Pakistani nationals who overstay in Indican face 3 years in jail, ₹3 lakh fine
Pakistani nationals on short-term visas who fail to leave India within the stipulated deadline are liable to be arrested, prosecuted and face penalties of three years in jail and a ₹3 lakh fine.
Under Section 23 of the Immigration and Foreigners Bill, 2025, foreign nationals who overstay their visa, violate visa conditions, or enter restricted areas in India face imprisonment up to 3 years, or a fine of a maximum ₹3 lakh or both.
Also Read: 'Look who's bearing brunt': Children separated from mothers, tears at Attari-Wagah ahead of India exit deadline
The Centre issued a 'Leave India' notice to all Pakistani nationals on short-term visas in India, stating that they had to leave the country by April 27. Special consideration was given to those on medical visas who are required to leave by April 29.
The Indian government's directive came after Pakistani-based terrorist organisation was linked to the attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam on April 22, which left 26 civilians dead.
Also Read: Tears, hugs, final goodbyes at Attari border as hundreds of Pakistanis leave India | Photos
The 12 categories of visa holders who have to leave India by April 27 include those who have a visa on arrival, business, film, journalist, transit, conference, mountaineering, student, visitor, group tourist, pilgrim and group pilgrim.
Union home minister Amit Shah had directed the chief ministers of all states to identify those Pakistani nationals who need to be deported and make arrangements accordingly.
As many as 509 Pakistani nationals, including nine diplomats and officials, left India over the last three days in accordance with the Indian government's directives following the Pahalgam attack.
Also Read: Punjab: Attari-Wagah border closure to hit biz, but traders say they stand with country
A total of 745 Indians, including 14 diplomats and officials, also returned from Pakistan through the Wagah-Attari border, reported PTI.
Mirroring New Delhi's punitive measures, Islamabad also announced retaliatory directives and cancelled visas given to Indians under the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme (SVES).
Relations between the two neighbouring nations have soured after the Resistance Front, a Pakistan-based proxy of the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), claimed responsibility for the deadly attack in Pahalgam.
Pakistan has denied involvement and has called for a neutral probe into the incident. Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and defence minister Khawaja Asif have also called for international involvement in the investigation to ensure fairness.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
12 minutes ago
- First Post
'Contempt it deserves': India slams Pakistan for accusation over Waziristan bombing
New Delhi has strongly rejected Pakistan's accusation that it was behind a deadly suicide bombing in North Waziristan, in which 16 soldiers were killed, calling it contemptible. read more India on Saturday slammed Pakistan for its false claim that it was behind a deadly suicide bombing in North Waziristan that killed 16 Pakistani soldiers. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) condemned the allegation, saying, 'We have seen an official statement by the Pakistan Army seeking to blame India for the attack in Waziristan on 28 June. We reject this statement with the contempt it deserves.' It has long been a tactic of Pakistan and its de facto rulers, the Army, to blame India for problems within their own country. Pakistan has long persecuted the Baloch people, depriving them of essential resources and exploiting their region. The same is true of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, which remains one of the country's most backward regions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Though the Pakistan Army uses terror as a tool of state policy against India, it continues to deflect responsibility for internal security failures. Earlier that day, a suicide bomber drove an explosives-laden vehicle into a military convoy in North Waziristan district, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. The blast killed 16 soldiers and injured 10 others, along with 19 civilians, according to a local official cited by AFP. The attack was claimed by the suicide unit of the Hafiz Gul Bahadur group, which is linked to the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). Violence has been rising in Pakistan's tribal regions. Since the Taliban's return to power in Afghanistan in 2021, attacks in Pakistan's border areas have sharply increased. Islamabad often accuses the Afghan Taliban of sheltering militants who carry out these cross-border strikes, but Kabul denies the allegations. So far this year, about 290 people—mostly security personnel—have been killed in attacks by anti-government groups in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, AFP reports.


Economic Times
16 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Students go Jekyll and hide online to pass visa scrutiny
Representative image. New Delhi: About three years ago, Sameer (name changed to protect identity) was attending a college on the East Coast where he was on the editorial team of his student magazine. Yet, his name was conspicuously absent from any articles critical of US government policies. The student deliberately kept a low profile in public. Online, though, he was bolder. As the admin of a spoof Instagram account, Sameer posted memes mocking then-presidential candidate Donald Trump's immigration policies and voiced support for a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict. Now, in 2025, the same student is preparing to move to the West Coast for his master's degree and is staring down the US State Department's advisory to disclose all social media handles used over the past five years. To ensure a clean slate, he turned to a "digital undertaker" - a professional who sanitises online presence, effectively scrubbing away years of potentially problematic posts. Sameer is not alone. Indian students seeking to study in the US are walking a fine line between digital expression and caution, say experts. Dreams at Risk They are finding ways to game the system—curating public profiles while offloading their real thoughts to 'spam' or pseudonymous accounts, using encrypted apps and niche platforms. 'Students applying for F, M or J visas have been creating alternative social media accounts for some time,' said Manisha Zaveri, joint managing director of Career Mosaic. 