Scholarship delay hits 3,500 Dalit students in UP; Mayawati seeks CM Yogi's intervention
Claiming that uncertainty is looming large over the education of 3,500 Dalit students, she sought an immediate intervention of Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath into the matter.
Taking to social media platform X, Mayawati said the government's "failure" to timely disburse scholarships to thousands of SC/ST students of colleges across several districts affiliated with Raja Mahendra Pratap Singh University, Aligarh, has led to "widespread anxiety and anger among people".
She claimed that, as per information received, despite repeated correspondence by the university and district administration, the "insensitivity and negligence" of the Social Welfare Department in Lucknow have led to a grave threat looming over the education of approximately 3,500 Dalit students.
Asserting that the aforementioned university in Aligarh was established through the special efforts of Chief Minister Adityanath, Mayawati expressed hope that he will take a keen interest in its smooth functioning and urgently resolve this "serious issue".
Notably, for the last several days, students of Raja Mahendra Singh University of Aligarh have been leading an agitation for scholarships to Dalits.
The university's officials said they will soon find a solution to the issue.
Reacting to the matter, Nagina MP Chandra Shekhar Azad said he was extremely distressed and angered by the "humiliation and discrimination" meted out to Scheduled Caste students.
"The Scheduled Caste students were treated unfairly regarding the right to scholarship, and an attempt was also made to humiliate them," he claimed.
"According to the students, when they approached the Vice Chancellor regarding the rejection of their scholarship forms, they were insulted based on their attire and social background. A student was told that you are a labourer's son; you should have been wearing slippers," Azad said.
Slamming the officials for "inhumane" behaviour, Azad said it violates Articles 15 and 17 of the Indian Constitution.
He urged the UP government and the university administration to conduct a high-level probe into the "rejected" scholarship forms of the Dalit students and an independent judicial investigation into "insults and threats" faced by the Dalit students.
Nagina MP said he will raise the issue in Parliament and streets as well, claiming that it was not just a fight of students, but for the Constitution and social justice.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC seeks clarity on school mergers, warns govt lawyers of fine
Lucknow: The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court has sought clarification from the Uttar Pradesh govt on whether a survey was conducted before deciding to merge primary schools in the state. The court has asked the govt to present the survey report, if any, and provide a well-prepared response to the petition challenging the merger. The court adjourned the hearing till Friday, warning the state's top lawyers that if they fail to present the govt's stand with full preparation and facts, a Rs 1 lakh fine may be imposed. The court made it clear that there will be no further postponement on Friday. A single bench of Justice Pankaj Bhatia passed the order on a writ petition filed by Krishna Kumari of Sitapur and 50 others. The petition was presented for hearing on Wednesday, but the govt lawyers had sought time till Thursday for arguments. Earlier, the petitioners' counsel L P Mishra and Gaurav Mehrotra argued that the state govt's decision of June 16 was "arbitrary" and "illegal". It was said that to ensure the right to education provided under Article 21A of the Constitution, the central govt passed the Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act in 2009, under which education was made compulsory for children between 6 and 14 years. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo To ensure this constitutional right, the govt established a large number of primary schools in the state under the provisions of the Right to Education Act. It was said that as per the intention of the Act, schools were established for every 300 population within a radius of one km to provide the constitutional right to education and now the govt is closing down a large number of schools by merging them through an administrative order. It was argued that this act was against the provisions of Article 21A of the Constitution and the RTE Act . It was also argued that once schools have been established on a large-scale to fulfil the goal of the constitutional right under the Right to Education Act, the work done under the said Act cannot be reversed by a mere administrative order because it cannot supersede any legislative provision. Newly-appointed additional advocate general Anuj Kudesia and chief standing counsel SK Singh appeared for the state govt, while Sandeep Dixit appeared as the advocate of BSA Sitapur. The govt counsel justified the merger decision, citing low student enrollment in many schools, with around 56 schools having no students at all. However, the court questioned whether a survey had been conducted to arrive at this decision and asked to see the survey report if one had been done. When the report could not be presented and the govt counsel started presenting its case with half-hearted preparations, the court got irked and started reprimanding the govt lawyers.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC rejects bail of man for postagainst PM, Army
Prayagraj: While rejecting the bail application of a man, who is accused of posting objectionable content on social media against the Prime Minister of India and Indian Armed forces, the Allahabad high court observed that the freedom of speech guaranteed under the Constitution does not extend to such acts which disrespect high dignitaries and create disharmony among citizens. Rejecting the bail application of Asharaf Khan alias Nusrat, Justice Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal on Wednesday said that it has become a "fashion among certain groups of people" to misuse social media in the garb of freedom of speech and expression by making unfounded allegations against high dignitaries, posting such material which creates disharmony and hatred among the people. Accused Ashraf Khan, booked under sections 152 (acts that endanger the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India) and 197 (imputations and assertions prejudicial to national integration) of BNS at Sasni police station of Hathras. It is alleged that the accused allegedly uploaded edited videos on his Facebook during the recent India-Pakistan military face-off. According to the prosecution, the accused allegedly posted objectionable content targeting PM Modi, defence minister Rajnath Singh, Army chief and other Army officials, in a bid to defame them. The counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and that the objectionable post had not been forwarded by the applicant, even though it was found on his mobile. On the other hand, the state's counsel argued that the alleged posts on social media created disharmony among people of India and also showed disrespect to Indian Military and Indian Air Force. The court observed, "Though our Constitution gives right to freedom of speech and expression to every citizen, but that freedom does not stretch to permit a person posting videos and other posts disrespecting to the Prime Minister of India, Indian Military and its officers, which on the one hand, causes disharmony among the people of India, and on the other hand, comes within the purview of encouraging the separatism and endangers the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India. "
