speeches; an organiser has since been arrested. On April 15, the police arrested two persons in connection with the murders.
A vehicle set ablaze during anti-Waqf law protests in the district (Photo: PTI)
advertisementChief Minister Mamata Banerjee has publicly rejected the implementation of the amended Waqf law in Bengal. 'Dharma means devotion, affection, humanity, peace, culture, harmony, and unity,' she declared in Kolkata on April 14, asking people to maintain peace. 'Why the fight? Why the riots, war, or unrest?' But critics point to the failure of intelligence units and the administration to anticipate the scale of the protests.
The communal unrest led to the exodus of some 400 terrified people. The BJP claims around 80 Hindu families fled across the Bhagirathi river to Parlalpur in Malda, though local officials dispute the number. There are also allegations that the BJP may have orchestrated the exodus, in a bid to create a communal narrative. Nor was the violence one-sided—Muslim homes faced retaliatory attacks, too. The BJP has also been accused of circulating doctored images of the violence to whip up emotions.Investigators suspect that the Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI), an offshoot of the banned Popular Front of India, played a role in fuelling the unrest. CPI(M) leader Mohammed Salim visited the family of Hargobindo and Chandan—both party supporters—and condemned the state's inaction against the alleged hate speeches by BJP leaders. 'The hate speeches led to reaction by the other community. It appears that these speeches also serve the ruling dispensation some purpose,' he said.TMC spokesperson Kunal Ghosh hinted at a larger conspiracy involving 'some central agencies, a section of the BSF, and two or three political parties,' claiming that miscreants were allowed to run amok and then escape unscathed. The suggestion seems to be that the carnage involved some spontaneous violence, as well as an element of politically engineered, and harvested, chaos.advertisementTEMPLE POLITICSThe violence in Murshidabad and elsewhere has to be seen in light of the game of competitive communalism that the TMC and the BJP are playing as they prepare for the electoral showdown next year. Religious symbolism, once peripheral to Bengal's political grammar, has moved centrestage. Temples are now political statements, and festivals potent tools of mobilisation.Since its ascent in 2011, the TMC largely adhered to the secular fabric of the erstwhile Left regime. It enjoyed robust support among minorities, who make up nearly 27 per cent of the state's population. Its response to the BJP's accusations of 'minority appeasement' and 'anti-Hindu' governance were once met with indifference. All that changed in 2019, when the BJP captured 18 out of the state's 42 Lok Sabha seats, clinching 57 per cent of the Hindu vote. Changing tack, the TMC's Hindu outreach expanded visibly. Mamata herself began flaunting her Hindu Brahmin identity. A stipend scheme originally started for imams in 2012 was extended to Hindu priests. Varanasi's famed Ganga aarti was replicated on the banks of the Hooghly. Plans for temples—replicas of Puri's Jagannath and Vaishno Devi—were announced. The Rs 250 crore replica of the Jagannath temple in Digha is set to be inaugurated on April 30, the day of Akshaya Tritiya, an auspicious day in the Hindu calendar. Not to be outdone, the BJP's Suvendu Adhikari has vowed to build a Ram temple in Nandigram; the foundation stone was laid on Ramnavami.advertisementRamnavami, in fact, has been converted into a statewide phenomenon by the BJP, alongside its affiliate Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) and its ideological parent, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). From a subdued ritual a decade ago, it has now morphed into a cultural juggernaut in the state. In 2025 alone, around 2,000 rallies were held, with Ram Mahotsavs claimed to have been held in over 100,000 locations. 'The misrule of the Trinamool Congress has brought together the Hindu community,' says BJP's Samik Bhattacharya. 'Their protests are being translated into Ramnavami and Hanuman Jayanti rallies.'The TMC has responded in kind. Ramnavami processions are now led by its own leaders. In Nabadweep and Purulia, TMC-run municipalities urged butcher shops to remain shut during Holi and Ramnavami. 'Our Ram is peaceful,' said TMC MP Partha Bhowmick, stressing that TMC leaders had always been part of such rallies. 