Centre should allow SRTCs to recruit drivers for new electric buses: Ramalinga Reddy
Speaking at the inauguration of the automated driving test track in Phajir, near Mangaluru, Mr. Reddy welcomed the move of the Centre to sanction 100 electric buses each to Mangaluru, Belagavi, Hubballi-Dharwad, Kalaburagi, Mysuru and Shivamogga.
The buses aimed at reducing pollution were set to be released to bus manufacturing companies. The companies were being asked to maintain the buses and also arrange drivers on their own, while the SRTCs will have to post their conductors and also provide space for depots for parking and maintenance of buses.
For the efficient operation of electric buses, it would be beneficial to directly allocate these buses to SRTCs, enabling them to recruit their drivers. The State corporations should also be provided with a concession in the GST. 'We have written to the Centre. Except for the demand to allow us to recruit our drivers, the Centre has favourably responded to our demands,' the Minister said.
Capt. Brijesh Chowta, MP, said the State government should take action at the earliest to complete the process of allotting land for setting up depots for electric buses. The introduction of electric buses will greatly transform commuting in the city by using government buses. He asked the Minister to take steps to have more buses on inter-State routes from Mangaluru, especially between Mangaluru and Kasaragod.
U.T. Khader, Speaker and Mangaluru MLA, also spoke.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
8th Pay Commission BIG Update: Bad news for Central government employees, delay likely in implementation of..., salary may increase by over...
8th Pay Commission Latest Update 8th Pay Commission: The Narendra Modi-led Central government had earlier approved the 8th Pay Commission, which will benefit millions of current government employees and retired personnel. To recall, Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw, in January this year, had said that once implemented, the salaries and pensions of central government employees would be revised. However, growing concerns have emerged among employees about whether the 8th Pay Commission will be implemented on time. It is important to note that the 8th Finance Commission is expected to submit its recommendations by the end of 2025, after which they are expected to come into effect from January 2026. First, the Commission has to prepare its report. Then it will be submitted to the government. The government will then decide whether the recommendations are appropriate or not. Only after this will the approval be granted. Will there be a delay in the 8th Pay Commission? The proposal-submission-approval process may lead to its implementation in the financial year 2027, according to a report by Ambit. The report claims that salaries could see an increase of around 30 to 40 percent. Notably, the Terms of Reference (ToR) have not yet been finalized. In such a case, the implementation of the 8th Finance Commission may take longer than expected. According to an Economic Times report, it could either be implemented by the end of 2026 or in early 2027. It is worth noting that the 7th Pay Commission was announced in February 2014 but came into effect two years later, in January 2016. Once implemented by the government, the 8th Pay Commission will benefit 5 million current employees and 6.5 million retired central government employees. Here are some of the key details: The recommendations of the 8th Pay Commission will directly benefit approximately 44 lakh central government employees across various ministries and departments The 8th Pay Commission will benefit over 68 lakh pensioners, totalling up to more than a crore direct beneficiaries. Notably, the 4.4 million central government employees and armed forces personnel represent 0.7% of India's 60 crore labour force, and nearly 9% of the formal sector
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
GST After 8 Years: Challenges, Gains, and Future Reforms
Published : Jul 11, 2025 17:23 IST - 9 MINS READ The Goods and Services Tax (GST), widely hailed as a good, simple tax, has the best and the worst of all features of the country's indirect tax system at this juncture, over eight years after its rollout. Both the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government (2004-2014), led by the Congress, and the National Democratic Alliance government (NDA), led by the BJP in its first two tenures (2014-24), have claimed credit for this consumption-based tax, which was launched on July 1, 2017, at a midnight special session of Parliament by the then Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. He used all his lawyerly acumen and persuasiveness to bring on board all the States and Union Territories. Early years Broadly seen as a precursor to a 'one-nation, one tax' in a country where the indirect tax system was riddled with multiple taxes and mind-boggling rates, GST was not instantly endorsed by trade and industry; it had to face a whole host of problems ranging from teething troubles to ground-level glitches that any new tax regime must wrestle with. GST subsumed as many as 17 local levies and taxes and 13 cesses into a five-tier structure, broadly simplifying the tax rates at 5, 12, 18, and 28 per cent. Bullion and jewellery had its own sui generis GST rate. Luxury and demerit goods such as tobacco are taxed at the highest rate of 28 per cent in the name of 'sin tax', while packed food and essential items attract the lowest rate of 5 per cent. The threshold limit of annual turnover for registration under GST for units engaged in supply of goods was raised from Rs.20 lakh initially to Rs.40 lakh effective