
Housekeeping time for Bangladesh
Even as an illegitimate
Yunus
is being pressured to announce legitimate elections in
Bangladesh
it is not clear whether it would be either inclusive or fair. India has, as have the Bangladesh army and sundry political formations in the country, rightfully called for the return of a people's mandate for the country at an early date.
Yunus' reluctance to hold elections by December 2025 seems to be goaded only by a misplaced appetite to hold on to power. Although the narrative that is being peddled is 'reforms before elections' such an argument does not hold water as the correct manner for reforms to be both introduced and enforced should actually rest on a popularly elected government that has the people's mandate. Yunus has no such mandate. He was foisted on a Bangladesh by a foreign power for extra-regional considerations including the creation of 'corridor' to the Rakhine province of Myanmar to facilitate war equipment for the Arakan Army to shore up its war against the Myanmar Army. The fact that even the Bangladesh armed forces have publicised their opposition to such a move showcases Yunus' partisanship and willingness to allow Bangladesh to be used by external machinations.
In any event, fair play necessitates that an inclusive election (as India has called for) cannot be without the Awami League contesting it. Although the secular party's leaders are in exile, hiding or in a state of disarray, the fact of the matter is that 55% of Bangladesh are Awami Leaguers and passionately loyal to Bangladesh's founding principles when it overthrew a malevolent Pakistan in 1971. Today, if they have been coerced into silence it is because of the muzzle of radical Islamism and street terror led by a few mercenaries cloaked in student's attire. The banning of the Awami League is not acceptable.
India must make it clear to the world and, of course, to Bangladesh what it means by inclusive elections. By any stretch of imagination, it cannot be without the inclusion of the Awami League, the political party that gave birth to Bangladesh.
The ban on the radical Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI) has been revoked by Bangladesh's judiciary, paving the way for its participation in elections. It is a recorded fact that Gholam Azam's JeI had collaborated with the rampaging Pakistan army after the onset of Operation Searchlight on 26 March 1971 which resulted in the genocide of the Bengali people in the erstwhile East Pakistan. It is not immediately understood as to how the people who adjudicate in Bangladesh can permit the 'Return of the Razakars' even as it sits mute to the banning of the Awami League, a formation which, as aforesaid, was the prime pronouncement for the formation of a new nation. It has to be admitted that free agency is being feloniously denied in present day Bangladesh.
Live Events
The manner in which a legitimately elected
Sheikh Hasina
was ousted, it is now beginning to be understood, had no popular endorsement in Bangladesh. It was nothing but swift overthrow of power, the mechanics of which were engineered by an extraneous power and summarily transported to the streets of Dhaka.
Among other incidental reasons, one of the explanations for Sheikh Hasina's fleeing her homeland was because she resisted pressure from the extra-regional power to use her country as a launching detachment against the Myanmarese junta which the Chinese are supporting.
Bangladesh was caught in the cross-currents of big power play. The overseas power wants a satellite state in the region and Yunus willingly played into the plot. Even the Chinese who were trying to elbow into the erstwhile East Pakistan were caught off guards. The Chinese do not play chequers in the manner that it has been put out in popular Indian media, but very cautiously and in a calibrated manner even if it means waiting for the turn of a generation. In fact, very little is known about the truth of Lalmonirhat. It is a strong possibility that the plan for a Chinese airbase in Lalmonirhat is yet another propaganda attempt by the West to dupe India.
If Op Sindoor brought back some legitimacy to the shores of India it is because of Modi-Shah's high Indian political acumen and ability to rise, rally and redeem for India. Indeed, the only force that stood by the nation and steadfast for God and country was the Indian armed forces. India continues to be fortified because its warriors in land, sea and air came as one to defend and protect. India also succeeded in signalling a measured approach to countering cross-border terror.
However, one aspect that needs to be forcefully flagged in the midst of the 'fog of war' is the fact that the terrorist eco-system has proliferated beyond Pakistan's sponsorship. It has not only reached Bangladesh but into India's vulnerable innards. Recent reports are of the opinion that Islamist tanzeems like Lashkar-e-Toiba and Jaish-e-Mohammad in concert with radical groups in Bangladesh are planning a massive radicalisation exercise of students in Indian universities. If such sinister anti-India moves are not nipped in the bud, then the nation will careen out of control. Gratefully pre-emptive steps that are correctly being taken in Assam by a farsighted Assamese leadership and the Assam Police, are laudable and must be emulated by the rest of India.
It might be questioned as to why is India has suddenly become so protective of Bangladesh.
