logo
Bride left furious after sister-in-law wears 'wedding dress' to her big day

Bride left furious after sister-in-law wears 'wedding dress' to her big day

Daily Mail​5 days ago
A bride was left fuming after her sister-in-law wore a 'wedding dress' to her big day.
Taking to the popular Reddit forum Wedding Shaming', an outraged guest shared photos of the woman in question, revealing a white, floor-length gown with floral detailing.
Looking uncomfortably like a bride, the rebellious attendee claimed she was wearing a sage green dress in accordance with the dress code, which was 'pastel chic'.
But the disgruntled bride was not happy, especially as her mother-in-law had already put in a request to wear white, which was denied.
The poster wrote: 'The dress code was summer pastel chic, so think Easter colours.
'The girlfriend of the groom's brother wore a sage green (wedding) dress that in no way, shape or form appeared to be sage green, or any other colour.
'The veil she's carrying was the flower girl's (her daughter). This was after the mother-in-law had asked the bride if she could wear a white jumpsuit to the wedding, to which the bride obviously said no.'
Aside from the colour, the design of the dress appeared obviously bridal - complete with off-the-shoulder sleeves and a romantic, figure-hugging silhouette.
To further undermine the claim that the dress was 'sage green', the sister-in-law is pictured wearing sage green shoes, with which the white dress starkly contrasts.
The post racked up thousands of comments and sparked a fiery debate, with many shocked on behalf of the bride.
One commenter wrote, simply: 'Wow, that's very bridal,' to which another incredulous user responded: 'Yeah this is straight up a wedding dress.'
Another comment dished out some seemingly obvious wedding guest advice, writing: 'To be safe, you should never wear any white dress to a wedding that is not yours.
'That being said, not all white dresses are wedding dresses. This is absolutely a wedding dress.'
At first glance, the images tripped many commenters up before they realised what they were looking at. One said: 'I was like "Cool, so what does the sister-in-law look like?"'
Another chimed in: 'Exactly what I was going to say. The poster clearly included pictures of the actual bride for comparison then forgot to add pictures of the offending sister-in-law… nope.'
A third felt the same, saying: 'My thought before I read the title was, "wow what a beautiful detail shot of the bride and the tablescape"... some people are insane.'
Although the rule of avoiding white on someone else's special day seems obvious enough, it is often broken.
'To be safer, as a bride, bring a paintball gun to your wedding,' advised one person. 'No white dresses but the bride.
'This policy will be enforced by the bride via paintball gun. If you do not wish to be painted, please do not wear a fresh white canvas.'
Some eagle-eyed followers were quick to spot the difference between the sage green shoes and the supposedly green dress.
'I like how her SHOE was sage green,' said one. 'Like, she had a perfect example of what the color is supposed to look like.
'Instead she went about as white as you can go on the color wheel. Wtf. Who thinks this is appropriate?'
A second joked: 'The dress looks like the smell of the color sage from another room.'
While holding the flower girl's veil, the sister-in-law's nuptial look goes even further.
The poster wrote: 'The flower girl is her daughter, but as a cherry on top: the daughter was also the ring bearer and was too nervous to walk down the aisle so guess who walked down with her? Mommy dearest.'
The majority of commenters could not believe the 'insane' decision to wear 'a full on wedding gown,' but others sided with the guest.
'"Summer Pastel chic" is simply asking for trouble,' wrote one.
'Honestly yes,' another agreed. 'So many pastels photograph white or look white under some lighting.'
A third shared their own story, writing: 'I wore a bright yellow floaty pleated dress with a belt to a friend's wedding. It was so clearly bright yellow, I thought it was a safe choice. Nope!
'A lot of the evening photos were black and white. My dress looked like a wedding dress.'
While the memo could be to blame, the comment section is unanimous in their belief that there is no lighting that could redeem the sister-in-law's poor outfit choice.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fortnite streamer forced to BAN 15-year-old fan from his Twitch chat over shock behavior
Fortnite streamer forced to BAN 15-year-old fan from his Twitch chat over shock behavior

