Ranveer Allahbadia's podcast returns on a strict watch
This new allowance by the Court is the second relief awarded to the podcaster. In a previous hearing, the Court had imposed a pause on The Ranveer Show "till further orders" and had placed a stay on filing fresh FIRs against Allahbadia.
Heat of the trial
In the last recent hearing, Advocate Abhinav Chandrachud, representing the YouTuber, shed light on how the livelihoods of the 280 employees that work under Allahbadia for The Ranveer Show rest upon the Court's decision on running it.
On the other hand, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appeared for the Union and the states of Maharashtra and Assam, the two FIR's filed against Allahbadia. "Vulgar", "perverse" and "really troubling" were the words used by Mehta in describing the podcaster's remarks, urging the Court to "let him be quiet for some time" and pushing for strict guidelines regarding content creation.
Mehta also reminded the Court that despite being summoned by the Gauhati Police, Allahbadia had not presented himself for investigation, to which Chandrachud retorted that the podcaster had written two letters to the Police, seeking a date and time for said investigation, but in vain.
The Court rules
The Court favoured the argument safeguarding the livelihoods of Allahbadia's employees but went on to place a strict moral guideline on his content, and consequently the content of all YouTubers and podcasters in India. He emphasised that while all citizens hold freedom of speech, this freedom is not absolute and must follow moral and legal guidelines. In-keeping with this advice, he asked the Union to propose a "very limited" set of guidelines which do not outrightly censor free speech. He also urged the government to consult stakeholders and the public to produce a framework, stating, "Everybody can contribute, and then we can determine the safest regulatory measure."
Moreover, the Court asked the Gauhati Police to send Allahbadia a date and time at the earliest, and decided that it would rule over the travel ban imposed on the podcaster in a separate hearing.
"Would you rather watch your parents have sex every day for the rest of your life or join in once and stop it forever?" This is the question Allahbadia had asked a contestant on the February 9 episode of India's Got Talent, sparking massive outrage, subsequent FIRs and even death threats. Since the event, the National Creators Awards winner and the creator of the show, Samay Raina, have apologised and taken down all previous episodes of The Ranveer Show.
That this remark gained unprecedented traction, made Indian headlines and primetime news may be due to the popularity of Allahbadia's work as a YouTuber and podcaster. Having hosted both local and international celebrities on this podcast forum, Allahbadia's work saw the great heights of acclaim, and as is the case always, the great depths of disdain following his crude remarks.
While a great chunk of the mammoth Indian population resonated with Mehta's concerns regarding the perverse nature of comedy being generated in the country, a separate faction digressed. "It feels like the state is trying to make an example out of Allahbadia," said Apar Gupta, founder of the Internet Freedom Foundation. Saket Gokhale, an opposition lawmaker, agreed, writing on X, "Crass content can be criticised if it offends you. However, you cannot have the state persecute and lock up people for offending your 'moral sentiments'" Other comedians took the opportunity to criticise the media on its monolithic view of the case and its blind condemnation of all digital content.
Whatever the case may be, this particular incident has caused a domino effect surrounding conversations about the need for passing punchy comments to go viral online, its consequences and the freedoms and limitations of thought and speech within India's obscenity laws.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
‘India's miscalculation and Pakistan's strategic victory'
This is apropos a letter to the editor 'India's miscalculation and Pakistan's strategic victory' carried by the newspaper yesterday. This writer would like to add that President Donald Trump convened his strategic team, led by Vice President JD Vance, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. Real-time intelligence painted a grim picture: Pakistan's counteroffensive was not only imminent, but could severely cripple India's command-and-control infrastructure, disrupt key economic hubs, and dismantle its air defense shield. JD Vance was dispatched to urgently communicate this intelligence to Prime Minister Modi. The message was blunt: any further escalation would result in irreversible consequences. The strategic calculus shifted instantly. Modi, once intoxicated with power and emboldened by false notions of invincibility, was brought to his senses. The once defiant leader now faced the reality of defeat, and with surprising haste, he accepted a ceasefire — grasping at the lifeline extended by US diplomacy. Pakistan's military response was not merely reactive — it was the product of years of strategic planning and technological upgrades. The Pakistan Air Force (PAF), often underestimated, proved formidable. It not only neutralized Indian air incursions but used advanced jamming techniques to cripple enemy communications, rendering even India's most prized Rafale jets vulnerable. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
