"Deepening India-France economic ties": Piyush Goyal meets French minister Eric Lombard
The discussions, which took place during Goyal's three-day official visit to France, also reviewed the progress of the India-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations, signalling a strong intent to bolster bilateral ties amidst a shared commitment to innovation and economic growth.
"Held a productive meeting with Eric Lombard, French Minister of Economy, Finance, and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty. Exchanged views on deepening our economic partnership, enhancing trade & investments with a special focus on technology and innovation across key sectors. Also discussed the progress of the India-EU FTA negotiations. Looking forward to stronger India-France economic ties," Goyal said in a post on X.
Earlier, the Commerce and Industry Minister expressed optimism that India could finalise its Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the European Union (EU) ahead of the year-end deadline, citing minimal divergences between the two economic blocs. Goyal emphasised the complementary nature of the Indian and European economies.
"There are not too many issues where we have divergence of opinion. We have both complementary economies," he stated. "In most cases, what is of offensive interest to India does not hurt the European economy. And likewise, goods and services that Europe would like to provide to India only support our growth story."
The minister acknowledged that certain sensitive areas require careful negotiation on both sides. "Obviously, in any trading relationship, there are certain sensitive issues on both sides which we have to resolve amicably in the interest of both the European Union and India," Goyal noted.
Goyal also held a series of high-level meetings in Paris with top French CEOs to explore new opportunities for India's growth across key sectors such as renewable energy, automobile manufacturing, electric vehicles (EVs), and consumer products.
As part of his engagements, Goyal met Bernard Fontana, Chairman and CEO of EDF Energy, to discuss India's growing role in the global clean energy transition.
He also met Luca de Meo, CEO of Renault Group, Nicolas Hieronimus, CEO of L'Oreal Groupe and Patrick Pouyanne, Chairman and CEO of Total Energies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times of Oman
a day ago
- Times of Oman
Government examining impact of US tariff, will take necessary steps to safeguard national interest: Piyush Goyal tells Parliament
New Delhi: The government told the Parliament on Thursday that US President Donald Trump has announced a reciprocal tariff on Indian goods, and it is examining the impact of the recent events and will take all necessary steps to safeguard national interest. Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal made a statement in the lower House of Parliament a day after Trump announced the tariff. He later made similar statement in the Rajya Sabha. Goyal's remarks came a day after the government issued a statement on the US decision to impose tariffs. On Wednesday, Trump announced the imposition of 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods and a penalty for importing Russian oil, even as there were hopes of an interim India-US trade that would have otherwise helped avoid elevated tariffs. Goyal said the Mnistry of Commerce and Industry is holding talks with exporters, industries and all stakeholders and gathering information on their assessment of this issue. "On April 2, 2025, the US President issued an executive order on reciprocal per cent baseline duty in effect since April 2025. With a 10% baseline tariff, a total of 26% tariff was announced for India. Full country-specific additional tariff was scheduled to come into effect on April 9 but on April 10 this was extended initially for 90 days and then extended till August 1 2025," Goyal said "Government gives utmost priority to the safeguarding of welfare of farmers, labourers, entrepreneurs, industrialists, exporters, MSMEs and stakeholders of the industrial sector. We will take all necessary steps to safeguard our national interest. The Government is confident that we will continue our swift journey of inclusive and consistent development towards the goal of Viksit Bharat 2047. Aatmanirbharta ki ore Bharat aatmavishwas se badh raha hai," he added. The Union Minister said that in less than a decade, India came out of the 'Fragile Five' economies and it has now become the fastest-growing economy in the world. "On the basis of the hard work of reforms, farmers, MSMEs and industrialists, we have come in the top five economies of the world from the 11th largest economy. It is expected that we will be the third-largest economy in a few years. Today, global institutions and economists see India as a bright spot in the global economy," he said. Goyal said India and the US started talks for a just, balanced and mutually beneficial Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) in March this year, and the goal of this was to finish the first stage of the Agreement by October-November 2025. On April 2, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order for reciprocal tariffs on various trade partners, imposing varied tariffs in the range of 10-50 per cent. He subsequently kept the tariffs in abeyance for 90 days, while imposing a 10 per cent baseline tariff. The deadline was to end on July 9, and the US administration later pushed it ahead to August 1. In March 2025, India and the US initiated talks for a BTA, with the countries stating that the first tranche would be signed by the fall of 2025. (October-November). Talks took place in New Delhi and the US, and there have also been virtual meetings. In its statement on Wednesday, Commerce and Industry Ministry said that it as taken note of a statement by the US President on bilateral trade and the Government is studying its implications. "India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective. The Government attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and MSMEs," the statement said. "The Government will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements including the latest Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK," it added. There were some reservations from the Indian side on the US demand for opening up the agricultural and dairy sectors for the US. Agriculture and dairy are critical for India as these two sectors provide livelihood opportunities to a large section of its people. US President Donald Trump had imposed reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries with which the US has a trade deficit. Since assuming office for his second term, President Trump has reiterated his stance on tariff reciprocity, emphasising that the United States will match tariffs imposed by other countries, including India, to "ensure fair trade".
Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
Substantial cut in tariffs in UK-India trade dea
The leading feature in the recent free trade agreement signed by the United Kingdom and India, during the visit by India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the UK, is the reduction of tariffs on a variety of goods from textiles to cars and furthermore, the deal allows market access for businesses. Talks on the trade agreement had already taken place in early May after three years of stop-start negotiations and both sides have been keen to seal the deal amid a turmoil of tariffs created over the months, by US President Donald Trump. This agreement between the world's fifth and sixth largest economies aims to increase bilateral trade by a further £25.5bn ($34bn) by 2040. It is the UK's biggest trade deal since it left the European Union in 2020. It is also India's biggest strategic partnership with an advanced economy and it could provide a template for a long-desired deal with the EU as well as for talks with other regions. Both sides hailed as historic a deal which will take effect following a ratification process, likely within a year after which firms such as drinks-maker Diageo and car companies such as BMW, Nissan, Aston Martin and Indian (Tata)-owned Jaguar Land Rover could benefit from lower duties. Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India speak during a press conference after signing a free trade agreement at Chequers near Aylesbury, England. — Reuters UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said there would be huge benefits for both countries, making trade cheaper, quicker and easier. 'We've entered a new global era, and that is one that requires us to step up, not to stand aside, by building deeper partnerships and alliances,' Starmer said in a statement. Modi called the agreement 'a blueprint for shared prosperity', highlighting how Indian goods from textiles to jewellery and seafood would secure better market access. The countries also agreed on a partnership covering areas such as defence and climate, and aim to strengthen co-operation on tackling crime. After spending three hours in talks with Starmer, Modi went to meet King Charles at his Sandringham estate. Under the trade agreement, tariffs on Scotch beverage will drop to 75 per cent from 150 per cent immediately, and slide to 40 per cent over the next decade. Tariffs on drinks such as brandy and rum will be cut to 110 per cent initially and end up at 75 per cent. On cars, India will cut duties to 10 per cent within five years from current level of up to 110 per cent under a quota system that will be gradually liberalised. In return, Indian manufacturers will gain access to the UK market for electric and hybrid vehicles, also under a quota system. Under the deal, 99 per cent of Indian exports to the UK will benefit from zero duties, including textiles, and Britain will have reductions on 90 per cent of its tariff lines, with the average tariff UK firms face dropping to 3 per cent from 15 per cent. But the projected boost to the UK economic output, of 4.8bn a year by 2040, is small compared to Britain's gross domestic product of 2.6bn in 2024. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has forecast that UK exports and imports will be about 15 per cent lower in the long run if Britain had stayed in the EU. The UK's Labour government, having been in power now for a year, has launched a reset of ties with the EU to smooth trade friction and won some tariff relief from the United States. The Confederation of Indian Industry called it a 'strong foundation for deeper market access.'
Observer
3 days ago
- Observer
Trump is winning his trade war. What will that mean for the economy?
