A Rajput show of strength as Brij Bhushan visits wrestling heartland
The leader who is facing sexual harassment allegations from several wrestlers was invited to an event to felicitate wrestler Rachna Parmar, in Bond Kalan village of Charkhi Dadri district.
Parmar, a member of the Rajput community, recently won a gold medal in the women's 43 kg category at the Under-17 Asian Wrestling Championship in Vietnam.
Charkhi Dadri is also the home district of Olympian wrestler Vinesh Phogat, who is currently a Congress MLA from Julana in Jind district. In 2023, Phogat was among the wrestlers who led a protest in Delhi against Singh over the sexual harassment allegations.
Singh was invited, along with local BJP MLA Sunil Sangwan and Lok Sabha MP Dharambir Singh, for the felicitation event by the Rajput Mahasabha. Both members of the Jat community like Phogat, Sangwan and Dharambir reportedly left the venue before Singh's arrival, citing time constraints.
However, this is being viewed as an effort to avoid ruffling feathers of the Jat community, given the caste equations in Haryana. Several khap leaders from the region had publicly opposed Singh's visit, and urged the organisers not to invite him.
In a statement, local khap leader Krishan Phogat said: 'Such persons come to break brotherhood, not to unite. The local MLA and MP should not attend the function either.'
However, the Rajput Mahasabha leader from Charkhi Dadri, Pawan Sanjarwas, called those opposing the visit 'anti-social elements' and warned that they would be 'taught a lesson' if they even tried to protest.
Speaking to The Indian Express, Sanjarwas said the opposition to Singh had only helped the Rajput Mahasabha. 'It led to more presence at the felicitation event.'
Sanjarwas also said that Rajput votes would consolidate behind the BJP with Singh's visit.
Colonel (retd) Devender Singh Rana, a Rajput community leader from Karnal, also supported the visit, saying it would help make a political impact.
The Rajput community, estimated to be around 8% of Haryana's population, is concentrated mainly in the districts of Rewari, Mahendragarh, Gurgaon Jhajjar, Bhiwani, Charkhi Dadri, Ambala, and Karnal, Rana said.
According to him, this translated into electoral sway in 17 of the 90 Assembly constituencies. Still, as of now, Haryana has only two Rajput MLAs – Shyam Singh Rana (Radaur), who is a minister in the BJP's Nayab Singh Saini government, and Yoginder Singh Rana (Assandh).
While the Rajput community is traditionally considered a BJP vote bank, cracks had surfaced in 2023 over the controversy surrounding a statue of 9th-century king Mihir Bhoj.
Thirty-five BJP leaders from Kaithal had threatened to resign after some party members from the Gurjar community referred to the king as 'Gurjar Pratihar Samrat Mihir Bhoj' during a statue unveiling.
The contention of the Rajput community is that Mihir Bhoj belongs to the community and should be referred to as 'Hindu Samrat' instead. The matter is currently pending in the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
Vinod Rana Thamber, a Rajput leader from Ambala, said Singh's visit should not be seen in the context of politics. 'The event organised in Bond Kalan village was just a social function to honour a member of the community.'
Sukhbir Siwach's extensive and in-depth coverage of farmer agitation against three farm laws during 2020-21 drew widespread attention. ... Read More
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
16 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
'Every Indian will be looked at with suspicion': Congress slams nationwide SIR plan
The BJP has mastered the art of taking a bad idea and making it worse. As if the chaos and opposition to the Bihar SIR was not enough, the BJP-controlled ECI now wants to subject the entire country through this trauma. Every Indian citizen will be looked at with suspicion,… — K C Venugopal (@kcvenugopalmp) July 12, 2025
Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why Maharashtra ‘urban Naxal' Bill's smooth sailing has put MVA in the dock
The smooth passage of the Maharashtra Special Public Security (MSPS) Bill in the state Legislative Assembly as well as the Council seems to have exposed the lack of coordination and political will among the Opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) alliance against the Mahayuti government led by Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis. On Thursday, the MSPS Bill, which seeks 'effective prevention of certain unlawful activities of Left-wing extremist organisations', was passed in the Assembly by a voice vote. The Bill sailed through the Lower House amid the Opposition's concerns over the definition and interpretation of some of its terms and clauses. The only dissenting note came from lone CPI(M) MLA Vinod Nikole. With 235 MLAs in the 288-member Assembly, the BJP-led Mahayuti holds an absolute majority in the House. Yet, the 53 MLAs representing the MVA missed the opportunity to put up a spirited fight, failing even to express their dissent in the Assembly during the passage of the Bill. Twenty-four hours later, the Bill was also passed by the state Legislative Council amid an Opposition walkout. In what appeared to be a course correction, the Opposition in the Upper House submitted a note of dissent against the Bill to Chairperson Ram Shinde. But this only exemplified the Opposition's lack of a uniform strategy on a crucial legislation like this, which has been dubbed a Bill against 'urban Naxalism'. Fadnavis put forth his views in favour of the Bill in the Assembly. 'The legislation is against those Left-wing extremist organisations, which are provoking people for armed revolt to demolish democracy, Parliament and institutions,' he said. 