'It allows students to maintain a curated, public-facing profile for visa scrutiny while preserving a private space for personal expression.' Zaveri said these dual identities are not new, but the motivations have evolved. What once began as a teenage desire for anonymity now serves a more strategic purpose, say Jain, founder of ForeignAdmits, noted a sharp rise in digital self-monitoring since the Israel-Gaza conflict flared up in 2023.'Some students have deleted their LinkedIn accounts altogether. Others have erased pro-Palestine posts after realising that their study-abroad dreams might be at risk,' he has built AI tools to pre-screen social media profiles for potential red flags, and consultations now routinely include deep dives into students' digital he warns against abrupt deletions. Given the possibility of embassies serving notices to social media platforms to provide additional access to certain suspect profiles on the pretext of national security, he said, 'Visa counsellors have advised students not to delete posts abruptly, warning that sudden changes could also raise red flags.'Students are now in a Catch-22 situation. Jain adds 'Your online persona now carries legal weight. It is not just about filtering out hate speech or extremist views. It is about every casual political opinion, every meme, every reposted reel from your student days.'Vibha Kagzi, founder of advises students to steer clear of certain topics: 'Consular officers will look for posts, comments, or associations that indicate hostility towards the US, connections with banned groups, or hateful commentary.'For Sachin Jain, country manager India and South Asia, ETS India, this digital duality is less a red flag and more a sign of sophistication.'Students are learning to treat online identity as an extension of their application. They are segmenting communication, with one profile for university interactions and another reserved for peer networks,' he shift, he argues, is part of a broadening of digital literacy, where students are segmenting their audiences just as professionals are simply relocating their online personas to alternative platforms that offer anonymity and addition to platforms like Telegram and Discord, nowadays 'students are increasingly using Reddit to express themselves openly as it doesn't reveal their original identity,' said Aditya Shanker Raghuwanshi, founder of Masterclass communication over Snapchat has also become an alternative due to its built-in privacy features and focus on ephemeral content, he added. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. The bike taxi dreams of Rapido, Uber, and Ola just got a jolt. But they're winning public favour Second only to L&T, but controversies may weaken this infra powerhouse's growth story Punit Goenka reloads Zee with Bullet and OTT focus. Can he beat mighty rivals? 3 critical hurdles in India's quest for rare earth independence HDB Financial may be cheaper than Bajaj Fin, but what about returns? Why Sebi must give up veto power over market infra institutions These large- and mid-cap stocks can give more than 23% return in 1 year, according to analysts Are short-term headwinds from China an opportunity? 8 auto stocks: Time to be contrarian? Buy, Sell or Hold: Motilal Oswal initiates coverage on Supreme Industries; UBS initiates coverage on PNB Housing


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
CJI Gavai says Article 370 went against Ambedkar's vision of one Constitution for India
Nagpur: Chief Justice of India Bhushan Gavai on Saturday said the 's unanimous verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370 to revoke special status for Jammu and Kashmir was consistent with Dr BR Ambedkar's vision of a single Constitution for a unified India. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He added that two constitutions for one country was never the vision of the chief architect of the statute. "We judges upheld the govt's decision to abrogate Article 370 to ensure that India is governed under one Constitution," he said, calling the judgment an important affirmation of Ambedkar's ideology. Justice Gavai was speaking at the inauguration of the Constitution Preamble Park at the Nagpur University's School of Law. Justice Gavai emphasised that though judges usually refrain from discussing their judgments in public, the Article 370 ruling was of such constitutional significance that it merited reflection. He said it aligned with the foundational principles laid down by Ambedkar, who firmly believed in unity through a single legal and constitutional framework. "During the Constituent Assembly debates, Dr Ambedkar clearly said India should not follow the American model of separate constitutions for the Union and states. He believed in one nation, one Constitution, and that's the philosophy we reinforced in the verdict," Gavai said. He further said even amid turmoil and constitutional breakdowns in neighbouring nations of Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka, India has remained united and democratic because of the strong constitutional edifice built by Ambedkar and his fellow framers. "Our neighbours have witnessed coups, collapses, and severe instability, but in 75 years, India has stood firm — thanks to the inclusive and progressive framework of the Constitution," he said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Accompanied by Union minister Nitin Gadkari, Maharashtra chief minister Devendra Fadnavis, revenue minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule, minister of state Ashish Jaiswal, and Bombay High Court's Nagpur bench judges including Nitin Sambre, Anil Kilor, Abhay Mantri and Justice Sanjeev Kalgaonkar of MP High Court, the CJI said he felt deeply honoured to inaugurate the Preamble Park during the Constitution's platinum jubilee year and during his first visit to Nagpur as the country's top judge. "The drafting of our Constitution was not merely a legal process, but a social revolution. Babasaheb worked for over two-and-half years to craft a document that gave voice and dignity to the weakest sections of society," said Gavai. He pointed out how Ambedkar ensured that social, economic, and political justice were embedded in the very Preamble of the Constitution. Visibly emotional during his speech, Gavai said he was proud to have recently unveiled Ambedkar's statue at the Supreme Court, and even more privileged to inaugurate the Preamble Park in Nagpur — the very city where Ambedkar led a historic socio-religious revolution by embracing Buddhism in 1956. Recalling landmark constitutional decisions, Gavai also referred to the Kesavananda Bharati case, which established the doctrine of basic structure. This doctrine states that while the Parliament can amend the Constitution, it cannot alter or destroy the "basic structure" or fundamental features of the Constitution. "Justice Mudholkar, who hailed from Nagpur, was among the first to articulate that the Constitution had a core that could not be altered. This idea was later reinforced by the Supreme Court, ensuring that fundamental rights and democratic principles could never be diluted," he explained. He described Preamble Park as a living monument to constitutional values, built not just to commemorate history but to inspire future generations. "The murals, Ambedkar's quotes, and visual elements in this park will help citizens internalise the ideals of liberty, equality, justice, and fraternity," he said. Gavai lauded Dr Ambedkar School of Law for its exceptional legacy of producing legal luminaries, including two former Chief Justices of India — M Hidayatullah and Sharad Bobde, many chief justices, and eminent lawyers. "This is a unique institution. Though I didn't study here, it feels like home. The college has contributed immensely to India's legal system," Gavai noted. The CJI also paid heartfelt tribute to his father, former Governor and MP RS Gavai, and senior Ambedkarite leader Dadasaheb Kumbhare for their lifelong commitment to social justice and the Ambedkarite movement.