Daily Mail​

time13 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Fortnite streamer forced to BAN 15-year-old fan from his Twitch chat over shock behavior

As technology and social media become increasingly embedded in our lives, people become more fearful as to how it may affect people - specifically younger generations. And as a popular Twitch streamer learned, children who are given unlimited access online tend to make some questionable decisions. Cody Conrod, or 'Clix,' is a popular pro Fortnite streamer with more than eight million followers. This means that he plays the online game on a live stream, all while interacting with subscribers and fans. These fans have the ability to donate real money to streamers, usually as an indication that they enjoy their content. While this is typically something a streamer would be happy about, Clix found himself in a situation where he was contemplating sending the money back to a viewer. Reddit users reposted a clip from Clix's stream, along with the title 'Fortnite Streamer Clix bans a 14-year-old in his Twitch chat for donating over $36,000 to him in a month.' After listening to the clip, it's revealed that the fan, Lucas, is 15 years old and donated $35,000 to streamers. Clix tries to make sense of the situation. 'You [made] $18K profit this year, you spent $35K on streamers, and now you want to quit the one thing that's making you revenue after you just spent all your money?' Clix asked the boy, incredulous. From the conversation, one can surmise that this 15-year-old boy is also a streamer who makes a good amount of profit - but also uses double that on other streamers. The boy confirms this information and says, 'Yeah, 'cause I don't enjoy it.' 'Dude, I don't want to promote refunds... but like, bro. Why the f**k did you spend $35,000?' Clix continued. Clix then tells Lucas that he makes 'millions and millions' of dollars but still wouldn't donate 'more than $2,000' to streamers a month. Lucas goes on to explain that he gets a 'dopamine rush' anytime a streamer says his name - 'it's addicting,' he said. In response, Clix first asks Lucas if his parents are 'financially stable' and then 'financially well,' and Lucas responds 'Yeah' to both.' When asked why he finally stopped, Lucas admits that his father found out and was 'annoyed.' From the clip, it's hard to tell what Clix ended up doing in the situation since he said goodbye to Lucas and the young fan said he was going to bed, but based on the title of the Reddit thread, it's assumed that he eventually banned the streamer for the irresponsible behavior. And Reddit users agreed with action while in disbelief that a teenager would have access to that much money - and then spend it so frivolously. 'This is my question. Where's this money coming from? Because if it's his parents' money, how have they not noticed?!' one Reddit user said. 'Kid donated my yearly salary to a streamer over the course of a month... Jesus Christ,' another added. 'Kids are f**king stupid and have access to mom and dads credit card. What do you expect?' one user said, summarizing the situation. 'Plus, this type of media glorifies it because you can be seen in front of thousands of others, generating a false sense of popularity.'