The answers are simple. First, because it had lent valuable Indian blood during its creation in 1971. Secondly, because it wants to safeguard its backyard from the rise of radical Islamism emanating from Bangladesh that may threaten the North East and in times to come the rest of India and finally to protect the sacred eastern shores from extra-regional piracy.
The planning that must occupy the policy makers in Raisina Hill in the coming weeks and months should be not only to 'archive the pain' that has been endured in Dhaka and Pahalgam in the last several months, but go forward in a positive quest for immediate remedial housekeeping in a country whose socio-political character has an important bearing on India's North East.
Lt Gen Arun Kumar Sahni is a Former Army Commander and GOC Dimapur Corps. Jaideep Saikia is a top strategist and bestselling author.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scroll.in
2 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Assam Congress writes to PM about alleged irregularities in dairy farming scheme, CM denies claims
The Assam Congress on Saturday wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi alleging 'serious irregularities' in a state government-supported dairy farming scheme. Assam Congress chief Gaurav Gogoi, in the letter to Modi, expressed 'serious concerns' about the Assistance to Entrepreneur for Establishment of Commercial Dairy Farming scheme. Under the scheme, individuals who want to set up commercial dairy farms or expand their existing farms are given assistance in securing bank loans, and are also given direct financial aid from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party government in the state. However, Gogoi alleged that several beneficiaries of the scheme appeared to be family members or associates of state ministers and MLAs. He further claimed that 'long-standing dairy farmers, particularly in districts like Bongaigaon, have reportedly been overlooked despite having applied multiple times and fulfilling the eligibility requirements'. Serious irregularities in Assam's dairy scheme exposed, genuine milk producers left out, while kin of ministers & MLAs make the list. Assam PCC President @GauravGogoiAsm writes to PM seeking a review. — Assam Congress (@INCAssam) June 28, 2025 The Congress leader added that the exclusion of experienced dairy entrepreneurs raised concerns about the fairness and transparency of the selection process. 'Equally alarming is the response from the Chief Minister of Assam [Himanta Biswa Sarma], who chose to justify the inclusion of minister's family members in the list of dairy scheme beneficiaries,' Gogoi said, adding that this 'open endorsement of political favouritism' had fulled public outrage. Claiming that it reflected a 'serious breach of oath', the Congress leader added that the alleged irregularities cast doubt on the state government's adherence to ethical governance and the rule of law. Gogoi, in the letter to the prime minister, also raised concerns about the Gorukhuti agricultural project. The project, launched in 2021, was aimed at promoting agricultural development and self-reliance through modern farming techniques in 77,000 bighas of land in Sipajhar. The project also included the procurement of high-yield Gir cows from Gujarat. Citing official records, Gogoi in his letter to Modi claimed that the cows were allocated to several elected representatives, including a firm owned by the wife of state minister Jayanta Mallabaruah, and sitting legislators Bhupen Pegu, Utpal Borah and Diganta Kalita, along with MP Dilip Saikia. 'The diversion of resources and livestock under a project supported by over Rs 5.5 crore in public funds compromises the very objective of government programmes designed to promote inclusive development,' he said. '…these actions go against the very principles of transparency, accountability, and equitable access.' Gogoi urged the prime minister to direct an inquiry into the matter. In September 2021, over 1,000 families, most of them Bengali-origin Muslims, had also been evicted from Dhalpur in Assam's Darrang district to make way for the Gorukhuti project. The evictions had led to protests from local residents, during which two persons were killed. CM Himanta Biswa Sarma denies claims In response to the allegations, Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma dismissed any wrongdoing and claimed that the Gir cows had begun dying due to climate incompatibility, India Today NE reported. BJP MLA Padma Hazarika, who was heading the project, had requested private persons to purchase the cattle due to a lack of buyers and fearing further losses, Sarma claimed. 'We should thank them for buying,' he said. 'Otherwise, there were no takers for these sick cattle.' The chief minister also accused the media of sensationalising the issue and comparing the situation to a 'cattle auction', India Today NE reported. He claimed that media houses were ignoring more serious issues, including illegal cow smuggling and security threats. Press bodies condemn state minister's remarks Meanwhile, the Press Club of India, the Gauhati Press Club and the Media Association of Assam has demanded an apology from Mallabaruah for his 'insulting' remarks about a journalist during a press conference on Friday. While responding to a question about the Gir cows asked by a journalist from the Sadin-Pratidin media group, the state minister reportedly referred to him as ' inferior,' Newslaundry reported. 'I will not speak to inferior people like you,' Newslaundry quoted Mallabaruah as saying. 