'The BJP wants to impose a foreign culture that teaches children to wield swords.'advertisementEven as this year's Ramnavami passed without incident, earlier years have provided enough of a volatile record: communal unrest erupted in Raniganj in 2018, in Asansol in 2019, in Howrah in 2022 and 2023, and in Murshidabad just last year.A COMMUNAL CAULDRONWest Bengal Chief Minister and TMC chief Mamata Banerjee has long been walking a political tightrope. While she prominently celebrates festivals like Durga Puja and Chhath Puja, she is equally visible championing welfare schemes for Muslims, attending Eid gatherings, and even appearing in a hijab. It's a carefully calibrated balancing act—aimed at projecting a Hindu-friendly image without alienating the crucial minority vote.But though she is reassuring Muslims that all is well, the party's own politicians are going off-script as politics veers toward religious majoritarianism. In March, Suvendu Adhikari declared in the assembly that he would 'drag minority MLAs of the TMC on to the streets' if the BJP came to power in 2026. In response, the TMC's Humayun Kabir threatened to break Adhikari's hands if he did not apologise. 'My party comes second,' he said. 'My community comes first.' Mamata also joined the fray, asserting her Hindu identity in the house, and accusing the BJP of 'importing fake Hinduism to the state'. It was a preview of the ideological battle shaping up ahead of the 2026 assembly election. Among the Muslim leaders who have been accused of making incendiary statements is Mamata's cabinet colleague and Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind leader Siddiqullah Chowdhury, who threatened to bring Kolkata to a standstill in protest over the Waqf law. 'This isn't politics of slogans anymore,' political analyst Nirmalya Mukherjee says. 'It's a high-stakes cultural war. If leaders don't tread carefully, Bengal could be staring at a bloodbath.'advertisementSigns of the dangers of communal politics showed up just a day before the Murshidabad flare-up. On April 10, a video showing Muslims protesting the Waqf Act in a rally in Kolkata purportedly asking a bus driver to remove a saffron flag, went viral. Instantly accusing the TMC of appeasement, the BJP urged Hindus to display saffron flags at their homes on Hanuman Jayanti on April 12.THE RACE TO POLARISE BENGALThe BJP and the ruling TMC are competing with each other for Hindu votes through the politics of temples and festivals
In the name of Ram: Trinamool members take out a Ramnavami rally in Howrah, April 6
Adding fuel to this already volatile situation are influential religious bodies. Recently, Pirzada Toha Siddiqui, a prominent cleric of the Hooghly-based Furfura Sharif, called for a mosque to be constructed in Digha to 'balance' the temple project. His more politically active kin, Abbas and Nawshad Siddiqui—founders of the Indian Secular Front (ISF)—are set to challenge the TMC's monopoly over Muslim votes.The RSS, too, has expanded its grassroots reach in Bengal. It is clear that unlike during the 2021 assembly polls and the 2024 Lok Sabha elections in Bengal, where the BJP won 77 (out of 294) and 12 seats (out of 42) respectively, the state unit's abysmal organisational strength will have RSS backing. Analysts say that the BJP, emboldened by its 38.73 per cent vote share in 2024, is aiming for a 7-8 per cent swing in 2026. The increased turnout of Hindu voters, bolstered by RSS and VHP mobilisation, is key to its realisation.
The cacophony of religious politics drowns the everyday concerns of the common man. There is little to address with the crisis of unemployment or the endemic corruption as evident in multiple alleged scams. The only non-religious issues to have pierced the political din are the alleged irregularities in the RG Kar rape case and the recent Supreme Court cancellation of nearly 26,000 school jobs due to widespread manipulation in the recruitment process under the West Bengal School Service Commission. Yet temples, identity and imagined historical grievances dominate the political narrative. The fire in Murshidabad was not lit in a day. Bengal's political class has sedulously stoked it over the years.Subscribe to India Today MagazineTune InMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump pushes to expand Abraham Accords with Azerbaijan, Central Asian nations, say sources
Trump pushes to expand Abraham Accords with Azerbaijan, Central Asian nations, say sources

