
2026 Nissan Armada Review, Pricing, and Specs
Overview
The 2026 Nissan Armada is a family-oriented workhorse that is competent at hauling people, cargo, or both. Adults will fit in each of the Armada's three rows of seats, and if you need to tow, it offers a maximum 8500-pound trailering capacity.
All models come with a twin-turbocharged V-6, as opposed to several rivals that come with V-8s, but performance is similar. The Armada can be ordered as stripped-down or as luxurious as you want, with top-spec Platinum Reserve models doing their best to imitate premium SUVs from the next rung up.
Expert Tip: If you like the Armada but want something with more prestige, consider the mechanically similar Infiniti QX80.
What's New for 2026?
Nissan has introduced a sporty-looking NISMO model to the Armada lineup for 2026. To accompany its racier appearance, the twin-turbocharged V-6 gets boosted by 35 horsepower over the standard trim for a total of 460 ponies.
The NISMO wears different front and rear bumpers, a rear spoiler, and unique 22-inch wheels. Quilted leather upholstery with red accents lines the seats, which feature adjustable side bolsters for the driver and front passenger.
Pricing and Which One to Buy
The price of the 2026 Nissan Armada is expected to start around $60,000 and go up to $80,000 depending on the trim and options.
SV
$60,000 (est)
SL
$65,000 (est)
Platinum
$72,000 (est)
Pro-4X
$76,000 (est)
Platinum Reserve
$80,000 (est) 0 $25k $50k $75k $100k $125k
We think the SL is the best value because it comes standard with a premium audio system, heated front seats and steering wheel, power-folding third-row seats, and a power liftgate. Four-wheel drive is a $3000 option on most trim levels, but it comes standard on the off-road-oriented Pro-4X.
Engine, Transmission, and Performance
Engines: 425-hp twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V-6; 460-hp twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V-6
425-hp twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V-6; 460-hp twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V-6 Transmission: 9-speed automatic
9-speed automatic Drivetrains: rear-wheel-drive; four-wheel-drive
All Armadas come with a twin-turbocharged V-6 engine and a nine-speed automatic transmission. The engine makes 425 horsepower in most trims but gets boosted to 460 horsepower in the NISMO model. Four-wheel drive is available, but the Armada's default drivetrain is rear-wheel drive.
Several optional features are available and improve the Armada's driving experience and off-road capability, including an available height-adjustable air suspension and a locking rear differential in four-wheel-drive models.
Our test drive of a 2025 Armada revealed strong acceleration and better ride and handling than expected for an SUV of this size. There were still some jittery body motions in the Platinum Reserve model we drove, equipped with the larger 22-inch wheels, but the Pro-4X rides on 20-inch wheels and provides better ride quality.
0–60-MPH Times
In Comparison: If you're looking for a big SUV that's much quicker, consider the Ford Expedition, which hit 60 mph in 4.9 seconds at our test track.
Nissan
Towing and Payload Capacity
The Armada is rated to tow up to 8500 pounds, which is slightly more than the Chevy Tahoe's 8400-pound maximum but less than the Ford Expedition's 9600-pound rating.
Fuel Economy and Real-World MPG
C/D 75-mph Highway Fuel-Economy Tests: 22 mpg (Platinum Reserve); 18 mpg (Pro-4X)
22 mpg (Platinum Reserve); 18 mpg (Pro-4X) EPA City Ratings: 15-16 mpg
15-16 mpg EPA Highway Ratings: 18-20 mpg
The EPA hasn't released any fuel economy information for the 2026 Armada yet, but the 2025 model earned ratings up to 16 mpg city, 20 mpg highway, and 18 mpg combined. The Expedition earned higher ratings on the highway but aligns with the Armada for efficiency in the city.
On our 75-mph real-world highway fuel-economy test, the Platinum Reserve beat its EPA ratings, delivering 22 mpg, while the Pro-4X matched its rating, delivering 18 mpg. For more information about the Armada's fuel economy, visit the EPA's website.