'There are six such organisations that have been banned in other states operating in Maharashtra. In total, there are 64 outfits, which are, under the guise of people's socio-economic uplift, engaged in destructive and dangerous unlawful activities.' With the Opposition failing to put the government under pressure over the MSPS Bill, what remains to be seen now is how the protest against the legislation would play out on the streets. To begin with, a delegation of the Opposition leaders is planning to head to the Raj Bhavan to convey their concerns to Governor C P Radhakrishnan next week. The MVA's constituents – including the Congress, NCP (SP) and Shiv Sena (UBT) – also plan to reach out to various Left organisations and launch a statewide campaign against the government. Whether the Opposition could successfully mobilise mass support remains to be seen. NCP (SP) leader Jayant Patil said, 'We were members of the Joint Select Committee and strongly voiced our concerns. But its last meeting's date change took many of us off guard. We had our scheduled programmes… Yet, we brought to their notice our concern.' The Bill was referred to a Joint Select Committee comprising members of both the Mahayuti and MVA after it was introduced in the Assembly during last year's monsoon session. Although the panel received 12,000 suggestions and objections from various quarters, it finally recommended only three changes to the Bill. In a candid admission, a senior Congress leader and former minister lamented, 'There is no unity within the MVA. Each party is doing what it feels is right. In the Assembly, had we collectively registered our dissent, it would have given us the moral standing to question the government's intention behind such legislation.' However, Shiv Sena (UBT) president Uddhav Thackeray, who is an MLC, argued, 'The battle is far from over. We support the government in the fight against Naxalism and terrorism. But if the government, through this legislation, is going to abuse power to harass opponents, it is unacceptable.' Uddhav also said, 'If they (government) bulldoze a legislation through majority support on the floor of the House, we will exercise our rights to take the fight to the people.' Notably, it was under the Opposition's pressure, primarily by Uddhav and his cousin Raj Thackeray's Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), that the Fadnavis government withdrew its controversial government resolutions (GRs) inducting Hindi in primary schools as part of the three-language policy. However, in the case of the GRs, it was the Thackerays' emotive pitch for the Marathi unity and pride that likely forced the government's hand. As regards the MSPS Bill, the Opposition reckons that the legislation, when enforced, could lead to a 'misuse of power against political rivals', and create a political environment in which anybody questioning the government could be tagged an 'urban Naxal' and face government action. To substantiate their apprehensions, Opposition leaders point to the absence of terms 'terror' or 'Naxal' in the legislation. Instead, it uses the terms 'Left-wing extremist' and 'frontal organisations'. Uddhav said, 'There is no mention of the words 'Naxal' or 'terror'… We are not against the fight against Naxal or terrorism, but if the government uses its majority rule to silence critics, we are not going to accept it.' In the past, legislation like the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA) and Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) were misused by those in power to arrest and imprison political opponents. 'Similarly, the Fadnavis government will misuse the MSPS legislation against its opponents,' the Sena (UBT) chief alleged. Fadnavis, however, said in the Assembly that the legislation is directed at tackling the Left-wing extremist organisations, assuring that it was not intended to target the Left or any other political opponents. After passage in the Assembly and Council, the MSPS Bill will be referred to the Governor for assent, following which it will come into effect as a law. Maharashtra would be the fifth state to pass such a public security Bill after Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Odisha and Chhattisgarh.
New Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
TPCC chief slams Amit Shah's remarks on Telangana Caste Survey
The TPCC chief highlighted that Telangana's survey, termed SEEEPC (Socio-Economic, Education, Employment, Political, and Caste survey), covered a massive population of over 3.54 crore people. 'With this depth and breadth of data collection, what else is left to find out? Amit Shah clearly doesn't understand the scope of what Telangana has achieved,' he said. Mahesh Kumar Goud also rebutted Shah's claim that the BJP government initiated the caste census on its own volition. He said it was Rahul Gandhi's consistent demand during the Bharat Jodo Yatra that forced the Centre to respond. 'Where were JP Nadda and Rajnath Singh when Rahul Gandhi was vocally advocating for a caste census? Why didn't they support it then?' he questioned. He further asserted that unlike the BJP, which is only beginning the exercise, the Congress government in Telangana has already started delivering on the data collected. 'The State has announced 42% reservations for Backward Classes in the local body elections,' he said. Goud demanded that Amit Shah and the Union government immediately clear the legislative bills passed by the Telangana Assembly to enhance the quota to 42% for BCs. 'If the Centre is sincere about social justice, let it support what Telangana has already initiated on the ground by adding the legislation's in the ninth schedule of the constitutions,' he said.
