
Jets' 5 biggest salary cap hits in 2025
The New York Jets currently possess roughly $36.7 million in cap space, according to OverTheCap. That's fourth-most in the entire league. General manager Darren Mougey is slated to enter training camp with an abundance of financial flexibility. With that in mind, we've analyzed the five biggest scheduled cap hits on the 2025 Jets.
Quinnen Williams, DT
Unsurprisingly, Quinnen Williams holds the Jets' largest cap charge by far at $21.5 million. Williams is on a four-year, $96 million extension that runs through the 2027 campaign. New Jets head coach Aaron Glenn is expecting him to be dominant throughout 2025.
Alijah Vera-Tucker, IOL
Right guard Alijah Vera-Tucker arguably enjoyed his most effective season in 2024. That's good timing, because the fifth-year option is slated to pay the 2021 first-round pick a fully-guaranteed $15.3 million. Vera-Tucker will hope to sign a lucrative extension in East Rutherford.
Sauce Gardner, CB
Despite still being on his rookie contract, cornerback Sauce Gardner has the Jets' third-largest cap hit at $10.6 million. The Jets have already triggered his fifth-year option next year at $20.1 million. Gardner is eligible to sign an extension and could get a record-breaking deal this offseason.
Quincy Williams, LB
Veteran linebacker Quincy Williams is on a modest three-year, $18 million extension signed in 2023. Williams' cap charge is a modest $8 million, fourth-biggest on the team. This is a contract year for the former Murray State standout.
Justin Fields, QB
The Jets signed Justin Fields to a two-year, $40 million contract in free agency to be the team's bridge starting quarterback. Fields' cap charge is $8 million this campaign, and is set to significantly increase to $23 million next offseason. Mougey structured the contract with void years through 2031 to minimize the financial impact.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
14 hours ago
- USA Today
Steelers countdown to kickoff — No. 71: a history of the number and who wore it best
The Steelers countdown to kickoff is here — and we're at 71 days until Pittsburgh faces off against the New York Jets at MetLife Stadium. In the spirit of the countdown, we're taking a look at the history of No. 71 and the players who wore it best. Current Steelers No. 71 wearer: OG Aiden Williams Following the 2025 NFL Draft, Williams signed with the Pittsburgh Steelers as an undrafted free agent. He played six seasons for Minnesota-Duluth (2019–2024) and appeared in 40 games — starting all 40. According to the Steelers' official team website, Williams was named a 2024 AFCA First Team All-American, a 2024 Don Hansen NCAA DII Honorable Mention All-American, and a 2025 East-West Shrine Bowl invitee. Pittsburgh has found hidden gems at guard before — but for Williams to fit this trend, he'll have to compete with backup guards Max Scharping and Spencer Anderson for a roster spot. Last five Steelers to wear No. 71: Best No. 71 in Steelers history: OT Charlie Bradshaw Bradshaw is without a doubt the best Steeler to wear the No. 71 — earning two Pro Bowl selections during his time in Pittsburgh from 1961 to 1966. Bradshaw was the anchor at the offensive tackle position, playing in 82 games for Pittsburgh — 80 of which came as starts. He was ultimately named to the Pittsburgh Steelers Legends — a selection of the franchise's best players before the 1970s.
