Gov. Stitt adds another new member to Ryan Walters-led education board
Stitt's appointment of Becky Carson could further curb the influence of state schools Superintendent Ryan Walters over the board and Oklahoma schools. Stitt and Walters, both Republicans, are increasingly at odds over how to improve K-12 education in the state.
Carson is the fourth person named to the board by Stitt since February, when he ousted and replaced three sitting board members. At the time, he cited disappointing test scores and "ongoing controversy" at the Oklahoma State Department of Education as his reasons.
Stitt has not formally announced Carson's appointment. Her appointment came to light through paperwork Stitt filed with the Oklahoma secretary of state on April 23. Carson's nomination, to fill a term that will end April 2, 2027, is subject to Senate approval.
Spokespeople for Stitt did not immediately return a message seeking comment on the nomination. Neither did a spokeswoman for Walters.
Stitt's moves to reshape the board could have major implications for Walters, who chairs the board and sets its agenda. Until this spring, Walters had faced no pushback from board members as he rolled out sweeping policy changes affecting schools statewide, such as barring school districts from changing a student's sex or gender designations in official records without board approval or implementing a statewide Bible-teaching mandate. During his first two years in office, no board member cast a vote opposite of Walters.
In January, the board unanimously passed a rule Walters proposed that would require schools to track students' immigration statuses. Stitt has criticized the proposal, which is pending final approval by state lawmakers.
The governor appoints six members of the seven-person board, with the state superintendent holding the seventh seat. The board has operated with only six people since October 2022, without a representative from the Fifth Congressional District. That seat remained vacant after a state senator refused to carry one of Stitt's prior nominations, Alex Gray, before the Senate.
A Senate spokesman said Carson can join the board and participate in meetings before being confirmed by the Senate. That body typically works on confirming high-level executive nominations during May, the final month of the legislative session.
Stitt's other new picks for the state education board, who also are awaiting Senate confirmation, already are having an impact. At the board's April 23 meeting, the three new members — Chris VanDenhende, Ryan Deatherage and Michael Tinney — delayed the approval of contested board minutes and debated with Walters about the circumstances surrounding a vote to approve controversial social studies standards.
Two of them told The Oklahoman before the meeting they would like the Oklahoma Legislature to return the proposed standards to the board for further consideration. Sen. Adam Pugh, R-Edmond, filed a resolution hours after the meeting to disapprove the standards. Pugh is the chair of the Senate Education Committee, which first will consider Carson's nomination.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Gov. Stitt adds another new member to Ryan Walters-led OSBE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
15 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump threatens ‘very significant' Russia sanctions, bashes ‘all talk' Putin
'They will be very, very powerful and very bad for the countries involved,' the president warned of his secondary tariffs. With Putin rebuffing his efforts to end the war, Trump has gradually moved closer to the European position on arming Ukraine. | AP Photo/Alex Brandon By Seb Starcevic 07/15/2025 08:50 PM EDT President Donald Trump upped pressure on Russia to 'stop the killing' in Ukraine within 50 days, warning Tuesday that his threatened economic penalties against Moscow and its trading partners would be devastating. Trump said yesterday he would impose secondary tariffs of up to 100 percent on countries that still trade with Russia in an effort to force the Kremlin to the negotiating table with Ukraine, giving Moscow until early September to respond. A bill by Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut that has 85 Senate co-sponsors would authorize the president to impose secondary tariffs of at least 500 percent on imported goods from countries such as China, Brazil and India.