Chloe's It Girl Bag Is Back Again
Chloe's It Girl Bag Is Back Again

Graziadaily

time16 hours ago

  • Graziadaily

Chloe's It Girl Bag Is Back Again

It was a fashion girl's fever dream. Picture 2005: skinny jeans are clinging on for dear life, the Alexander McQueen skull scarf is already two years deep into iconic status, and the Chloé Paddington bag? It's everywhere. Tucked into the crooks of arms belonging to Hollywood It girls - Hilary Duff, Halle Berry, Kate Moss, Katy Perry. Age four, I had no idea what that clunky, padlocked bag meant, but I was about to find out. Designed by Phoebe Philo in 2004, the boho Paddington didn't need to beg for attention. Unlike the Balenciaga City bag, which took a minute to catch fire, this one exploded instantly. The first 8,000 units sold out before they even hit the shelves. It was peak 'if you know, you know', before that was even a thing. But like most era-defining accessories, the Paddington faded into fashion's archive. Until now. In March 2025, during Paris Fashion Week, Chloé's new creative director Chemena Kamali resurrected the Paddington for her Fall/Winter '25 runway. It's back in four updated colourways with a modernised silhouette and a new price point of €2,300 (£1,950) in Europe and \$2,750 (£2,130) in the US. For comparison? The original retailed for around \$1,400 (£1,085) in 2005. So yes, it's doubled in price but should that stop you? Not likely. The hype is real. According to Reddit, the new version is less heavy (a major complaint with the OG), and Depop has reported a 1,137% spike in searches for vintage Paddingtons since June. Because if there's one thing this generation loves, it's bringing something back-from low-rise jeans to point-and-shoot cameras, and of course, It-bags. Chloe Womenswear Fall/Winter 2025-2026 ©getty images The reissued Chloé Paddington will be available from September, but until then, you can join the waitlist or hit the secondhand market. You can find one on Depop, eBay, or Vestiaire - just be prepared to fight for it. 1. Chloé Paddington Bag Renee Washington , Grazia's digital fashion and beauty writer, lives online. With a penchant for wispy lashes and streetwear, she writes about the worlds of fashion and beauty from the viewpoint of the modern fashion girlie.. Main image credit: @chloé

Netflix fans 'called in sick' to binge final season of gut-wrenching series
Netflix fans 'called in sick' to binge final season of gut-wrenching series

Metro

time16 hours ago

  • Metro

Netflix fans 'called in sick' to binge final season of gut-wrenching series

A Netflix series has left fans lying to their bosses so they can binge the 'gut-wrenching' finale. Part two of the second season of The Sandman, adapted from Neil Gaiman's beloved comic book series, has finally dropped on Netflix. The second season focuses on Dream and his epic final journey as he looks to rebuild his kingdom. But the show has been dogged by the accusations against Gaiman, which sent shockwaves through his fanbase earlier this year. Despite that, the show has remained extremely popular with its fans, even causing them to 'call in sick' so they can watch it. Before it was released on the streaming platform, Sullyville said on Reddit: 'I called in sick. I just had a iced coffee. I'm here with you all waiting for the drop.' Wake up to find news on your TV shows in your inbox every morning with Metro's TV Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your show in the link we'll send you so we can get TV news tailored to you. Taking to X, @DailyJakeSweet added: 'Well it's over. The Sandman is over. I'm a mess I won't tell more to avoid spoilers but I'm happy that we were given such a great adaptation, with a fabulous cast. Also I didn't stop crying, did I mention I'm a mess?' @LauraRival1 commented: 'I have no words, it's magnificent, this adaptation is a jewel with intense emotions. The actors are just perfect! Thank you all for bringing this story to life!' @howlnini also said: 'TheSandmanSeason2 a beautiful end to a beautiful show :) what a ride! I will remain seated for the final episode.' Despite the overwhelmingly positive reactions to the series, Netflix has already confirmed that this will be the last we see of Dream (Tom Sturridge), in an announcement that came in the wake of sexual misconduct allegations levied against Gaiman, who co-developed the show from his comics. The first six episodes dropped on July 3, with the second five having arrived today. Ahead of the season, Netflix released a teaser trailer for The Sandman season two, which did not mention Gaiman by name. The showrunner, Allan Heinberg, notably also did not mention Gaiman or the allegations when he shared a statement about the show's conclusion. More Trending 'The Sandman series has always been focused exclusively on Dream's story, and back in 2022, when we looked at the remaining Dream material from the comics, we knew we only had enough story for one more season,' he told Netflix's Tudum. A number of projects involving Gaiman across film and TV have either been paused or cancelled altogether – including Good Omens on Prime Video, which is now ending in a feature-length episode without Gaiman's involvement. View More » The Sandman season 2 part two is available to stream on Netflix. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Will there be a season 3 of The Sandman? Latest news as season 2 ends MORE: 'Best crime thriller of 2025' tops Netflix charts with nearly 25,000,000 views MORE: British ITV drama 'that made TV history' storms Netflix top 10 chart

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store