PBS, Star reaffirm support for GRS at joint convention
Published on: Sat, Jul 12, 2025
By: Jonathan Nicholas Text Size: Joachim receives a memento from Star secretary-general Senator Datuk Edward Linggu. PENAMPANG: The call for Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) to contest the upcoming state elections independently was a key message during the first joint convention between Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) and Parti Solidariti Tanah Airku (Star) at KDCA Hall on Saturday. PBS acting president Datuk Seri Dr Joachim Gunsalam warned against breaking away from GRS, saying a PBS-Star alliance alone lacked the numbers to form government. He said GRS remained Sabah's best chance for local political leadership, urging members to unite behind the coalition for the sake of stability and progress. Joachim expressed confidence in GRS contesting seats in Sulabayan, Semporna and Sungai Sibuga, while calling on youth to step up and lead efforts at the grassroots level. Star president Datuk Seri Jeffrey Kitingan said Sabah has long been divided by external interests and that the coming polls should focus on reclaiming the Sabah agenda. He spoke of historical grievances, including Sabah's perceived loss of status since Malaysia's formation, and called on Sabahans to revisit and understand their constitutional rights under MA63. Responding to allegations linking him to a mining scandal, Jeffrey denied wrongdoing and urged voters to treat the election as a referendum on returning political power to Sabahans. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Sabah polls: Youths urged to 'wake up' and take charge of their future
KOTA KINABALU: Sabah's younger generation must wake up and fight for their future before it is too late, says veteran politician Tan Sri Joseph Pairin Kitingan. Speaking at the joint Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS)-Sabah STAR Convention at the Hongkod Koisaan in Penampang on Saturday (July 12), he warned that Sabah is still being dictated to by national parties. As such, he said, it was for the people, especially youths, to reclaim the state's autonomous rights under the Federation. 'This is your home, your state. Don't just let others govern you and decide your future. You must stand up and save Sabah,' said the 84-year-old former chief minister and founder of PBS, which toppled the ruling Parti Berjaya in 1985. ALSO READ: Sabah polls: GRS faces tough fight to stay in power, say analysts His comments came after some 7,000 people at the convention chanted 'Solo!' in unison, calling for Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) to contest the next state election on its own, without help from national parties. The chant, which echoed through the Hongkod Koisaan hall in Penampang, sent a message that Sabahans are ready for local parties to lead the state on their own terms. Pairin, now PBS' premier adviser, did not directly say if GRS should go solo, but he made his position on local-led leadership crystal clear. Parti Bersatu Sabah founder Tan Sri Joseph Pairin Kitingan (right) shakes hands with Chief Minister Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor after the PBS–Sabah STAR Convention at the Hongkod Koisaan in Penampang on Saturday (July 12). Asked if he wants Sabah to be governed by strong local parties like neighbouring Sarawak, he replied: 'Well, you know the conclusion. You make a comparison, of course, it is like Sarawak. But come on, they (national-based parties) are playing with us. 'We should not be controlled by national-based parties. Just look at Sarawak, they are running the show themselves,' said Pairin, who is also Huguan Siou (paramount leader) of the KadazanDusun Murut. ALSO READ: PBS, Sabah STAR grassroots call for GRS to go solo in upcoming Sabah polls He also criticised the delay in implementing the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63), saying that Sabah is still begging for what was promised decades ago. 'We are kneeling on the ground asking them to return our rights. Is that what you want to keep doing? No, of course not. We should be back on our own feet. Wake up!" he stressed. He urged young Sabahans, especially first-time voters, to take their role seriously in shaping the future of the state. Chief Minister Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor giving the thumbs up to Parti Bersatu Sabah founder Tan Sri Joseph Pairin Kitingan (right) and other leaders before leaving after launching the closing the PBS–Sabah STAR Convention at the Hongkod Koisaan in Penampang on Saturday (July 12). 'They must remember, this is their home. Their fight is for Sabah's future. Do not just allow others to govern you and hold back your rights,' he said. Although GRS has not made a formal decision on whether to go it alone in the coming state election, a growing chorus of voices is urging it to take charge of its political direction. 'Let them (GRS leaders) work together. But the goal must be to save Sabah,' Pairin added. Chief Minister and GRS chairman Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor acknowledged the sentiment but said any decision will be made collectively through the GRS supreme council. ALSO READ: Sabah state assembly's done for the current term, says Hajiji as polls loom He stressed that while the Chief Minister has the prerogative to advise on dissolving the assembly, consensus among all coalition partners is crucial. While Hajiji avoided committing to the 'go solo' call, both Sabah STAR president Datuk Seri Dr Jeffrey Kitingan and PBS acting president Datuk Seri Dr Joachim Gunsalam openly supported it. Kitingan favoured minimal seats for electoral partners outside the coalition, while Gunsalam insisted GRS must remain the dominant faction. Hajiji stated previously that he prefers to maintain ties with Sabah Pakatan Harapan but is not open to working with Sabah Barisan Nasional.