from April 1, 2019, to ensure that GST compliance was not is required by small units below the threshold turnover and they were exempted from GST. Also Read | GST & federalism Grey areas With the benefit of hindsight, experts have contended that while GST has by and large simplified indirect taxes, many grey areas still linger despite the passing of eight years. They encompass a wide swath of issues, from rate rows to procedural complexities, burdening domestic taxpayers and professionals with compliance hurdles and troubles galore. This is conclusively borne out by the avalanche of GST circulars down the eight years which show ongoing compliance issues. There are numerous instances where the courts have conclusively ruled that clarifications of the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) circulars could not override the CGST Act, bringing clarity and relief to the taxpayers. According to fiscal experts, because tax authorities are inundated with representations and courts give new interpretations, it is no surprise that the CBIC issues circulars to clear the air, ensure uniformity, and facilitate smooth compliance. But it is certainly not a commendable state of affairs when there are over 8,000 disputes involving the GST system over eight years, even as the long-delayed process of setting up an appellate tribunal has barely begun, with the GST Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 2025, coming into force in April this year. GST Council meeting Meanwhile, the the GST Council has not held a meeting for over six months. The Council, which meets every quarter, last held a meeting on December 21, 2024, wherein the States discussed many issues bearing on the fiscal relationship with the Centre in the light of GST revenues not growing at the 14 per cent annual rate as assumed with the advent of the tax. There is also a need for higher allocation from Central taxes to their revenue kitty now that the 16th Finance Commission has completed the process of consultations with the States and is in the midst of getting its report ready by October 2025. Even as the High Courts are neck-deep in disputes, most of which would invariably relate to procedure or method rather than the statute itself, the professional tribunal will hopefully deliver, and to the satisfaction of the stakeholders. Also Read | Time to overhaul or replace GST June collection growth slips Be that as it may, the eighth anniversary of GST on July 1 was coterminous with the dismal tax collection for the month of June, after two resounding performances of of Rs.2 lakh crore each in April and May 2025. GST collections in June grew only 6.2 per cent year-on-year, the slowest since June 2021 and lower than the fantastic run of 12.6 per cent and 16.4 per cent in April and May, respectively. The slide-down stemmed from a dip in collections in domestic transactions and imports. Net GST revenue adjusted for refunds and transfers (input tax credit and after States' share) stood at Rs.1.59 lakh crore, marking am even lower and tepid 3.3 per cent year-on-year rise. As it is a consumption tax, a tangible fall in yields mirrors anaemic economic activity, besides inveterate inefficiencies in the system, which need to be tackled with new processes and procedures to ensure et the cooperation of all the beneficiaries and stakeholders for the overall efficacy of the tax. GST and ease of doing business Undoubtedly, the simplified GST regime has, by degrees, transformed the ease of doing business in the country over the years, as it has resulted in a 33 per cent improvement in transport time, enabling the logistics business to prune drastically the dwelling time in various check-points that had become choke points in the free movement of goods across the States and within States. There has also been a distinct improvement in the number of commercial taxpayers, from 60 lakh to 1.5 crore, with an average monthly collection that is close to Rs.2 lakh crores. E-invoicing and e-way bills have had a tremendous effect in terms of efficiency in operations for business and trade. It is not all hunky-dory in the GST ecosystem, though, as the total number of GST evasion cases detected by the Central government since 2020 has gone up significantly from 12,596 in 2020-21 to 25,397 in the first 10 months of 2024-25, involving a total amount of Rs.6,79,505 crore in a total of 86,711 cases in the period. Of this, Rs.1,23,896 crore has been recorded as voluntary deposits by the defalcators. In input tax credit or refund claims, there were 42,673 cases during this period involving Rs.1,66,241 crore, of which Rs.12,367 crore was accounted for by voluntary deposits, according to Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary in a written query in the Lok Sabha on March 10, 2025. Finance Ministry mandarins claim that there are several ways to help in improving compliance and preventing tax evasions such as digitisation through e-invoicing. Operational efficiency Besides, GST analytics such as automated risk assessment based on compliance attributes of taxpayers, highlighting of outliers based on system-flagged mismatches, and providing intelligence inputs with a view to manage GST revenue risks through various tools have gone a long way to bring efficiency in operations. Efficiency has been improved by the ability to generate actionable reports, gleaning inputs about GST non-compliance or evasion on the basis of identified anomalies in taxpayer comport—including potential tax evasion, fraudulent registration, and suspicious e-way bill activity—and selection of returns for scrutiny and taxpayers for audit based on various risk parameters. The GST Amnesty Scheme under Section 128A of the IT Act announced this year is a welcome step to help taxpayers clear old arrears sans excruciating penalties. It is germane to note that a PricewaterhouseCoopers report forwarded to the GST Council, whose Chairperson is the Union Finance Minister and all State Finance Ministers are Members, pitched for the simplification of procedures, lessening of compliance burdens, and reduction in rates to three with a view to broadening the base by bringing petroleum products under the GST ambit. PricewaterhouseCoopers said: 'A transition from a 4-tier to a 3-tier rate structure would reduce interpretational disputes, improve tax certainty, and simplify compliance.'