'I will answer when your owner asks me a question.' Targeting journalists for merely asking uncomfortable questions has become a routine phenomenon for politicians and others who are in power and accountable to the people. Such behaviour is against the spirit of a democratic nation. We endorse the Gauhati Press Club statement and… — Press Club of India (@PCITweets) June 28, 2025 The Media Association of Assam demanded an apology from the state minister for his remarks, Northeast News reported. Media Association of Assam's President Hiren Chandra Kalita and Secretary-General Chandra Kumar Shaikia condemned the remarks and called on all journalists to boycott Mallabaruah until he apologises. The Gauhati Press Club also condemned the recurring incidents of journalists facing backlash from political leaders when faced with uncomfortable questions. 'From MPs, MLAs to ministers and other office bearers of different parties, we have seen an alarming trend of targeting the journalist who poses a question that puts them in a difficult position,' Susmita Goswami, Gauhati Press Club chief, said on Friday. On Saturday, the Press Club of India said that it endorsed the Gauhati Press Club statement and urged political leaders to refrain from such undignified behaviour. 'Targeting journalists for merely asking uncomfortable questions has become a routine phenomenon for politicians and others who are in power and accountable to the people,' it said in a statement. On Sunday, Mallabaruah apologised for his remarks about the journalist amid the mounting backlash, The Assam Tribune reported. '...I have not intentionally insulted any journalist," he claimed. "Yet, if my words have hurt someone's sentiments, I truly regret it." Saying that he did not intend to belittle journalists as a whole, the minister acknowledged that his choice of words was inappropriate and hurtful. However, he claimed that his remarks were directed at a particular journalist from a specific news channel whom he accused of asking repetitive questions with an agenda driven by the owner of the channel.


The Hindu
15 hours ago
- The Hindu
What are the issues around deportation?
The story so far:At least seven West Bengal residents who were pushed to Bangladesh by the Border Security Force (BSF) on suspicion of being Bangladeshis were brought back to India after the intervention of the State government. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee said on June 25 that residents speaking in their native Bengali language are being branded as Bangladeshis in some Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-ruled States. Several people who were pushed from Assam to Bangladesh also returned as they were found to be Indians or that their citizenship cases were sub-judice. Why have matters escalated? After the regime change in Bangladesh in August 2024, the police across the country were asked by the Union Home Ministry to detect Bangladeshis who had illegally entered the country and were living here on forged documents. The drive assumed momentum after the Pahalgam terror attack in April and the subsequent 'Operation Sindoor'. The Ministry has issued instructions to States to deport undocumented migrants but in most cases pushbacks are happening. Around 2,500 suspected Bangladeshis have been pushed back so far. On May 10, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said that the government has decided to implement the 'pushback' mechanism to check infiltration instead of going through the legal route which is a long-drawn process. Home Minister Amit Shah has asked top intelligence officials to make an example of 'infiltrators' by detecting, detaining, and deporting them. In 2022, at an Intelligence Bureau meeting, Mr. Shah had asked officials to identify around 100 illegal migrants in each State, check documents and arrest and deport them. He asked them to continue with the crackdown even if neighbouring countries do not accept the undocumented migrants. What is the difference between deportation and pushback? Deportation is a legal process which involves detaining and arresting a foreigner suspected to be living in India without documents or who has entered the country illegally. The case is presented before a court and after exhaustion of all legal avenues, which includes conviction by the court, the country which the foreigner belongs to is contacted and the deportation takes places once the identity is confirmed. Pushbacks are not a legal procedure and there are no stated rules. They happen when a foreigner has been caught by the border security force on the international border and, depending on the intensity of the case or the discretion of the border personnel, they are either arrested, made to face the law here or pushed back. Since citizenship and foreigners are Union List subjects, it is the Home Ministry which delegates powers to deport foreigners to State governments. In 2024, the Ministry told the Jharkhand High Court that since the 'Central Government does not maintain a separate federal police force exclusively dedicated to the task of detection and deportation of illegally staying foreigners, action in this regard has been entrusted to the State police.' What is the Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950? On June 9, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said the State government was likely to enforce a 1950 law to identify and evict illegal foreigners, adding that under the law, district commissioners are empowered to declare individuals as illegal immigrants and initiate eviction proceedings. The 1950 Act was passed by Parliament amid communal disturbance and violence following the Partition of India in 1947 and creation of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) bordering West Bengal, Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram. The Act says that 'it extends to the whole of India', but has