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Steelers Legend Makes Surprising Aaron Rodgers Prediction: ‘Real Ugly, Real Fast'
Former Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker James Harrison has a bold prediction for quarterback Aaron Rodgers in 2025. It's difficult to predict what version of 41-year-old quarterback Aaron Rodgers the Pittsburgh Steelers are getting in 2025. But former Steelers linebacker James Harrison doesn't have a lot of confidence that it will be a good one. Advertisement 'I think they can make it work if they winning,' Harrison said on the 'Nightcap' podcast. 'If they start losing and it's looking like they ain't gonna make above .500, I think it gets real ugly, real fast. To the point of they may just be like, 'You know what, let's let this dude go midseason. For Aaron, let's just get him outta here and put one of these other quarterbacks in.'' Cutting Rodgers would be very surprising, especially after the Steelers waited several months for him to sign with them this offseason. Parting ways with Rodgers midseason wouldn't benefit Pittsburgh financially, either. His one-year, $13.65 million contract includes $10 million guaranteed, so the four-time NFL MVP would have to make things very uncomfortable to make the team move on. Advertisement Still, the 2025 season is all about going out on a good note for Rodgers after he had a very disappointing two-year stint with the New York Jets. New York Jets quarterback Aaron Rodgers during a game against the Pittsburgh Steelers on Oct. 20, 2024. — Ed Thompson / Steelers Now In 2023, he suffered a season-ending torn Achilles on just the fourth offensive snap of the year. And then last season, he led the Jets to a 5-12 finish. So it's safe to assume he would do whatever it takes to not be released in what he believes will be his final season in the NFL. 'Yeah, I'm pretty sure this is it,' Rodgers said. 'You know, that's why we just did a one-year deal. The Steelers didn't need to put any extra years on that or anything, so this was really about finishing with a lot of love and fun and peace for the career that I've had. I mean, I've played 20 freaking years. It's been a long run and I've enjoyed it. What better place to finish than (with) one of the cornerstone franchises of the NFL.' Advertisement This article originally appeared on Steelers Now: Steelers Legend Makes Surprising Aaron Rodgers Prediction: 'Real Ugly, Real Fast' Related Headlines


NBC Sports
20 hours ago
- NBC Sports
Justin Tucker hopes to thread needle between claiming innocence, accepting responsibility
When the NFL announced on Thursday that former Ravens kicker Justin Tucker has received a 10-game suspension under the Personal Conduct Policy, the initial reaction based on the bare-bones statement was that the league completed its investigation and its in-house legal process with a finding that Tucker had done what he was accused of doing during one or more massage-therapy sessions. It quickly became clear that the suspension didn't result from the procedures created by the NFL. It came from a negotiation between the league, the union, and Tucker. And that's what made aspects of the statement issued by Tucker's representative confusing. Especially at the outset. 'We are disappointed with the NFL's decision,' Rob Roche began in the comment that was widely distributed to reporters and for the most part disseminated with little if any context or explanation. The NFL's 'decision' wasn't to suspend Tucker 10 games. It was to propose (presumably) a longer suspension if the process played out and to offer Tucker a 10-game suspension. It was Tucker's 'decision' to accept the 10-game suspension. That fact, obscured by Roche's statement, is an important one. Tucker accepted a 10-game suspension for something he loudly insisted he didn't do. 'Justin has always strived to carry himself in a way that would make his family and community proud,' Roche added. 'He stands by his previous statements.' But does he? Who accepts a punishment for something they know they didn't do — especially when reasonable minds will be inclined to include that accepting a 10-game suspension represents an admission of responsibility? 'In order to put this difficult episode behind him and get back on the field as soon as possible, we have advised Justin to accept this resolution and close this matter,' Roche said. 'The people who know Justin best know his character and understand that while he remains fully committed to excellence as a football player, he is deeply dedicated to his most important lifetime roles as a father, husband, and friend.' It's one thing to advise Tucker to take a one-game or a two-game suspension. Ten games sends a much different message. Ten games suggests that Roche and others feared the league would emerge from the hearing before retired judge Sue L. Robinson with a much longer suspension. And so, on one hand, Tucker still says he didn't do anything. On the other hand, he has accepted a TEN-GAME SUSPENSION for something he swears he didn't do. That's a difficult needle to thread, especially if he plans to eventually sue the Baltimore Banner for defamation based on the reporting that sparked this situation in late January. For a defamation case to fly, Tucker will have to prove that the information was false (and that the Banner knew it was false or acted with reckless disregard to the truth or falsity of the information, since Tucker is a public figure). The suspension means, as a practical matter, that Tucker will also need to show that even the NFL was duped by the false allegations.