First Post

time20 minutes ago

  • First Post

Trump pushes to expand Abraham Accords with Azerbaijan, Central Asian nations, say sources

The Trump administration is in advanced talks with Azerbaijan and preliminary discussions with Central Asian nations to expand the Abraham Accords, according to sources. The initiative aims to solidify symbolic ties with Israel, despite regional tensions and the ongoing war in Gaza. read more The administration of US President Donald Trump is in discussions with Azerbaijan about the possibility of the country, along with some Central Asian partners, joining the Abraham Accords, with the aim of strengthening their current relationships with Israel, according to five sources familiar with the matter. As part of the Abraham Accords, signed in 2020 and 2021 during Trump's first term, four Muslim-majority nations agreed to normalise diplomatic ties with Israel following US mediation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Azerbaijan and all Central Asian countries, on the other hand, already have longstanding relations with Israel, so any expansion of the accords to include them would be largely symbolic, focussing on strengthening ties in areas such as trade and military cooperation, according to the sources, who asked to remain anonymous to discuss private conversations. Such an expansion would demonstrate Trump's willingness to consider less ambitious agreements than his administration's objective of persuading regional heavyweight Saudi Arabia to re-establish ties with Israel while conflict rages in Gaza. The kingdom has repeatedly said that it will not recognise Israel until Israel recognises a Palestinian state. A rising death toll in Gaza and malnutrition caused by Israel's blockade of supplies and military operations have fuelled Arab outrage, hindering efforts to expand the Abraham Accords to include additional Muslim-majority nations. The war in Gaza, where over 60,000 people including tens of thousands of women and children have died according to local health authorities, has provoked global anger. Canada, France and the United Kingdom have announced plans in recent days to recognize an independent Palestine. Another key sticking point is Azerbaijan's conflict with its neighbor Armenia, since the Trump administration considers a peace deal between the two Caucasus nations as a precondition to join the Abraham Accords, three sources said. While Trump officials have publicly floated several potential entrants into the accords, the talks centered on Azerbaijan are among the most structured and serious, the sources said. Two of the sources argued a deal could be reached within months or even weeks. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's special envoy for peace missions, Steve Witkoff, traveled to Azerbaijan's capital, Baku, in March to meet with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev. Aryeh Lightstone, a key Witkoff aide, met Aliyev later in the spring in part to discuss the Abraham Accords, three of the sources said. As part of the discussions, Azerbaijani officials have contacted officials in Central Asian nations, including in nearby Kazakhstan, to gauge their interest in a broader Abraham Accords expansion, those sources said. It was not clear which other countries in Central Asia - which includes Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan - were contacted. The State Department, asked for comment, did not discuss specific countries, but said expanding the accords has been one of the key objectives of Trump. 'We are working to get more countries to join,' said a US official. The Azerbaijani government declined to comment. The White House, the Israeli foreign ministry and the Kazakhstani embassy in Washington did not respond to requests for comment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Any new accords would not modify the previous Abraham Accords deals signed by Israel. Obstacles remain The original Abraham Accords - inked between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan - were centered on restoration of ties. The second round of expansion appears to be morphing into a broader mechanism designed to expand US and Israeli soft power. Wedged between Russia to the north and Iran to the south, Azerbaijan occupies a critical link in trade flows between Central Asia and the West. The Caucasus and Central Asia are also rich in natural resources, including oil and gas, prompting various major powers to compete for influence in the region. Expanding the accords to nations that already have diplomatic relations with Israel may also be a means of delivering symbolic wins to a president who is known to talk up even relatively small victories. Two sources described the discussions involving Central Asia as embryonic - but the discussions with Azerbaijan as relatively advanced. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But challenges remain and there is no guarantee a deal will be reached, particularly with slow progress in talks between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The two countries, which both won independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, have been at loggerheads since the late 1980s when Nagorno-Karabakh - an Azerbaijani region that had a mostly ethnic-Armenian population - broke away from Azerbaijan with support from Armenia. In 2023, Azerbaijan retook Karabakh, prompting about 100,000 ethnic Armenians to flee to Armenia. Both sides have since said they want to sign a treaty on a formal end to the conflict. Primarily Christian Armenia and the US have close ties, and the Trump administration is wary of taking action that could upset authorities in Yerevan. Still, US officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Trump himself, have argued that a peace deal between those two nations is near. 'Armenia and Azerbaijan, we worked magic there,' Trump told reporters earlier in July. 'And it's pretty close.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

​House of wars: on Parliament, Operation Sindoor discussion
​House of wars: on Parliament, Operation Sindoor discussion

