PMC to start strengthening work on 60 bridges
Bridge strengthening involves reinforcing existing bridges to improve their structural integrity and capacity, often to meet updated load requirements or repair damage.
The PMC had already done the safety audit of the 98 bridges which include bridges on all the rivers, flyovers and railway over bridges in the city. Of the 98 bridges, strengthening work on 38 bridges has been completed in the first phase.
The move comes after four people died and 51 were injured when an old narrow bridge over the River Indrayani near Talegaon in Pune district.
Naval Kishore Ram, PMC commissioner, said, 'PMC has done strengthening work on 38 bridges. We will audit the remaining bridges and start strengthening work soon.'
Sandip Patil, head, PMC planning department, said, 'Two years ago we did the safety audit of all the bridges. We have even carried out the strengthening work of some bridges which are essential in the first phase. We will now undertake the second phase very soon.'
Back in 2017 after the collapse of another bridge on the Savitri River in Mahad, PMC had presented the report of a structural audit conducted last year of the seven bridges built during the British era.
Shrikant Gaikwad, PMC engineer, said, 'The work was done at the cost of ₹12.48 crore.'
The PMC had divided the bridges into two categories which include heritage bridges that were over constructed before 1952 and those built after 1952. Some bridges are very old in Pune which include Lakadi Bridge, Shivaji Bridge, Bund Garden Bride and Holkar Bridge. PMC had closed the Bund Garden bridge for traffic movement and only kept it open for pedestrians.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
5 hours ago
- Scroll.in
How the Rann of Kutch became essential to the Indus Basin conflicts between India and Pakistan
The simmering tensions from the 1947 Kashmir dispute and Pakistan's territorial claims that the Rann of Kutch – a peninsular tract of land with an area roughly of 8,880 square miles surrounded by the Indus towards the west and the Gulf of Kutch in the south – was part of Sindh province, were straining the two countries' relations and became a significant precursor to the 1965 war. Topographically, the Rann of Kutch is divided by a highland into two parts – the Great Rann in the north (6950 square miles) and the Little Rann in the south-east (1930 square miles). The former connects with the Arabian Sea through Kori Creek in the west, and the latter is connected with the Gulf of Kutch in the south-west. The eastern edge of the Kutch merges with the Luni drainage area. Described as a 'bowl-shaped depression', the north-eastern part of Kutch resembled, as the Imperial Gazetteer of India described, '… large tract of salt with dazzling whiteness … Except a stray bird, a herd of wild asses, antelope, or an occasional caravan, no sign of life breaks the desolate loneliness'. Millennia ago, the Rann of Kutch was far from a desolate landscape. Archaeological and geological evidence reveals a thriving hub of life during the Harappan period, where settlements like Dholavira and Lothal flourished. The Rann of Kutch was indeed a bustling navigational channel, offering safe harbours for overseas trade and inland commerce along riverine routes that connected to the Sindh region. The lost Saraswati River mentioned in ancient Indian traditions, as some evidence suggests but continues to be debated, flowed independently into the Arabian Sea, possibly 'along the courses of the now defunct rivers such as Ghaggar, Hakra and Nara' during the Harappan Bronze Age and the Iron Age Vedic period. What was once a fertile delta of the Indus and its tributaries was altered by tectonic disturbances, such as the one in 1819, which created a natural bund that stopped one of the branches of the Indus from flowing into the Great Rann. Following the partition of the Indian subcontinent, the state of Kutch acceded to India, while the province of Sindh became a part of Pakistan. The boundary between the two, like many issues of that tumultuous time, became a point of contention and remained unmarked for years to come. Pakistan staked its claim to the Rann as a landlocked or an inland sea, and under international law, the boundary should, therefore, run through the middle. India argued that the Rann had never been classified as such, and pointed to a 1906 British administration note that declared both the wetness and dryness of the Rann as appearing to be a swamp or marshland. The British understanding was rooted in the observations employed by G Le G Jacob, who in 1844 wrote, 'I do not know any English word exactly corresponding to Rann. It is neither exclusively a swamp, nor a fen, nor a desert, nor a salt marsh, but a compound of all.' In further support of its claim, India referred to historical documents, referencing official maps spanning from 1872 to 1943, sources such as the Gazetteer of Sind from 1907, the Imperial Gazetteer of India published in 1908 and 1909, as well as documents from the political departments dated 1937, 1939 and 1942. These proved that the Rann of Kutch fell squarely within the Western State Agency that had become part of India as a result of accession. Pakistan, however, based its claim on the historical invasion of the Rann by the Sindh ruler Ghulam Shah Kalhora in 1762, asserting that this act established Sindh's juridical boundaries, which Pakistan argued remained valid even after 1947. But