logo
From Eyesore to Opportunity: Gary's Side Lot Program Gives Hope to Homeowners

From Eyesore to Opportunity: Gary's Side Lot Program Gives Hope to Homeowners

Yahoo26-03-2025

Gaynette Ford remembers the day she danced in the street.
After years of living next to a crumbling drug house, where strangers loitered, and needles littered the ground, she had all but given up on getting it torn down. Then, one afternoon, she came home to a sight she never expected: a demolition crew leveling the eyesore to the ground.
'I danced in the streets, just to have the comfort of knowing it was gone,' she recalled.
Ford, 81, has lived in her Gary home since the early 1980s, when she bought it at auction for $25,000. For decades, she maintained the vacant lot next door, taking care of the grass and upkeep, even though it wasn't officially hers. All she wanted was to keep her block looking decent.
The Gary Side Lot Program, housed in the office of the Gary Redevelopment Commission, allows citizens who live next door or adjacent to an empty lot or parcel owned by the city to acquire the lot. Categorized as 'side lots,' the program aims to reduce blighted conditions within neighborhoods and return properties to the tax rolls.
'Our goal is to make sure that as the city grows, that the people who stuck it in with the city have the opportunity to grow wealth,' said Chris Harris, executive director of redevelopment. He said the Gary Redevelopment Commission owns more than 4,000 properties throughout the city, over 80% of which are vacant lots.
Gary homeowners interested in the program must visit the redevelopment office, where staff will help determine eligibility. If the city or another entity owns the lot, the office will work to secure the land rights for the homeowner.
Applicants must be current on their city and state taxes for at least two years and have lived in the city for an extended period while maintaining sole ownership of their existing property. They must also attend a meeting with the commission to explain why they want the lot and what they plan to do with it.
Once approved, program participants can use the lot to build a garage, create off-street parking, expand their yard for gardening, or add other structures that enhance the property.
'The vision was always to make sure that the homeowner's current parcel was contiguous with the parcel we just acquired, and it would not just be separate but still in their name,' Harris said, emphasizing that people record their new deeds when going through the program to make everything official.
With over 30 citizens completing the program, the office hopes to ramp up information dissemination to encourage citizens to continue the process.
'It just helps with the aesthetics of the city,' said Harris about the program.
A big push for this program has been giving these lots to homeowners who have taken care of them, even before the program awarded ownership of the plot.
One of the program's successes, Shirley Griffin, moved to Gary from Mississippi shortly after graduating from high school in the late '80s. While working in finance and accounting, her family invested in the home for about $5,000, which they bought and fixed up. The house next door was once a sanctuary for drug users, she said. But eventually, the house was torn down, and she and her family took it upon themselves to keep the vacant lot tidy.
'I want it to look nice where I am staying,' Griffin said.
At some point, someone asked why she didn't just buy the side lot. She didn't even know that was an option. Hearing about the program from a neighbor, she decided to steamroll the process of getting her side lot. The most stressful part of the process was the waiting game to see if she got approved.
'I think it's really good for homeowners because they have more property,' Griffin said. 'These houses are so close together, so now you have more room off to the side of it, you won't hear loud music or other things going on.'
Many of the vacant lots owned by the city are in the Midtown neighborhood and can be traced back to the socioeconomic divide in the city. Surveys from the Gary Commercial Club in the 1930s showed these areas were heavily concentrated in poverty, with redlining following slowly behind it as the city rapidly grew with development but fell shortly afterward thanks to overcrowding and weak building regulations.
Attempts to tackle these challenges have long been part of the city's agenda. In the 1960s, former Gary Mayor Richard Hatcher sought to combat the city's poverty through his Model Cities program, which rehabbed areas where crime and poverty existed. Senior homes, low-income housing, and other retail locations were built along Broadway to aid in the high unemployment rate for black people while fixing the poverty rate.
For Ford and Griffin, reclaiming the neglected land isn't just about expanding their property; it's about building something lasting and leaving behind a piece of themselves.
When it's warmer, Ford plans to plant a garden with benches and chairs for others in the community to enjoy. She hopes a program like this will encourage more people to come to Gary and stay for a long time. As the walls of her home were filled with pictures and information for the last several generations, a favorite pastime is to study her family's history; she looks forward to what the future could be for those other recipients as well.
Meanwhile, Griffin is planning her own transformation. Now that the lot is officially hers, she plans to have it cleaned back into her backyard to remove any shrubbery. She has ideas for what to do with her project, from a garden with a firepit to a small office space to a recreation area for her family.
As a full-time caretaker of her disabled daughter, she hopes this program will encourage other community members to join and continue to make changes throughout the city.
'I'm benefiting, and the city is benefiting too; plus, the neighbors are gonna appreciate that it's looking nice over here because it makes their property look nice, too,' she said.
The post From Eyesore to Opportunity: Gary's Side Lot Program Gives Hope to Homeowners appeared first on Capital B Gary.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gary officials celebrate progress of Aetna home construction
Gary officials celebrate progress of Aetna home construction

Chicago Tribune

time2 days ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Gary officials celebrate progress of Aetna home construction

