Republicans Disappear From Congress as Mike Johnson Asks Them to Vote
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
House Speaker Mike Johnson has said some of the Republicans still refusing to back the One Big Beautiful Bill Act were not in the House chamber as he fought to secure their votes.
The roll call vote on the massive tax and spending cuts package that started late Wednesday was held open for hours as several Republicans refused to give their votes.
Johnson told Fox News late Wednesday that he "might keep [the vote] open a little while" because "among those 'no' votes, I've got a couple of folks that are actually off-site right now, had to attend family affairs or events this evening and so some of them are on the way back."
Among them was Representative Brian Fitzpatrick, who reportedly left the House chamber.
"Republicans are trying locate Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, who delivered a surprising no vote on the mega bill rule. Likely to try to flip him," NBC News correspondent Melania Zanona wrote on X, formerly Twitter.
"I told a member I saw him bolt out of the chamber and leave the area."
House Speaker Mike Johnson arriving at the U.S. Capitol in Washington D.C. on Wednesday.
House Speaker Mike Johnson arriving at the U.S. Capitol in Washington D.C. on Wednesday.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
This is a breaking news story. More to follow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fox News Host Hits Republican Lawmakers With A Blunt Election Warning
Republican lawmakers on Thursday were in a jubilant mood as they marked the passage of President Donald Trump's signature 'big beautiful bill.' But Fox News host Jessica Tarlov said some of them might not be celebrating next year, when they could face unexpectedly early retirement. Polls show the bill ― which adds trillions to the debt, cuts taxes for the wealthy, and slashes Medicaid ― is deeply unpopular with the American public. With midterm elections looming in 2026, Tarlov ― a rotating co-host of 'The Five' ― wrote on X that moderate Republicans in particular will be at risk next year: By voting for this budget bill, many moderate Republicans are ensuring their retirement will come earlier than expected. — Jessica Tarlov (@JessicaTarlov) July 3, 2025 The bill is so unpopular that CNN data chief Harry Enten earlier this week showed it was underwater in five recent polls by between 19 and 29 percentage points. 'The American public at this particular point hate, hate, hate the 'big, beautiful bill,'' he said. 'As far as they're concerned, it's not a 'big, beautiful bill,' it's a big, bad bill.' Democrats also believe that Republicans who support the bill will pay the price at the polls next year. 'There are House Republicans now, this morning, who are about to sign their political obituary with this vote,' Representative Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) told Reuters before the final votes were cast. 'They are literally walking the plank for Donald Trump.' The party that wins the White House often suffers in the midterm elections that follow. Former MSNBC host Chris Matthews expects that to be the case next year, as well, and said the passage of the bill won't make things any easier for Republicans. He estimated that Democrats could pick up between 15 and 20 seats ― more than enough to win control of the House.
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Democrat Jeffries Sets Record In Speech Delaying House Vote on Trump Bill
Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries broke the record for the House's longest 'magic minute' floor speech Thursday, using his unlimited speaking privileges to drag House Republicans' megabill vote hours past the intended schedule. New Yorker Jeffries' speech passed the previous record held by then-Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) of eight hours and 32 minutes. Not only did Jeffries' rambling remarks delay President Donald Trump's tax bill vote — they also brought his criticisms of the GOP agenda onto the most popular morning news shows.
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
US House Passes Tax Bill, Sending It to Trump
CC-Transcript 00:00Eventually we got this. The president had said there was going to be no more negotiations. This was going to be done by the July 4th holiday. It is July 3rd in the afternoon, and at least passage of the bill is now complete. What's next? The next thing is the president plans to sign the legislation tomorrow. And you can bet that there's now going to be a giant message war between Democrats and Republicans over whether this is good for America or bad for America. We already had 8 hours and 35 minutes of Hakeem Jeffries speaking about how this was disgusting, just to use one of the phrases. But he essentially railed against this bill the entire time. What are the most contentious aspects of this bill? So the Democratic case is that this is essentially a Robin Hood in reverse religious legislation that it takes from the poor and gives to the rich. And indeed, a lot of the direct benefits from this book go to wealthy people and companies. And a lot of the safety net cuts will wind up hurting relatively low income Americans. The Republican view is, hey, there's $4.5 trillion in tax cuts here to goose the economy, get growth going, and that growth will ultimately we're down to the benefit of Americans. And in fact, we had Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant on Bloomberg TV just a few minutes ago, just before this bill was passed. And he mentioned that when the CBO was scoring the bill, it didn't even take into account any revenue from tariffs that could ultimately be up to $2 trillion, which would also help to offset some of the costs. I'm curious, how did the president win over holdouts? Because there came a time when there were no more negotiations and still the members of the House Freedom Caucus did seem to fall into line. So there were very strong disagreements on parts of this legislation, some from conservatives and some from moderate. But generally most of the Republicans were very much in favor of the tax cuts and the increases in defense spending and immigration enforcement that are the core of the bill. The disagreements were the fiscal conservatives often felt like, hey, this is going to add more than $3 trillion to the deficit. That's a lot of money. We want to see more spending cuts on the moderate side from Republicans. People who are vulnerable to challenges in swing districts were saying, hey, we're going to cut $1,000,000,000,000 from Medicaid. This is going to wind up hurting people and costing us in the election. So you had one camp saying we want to cut more spending and the other camp saying, hey, you're cutting too much. But at the end of the day, they wanted these tax cuts. President Trump has huge sway over the Republican Party. This is the one piece of legislation he wants. He cranked up the pressure and they more or less agree with the main pillars of it. Should we expect executive orders or anything like that? Was anything promised in the background that might appear over the next two weeks, two months? So there were these discussions with the fiscal conservatives in which they received reassurances about executive action. Now, they haven't detailed exactly what those promises are, so we don't know exactly. But for instance, one of them was talking about the president's going to take a very hard line on clean energy permitting and things to make sure that there aren't too many clean energy projects that became eligible for clean energy tax credits before they expire in about a year or so, particularly for wind and solar installations. There were also received assurances. So they say that the Medicaid stuff will be stringently enforced and consequently reduce Medicaid spending as much as possible. But we haven't heard that from the president and we haven't gotten, you know, very clear examples of that. And then, you know, it depends on what he actually does. Well, exactly, Mike. And to that point is this now peak Trump. Will his supporters, the MAGA supporters, see any benefits or any portions of them see any benefit from this bill immediately? And if not, what does it mean for the midterms? Well, there were a lot of the things that appeal to populists were front loaded in the beginning of the bill. So, for instance, elderly Americans will get a bigger standard deduction on their income taxes. Workers who get tips or overtime pay will get it for the next four years. A portion of that pay exempted from taxes for a lot of Americans with families. There'll be an increase in the maximum child tax credit. So there are some tangible things that help. The sort of rank and file Trump voters, and they will come early. The spending cuts will be backloaded more.