. Even as these crucial reforms are underscored to render this important tax to improve its operational efficiency, it is not altogether out of place to highlight the overwhelming urgency on GST reforms recommended by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of Parliament. The 19th report of the PAC, tabled in the Budget session of Parliament, sought a comprehensive review of the GST framework to preclude 'unnecessary procedures and requirements' and advocated a a 'revamped GST 2.0', with due consultations of all the stakeholders. Also Read | GST: For a fair share for the States Room for improvement In its scathing review of the extant GST, the PAC noted that the failure to put in place the mandatory Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) audit of the Compensation Fund Account for more than six years had 'adversely affected' release of compensation to States. It may be noted that GST's advent in 2017 had led to apprehensions among States about loss of fiscal autonomy and centralisation of all collections to the Union. The GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017, came into force to compensate for this loss of revenue and promised States a 14 per cent annual revenue growth for five years (2017-22). But many States have bemoaned either non-receipt of funds or undue delays which they said negatively impacted governance. Alluding to filing and refunds by GST payers, the PAC lamented the extant mechanisms as inadequate, pointing at unconscionable waiting periods for refunds which could result in potential cash flow problems to businesses operating on wafer-thin margins in a high-cost economy. It said that the refund processing system ought to provide clearer timelines for processing claims and regular updates on their status. According to fiscal experts, the time is ripe for the Finance Ministry to strongly consider the growing concerns of the States regarding their financial requirements and the revenue share they get not only through this indirect tax but also in the overall devolution of taxes, and reduce the Centre's recourse to cess, as it is not not shareable with States. Alongside, other overriding concerns voiced by trade and industry also need to be factored in by the GST Council in its forthcoming meeting so that the beneficiaries bear this tax with less pain and more gain to the treasury in a mutual win-win game, going forward. G. Srinivasan is a freelance journalist based in Delhi who previously worked with The Hindu Group.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
8th Pay Commission: Expected hike, implementation timeline, beneficiaries — Full details inside
The Central Government is gearing up for the implementation of the 8th Pay Commission, which will overhaul the pay structure, allowances, and pensions of nearly 1 crore central government employees and pensioners. Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw earlier confirmed the formation of the commission is expected by January 2026. What Is the 8th Pay Commission? The Pay Commission reviews and recommends changes in the salary structure, allowances, and pension benefits of central government employees. The 8th Commission will revise key elements such as: Basic Pay Dearness Allowance (DA) House Rent Allowance (HRA) Transport Allowance (TA) It will benefit over 50 lakh government employees and around 65 lakh pensioners, including defence personnel. When Will It Be Implemented? While the Commission is expected to be formed in early 2026, reports suggest recommendations may be submitted by the end of 2025. However, the actual implementation could be pushed to FY27, depending on how quickly the Terms of Reference (ToR) are approved and the report is finalized. Past trends show such delays are common—the 7th Pay Commission was announced in 2014 but implemented in 2016. How Much Salary Hike Is Expected? Although official numbers are awaited, industry estimates predict a 30–34% salary hike, in line with earlier trends and recent tax cuts worth ₹1 trillion planned for FY26. Current minimum basic salary: ₹18,000 Expected minimum post-hike salary: ₹51,480 Estimated government expenditure: ₹1.8 lakh crore The fitment factor, which was 2.57 in the 7th CPC, plays a critical role in determining the revised pay. A higher fitment factor will result in a proportionately higher basic pay. Understanding the Salary Structure: Basic Pay: Fixed and based on pay level (≈51.5% of income) DA (Dearness Allowance): Adjusted for inflation (≈30.9%) HRA (House Rent Allowance): Location-based rental support (≈15.4%) TA (Transport Allowance): For commuting expenses (≈2.2%) For example, an employee earning ₹18,000 basic pay with 50% DA would receive ₹9,000 as DA, bringing the total to ₹27,000—excluding other allowances. The 8th Pay Commission is set to bring substantial relief and salary upgrades for lakhs of government employees and pensioners. While January 2026 is a tentative milestone, actual rollouts might stretch to FY27. Keep an eye on the official ToR and recommendations for precise updates.