Interior, Comfort, and Cargo
First Row: The Armada wears a modern and inoffensive interior design, and its cabin is designed with comfort in mind. The front seats are road-trip ready with plenty of cushioning and a lot of adjustability. The Platinum Reserve trim offers particularly nice materials such as quilted leather, giving the Armada a legitimate luxury SUV vibe.
Second Row: A second-row bench seat is standard and puts the Armada's passenger capacity at eight, but if you choose the optional second-row captain's chairs, that number drops to seven. The seats here are also plushly cushioned and they easily fold away for access to the third row.
Third Row: While some smaller three-row SUVs sacrifice third-row passenger space for second-row comfort, the Armada provides both. The rearmost row isn't as suitable for adults as the first and second, but you can put a pair of grownups back there so long as they aren't six-footers.
Cargo Capacity: We fit 6 carry-on suitcases behind the third row in our testing, and the third-row seats fold automatically at the touch of a button in the higher trim levels to reveal a larger cargo area that fits 24 suitcases.
Nissan
Infotainment and Connectivity
Infotainment: 12.3-inch touchscreen (standard); 14.3-inch touchscreen (optional)
Connectivity: Bluetooth, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto
Audio System: 6-speaker stereo (standard); 12-speaker Klipsch stereo (optional)
All trim levels come standard with two 12.3-inch screens that stretch across the dashboard. The left screen is a digital gauge cluster, while the right screen is a touchscreen infotainment system. Higher trim levels have an even larger 14.3-inch touchscreen.
Google built-in apps are optional; wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto smartphone-mirroring functions are standard. A 12-speaker Klipsch stereo system comes on SL, Pro-4X, and Platinum trims.
Safety and Driver-Assistance Features
Every Armada has a suite of standard driver-assistance features which includes blind-spot monitoring, pedestrian detection, automated emergency braking, and lane-departure warning. A hands-free driving assistant called ProPilot Assist 2.1 is available as an option.
For more information about the Armada's crash-test results, visit the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) websites. Key safety features include:
Standard Safety Features: automated emergency braking, lane-departure warning, lane-keeping assist
automated emergency braking, lane-departure warning, lane-keeping assist Optional Safety Features: adaptive cruise control with a hands-free driving mode
Warranty and Maintenance Coverage
The Armada's warranty coverages are average for the industry. Nissan also doesn't offer any complimentary scheduled maintenance, unlike the Chevrolet Tahoe and the GMC Yukon.
Limited Warranty: three years or 36,000 miles
three years or 36,000 miles Powertrain Warranty: five years or 60,000 miles
five years or 60,000 miles Complimentary Maintenance: None
C/D Test Results and Specs
We test every vehicle we can. Data in the chart below may be for a different model year if the model remained unchanged from when we last tested it.
Specifications
Specifications
2025 Nissan Armada Platinum Reserve 4x4
Vehicle type: front-engine, 4-wheel-drive, 7-passenger, 4-door wagon
PRICE
Base/As Tested: $82,000/$85,450
ENGINE
twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve V-6, aluminum block and heads, direct fuel injection
Displacement: 213 in3, 3492 cm3
Power: 425 hp @ 5600 rpm
Torque: 516 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm
TRANSMISSION
9-speed automatic
CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: control arms/multilink
Brakes, F/R: 13.8-in vented disc/13.8-in vented disc
Tires: Bridgestone Alenza Sport A/S
275/50R-22 111H M+S
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 121.1 in
Length: 209.6 in
Width: 80.0 in
Height: 75.2–80.1 in
Passenger Volume, F/M/R: 66/55/41 ft³
Cargo Volume, Behind F/M/R: 97/56/20 ft³
Curb Weight: 6118 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 6.1 sec
1/4-Mile: 14.5 sec @ 98 mph
100 mph: 15.0 sec
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 6.9 sec
Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 3.4 sec
Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 4.5 sec
Top Speed (gov ltd): 123 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 179 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.80 g
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 16 mpg
75-mph Highway Driving: 22 mpg
75-mph Highway Range: 510 mi
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/City/Highway: 17/16/19 mpg
--
2025 Nissan Armada Pro-4X
Vehicle type: front-engine, 4-wheel-drive, 8-passenger, 4-door wagon
PRICE
Base/As Tested: $75,750/$80,455
ENGINE
twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve V-6, aluminum block and heads, direct fuel injection
Displacement: 213 in3, 3492 cm3
Power: 425 hp @ 5600 rpm
Torque: 516 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm
TRANSMISSION
9-speed automatic
CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: control arms/multilink
Brakes, F/R: 13.8-in vented disc/13.8-in vented disc
Tires: Yokohama Geolander A/T G015
275/60R-20 115H M+S
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 121.1 in
Length: 209.6 in
Width: 80.0 in
Height: 75.2–80.1 in
Passenger Volume, F/M/R: 66/55/41 ft3
Cargo Volume, Behind F/M/R: 97/56/20 ft3
Curb Weight: 6085 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 5.9 sec
1/4-Mile: 14.4 sec @ 98 mph
100 mph: 15.0 sec
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 6.9 sec
Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 3.5 sec
Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 4.4 sec
Top Speed (gov ltd): 123 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 175 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.77 g
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 14 mpg
75-mph Highway Driving: 18 mpg
75-mph Highway Range: 420 mi
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/City/Highway: 16/15/18 mpg
C/D TESTING EXPLAINED
More Features and Specs

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Summit Racing Equipment NHRA Nationals Pairings
Saturday At Summit Racing Equipment Motorsport Park Norwalk, Ohio Sunday's Pairings Top Fuel 1. Justin Ashley, 3.752 seconds, 330.88 mph vs. 16. Scott Farley, 3.973, 257.48; 2. Antron Brown, 3.755, 333.33 vs. 15. Doug Kalitta, 3.953, 294.37; 3. Tony Stewart, 3.755, 327.11 vs. 14. Kyle Wurtzel, 3.895, 305.29; 4. Brittany Force, 3.784, 334.65 vs. 13. Lex Joon, 3.882, 313.73; 5. Shawn Langdon, 3.789, 324.59 vs. 12. Doug Foley, 3.841, 317.49; 6. Steve Torrence, 3.812, 329.34 vs. 11. Shawn Reed, 3.826, 322.42; 7. Dan Mercier, 3.813, 330.15 vs. 10. Clay Millican, 3.823, 324.20; 8. Spencer Massey, 3.816, 319.37 vs. 9. Josh Hart, 3.818, 325.37. Did Not Qualify: 17. Will Smith, 3.997, 283.85. Funny Car 1. Cruz Pedregon, Dodge Charger, 3.890, 318.39 vs. 16. Buddy Hull, Charger, 4.127, 276.75; 2. Austin Prock, Chevy Camaro, 3.900, 331.28 vs. 15. Dale Creasy Jr., Charger, 4.087, 312.57; 3. Ron Capps, Toyota GR Supra, 3.908, 325.06 vs. 14. Paul Lee, Charger, 4.079, 306.26; 4. Jack Beckman, Camaro, 3.913, 321.35 vs. 13. Chad Green, Ford Mustang, 4.072, 311.56; 5. Matt Hagan, Charger, 3.926, 329.67 vs. 12. J.R. Todd, GR Supra, 4.061, 322.50; 6. Alexis DeJoria, Charger, 3.960, 327.11 vs. 11. Dave Richards, Mustang, 4.040, 317.19; 7. Hunter Green, Charger, 3.972, 322.50 vs. 10. Bob Tasca III, Mustang, 4.012, 322.73; 8. Daniel Wilkerson, Mustang, 3.997, 321.50 vs. 9. Spencer Hyde, Mustang, 4.005, 314.97. Did Not Qualify: 17. Julie Nataas, 4.148, 294.11; 18. Chris King, 4.267, 249.72; 19. Bobby Bode, 4.386, 205.19; 20. Mike McIntire, 4.927, 173.14; 21. Joe Morrison, 5.248, 147.04. Pro Stock 1. Greg Anderson, Chevy Camaro, 6.594, 207.30 vs. 16. Derrick Reese, Ford Mustang, 6.721, 203.98; 2. Dallas Glenn, Camaro, 6.596, 207.37 vs. 15. Val Smeland, Camaro, 6.703, 204.82; 3. Matt Hartford, Camaro, 6.603, 207.88 vs. 14. Chris McGaha, Camaro, 6.652, 207.59; 4. Greg Stanfield, Camaro, 6.613, 206.73 vs. 13. Mason McGaha, Camaro, 6.650, 207.53; 5. Cory Reed, Camaro, 6.616, 208.17 vs. 12. Troy Coughlin Jr., Camaro, 6.640, 205.32; 6. Eric Latino, Camaro, 6.619, 206.45 vs. 11. Deric Kramer, Camaro, 6.632, 209.07; 7. Cody Coughlin, Camaro, 6.626, 206.57 vs. 