Daily Express
2 hours ago
- Daily Express
‘History determines politics': Ex-AG says good time to revisit M'sia's formation
Published on: Sunday, July 13, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jul 13, 2025 By: David Thien Text Size: TOMMY said the concerns expressed by Sabahans and Sarawakians of domination by the Centre made its naked appearance within three years of Malaysia's formation. 'Stephen Kalong Ningkan's removal as Sarawak Chief Minister and his replacement by a pliable Penghulu Tawi Sli, made predictions of Kuala Lumpur's domination come true very quickly. 'The outbreak of the May 1969 riots in Kuala Lumpur without any manifestation in East Malaysia, the National Emergency that followed and the introduction of the National Economic Policy in 1971, proved critics right that race-based politics would be exported to East Malaysia.' Tommy said the politics that developed over the 60 years since 1963 is best understood against the historical background of the Federation. 'History determines politics. Without a past, how to understand the present or hope for the future? Hence, it is critical to consider the genesis of Malaysia's formation, which takes us back to the British Empire and World War II. As we complete the first quarter of the 21st century, this is as good a time as any to revisit our foundation. 'The major actors in this decolonisation exercise of the British Empire were Britain, Malaya, Singapore, North Borneo, Sarawak and Brunei. Also playing a starring role were neighbouring Indonesia and Philippines, each hostile to any federation.' 'The United States looked at every development in international affairs from Cold War lenses.' 'Finally, the United Nations was directly involved in the final months of its creation. Prime Ministers Harold MacMillan and Tunku Abdul Rahman were pivotal, with Lee Kuan Yew having a significant presence. Leading the Opposition were the charismatic leaders of the Third World, President Sukarno and President Macapagal of the Philippines.' 'As one would expect, each of the nations and its leaders had differing interests in supporting or opposing the establishment of Malaysia.' 'None of their national interests were identical. Accordingly, it is proposed to consider how each of them acted in the run-up to 1963.' 'The primary source of information on the decision-making is found in the collection of documents compiled by one of Malaya's foremost historians, Professor Anthony Stockwell in the 'British Documents on the End of Empire' in the dedicated volume on Malaysia. 'Upon the reduction to 30 years of official documents for public release by the Wilson Government in 1965, nearly all the files and records became available for publication.' 'The Malaysia volume was published in 2004. Obviously, these documents tell the story of the making of Malaysia from the perspective of British policy-makers, but with that caveat, it is a treasure trove.' Tommy said the post-war separation of Singapore and Malaya was deeply regretted, not only by the Left but also by many British policy-makers not least on economic grounds, but the prospect of merger was always kept alive. 'In a despatch dated 25th October 1960 from Lord Selkirk, the UK High Commissioner in Singapore, to Iain MacLeod, the Secretary of State for the Colonies, British policy was succinctly stated as follows:- 'Our first recommendation is that Her Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom should accept as the ultimate aim of their policy the development of a political association between Malaya, Singapore and the Borneo territories such as would enable them to take their place within the Commonwealth as a single entity strong enough to resist encroachment from their neighbours or from Communist China. 'Though the exact form of union, federation or confederation that might emerge cannot be foreseen at this stage, we consider that some such broad association provides the only satisfactory evolution which will safeguard in the longer term not only the security, economic development and welfare of the territories themselves, but also, on a basis of consent, the United Kingdom's own essential defence interests consisting of the base in Singapore and the necessary deployment areas outside it.' However, this was met by this response from Sir William Goode, Governor of then North Borneo:- 'North Borneo is a strikingly beautiful country of happy, friendly people, busy building and planting for the future and still content with colonial rule.' He narrated that as the 1960's began, British foreign policy was to reduce or eliminate her colonial and defence commitments globally. MacMillan's famous 'Wind of Change' theme was announced in Ghana in January 1960, and repeated in Cape Town in February 1960. British policy in South-East Asia must, therefore, be viewed against the background of its overall imperial policy amid the setting of the British Sun all over the world. 