S. Asia faces prospect of ‘water war'?
Predictions by the United Nations and the World Bank state that water scarcity impacts approximately 40 percent of the world's population, with up to 700 million people at risk of displacement due to drought by 2030. A World Bank report has stated that water scarcity, aggravated by climate change, could hamper economic growth, lead to migration, and trigger conflicts. World Economic Forum has water challenges under its focus. A paper presented at this forum, way back in October 2018, by Paul Ratner — titled: 'Where will the 'water wars' of the future be fought?' highlighted the five most vulnerable hotspots as the Nile, Ganges-Brahmaputra, Indus, Tigris-Euphrates, and Colorado rivers. The paper paints a disturbing picture of a nearby future where people are fighting over access to water. Now South Asia is witnessing a 'water war' era where hydro-political issues have flared up between China, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh with China, India, and Pakistan begin constructing dams at unprecedented pace as water sources becoming scarce. Water scarcity with growing population, climate change, glacier melt, and monsoon unpredictability are intensifying regional dependence on rivers. China's recent announcement to construct the world's largest hydroelectric power project on the Yarlung Tsangpo (Brahmaputra River's upstream segment in Tibet), estimated to cost USD 170 billion, has attracted reactions from India and Bangladesh, both rely heavily on the Brahmaputra's waters. This megaproject ignites strategic tensions in an already volatile region. India's concerns are loss of water control, strategic vulnerability and seismic sensitivity. India fears upstream diversion could dry up the Brahmaputra during critical agricultural seasons. India fears that China's strategic control of the headwaters could be a pressure tactic in any future Sino-Indian military standoff. The Brahmaputra is a trans-boundary river that flows from Tibet into Arunachal Pradesh and Assam (India), then into Bangladesh. The dam in question is to be built at the 'Great Bend,' where the river curves sharply before entering India. This is the most hydrologically and seismic sensitive part. Bangladesh receives around 70 percent of its freshwater inflow from India; a reduction in Brahmaputra flows due to upstream Chinese control could lead to saline intrusion, crop failure, and food insecurity. Furthermore, Bangladesh and India have unresolved disputes over Teesta River sharing. China describes the planned dam as a clean energy triumph and considers the concerns of India and Bangladesh as unfounded. It claims the project is for hydropower (not irrigation or large-scale diversion). India's suspension of Indus Water Treaty (IWT) and its unilateral water control on western rivers belonging to Pakistan (Indus, Jhelum, Chenab) can lead to conflicts if not wars. China's Brahmaputra Dam could work as a leverage. With China as an upper riparian power on another major South Asian river system, Pakistan can work to diplomatically highlight India's double standards — protesting Chinese upstream control while exercising it over Pakistan downstream. If India escalates its water weaponization, Pakistan could align more closely with China and even propose regional water negotiations including all key stakeholders — possibly under the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). China's action serves Pakistan's interest in regionalizing the water discourse, challenging India's long-standing resistance to multilateral water negotiations At the heart of the matter is water sovereignty and regional power dynamics. With India unilaterally suspending parts of the Indus Waters Treaty after the Pulwama incident and subsequent tensions with Pakistan, the emergence of China as an upper riparian power is now rebalancing the equation — particularly for Pakistan, which may see an unexpected leverage. War over water? Not yet. But the seeds are sown. While a literal 'water war' may still be far away, the politicization of rivers is undeniably underway. Asia's great rivers are no longer just lifelines — they are becoming lines of control, lines of contention, and lines of influence. Unless water is treated as a shared climate asset, not a sovereignty token, this region, which is home to a fifth of the world's population, may soon face a crisis deeper than politics: the crisis of thirst. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
10 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Hollywood vs censorville
A rude emoji was replaced with a politer one in F1: The Movie. Photo: File Film fans in India were outraged to learn that a 33-second kiss scene in Superman was shortened to just a few seconds by their country's censors. Despite the film's 13+ rating, India's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) felt compelled to sanitise the embrace they described as "overly sensual." When it was created through the Cinematograph Act of 1952, the CBFC's official mandate was to certify films according to age categories, but it has since become notorious for its role as a censor. Recent examples of alterations in major Hollywood productions include replacing a middle-finger emoji appearing in F1: The Movie with a fist emoji. Swear words were muted in Marvel's Thunderbolts and Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning. In Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer (2023), the Indian board had Florence Pugh's nudity covered up with a digitally inserted CGI dress. "If a scene is meant