Assam-specific provisions. Section 2 of the Act says that if the Union government is of the opinion that any person or class of persons, having been ordinarily resident in any place outside India are detrimental to the interests of the general public of India or any Scheduled Tribe in Assam, the Union government may by order, 'direct such person or class of persons to remove himself or themselves from India or Assam within such time and by such route as may be specified in the order'; and 'give such further directions in regard to his or their removal from India or Assam as it may consider necessary or expedient'. What are the laws for foreigners? Till April this year, matters relating to foreigners and immigration were administered through 'pre-Constitution period' laws enacted during the First and Second World Wars, which were the Foreigners Act, 1946, Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920, the Registration of Foreigners Act, 1939 and the Immigration (Carriers' Liability) Act, 2000. In April, Parliament enacted the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025 repealing the old laws. Unlike Pakistan and Bangladesh borders, the rules for movement of people along Nepal and Myanmar are different. Nepal has a free-border agreement with India, and a Free Movement regime (FMR), allowing movement of people residing within 10-km on either side, exists along the India-Myanmar border. Following the May 2023 ethnic violence in Manipur, the Ministry in 2024 decided to fence the entire 1,643-km Myanmar border in the next 10 years. Post the military coup in Myanmar in February 2021, over 40,000 refugees from Myanmar belonging to the Chin ethnic group who are closely related to the Mizo community crossed over to Mizoram. On March 10, 2021, the MHA sent a letter to the State governments of Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur and Mizoram that the refugees should be identified and deported and that the State Governments have no powers to grant 'refugee' status to any foreigner as India is not a signatory to the UN Refugee Convention of 1951 and its 1967 Protocol. The refugees continue to live here. What is behind this recent drive? Since the April 22 terror attack at Pahalgam, the police has intensified the drive to detect undocumented migrants. Initially, they were taken by trains to border districts and then pushed to Bangladesh by the BSF. In some instances, migrants after being up picked from Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Maharashtra, were flown by planes to Agartala in Tripura and transported to the Bangladesh border by BSF personnel. The police and the BSF record biometrics and photographs of the undocumented migrants. It is to be noted that the BSF has never acknowledged any of the pushbacks. The Ministry has asked the States to verify the claims of undocumented migrants who claim Indian nationality after which District Magistrates are to send a report within 30 days, failing which the Foreigners Regional Registration Officer would deport them. In 2022, the Unique Identification Authority of India was asked to maintain a 'negative list' to stop undocumented migrants from procuring identity documents in the future.


The Print
17 hours ago
- The Print
India bans imports of certain jute, other items from Bangladesh through land routes
The goods under these curbs include jute products, flax tow and waste, jute and other bast fibres, jute, single flax yarn, single yarn of jute, multiple folded, woven fabrics or flex, and unbleached woven fabrics of jute. However, imports are allowed only through Nhava Sheva seaport in Maharashtra, the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) said in a notification. New Delhi, Jun 27 (PTI) India on Friday banned imports of certain jute products and woven fabrics from Bangladesh through all land routes amid strained relations between the two countries. Such port restrictions will not apply to Bangladeshi goods transiting through India to Nepal and Bhutan, it added. It further said re-exports of these products from Bangladesh to India through Nepal and Bhutan will not be allowed. 'Import from Bangladesh shall not be allowed from any land port on the India-Bangladesh border. However, it is allowed only through Nhava Sheva seaport,' the DGFT said, adding that 'imports of certain goods from Bangladesh to India are regulated with immediate effect'. Earlier in April and May, India announced similar curbs on imports from Bangladesh. On May 17, India imposed port restrictions on the import of certain goods like readymade garments and processed food items, from the neighbouring country. On April 9, India withdrew the transhipment facility it had granted to Bangladesh for exporting various items to the Middle East, Europe and various other countries except Nepal and Bhutan. These measures were announced against the backdrop of the controversial statements made by the head of Bangladesh's interim government Muhammad Yunus in China. The comments did not go down well in New Delhi. It also drew sharp reactions from political leaders in India across party lines. India-Bangladesh relations have nosedived dramatically after Yunus failed to contain attacks on minorities, especially Hindus. Bangladesh is a big competitor of India in the textile sector. The India-Bangladesh trade stood at USD 12.9 billion in 2023-24. In 2024-25, India's exports stood at USD 11.46 billion, while imports were USD 2 billion. Bangladesh's perceived growing proximity with Pakistan and China and the implications of India's strained ties with its eastern neighbour were also discussed at a parliamentary committee meeting on Friday, according to sources. PTI RR CS BAL BAL This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.