10. Jeg Coughlin, Camaro, 6.631, 205.66; 8. Aaron Stanfield, Camaro, 6.626, 207.05 vs. 9. Erica Enders, Camaro, 6.630, 206.95. Pro Stock Motorcycle 1. Matt Smith, Buell, 6.816, 200.86 vs. Bye; 2. Gaige Herrera, Suzuki, 6.820, 199.11 vs. 13. Odolph Daniels, Suzuki, 7.336, 182.85; 3. John Hall, Beull, 6.832, 199.35 vs. 12. Wesley Wells, Suzuki, 7.233, 183.69; 4. Angie Smith, Buell, 6.839, 198.32 vs. 11. Chris Bostick, Suzuki, 6.970, 193.32; 5. Richard Gadson, Suzuki, 6.853, 197.28 vs. 10. Chase Van Sant, Suzuki, 6.922, 195.76; 6. Ron Tornow, Victory, 6.862, 197.88 vs. 9. Marc Ingwersen, EBR, 6.901, 192.99; 7. Jianna Evaristo, Buell, 6.886, 199.08 vs. 8. Steve Johnson, Suzuki, 6.891, 195.05.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
I'm a Mechanic: These Are the 5 Cars I Would Never Buy in 2025
Not all cars are reliable. Some vehicles have high maintenance costs and persistent mechanical issues. Even if they have the most attractive designs, it's best to avoid such cars if you don't want to drain your wallet. Read Next: Explore More: Alan Gelfand, a mechanic and owner of German Car Depot, shared five cars he would never buy in 2025 because they're expensive to maintain and are prone to mechanical problems. The Chrysler 200 has been out of production since 2017, but preowned vehicles are still available for purchase. 'They end up being expensive to maintain,' Gelfand said. Besides being costly to service, Gelfand also noted that the Chrysler 200 has poor transmission quality, electrical system issues and uncomfortable driving dynamics. 'The 9-speed automatic transmission is notorious for jerky shifting and premature failure,' he said. Check Out: This midsize sedan has a luxurious look but has a major continuously variable transmission (CVT) issue, which can be costly to replace. 'I would never purchase this vehicle because the CVT is its major flaw,' Gelfand said. 'We have had to replace numerous Altima transmissions because they tend to fail at approximately 60,000 miles.' The Jeep Renegade may appeal to many people because it's a compact SUV, but Gelfand said it's one of the most unreliable cars. 'The vehicle presents itself as modern, yet it experiences multiple electrical breakdowns while its driving comfort remains poor,' he said. 'It will experience powertrain lights and shifting issues and connectivity problems that will require frequent visits to the shop.' This luxury compact SUV's sleek design looks attractive in many ways. However, the Range Rover Evoque will let you visit the repair shop regularly. 'It looks stylish yet lacks reliability. We have observed engine oil leaks together with transmission problems and total electrical shutdowns, which occur frequently below 80,000 miles,' Gelfand said. While the Chevrolet Spark is an affordable car, it's not worth the price. 'The vehicle demonstrates low construction quality together with high noise levels and weak engine performance,' Gelfand said. Rather than settling for this vehicle, Gelfand recommended a used Honda or Toyota since these models cost less and offer better durability. More From GOBankingRates How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on I'm a Mechanic: These Are the 5 Cars I Would Never Buy in 2025
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's early birthday present to himself—the first Tesla just drove itself from its factory straight to the customer
In its second milestone in a week, Tesla arranged for a Model Y crossover to drive itself from its Texas factory to a customer in downtown Austin some 30 minutes away. It follows the successful launch of its robotaxi service this past Sunday. City officials, however, told Fortune they had no choice in the matter: 'the City does not have the authority to regulate these vehicles.' Tesla celebrated a historic first on Friday when a new Model Y left the factory in Austin and—without anyone in the vehicle—drove itself to a waiting customer a half-hour away. Already the second milestone this week after the commercial deployment of his robotaxi service, it marks an early birthday present for CEO Elon Musk. The entrepreneur had promised it to Tesla supporters for June 28, which is coincidentally when he turns 54 years old. 