The Hindu
31 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Socialism, secularism are the spirit of the Constitution
India's Constitution is not merely a legal document. It is the embodiment of the ideals and the aspirations of a nation that was forged in the crucible of an anti-colonial struggle. Among its most fundamental principles are socialism and secularism, values that are not confined to the Preamble alone but which are woven throughout its text, reflected in the Directive Principles of State Policy, in the Fundamental Rights, and in its very structure. Recent calls by the leadership of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) leadership to remove the words socialism and secularism from the Preamble are not just an attack on semantics but is also a direct assault on the foundational vision of the Indian republic itself. The RSS General Secretary made this call recently under the garb of criticising the Emergency, which happened 50 years ago, as the words socialism and secularism were added in the Preamble under the Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 during the Emergency. It is a deceitful move by the RSS to invoke the Emergency in order to discredit these principles, especially when it colluded with the Indira Gandhi government during that time for its own survival. To use that event in history to now undermine the Constitution reflects the RSS's hypocrisy and opportunism. Reflected in the Preamble and beyond Socialism, in the Indian Constitution, is a commitment to social and economic justice, the eradication of inequality, and the creation of a welfare state. The Preamble promises 'Justice, social, economic and political' to all citizens, and seeks 'Equality of status and of opportunity'. It underlines the fact that even before the 42nd Amendment, the spirit of socialism was always present in our Constitution. There were significant efforts in the Indian Constitution to increase the freedoms of citizens and to reduce the inequalities prevalent in society. The Fundamental Rights were major steps in that direction. Article 14 guarantees equality before law. Article 15 prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. Article 16 ensures equality of opportunity in matters of public employment. These rights, read together with the Preamble and Directive Principles, enshrine a vision of a society free from exploitation, where the dignity of every individual is upheld. The Directive Principles of State Policy have the clearest articulation of the socialist vision, in the Indian Constitution. Articles 38 and 39 clearly lay it out, and is further explained in Articles 41, 42 and 43. These provisions are not just aspirational; they have guided landmark legislation and judicial interpretation in India. Secularism in the Indian Constitution is not mere religious neutrality but the positive assurance that the state will treat all religions equally, protect the rights of minorities, and ensure that no citizen suffers discrimination on the basis of faith. The original text of the Preamble, even before the addition of the word secular in 1976, had already promised 'Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship' and 'Fraternity assuring the dignity of the individual…'. Under Fundamental Rights, Articles 25 to 28 provide the Right to Freedom of Religion and further underscore the secular nature of the Indian Republic. Articles 29 and 30, on Cultural and Educational Rights, too reiterate this. These articles ensure that the state neither identifies with nor privileges any religion, and that every citizen, regardless of faith, enjoys equal rights and protections. Even the Supreme Court of India has repeatedly affirmed that secularism is part of the Constitution's 'basic structure'. The Basic Structure Doctrine was introduced in 1973 in the Supreme Court's landmark judgment in Kesavananda Bharati. It holds that while Parliament can amend the Constitution, it cannot alter its fundamental structure, i.e., the basic structure of the Constitution is inviolable. As mentioned earlier, the 42nd Amendment which introduced the words socialism and secularism in the Preamble of the Constitution was enacted in 1976, three years after this historic verdict. Yet, the additions could be made precisely because they did not violate the basic structure of the Constitution. Inseparable from the Constitution's fabric It is a fallacy to claim that socialism and secularism in the Preamble of the Constitution are mere 'additions' or 'impositions' from the 1970s. The Objective Resolution of the Constituent Assembly, the Constituent Assembly debates themselves and the lived experience of India's glorious anti-colonial freedom struggle all testify that these values were central to the vision of the Republic's founders. The Constitution's commitment to social and economic justice, equality, and fraternity is inherently socialist. Its guarantee of religious liberty, non-discrimination and minority rights is inherently secular. Even if the words socialist and secular (the word secular was there in Article 25(2)(a) even before the 42nd Amendment) were to be removed from the Preamble, the Constitution's core philosophy, structure and provisions would remain unchanged in their essence. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's final speech to the Constituent Assembly on November 25, 1949, offers profound insights that reinforce the argument that the notion of equality (which forms the foundation of the ideas of socialism and secularism) is embedded in the Constitution's spirit and structure. B.R. Ambedkar's words remain a guiding light against any attempt to dilute these foundational values. The real agenda has been exposed The RSS's demand to remove socialism and secularism from the Preamble of the Constitution is a calculated move to undermine the very foundations of the Indian Republic. It exposes its long-standing agenda to replace the Constitution with a veiled Manusmriti, subvert the secular democratic republic of India, and create a theocratic Hindu Rashtra. The attempt to erase socialism and secularism from the Preamble is an attempt to rewrite history, to delegitimise the legacy of India's anti-colonial freedom struggle, and to pave the way for an oppressive majoritarian state. The Constitution of India is a living document that is designed to secure justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity for all. Socialism and secularism are the pillars on which the edifice of the Indian Republic stands. To attack them is to attack the very soul of India's democracy. All those who cherish the values of the freedom struggle — a struggle that the RSS was not part of — must stand united in defence of the lofty values of the Constitution, and resist any attempt to destroy the idea of India. M.A. Baby is the General Secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist)