India swiftly countered, pointing out that Kalhora's son, Sarfraz Khan, had withdrawn those very troops in 1772, undermining the continuity of the claim. For India, the territory had been 'defined' but never 'demarcated', and, therefore, no valid dispute existed. Yet, Pakistan clung to Kalhora's invasion as the foundation of its argument and the rationale of its claim. Sensing the strategic value of the Rann of Kutch, India, in the 1950s, took steps to fortify its position. It established a major naval base in the Gulf of Kutch, built an air base in Jamnagar (historically known as Nawanagar) and stationed an army garrison in Khavda, just south of the 24th parallel. India had secured a commanding foothold, from which joint military operations could be swiftly launched deep into Pakistan, driving a powerful wedge between northern and southern Sindh, severing Karachi from the rest of Pakistan and choking its access to vital sea routes. In 1956, tensions over the Rann had erupted when Pakistan set up a post at Chhad Bet, prompting swift action from Indian forces, who moved in and overwhelmed the Pakistani presence. A ceasefire line was drawn in the Rann in 1958, and two years later, a ministerial-level meeting cautiously agreed to maintain the status quo until such time as the de jure boundary was finalised. Recognising the vulnerability of the border to Pakistani encroachments, the 7 Grenadiers camel battalion was reorganised into an infantry unit and positioned around the line of control between Bhuj and Khavda. The Bhuj airstrip was upgraded to accommodate fighter aircrafts, while all-weather airstrips were constructed at Chhad Bet, Khavda and Kotda, enabling Austers and Dakotas to land with ease. A saltwater distillation plant was set up at Chhad Bet, and a protective bund was built to guard against tidal flooding in the area. As a long-term measure, several roads of strategic importance were proposed to be built. With these measures in place, India fortified the region, ready for any future threats. Public opinion in Pakistan could never forget Indian antagonism, and the Rann remained a critical piece in Pakistan's ambitions, waiting for the right moment to be played. As mentioned earlier, in 1963, Pakistan's foreign minister Bhutto went to Peking eager to break bread with the Chinese communists. As an ideological state, the allure of forging ties with fellow ideological nations such as China was irresistible, but more importantly, it could provide a counterweight to a bigger and stronger India. Pakistan was more than willing to bend backwards, and apart from the boundary agreement and cultural cooperation, it also became the first non-communist country to start its commercial flights to Beijing. Years later, in his final testament, Bhutto regarded his efforts in forging ties with China, despite US pressures, as the crowning achievement of his legacy. On a visit to the US in November 1963, just before the state visit of the Chinese leader Zhou Enlai to Pakistan, Bhutto met with President Lyndon Johnson and received a veiled warning: 'He [Johnson] wanted Bhutto to know there would be a serious public relations problem here if Pakistan should build up its relations with the Communist Chinese. He [Johnson] was not pro-Pakistani or pro-Indian but pro-Free World. Such a state visit would make it increasingly difficult for us.' The Sino–Pakistan bond has proven to be vital to Pakistan's social and economic development, especially in the hydropower and roadway sectors. China, though, in the early phase, maintained a discreet stance in its relationship with Pakistan, even opting to remain uninvolved in the India–Pakistan wars of 1965 and 1971; but by the mid-2000s, it began to elevate Pakistan as a crucial ally in its global ambitions, driven in part by shifting dynamics in US–India relations. Notwithstanding concerns over debt and security – dismissed by China as Western propaganda – the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has, to date, delivered $25.4 billion in direct investment, created 2,36,000 jobs, built 510 km of roadways and generated more than 8000 MW of electricity. By January–February 1965, the Rann had become a volatile flashpoint. In fact, trouble had already started in the Kanjarkote area several months earlier, with Pakistani forces frequently trespassing into Indian territory. Kanjarkote was a fort in ruins, about 1.3 km south of the Pakistan border on the northwestern fringe of the Rann. While the area south of Kanjarkote was a flat and featureless plain, the north consisted of a series of parallel sand dunes providing a vantage point for Pakistan troops. Pakistan had developed its border area around Kanjarkote with a sizeable town called Badin, 30 km from the border, complete with drinking water, road connectivity, communication and an airfield nearby with radar. In contrast, no drinking water was available for Indian troops except at Khavda, and a very limited water provision at Vigokot, which were 104 km and 119 km from the border, respectively. The logistical advantage prompted Pakistan to deploy its Indus Rangers into Kanjarkote, a move that India claimed violated the 1958 ceasefire line agreement. Pakistan, however, believed India had deliberately provoked the situation, using the spectre of external aggression to divert attention from its own internal crises. Rather, Pakistan saw India's internal disturbances as an opportune moment to test and challenge its neighbour.