As he stood outside a newly constructed home on 10th Avenue, Gary Mayor Eddie Melton said the structure represented much more. 'This is proof that Gary's plan and strategy in revitalizing neighborhoods is in the works,' Melton said Friday. 'This is more than just a city initiative — this is a collaborative effort with stakeholders and organizations that are extremely important.' Melton and other officials allowed the public to see progress on the first single-family home to be built in the Aetna neighborhood in decades. The home, located at 5544 E. 10th Ave., will be complete near the end of July. The development was spearheaded by Frederick Long and Laneé Nicole, local real estate professionals, and developer David Sutor. The Gary Redevelopment Commission opened a Requests for Proposals process in 2024, with the proposal selected during a June 5, 2024, commission meeting, according to a news release. 'Today is a celebration, not just of building homes, but of people, of partnerships, of promise and progress,' Nicole said. 'This isn't just a house — it's somebody's home. This isn't just a community — it's our community.' The single-family structure is part of 15 planned homes that will feature ranch-style and two-story options, modern amenities and new construction. All homes will be built on a slab without basements. Ranch properties will be about 1,400 square feet, starting at about $220,000, and two-story homes will be about 2,000 square feet and start at about $260,000, according to a news release. The remaining 14 homes are planned to be completed throughout the next couple of years. Christopher Harris, executive director of redevelopment for the city of Gary, said his goal is to see more than demolition in the city, and seeing the new home Friday gave him hope for the future. 'Think about it: 15 new construction homes in this neighborhood,' Harris said. 'It hasn't happened (in Aetna) in decades. That speaks to the demand, right?' The construction is part of the city's initiative to remove blighted structures throughout Gary. In March, the city began its second phase of the Aetna demolition, according to Post-Tribune archives. Blight elimination is one of Melton's focuses as mayor. As state senator, Melton created the Senate Bill 434, which established the blighted property demolition fund and allows the city to receive $6 million from the state of Indiana for blight elimination. The city had to match those funds, with half coming from American Rescue Plan Act funds and $3 million from the Hard Rock casino. On Friday, Melton said his goal was to start demolishing blighted homes in Aetna before moving to the rest of the city. Last year, Gary demolished about 40 blighted structures in the Aetna neighborhood, Melton said. 'We piloted this targeted approach to make a noticeable, meaningful and impactful difference, so residents can see (the change),' he said. 'Is it complete? Absolutely not. There's still a lot of work left to do.' Melton believes the Aetna neighborhood offers many opportunities to residents and future homeowners. He highlighted its proximity to the South Shore Line's Miller train station, a Gary Public Transportation Corporation route and major highways, including Interstates 65, 94, 90 and 80. He also highlighted the proximity to Miller's Lake Street offerings, the beachfront and Indiana Dunes National Park. Councilman Myles Tolliver, D-at large, spoke at Friday's press conference, saying he's excited about what the development means for Aetna's future. Tolliver shared Melton's sentiments about why Aetna is a prime location for new development. 'Here is the greatest city in Northwest Indiana,' Tolliver said. 'It's time for us to show it. We do that by building infrastructure and what will be homes.'

‘No one' excited about Kamala Harris' potential gubernatorial run, say California donors
‘No one' excited about Kamala Harris' potential gubernatorial run, say California donors

New York Post

time3 days ago

  • New York Post

‘No one' excited about Kamala Harris' potential gubernatorial run, say California donors

Former Vice President Kamala Harris' prospective gubernatorial bid is not striking up much excitement among Democratic fundraisers in California, Politico reported Friday. The outlet spoke to multiple Democratic Party donors in California to see how they felt about Harris possibly running for governor. So far, her interest in exploring a gubernatorial run in the state following her 2024 presidential election loss hasn't enthused many. Advertisement 'She still would probably lead, but honestly, no one is incredibly pumped,' one Southern California fundraiser told Politico. Harris, who lost November's election to President Donald Trump, is seriously considering a 2026 bid to succeed term-limited Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif. A source close to Harris told Fox News Digital in March that she has told allies she will decide by the end of summer on whether to launch a gubernatorial campaign. The two potential options for Harris are launching a gubernatorial run next year in her home state or seeking the presidency again in 2028. Extremely early polls in the next Democratic Party presidential nomination race — which are heavily reliant on name recognition at this point — indicate that the former vice president holds a significant lead over other potential White House contenders. 3 AP Advertisement 'In interviews, several major donors in the state told POLITICO they fear her reemergence as a candidate would re-open still-fresh wounds from her defeat in 2024,' the outlet reported. 'Some harbor lingering frustration about how her billion-dollar campaign juggernaut ended in debt and want assurances she would have a clear plan to win the governor's mansion.' Mather Martin, a party fundraiser from San Francisco who worked for multiple Harris campaigns, told Politico, 'There was more enthusiasm at first' for Harris' run. However, he added, 'I think it waned a bit.' Another donor who gave a six-figure donation to Harris' presidential campaign last year told the outlet they had found the implosion of her White House bid 'traumatizing' and seemed reluctant to support her in the state. 3 REUTERS Advertisement 'Kamala just reminds you we are in this complete s— storm. With Biden, we got bamboozled… I think she did the best she could in that situation, but obviously she knew about the cognitive decline too. I've written so many checks because I knew the Trump administration would be horrible, but we're living in a nightmare because of the Democrats. I'm furious at them, truly.' The donor who declared that 'no one is incredibly pumped' about Harris' run also shared that donors 'realize it's just going to bring up the whole pathetic last presidential, which no one wants to hear about again. And then it's the whole 'Did you know Joe Biden?' thing.' Scott Drexel, a donor-adviser based in the San Francisco Bay Area, noted, 'It's very fair to say there's not an overwhelming clamor' for Harris' gubernatorial run. 3 Gado via Getty Images Advertisement He also pointed out, 'It's very hard for there to be one if it's not 100 percent clear if she really wants to do it.' 'She's going to have to work for the nomination. Every day that passes, there's less of a sense of inevitability about her candidacy,' Drexel said. Democratic donor and San Francisco trial lawyer Joe Cotchett told Politico, 'She is talking to people around the state about whether she is going to run. If she does, she's going to have very difficult problems.' Harris' team did not immediately reply to Fox News Digital's request for comment.