'With regard to her remaining colonies in South-East Asia, a high-level Committee reported to Prime Minister MacMillan in October 1960. The aims of the British Government were stated by that Committee as follows:- (a) to contain Communism; (b) to maintain Western influence; The United Kingdom also has certain special obligations in the area:- (a) as the centre of the Commonwealth and the Sterling area; (b) to her dependent territories, notably responsibility for Hong Kong and prevention of Communist control over Singapore.' Tommy noted that constraints on UK's defence policy were highlighted, viz, that British resources and facilities could not continue for another decade (that is, into the 1970s) on 'present scales and in present terms'. More decisive was the high-cost factor in the light of her economic situation. A review of her defence role in South-East Asia was, therefore, urgently needed. At the same time, the total withdrawal of British forces could not be contemplated because that would mean abandoning her colonial responsibilities and her defence treaty with Malaya. 'The making of Malaysia, at least from the British perspective, also had an economic dimension. The British economy faced balance of payments problems and galloping defence costs associated with the Cold War. Stockwell writes:- 'Strategies of decolonisation could help Britain address these problems if, by moving from formal to informal empire, it found a new role in the world. With respect to South-East Asia, the 'Grand Design' for a 'Greater Malaysia' might perpetuate Britain's influence in the post-colonial period. Those in British governing circles who welcomed Malaysia did so on account of its expected benefits for Britain.' Tommy: 'Hence, the condemnation of Malaysia from the Left as 'neo-colonialism', had ample justification, that is, the pursuit of imperialism by indirect means through favourite proxies or cronies.' What were British economic interests in real terms? British private capital investment in Malaya was estimated at about £400 million (compared with £335 million in India and £108 in Pakistan). British exports were valued at £60 million annually, while 22 per cent of Malaysia's imports were from the mother country. 'In early 1963, Sir Geofroy Tory, the United Kingdom High Commissioner in Kuala Lumpur, observed that Britain had 'a very big financial stake in Malaya and a considerable vested interest in the maintenance of a stable and prosperous Malayan economy'. Nonetheless, the impact of economic factors should not be exaggerated, for ultimately the security of the region and the cost of maintaining it was the overriding consideration. Stockwell summarised British policy this way:- 'The prospects for the 'Grand Design' were, therefore, assessed from the strategic perspective not the economic. Bases not markets, security not commerce, international influence not investment opportunities dominated the thinking of British ministers and officers'. In summary, the compelling attraction of Greater Malaysia for the United Kingdom was the prospect of retaining influence while reducing expenditure. Hence, the United Kingdom's objective to continue to play a dominant role in world affairs generally, and as a major former colonial power in South-East Asia at reduced cost, would be accomplished in the new Federation.
Daily Express
3 hours ago
- Daily Express
Ibahan folks never sidelined: Juil
Published on: Sunday, July 13, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jul 13, 2025 By: Hayati Dzulkifli Text Size: Limbahau Assemblyman Datuk Juil Nuatim Kota Kinabalu: Physical development of Limbahau state constituency and its people's needs have never been sidelined by the present State government, said its independent Limbahau Assemblyman Datuk Juil Nuatim. In fact, he said he was thankful to the State government, under the leadership of Chief Minister Datuk Seri Hajiji Haji Noor, for approving various development initiatives that have transformed Limbahau. 'Since I was entrusted with the people's mandate to represent Limbahau, much development has been brought into the area – the needs of the people continue to be improved, roads upgraded, basic amenities strengthened and the problems and hardships of the people addressed. 'This is not mere rhetoric; it is a reality. It is not fantasy, but a true manifestation of a caring government moving in line with the grand vision of Sabah Maju Jaya (SMJ),' he said when debating the Supplementary Supply Bill 2025 at the State Legislative Assembly here, recently. Subscribe or LOG IN to access this article. Support Independant Journalism Subscribe to Daily Express Malaysia Access to DE E-Paper Access to DE E-Paper Exclusive News Exclusive News Invites to special events Invites to special events Giveaways & Rewards 1-Year Most Popular (Income Tax Deductible) Explore Plans Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