'The first fully autonomous delivery of a Tesla Model Y from factory to a customer home across town, including highways, was just completed a day ahead of schedule,' Musk posted on Friday. 'There were no people in the car at all and no remote operators in control at any point. FULLY autonomous.' Since this is completely unsupervised full-self driving (FSD) in its first-ever practical application for the brand, Tesla uploaded a video as proof. It documents from various angles the roughly 30-minute drive from the Austin factory to 1515 S. Lamar Blvd. downtown, where its new owner took possession. Whether this delivery is just a one-off test or part of a broader plan to revamp distribution remains unclear. While it might in theory save on at least part of the $1,390 destination fee Tesla charges, it risks scratching or denting the vehicle in transit—or even just arriving at the customer dirty, looking like it had just been through a rainstorm. Additionally, the Model Y's range maxes out at an official 357 miles with real world tests indicating a lower range. Unless it could drive from one Tesla service center to the next, so that an employee could recharge it, the range would limit it to a radius inside Texas. Lastly, regulations on the ground could make it outright illegal as state governments currently determine under what conditions autonomous vehicles, if at all, can drive on their roads. In the case of Austin, for example, city officials told Fortune they had no say in what Musk's company did. 'Tesla made the City aware of their intent to deliver a fully autonomous vehicle,' a spokesman for the Texas state capital said. 'While the City does not have the authority to regulate these vehicles, we will continue to work with the company to provide feedback if public safety issues arise.' The autonomous delivery also elicited skepticism as to whether Tesla might be misleading people into believing the technology is more robust than it really is. Some pointed to the fact the video was not livestreamed, but rather uploaded later. In addition, the robotaxi service that began operation in Austin on Sunday still only operates during certain hours, does not drive to the airport, and features a safety monitor in the front passenger seat at all times. Moreover, the timing is advantageous, as Musk has been attempting to shift investor focus towards the rollout of his robotaxi technology and away from its struggling core business of selling EVs. This coming week, Tesla is expected to publish second-quarter global production and delivery figures that show a 14% decline in deliveries to 383,000 vehicles, according to the median estimate polled by the company's investor relations team. While a few skeptics are bound to remain mistrustful no matter what, the suspicion is rooted in part in experience. Nearly nine years ago, Tesla posted a similar demonstration when it released the 'Paint It Black' video. It claimed that a vehicle was driving entirely on its own and the human behind the wheel was not even there to monitor for safety. 'The person in the driver's seat is only there for legal reasons,' it stated in the video posted in October 2016. 'He is not doing anything. The car is driving itself.' Tesla's AI director Ashok Elluswamy later testified in a sworn deposition the footage was not meant to be an accurate representation of the technology. Both the video and the blog post have since been expunged entirely from Tesla's site, but thanks to YouTube and web archives they are still viewable. There was another, more recent example, as well. In October 2024, Musk showcased prototype robots interacting with human guests at an event without telling anyone they were tele-operated remotely by humans. Tesla didn't respond to a request for comment from Fortune. But Elluswamy, who has risen the ranks at Tesla since working on the 2016 video, denied there was any trickery with the self-driving delivery video on Friday. 'Literally chose a random customer who ordered a Model Y in the Austin area. Vehicle is exactly the same as every Model Y produced in the Tesla factory,' he replied to a question on X. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data