Politico
29 minutes ago
- Politico
Senate GOP needs Vance on recissions vote
Senate Majority Leader John Thune says he will bring the first procedural vote to the floor Tuesday on the White House's request to claw back $9.4 billion in spending. It's not clear he has even the 51 votes necessary to start debate on the package. Congress needs to approve the request before it expires Friday, or the administration will have to spend the money as lawmakers originally intended. That deadline is looming large as several GOP senators insist the administration clarify what spending it is actually seeking to rescind. They'll question President Donald Trump's budget director Russ Vought during senators' closed-door lunch Tuesday afternoon. 'We still are lacking the level of detail that is needed to make the right decisions,' Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins told reporters Monday evening. 'It's extremely unusual for any senator to not be able to get that kind of detailed information.' The Maine Republican is concerned not just over the administration's proposal to scale down the global AIDS-fighting program PEPFAR, but also about broader cutbacks in overseas public health. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) told POLITICO he's particularly interested in protecting funding for global food aid programs like Food for Peace and the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program. It's increasingly evident the rescissions package will have to be changed in order to pass the Senate, and Thune told reporters as he left the Capitol on Monday that leadership is working with wary senators to 'see what a path forward on amendments looks like.' Senate leaders expect a vote-a-rama on amendments to start Wednesday, teeing up a final vote late Wednesday or early Thursday. If senators are able to advance a package with tweaks, House GOP leaders plan to put the package on the floor Thursday; they have already started to clear away procedural hurdles that would prevent them from passing the spending cut proposal ASAP. Throwing another wrinkle into it all, though, is that House GOP leaders don't want the Senate amending the package at all, knowing their members will be jammed with changes they don't like and be forced to choose between passing a watered-down product or missing the deadline to act. 'I think you got to respect the White House's request, and that's what we did, so I hope that's what we get back,' Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Monday. 'There are two big categories of rescissions, and I'm not sure either of them should be subject to dispute.' It's also unclear whether an amended rescissions package would even have the support in the Republican House. Fiscal hawks are already drawing red lines, with Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) going as far as telling POLITICO he won't support a rescissions package that is 'a penny less' than the House-approved version. MEANWHILE, IN OTHER FUNDING FIGHTS — Senate appropriators remain at a standstill on moving a funding bill forward for the Commerce and Justice departments. They're trying to schedule a briefing with the FBI on the administration's rationale for abandoning the plan to move the bureau to suburban Maryland, according to Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), whose stand against Trump's desire for a site in the District of Columbia derailed a markup of the bill last week. But Van Hollen insists that even if the FBI assures senators that the Washington location is a secure site, he won't back off his attempt to block the administration from diverting about $1.4 billion that has been set aside for relocating the agency's campus to Maryland. Across the Capitol: House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole said that House leaders began whipping votes Monday night as the chamber prepares to take its vote on the $831.5 billion defense appropriations bill later this week. While defense appropriations bills have been bipartisan in the past, Republicans are expecting this measure to be a largely party-line affair. What else we're watching: — Epstein meltdown: We'll see if Republican leaders' headache from their members over the DOJ's failure to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein continues. Rep. Norman voted Monday in favor of a Democratic amendment in the House Rules Committee that would have forced a floor vote on the DOJ releasing more materials from the federal case. — Russia sanctions timeline: The bipartisan Russian sanctions bill might stall in the House and Senate after Trump announced secondary tariffs on countries trading with Russia. Thune said Monday he would hold off on advancing the bill for now. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise also said a vote could be delayed to post-August recess. — Dems' last stand against a controversial Trump pick: Senate Democrats are making a final bid to draw the spotlight to a whistleblower's allegations that Emil Bove, a top Justice Department official and 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals nominee, urged defiance of the same judicial branch he is seeking to join. Democrats want the whistleblower, Erez Reuveni, to testify before senators prior to their confirmation vote on Bove, which is set for Thursday morning. Jordain Carney, Katherine Tully-McManus, Jennifer Scholtes, Meredith Lee Hill and Cassandra Dumay contributed to this report.
Politico
34 minutes ago
- Politico
Mamdani expected to clarify his position on ‘globalize the intifada'
Mamdani's campaign did not comment Tuesday on any moves the candidate would make to clarify his position on the phrase. But some Democrats welcomed the step as a significant gesture. 'Many Jews believe it is the bare minimum for Zohran to go beyond distancing himself personally from language like 'globalize the intifada,'' said an aide to a Jewish elected official granted anonymity to speak freely about the sensitive matter. 'He must proactively be clear that language that incites violence against Jews simply isn't acceptable, from anyone, in the city he wants to lead.' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries have also referenced Mamdani's defense of 'globalize the intifada' — a rallying cry regarded as a call to violence against Jews for some and a call for Palestinian resistance to others — as they weigh whether to back his campaign for mayor. Mamdani, a Queens state lawmaker who toppled former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in last month's primary, was asked about the phrase last month in a podcast by The Bulwark. He said then that he hears it as a call for Palestinian human rights. 'That's not language that I use,' the candidate told NBC News after winning the primary. 'The language that I use — and the language that I will continue to use to lead this city — is that which speaks clearly to my intent, which is an intent grounded in a belief in universal human rights.' Mamdani has also said that the words mean different things to different people. An aide to a New York Democrat said, 'Any walking back of the 'globalize the intifada' nonsense is desperately needed if Mamdani wants to quell the deep and legitimate concern that many in the Jewish community have of him in this moment.' Mamdani's reaction to the phrase has been a central part of many of his ongoing discussions with elected officials and community and business leaders, and several have said publicly and behind closed doors that they hoped he would walk back his statements.
