Iran could restart enriching uranium in 'matter of months', UN nuclear chief says
Grossi told CBS News that Iran still retained the 'capacities' to enrich. 'They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that."
"But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there,' he told CBS, according to a transcript of his interview released ahead of his interview.
'It is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage…Iran has the capacities there, industrial and technological capacities. So if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again.'
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Iran has lashed out at the IAEA. President Masoud Pezeshkian told his French counterpart, Emmanuel Macron, that Tehran had halted cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog due to what he called the agency chief's "destructive" behaviour towards the Islamic Republic, his office said on Monday.
Iranian lawmakers last week voted in favour of a bill to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, citing Israel's 13 June attack on Iran and later strikes by the United States on nuclear facilities.
"The action taken by parliament members... is a natural response to the unjustified, unconstructive, and destructive conduct of the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency," Pezeshkian told Macron in a phone call late Sunday, according to a presidency statement.
The fate of Iran's nuclear programme after US strikes on Iran's Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear facilities has been hotly debated.
An Arab official previously told Middle East Eye that Iran had received advance warning of the US strikes on its Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear facilities. Amwaj Media first reported that Tehran was notified before the US attacked.
'Vindicated': Unscathed by war, Gulf states look to capitalise on Israel and Iran's losses Read More »
Trump has insisted that US strikes 'obliterated' Iran's programme.
The White House pushed back aggressively on a leaked Department of Defence intelligence document, first reported by CNN, which assessed that US strikes only set Iran's programme back a few months. Later, the White House shared a statement from the CIA disputing the leaked assessment.
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said last week that the country's nuclear facilities had been 'badly damaged'.
But Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, downplayed any lasting impact last week, saying Iran scored a "victory" over Israel in the war.
'The American president exaggerated events in unusual ways," he added, insisting the strikes had done "nothing significant" to Iran's nuclear infrastructure.
Trump said last week the US was going to meet with Iran. He signalled that he might consider sanctions relief on Iran, saying that China could continue buying Iranian oil.
However, on Monday, he took a hard line. "I am not offering Iran ANYTHING, unlike Obama," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.
"Nor am I even talking to them since we totally OBLITERATED their Nuclear Facilities.'
The statement comes as Iran's deputy foreign minister told the BBC that talks between Washington and Tehran cannot resume unless the US rules out further strikes on Iran.
Majid Takht-Ravanchi told the British broadcaster that the US had signalled it wants to return to the negotiating table, a week after it struck three Iranian nuclear facilities.
"We have not agreed to any date, we have not agreed to the modality," said Takht-Ravanchi.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
25 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
'Major hurdles' remain in Gaza truce talks despite claims of progress
Major obstacles remain in the Gaza ceasefire talks, despite recent optimism from Israeli officials and US President Donald Trump, according to media reports. Trump said on Tuesday that Israel "agreed to the necessary conditions to finalise the 60 Day ceasefire". The US president, who is set to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu next week, added that during the nearly two-month truce, parties will work on ending the war. "The Qataris and Egyptians, who have worked very hard to help bring Peace, will deliver this final proposal." Despite reports in Israeli media suggesting progress in truce negotiations, other accounts hint at serious challenges hampering the process. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Speaking to The Times of Israel, two Arab diplomats said that "major hurdles remain", particularly around the recently established US-Israeli aid distribution system operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Hamas has demanded a return to the previous UN-run aid delivery mechanism. The controversial GHF, which began operations in late May after a three-month complete blockade of the Gaza Strip by Israeli forces, has been sharply criticised. More than 580 Palestinians have been killed and over 4,200 wounded by Israeli troops while attempting to access food and aid supplies. Hamas's concerns have been echoed by international organisations. On Tuesday, over 170 NGOs jointly called for an end to what they described as the 'deadly' US- and Israeli-backed GHF system, urging a return to United Nations-led aid coordination. While some Israeli media outlets have reported signs of Netanyahu's willingness to resume negotiations, others paint a different picture. Channel 13, for instance, quoted Netanyahu taking a hardline stance during a recent security cabinet meeting, reportedly stating: 'We need to kill every person that holds a weapon. Nothing less than this.' As for mediation efforts, Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesperson Majed Al-Ansari stated on Monday that 'it is too early to talk about a timeframe for a ceasefire agreement', noting that current efforts are focused on restarting talks. A phone call on Tuesday between the foreign ministers of Egypt and Qatar affirmed both countries' commitment to a joint effort aimed at ending the bloodshed in Gaza, securing the release of prisoners and detainees, and facilitating the unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid. Though Hamas has yet to release an official statement, senior official Taher al-Nunu told Palestinian media that the movement is 'ready and serious about reaching an agreement' and is open to 'any proposal that clearly meets the requirements for ending the war or leads to its complete end'. Captive exchange and aid increase According to Israel's Kan 11 news outlet, two diplomatic sources say the current ceasefire proposal includes a 60-day truce, during which eight living Israeli captives would be released. Two additional hostages would be released on the 50th day of the ceasefire, alongside the return of 18 Israeli bodies held in Gaza. Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid tells Netanyahu to accept Gaza truce deal Read More » Meanwhile, Qatar's version of the proposal includes a withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Morag axis and an increase in humanitarian aid entering the besieged territory. The Morag axis, primarily agricultural land, runs between Khan Younis and Rafah, stretching east to west across southern Gaza. It also includes areas previously designated by the Israeli army as a "humanitarian zone", where displaced Palestinians had been instructed to seek refuge. An Israeli source speaking to Haaretz claimed that while Israel has shown "flexibility" on several issues, it remains firm on troop withdrawal boundaries, refusing to pull back beyond the line defined in the last ceasefire agreement. The source also noted that the current draft does not provide detailed provisions on aid distribution but includes broad language allowing for large-scale humanitarian relief, echoing clauses from previous agreements. On the Palestinian side, a source stated that Hamas has not officially responded to Trump's recent comments, citing the absence of a formal, detailed proposal. The source added that the key point of disagreement lies in what happens after the 60-day truce. Normalisation push The same source told Haaretz that while the latest proposal does not explicitly guarantee an end to the war in Gaza, it includes "very strong assurances" on the matter. One clause, for example, states that if no agreement is reached within the 60-day ceasefire, mediators will be responsible for continuing negotiations 'under certain conditions. Trump lifts bulk of US sanctions against Syria Read More » "These are not just words, this is also the general atmosphere that allows Hamas to see how much the Americans want and can take Israel there," the source added. An Arab official believes that Hamas would only agree to the current draft of the proposal if there is a document or oral promise from Washington that the truce would lead to an end to the war. According to a number of sources speaking to Haaretz, the current truce draft could include "diplomatic compensation" for Israel, including normalisation and establishing relations with several Arab states. The sources in Israel, the US and Gulf countries said the achievements are likely to include a resumption in establishing relations with Saudi Arabia and an end to hostilities with Syria, as well as normalisation with Oman. Such moves aim to soften the approach of far-right ministers under Netanyahu's government, many of whom are against ending the war.
Middle East Eye
25 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Egypt asks US to pressure Libya's Haftar not to back Turkey maritime deal
Egypt has asked the United States to intervene to prevent Libya's eastern parliament from ratifying a maritime deal with Turkey, multiple regional officials have told Middle East Eye. An Egyptian official told MEE on Wednesday that Cairo is concerned that if Libya's eastern parliament ratifies the deal, initially inked by eastern Libya's rival western government in 2019, it could spark tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean at a time when Egypt grapples with the fallout from the wars in Gaza and Sudan. One Egyptian official and one official in the region told MEE that Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty raised the topic of US intervention in a phone call with Massad Boulos, the US's senior adviser on Africa, last month. They said that Boulos said he would call Khalifa Haftar, the de-facto ruler of eastern Libya, to discuss the issue. MEE reached out to the State Department for detailed information on what was discussed in the call but did not receive a response by time of publication. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Several Libyan media outlets have reported that the country's eastern parliament could ratify the 2019 maritime agreement in the coming weeks, which would recognise Turkey's claim to an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) over a wide-swath of the Eastern Mediterranean. Libya's eastern parliament, based in Tobruk, is de-facto controlled by Haftar who has been supported by various regional actors at different times since 2011, including the United Arab Emirates, the US, Egypt, France and Russia. Trump envoy Massad Boulos to visit Libya amid rising tensions, sources say Read More » The 81-year-old dual Libyan-US citizen wields considerable power in eastern Libya and in mid-2019 launched a failed attempt to topple the country's UN-recognised government in Tripoli. At the time, the UN-recognised government, which counts Turkey as its major backer, signed the maritime demarcation agreement with Ankara which sparked anger from Greece and other regional actors over claims they were excluded. Greece countered the deal by signing their own with Egypt. Libya's eastern parliament initially opposed the deal, but in recent months, and despite intensive lobbying by Athens and Cairo, Haftar appears to be close to endorsing the pact. Greece's Foreign Minister George Gerapetritis is expected to travel to Benghazi and Tripoli this week to address the maritime dispute, one of the regional sources told MEE. Meanwhile, the sources told MEE that Cairo was wary of a change in the status quo on the maritime dispute and was actively aiming to secure reliable gas supplies. In June, Libya's National Oil Company based in Tripoli signed an agreement with Turkey's state oil company TPAO to conduct surveys for oil in four maritime blocs that the Egyptian official said may infringe on Egypt's EEZ. Old fault lines dissipate Eastern Libya's pivot on the issue reflects a broader shift in the region where the old ideological fault-lines that defined conflicts after the 2011 Arab Spring uprisings are dissipating. After sending arms, mercenaries and soldiers to combat Haftar's army, Turkey has shown a new willingness to work with its former foe. Exclusive: Greece to lobby Egypt against Haftar endorsing Turkey-Libya maritime deal Read More » The Turkish Ministry of Defence hosted three military delegations from Haftar's self-styled Libya National Army (LNA) in June, and Haftar's youngest son, Saddam, visited Ankara in May after visiting Qatar earlier this year. Sources told MEE that Saddam Haftar's growing contacts with Ankara, including in the military sphere, had irked Egypt. An Egyptian official and a Libyan official said that Egypt believed Saddam was responsible for a cross-border raid into Sudan and that his fighters had helped the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) against the Sudanese military. Although Egypt and Turkey are on opposing sides in Libya, they both back the Sudanese army in its fight against the UAE-backed RSF. Egypt has deep interests in Libya and shares a long and porous 1,115km long border with the country's east. Earlier this week, Sisi hosted Khalifa and Saddam Haftar in El Alamein to discuss border security. Whilst Libya remains bifurcated with clashes between rival militias, generally there has been no return to major fighting. The Trump administration enjoys good ties to the Haftar family and during his first term in office, US President Donald Trump held a phone call with Haftar during the height of fighting in the country. Meanwhile, MEE previously revealed that Saddam met Boulos in Washington DC earlier this year and also discussed regional security with senior US intelligence officers.