for mature audiences, it should simply be placed in the appropriate category," argued writer Disha Bijolia in Indian online magazine Homegrown. "Instead, the CBFC repeatedly interferes with a filmmaker's vision — cutting into plots, disrupting emotional arcs, and flattening the intent behind entire narratives." Satisfying demand Along with the widespread censorship method of simply banning films, releasing alternate versions of movies is also well established in many countries beyond India. Authoritarian states know that even if a film is banned, it can still circulate illegally, which motivates them to distribute their own "more appropriate" versions of the works. Way before AI-created imagery became widely available, Iran had already equipped the country's censors with new digital technology by 2010, allowing them to tweak dialogues and images that didn't conform to Islamic modesty. The approach is detailed in an 2012 article in The Atlantic, which also shows stills comparing how the original scenes were retouched in the Iranian versions: Women simply disappear from the frame, or their neckline is covered up with a clunky vase. Even Will Ferrell's crotch is hidden behind a wall in the motorsports comedy Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby (2006). Drugs not okay Even though many major Hollywood studios no longer distribute their films in Russia since it launched its full-scale war on Ukraine in 2022, there are still some Western films appearing in the country's cinemas or on streaming platforms. One recent example of a film that circulated in an altered version was the award-winning US film Anora (2024). Censors simply zoomed into various scenes to crop out the depictions of characters using drugs, as shown by independent Russian-language news site Meduza. Meanwhile, the film's nude scenes featuring the stripper played by Mikey Madison were left untouched. A film like Anora would never air on Turkish television. Under President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's conservative AKP government, around 95 per cent of the media landscape has been brought into line with their conservative guidelines. Broadcasters mainly avoid sex scenes and portrayals of LGBTQ+ characters. Historical topics seen as promoting "anti-Turkish rhetoric" can be particularly contentious. Cigarettes and alcohol are also blurred on TV, with some stations coming up with creative solutions to cover up the items. Meanwhile, some Hollywood studios have released their own self-censored versions to circumvent bans and blurs. Sony Pictures supplied an alternate version of Blade Runner 2049 to Turkey and other non-Western markets, removing or cropping scenes showing nudity, as film critic Burak Göral first noted. Turkey's Film Critics Association (S?YAD) issued an open letter condemning the censorship, noting that the cuts were "an insult to moviegoers in Turkey." Accessing China China is renowned for banning and shortening films, too. Official censorship guidelines prohibit, among other things, the "promotion of cults or superstition." The 2016 Ghostbusters reboot thus failed to be released in the country despite being retitled Super Power Dare Die Team. Surprisingly, Disney's Coco, which centers on the Mexican Day of the Dead, was authorised a year later. Major productions that have been altered by China's censors include the 2012 James Bond film, Skyfall. A scene in which a Chinese security guard is killed was completely cut out because it suggested that China is unable to protect its own territory from foreign agents. In other "controversial" scenes, the subtitles differed from what was actually been said on screen. In the famous portrait scene in James Cameron's Titanic 3D (2012), Kate Winslet was cropped up to her chin to hide her nudity. "Considering the vivid 3D effects, we fear that viewers may reach out their hands for a touch and thus interrupt other people's viewing," a Chinese official explained. In 2022, social media users widely mocked the censors' alternate ending for Minions: The Rise of Gru. In the original version, villains Gru and Wild Knuckles evade capture by authorities after the latter fakes his own death. But through a series of subtitled stills that were widely compared to a PowerPoint presentation for their poor quality, the Chinese version had Wild Knuckles arrested and imprisoned for 20 years; he starts a theater troupe in jail. Gru is portrayed as simply "returning to his family," with being a father becoming his "biggest accomplishment." Hollywood studios have also been releasing their own alternate versions of movies in China to avoid state censorship — and the PowerPoint slides. The country began allowing a limited number of Hollywood films per year into the country in 1994, and as major studios increasingly competed to gain access to the restricted and lucrative slots, they also started tailoring their stories to please a Chinese market of some 1.4 billion people. A 2020 report by nonprofit organisation PEN denounces the growing trend of producers willingly altering their films for Beijing's censors: Hollywood filmmakers "are making difficult and troubling compromises on free expression," it stated. Iron Man 3 (2013) is a prominent case highlighting this approach. While altered films typically lose runtime, four minutes of extra content were added to the Marvel blockbuster, with exclusive scenes featuring Chinese star Fan Bingbing and actor Wang Xueqi, as well as scenes promoting a local milk brand. In the Chinese version, the beverage helps Iron Man/Tony Stark recover from an injury.