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
PMC finally approves dog park in Kharadi
After more than two years of planning and two unsuccessful proposals, the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) has finally approved the development of a dedicated dog park on a 3-acre plot in Kharadi, bearing survey numbers 25 and 26. The decision was taken by the PMC's veterinary department last week. (REPRESENTATIVE PHOTO) The decision was taken by the PMC's veterinary department last week. The civic body has been working to set up a dog park in Pune since 2023. The previous plans to establish such parks in Katraj and Baner were proposed but later dropped due to administrative approval challenges. Dr Sarika Funde-Bhosale, chief veterinary officer, PMC, said a letter has been given to the road, water supply, electric and building construction departments to start work on the development of roads, water supply lines and electricity lines and build a compound wall. 'The park will be equipped with pet-friendly features such as fenced play areas, walking tracks, shaded zones, drinking water points, and waste disposal bins. Other facilities like a jogging track, swimming pool, parking facility, playing instruments, grooming parlour and veterinary services will be made available at the dog park. However, the facilities will be made available in a phased manner,' said Funde-Bhosale. PMC in June 2023 decided to set up the city's first pet dog park on a 3.5-acre plot on the Katraj-Kondhwa Road. A budget provision of ₹1 crore has been made for its construction. The plot originally belonged to the PMC-run Rajiv Gandhi Zoological Park (RGZP). The civic body had sought permission from CZA to use the land for a dog park. However, CZA on December 26, 2023, rejected the proposal, stating the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, prohibits zoos from housing domestic animals and pets within premises. Similarly, the civic veterinary department in May 2024 identified a 36,000 square feet plot in Baner to set up a dog park. The proposal for the same was sent to the municipal commissioner of PMC. However, the plot was later allotted to another department of PMC.
Indian Express
17 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘Less than 10% of PMC's goal achieved': How cycle tracks fail cyclists in Pune city
In 2017, the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) came out with a Comprehensive Bicycle Plan with an aim to create a 824- km cycle network and to increase the modal share of cycling from 3 per cent to 25 per cent by 2031. However, according to ground research by NGO Parisar based on the PMC data, only 83 kilometers of tracks have been built till date, and many of them have faded away or are not operational anymore. PMC's plan envisioned 824 km of cycle network across the city with 531 km segregated cycle track, 154 km marked or painted cycle lanes, 75 km independent cycle ways/ greenways, 54 km or currently existing cycle tracks that are to be retrofitted, and 11 km of footpath and cycle track merged. Less than 10% of this goal has been achieved, observed Parisar. Tanzeel Allapur, Project Lead-Sustainable Mobility at Parisar, said, 'The plan is very good. If some other city wants to do it, they should look at the Pune bicycle plan. But in implementation it has absolutely not met the goal that it set out to do. We have nowhere reached track length or increase in modal share envisioned. The cycling department at PMC was merged with the road department, so there is no dedicated authority to look after it as well.' Ranajit Gadgil, avid cyclist and programme director at Parisar, said that comprehensive coverage of cycling tracks is really lacking in the city as some officials did not follow through on the Comprehensive Bicycle Plan. 'Cycle tracks need to be in really good condition and designed exceedingly well for cyclists to be able to use them. If there are problems with that cycle track—continuity, lack of ham, obstacles, host of other things—cyclists will just not use them. They will just start using the carriageway,' he explained. On roads like Fergusson College Road and Jungli Maharaj Road, where cycling paths exist along with the footpaths, better marking and distinction could help pedestrians keep off the paths, said Gadgil. 'If there are enough cyclists using that cycle track, then pedestrians sort of know that people are cycling on this. It is a chicken-and-egg problem,' Gadgil added. Kiran Wargale, a Pune-based cycling enthusiast, flagged safety concerns for cyclists in the city. 'Most roads in the city are extremely unsafe for cycling. It's unfortunate, especially for a city that was once known for its vibrant cycling culture. Apart from a few exceptions like Aundh Road, Pashan–NDA Road, and some stretches in Pimpri-Chinchwad, the overall infrastructure is in a very bad state,' he said. 'Poorly maintained cycle tracks, damaged roads where no tracks exist, and the constant threat from unruly traffic, especially heavy vehicles pose serious risks. As a result, many cyclists are forced to ride on the city's outskirts, but even reaching those areas on a cycle involves significant danger,' he added. Another cyclist Ashwin said, 'There's no real thought given to integrating cycling into the city's transport planning. Cycle lanes, where they exist, are mostly encroached and abruptly end. It feels like cyclists are invisible in the bigger mobility picture. Instead of being encouraged as a sustainable and healthy mode of transport, cycling is treated as an afterthought. Non-existent cycling infrastructure is a sign that the city is moving in the opposite direction of sustainable development.' Rahul Nene, founder of cycling group Speaking Wheels, however has a different view. He said that the focus should be on increasing awareness about cycling rather than focusing on building cycling tracks. 'Rented cycles with proper safety mechanisms need to be reintroduced so that more people are out on the roads and driving. Currently there is not enough demand for cycling tracks, they are empty when I drive on them. Only once there is more awareness and the demand is created, we can think of building cycling tracks,' he opines. (With inputs from Sushant Kulkarni) Soham is a Correspondent with the Indian Express in Pune. A journalism graduate, he was a fact-checker before joining the Express. Soham currently covers education and is also interested in civic issues, health, human rights, and politics. ... Read More