Middle East Eye
26 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
UK MPs to vote on Palestine Action ban
British parliamentarians are set to vote on an order for the proscription of the protest group Palestine Action on Wednesday afternoon. If MPs vote in favour, the order will go before the House of Lords on Thursday, with the ban due to come into force as soon as Saturday. If passed, the move will designate Palestine Action a terrorist organisation, making membership and support for them a criminal offence, and punishable by up to 14 years in prison. It will mark the first time that a direct action group has faced proscription, placing it alongside groups like the Islamic State and al-Qaeda under British law. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's order, which was laid before parliament on 23 June, has proposed two other organisations, neo-Nazi groups the Maniacs Murder Cult (MMC) and the Russian Imperial Movement (RIM) for proscription along with Palestine Action. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In a statement, Cooper said that each of the groups had 'passed the threshold for proscription based on clear national security evidence and assessments'. All three proscription orders will be debated and voted on together under the statutory instrument, with MPs unable to vote to ban some organisations and not others. Palestine Action said the move to group the organisations together in the same vote is a deliberate attempt to ensure the order passes and forms part of Cooper's efforts to proscribe the group 'via the backdoor without proper Parliamentary consideration'. Clare Hinchliffe, the mother of one of 18 Palestine Action activists who were arrested on terrorism charges in August 2024 and have been held on remand since, told MEE that the ban could criminalise her support for her daughter. "It's scary, because we will continue to advocate for our loved ones and we don't know if that will be interpreted as support for Palestine Action," she said. "I cannot afford to go to prison. I am needed to support my daughter. I'm a single parent, the only one paying the mortgage. I have a younger daughter to care for. I can't go to prison, but I'm outraged that I should be put in that position for advocating for my daughter." 'A terrifying escalation' On Monday, the High Court granted Palestine Action an urgent hearing on Friday to consider a judicial review of the decision. If successful, the group's co-founder, Huda Ammori, would be given the opportunity to apply for "interim relief", which could stay the ban until after the review. Speaking to Middle East Eye on Tuesday, Ammori said that she thought it was likely the ban will be voted through. "Palestine Action was formed because we didn't rely on appealing to the politicians and the government to create changes for the people of Palestine," Ammori said. UK High Court grants Palestine Action urgent hearing to challenge ban Read More » "I understand how the system works and it's not a democracy by any means," she said, adding that she thought it would be likely MPs will be whipped to supporting the ban. "I don't think that's an excuse for us to be complacent in not holding them to account. Every single person who votes for us to be proscribed should be held to account for this huge attack on civil liberties." Meanwhile, pressure is mounting on Cooper to abandon the ban, with several UN special rapporteurs warning the decision could have a "chilling effect' on protest and advocacy in relation to Palestine. On Tuesday, hundreds of lawyers signed two letters to Cooper from the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) lawyers' group and the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers, warning that the group's ban could set a dangerous precedent. Also on Tuesday, Amnesty International's UK CEO wrote to parliamentarians, warning that the group's proscription would be a 'grave misuse of anti-terrorism powers'. 'The proscription of Palestine Action would be wholly unnecessary, disproportionate, and in violation of the right to freedom of association and expression amongst other human rights at risk should this harmful and dangerous motion proceed,' the NGO's UK chief, Sacha Deshmukh, said. Yasmine Ahmed, UK director of Human Rights Watch, described the proposed ban as 'a terrifying escalation in this government's crusade to curtail protest rights'. 'Politicians should not be wielding the power of the state to protect corporate interests and silence legitimate non-violent protest. We expect this of authoritarian regimes like Russia or China, not a country like the UK that professes to believe in democratic freedoms.'