America's leaders confuse economic coercion for good exchange
America's leaders confuse economic coercion for good exchange

The Hill

time3 days ago

  • The Hill

America's leaders confuse economic coercion for good exchange

Amid their debates over tariffs, taxes and regulations, Democrats and Republicans seem to have reached a quiet consensus that they should be more involved in economic exchange. They shouldn't. On crowded streets, in office buildings and online, people meet, words pass and goods exchange hands. But the exchanges can take one of two forms. The first is the key to just, sustainable and rapid growth. While the other leads to political dysfunction, bad investments and economic stagnation. When Democratic and Republican leaders fail to distinguish between the two — especially at the same time — it poses a grave threat to the U.S. political economy. The good type of exchange is voluntary. There is no fraud from the buyer or seller and no force from anyone else. Both can walk away with a smile and something that they value more than whatever they gave up. Governments play an important role by ensuring people have the economic freedom to pursue these exchanges. Like a neutral referee ensuring fair play, a wise government impartially safeguards everyone's right to own, use and exchange property. And it stands aside when it needs to, allowing us to make our own economic choices unencumbered by high or inequitable taxes, meddlesome regulations or steep barriers to trade. Bad exchange is coercive, even if subtly so. And subtle government coercion is all the rage these days. In one way or another, coerced exchange involves either fraud or force. An obvious example is a thug who threatens to take your money or your life. A less obvious example (involving better intentions) is the government official empowered to tell you what to do with your person or your property. The power to tax is widely accepted but fundamentally coercive. And the higher the taxes, the greater the coercion. Outlawing mutually agreed upon prices between sellers and buyers — as both President Trump and former Vice President Harris proposed at some point — is also coercive, as are Trump's tariffs, the first iteration of which were largely accepted by Biden. State governments limit entry into dozens of professions through occupational licenses that prevent upward mobility with little or no benefit to the public. When the government stipulates when, where, and how property may be used, it is coercive. Local governments assert such power over land use, helping send home prices through the roof. And in the latest example, the Trump administration flexed coercive power in its unusual arrangement with Nippon Steel. People tolerate some degree of government coercion, especially if it serves the general welfare by protecting our rights — that is, by keeping others from coercing us. But when governments stop being neutral referees and become active — if invisible — participants in our exchanges, we all pay a price. First, individuals lose agency. The great economist Adam Smith argued that coercers imagine they can 'arrange the different members of a great society with as much ease as the hand arranges the different pieces upon a chess-board' without acknowledging any other 'principle of motion besides that which the hand impresses upon them.' Think of President Biden's attempt to transfer wealth from those without college degrees to those with college degrees, despite the fact that the latter earn about 70 percent more money. Or consider Trump's attempt to transfer wealth from manufacturers that use steel to manufacturers that make it. Each is a queen's gambit that sacrifices some chess pieces for the sake of other, preferred pieces. Second, society loses talent. When policymakers spend their time transferring wealth from one group of citizens to another, some citizens spend their time trying to gain from it, while others expend effort to avoid being victims. When this happens, some of society's best and brightest waste their time, money and effort transferring wealth instead of innovating and creating new wealth. Finally, society loses essential knowledge that helps it operate. We each place our own value on certain goods and services. Only I know whether my next dollar is best spent on a doll or a dolly. The only way to make sure trade serves each of our needs is to allow us to make these tradeoffs ourselves, guided by market signals of prices, profit and loss that help us adjust our plans to those of others. The Soviet system was based on not-so-subtle coerced exchange. And as that system crumbled around them, its leaders wondered how they managed to get rockets to Venus but couldn't get working appliances in (communal) kitchens. Meanwhile, the Croatian journalist Slavenka Drakulić noted that in its 70-year existence, communism never managed to supply women with tampons. This is what happens when individuals are not allowed to make their own economic decisions. Leaders in both parties once understood this. Matthew Mitchell is a senior fellow at the Fraser Institute and a senior affiliated scholar at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store