WASHINGTON — Over the last six months, the United States has left behind the global trade order that persisted for decades in favor of something drastically different and largely untested. Formidable economies such as the European Union and Japan have abruptly made peace with higher tariffs on their exports, acquiescing to President Donald Trump's demands in order to avoid damaging trade wars and to coax even steeper U.S. duties down just a little bit. As major economies fall in line to sign agreements that include the highest tariffs in modern history, the president's vision for global trade is rapidly being realized. That new normal uses the U.S. economy as leverage, with other countries accepting tariffs of 15% to 20% to do business with the United States. Even higher rates will be imposed on exports of critical products, including steel, or on certain adversarial countries, such as China. The outcome has seemingly proved Trump right that his tariff threats are a powerful bargaining tool. And the muted market reaction to 15% tariffs on Japan and the EU suggests that the panic many expected from his earlier, more extreme levies may not materialize. Nigel Green, the CEO of deVere Group, a global financial advisory, called the EU deal 'a reset, not a resolution.' 'A year ago, markets would have recoiled,' he said. 'Today, they're simply grateful it wasn't worse.' While the president's plan for global trade now looks like a political victory, whether it will be an economic success remains much more debatable. The Trump administration has essentially embarked on a vast economic experiment, with tariff levels not seen in the United States since the early 20th century. The rates Trump is asking other countries to agree to are typically used by poor economies trying to protect nascent industries, not by industrial powerhouses like the United States. Trump and his supporters argue that higher tariffs will encourage many more companies to produce in the United States, creating U.S. factory jobs while having minimal impact on businesses and consumers. The president also insists that foreign governments, not U.S. businesses or consumers, will pay the tariffs, despite long-standing research that shows Americans ultimately bear the brunt. Clyde Prestowitz, a former U.S. government official and the founder of the Economic Strategy Institute, said Trump's America had 'a lot of similarities' with the United States before 1946 and other countries, such as China, that built their economies with so-called mercantilist policies, using protectionism to try to amass trade surpluses and wealth. 'It worked for England, the U.S., France, Benelux, Germany, Japan, Korea and all others who became rich,' Prestowitz said. But many economists continue to predict that Trump's tariffs will result in higher prices both for businesses that import products and for the consumers who buy them. They expect that to slow the economy and backfire, at least somewhat, on the president's efforts to rev up manufacturing. In recent weeks, automakers such as General Motors and Volkswagen have reported hits of more than $1 billion from tariffs. 'What's lost in translation is even as these deals are being cut, the eventual tariff rate is likely to peak around 20%, which is up a lot from below 3,' said Diane Swonk, the chief economist at KPMG. While people expected the economic effect of tariffs to be 'instantaneous,' Swonk said, their rollout has been uneven, with many stops and starts, and it is taking time for the impact to work through supply chains. Economic research suggests that it takes six to 18 months for the full effects of tariffs to show up, she said, and that Trump's first-term trade war with China, which began in 2018, did not lead to weakness in manufacturing until the next year. Brad Setser, an economist at the Council on Foreign Relations, said he believed the tariffs were 'big enough that they're going to slow the economy' and 'a meaningful change in policy, one that I think most Americans will feel.' But he cautioned that the tariffs were probably not significant enough to push the U.S. economy into a recession, and that price increases for consumers would be 'big enough to be noticeable but not a giant shock.' Buyers of small appliances, clothing and toys are likely to see an impact by this fall, given the tariffs of 20% to 30% on many Asian countries that make those goods, Setser said. 'It's a policy that in most models would slow the economy, not stop the economy from growing,' he said. Some analysts argued that recent deal announcements have been positive because they have averted, at least for now, the likelihood of trade wars with major trading partners, but some say the agreements have limited economic benefits beyond that. Stephen Olson, a former U.S. trade negotiator, called the U.S.-EU deal 'both highly protectionist and unapologetically mercantilist' and said the EU had 'played a bad hand about as well as it could have.' 'The EU sees value in healthy, robust, and open North Atlantic trade relations. President Trump does not,' said Olson, a senior visiting fellow at the ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute, a research institution in Singapore. He added, 'In assessing what we know about the agreement, it is fair to say that it could have been worse, but that is hardly a ringing endorsement.' Trump's efforts to redraw the global trade map are not yet done. His administration has yet to clarify what tariff rates will apply to dozens of countries as of Friday, its deadline for reaching deals. According to tracking by Goldman Sachs, trading partners accounting for 56% of U.S. imports — including Canada, Mexico, South Korea, Brazil, and India — have not yet signed preliminary agreements. Analysts said it was also possible that the deals Trump has struck could unravel quickly, given his penchant for making new tariff threats and renegotiating agreements that even he has signed. U.S. officials have signaled that they expect to issue new tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals in the next two to three weeks, which could further reroute trade and anger some trading partners. As a large and diverse economy, the United States is generally less dependent on trade than other countries. Trade generates about a quarter of U.S. economic activity, compared with more than two-thirds in Mexico and Canada. In Canada, analysts say, U.S. tariffs may trigger a recession that could last through 2025 unless a deal with the United States is reached. But the effects of tariffs still spill through the U.S. economy, raising costs for businesses and consumers. That gives businesses less money to spend on hiring, expansion, and innovation, and slows consumer spending, the economy's real driver. Economists also have doubts that these trade deals will accomplish one of Trump's most important goals: reducing the nation's trade deficit, which he sees as evidence that the United States is being ripped off. Setser said tariffs could shrink or increase trade deficits with individual countries, but that he expected tariffs to have little impact on the U.S. trade deficit overall, unless they hurt the economy and shrink consumer spending. Maurice Obstfeld, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics who has argued that trade deficits are determined more by factors like saving rates and government spending, also said he expected tariffs to have little impact on the overall U.S. trade deficit. 'I doubt these deals will materially reduce the U.S. trade deficit, especially with the Trump administration having passed a fiscal bill that sharply increases the federal budget deficit in the near term,' he said. This article originally appeared in