The Hindu

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

​House of wars: on Parliament, Operation Sindoor discussion

The government and the Opposition crossed swords in Parliament during a discussion on Operation Sindoor this week. There was unanimity in praising India's armed forces, but there was little common ground beyond that. Operation Sindoor was India's military response to the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, on April 22, 2025, which claimed 26 lives. The elimination of three terrorists behind the attack, just before the parliamentary debate, helped the government's case. It told Parliament that these terrorists were Lashkar-e-Taiba members from Pakistan. The Narendra Modi government's strident approach seeks to change the behaviour of Pakistan and reassure its domestic audience. The success of this approach is debatable and the Opposition sought to put the government on the spot on both counts. A demonstrated willingness to use force against Pakistan in the event of a terrorism incident is a definitive turn in India's strategy, and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) takes pride in that. But there is no evidence yet that it is working though there has been chest thumping around it by the ruling party. The discussion in Parliament barely addressed the implications of this approach, which is being touted as the new normal. The Opposition and the government agreed on the need to punish Pakistan, and also disagreed on who would do it better. The government claimed success in meeting its objectives of launching a military operation and denied that it had acted under pressure in ending the war. Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi demanded a pointed response to repeated claims by U.S. President Donald Trump that he mediated the ceasefire but the Prime Minister evaded a direct response on it. The government contradicts itself when it says that the operation was a success, and that it is continuing. It is also exasperating to hear a party that is now in its eleventh year of uninterrupted power, blame people who passed away decades ago for any challenge that India faces now. There was little self-reflection regarding the lapses that led to the terrorism incident, and whether and how the government plans to address them. The government had sent joint teams including several MPs from the Opposition abroad to garner support for India in the aftermath of the operation, but that sign of statesmanship was a short-lived aberration, as it turns out. The world is changing rapidly and India's capacity to navigate those changes will be largely determined by its own character. Questioning the patriotism of political opponents is an easy route to take to evade tough questions, but the BJP must realise that such an approach has diminishing returns.

Delhi court dismisses defamation case filed by AAP's Satyendra Jain against BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj
Delhi court dismisses defamation case filed by AAP's Satyendra Jain against BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj

The Hindu

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Delhi court dismisses defamation case filed by AAP's Satyendra Jain against BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj

A Delhi court on Thursday dismissed an appeal filed by Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Satyendar Kumar Jain in a defamation case against Bharatiya Janata Party MP Bansuri Swaraj, citing that merely repeating information already in the public domain does not amount to defamation. The court also criticised the Enforcement Directorate (ED), which had initially posted on X the information shared by the BJP MP, saying that the central agency holds the responsibility of sharing only accurate and non-misleading information with the public. Special Judge Jitendra Singh of the Rouse Avenue Courts observed that sufficient ground does not exist for taking cognisance of the offence as defined and punishable under Section 356 of the BNS. The case filed by Mr. Jain is based on 'defamatory' comments about him during a television interview by Ms. Swaraj. The AAP leader stated that during the interview, Ms. Swaraj allegedly claimed that ₹3 crore in cash, 1.8 kilograms of gold, and 133 gold coins were recovered from the AAP leader's house. The ED also shared this information on its social media handle. Mr. Jain alleged that the statement made on TV had damaged his reputation. Mr. Jain had challenged a trial court order that rejected his criminal defamation complaint against the BJP MP earlier this year. In a strongly worded message, the court said that it is incumbent upon an investigative agency such as the ED to act impartially and uphold the principles of fairness and due process. 'Any dissemination of information, including but not limited to official social media platforms, must be accurate, non-misleading, and free from sensationalism,' the court said. 'The presentation of facts in a manner that is misleading, scandalous, or inten to defame or politically prejudice an individual would not only undermine the integrity of the agency but may also amount to an abuse of power and violation of the individual's fundamental rights, including the right to reputation under Article 21 of the Constitution,' it said. While dismissing the defamation case, the court added that there was no 'willful misrepresentation or malicious intent' of the accused, hence Ms. Swaraj cannot be held liable for the alleged offence of defamation. 'If at all any statement is perceived as defamatory, the liability, if any, would lie with the source agency, i.e., the ED, which originally disseminated the information. The proposed accused, being a secondary communicator of officially released material, cannot be fastened with criminal liability, especially in the absence of intent to harm the reputation of the Complainant,' it added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store