SIS Forum appeal not concerned with substantive beliefs, doctrine of Islamic faith, says Federal Court
Published on: Sat, Jun 21, 2025
By: Bernama Text Size: PUTRAJAYA: The appeal by Sisters in Islam (SIS) Forum (Malaysia) does not concern the substantive beliefs in the religion of Islam, its mandates or doctrines relating to the Islamic faith but relates to the exercise of legal powers by certain state authorities, says the Federal Court in its judgment. Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat said the challenge only concerned the review of the Selangor State Fatwa Committee, the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (MAIS) and the Selangor government's exercise of certain powers under the law, which is distinct from the substance and contents of their decisions. 'While it concerns a certain fatwa (religious edict), the case has neither to do with the substantive beliefs held in the religion of Islam nor does it have anything to do with the administration of the substantive aspects of the religion of Islam,' she said in the 40-page majority judgment. The top judge said in all civilised democracies with independent judiciaries, it is routine for the executive's decisions to be subjected to judicial review and in most cases, the subject matter of the exercise of discretion in the plaint is not the main issue rather the manner in which the decision was made. On Thursday, the Federal Court bench, in a 3-1 majority ruling, held that the 2014 fatwa issued by the Selangor State Fatwa Committee and gazetted by the Selangor state government is valid, but only insofar as it applies to individuals, not companies. The court ruled that a fatwa cannot be imposed on an organisation like SIS Forum as it is not capable of professing a religion.
Advertisement The ruling partially allowed the appeal by SIS Forum and its co-founder Zainah Mahfoozah Anwar to quash the 2014 fatwa, which had declared the group as deviating from Islamic teachings. In the written judgment released on the judiciary's website, Justice Tengku Maimun explained that the Selangor state government and the religious bodies are part of the executive branch and are empowered by the Federal Constitution and laws passed by the Selangor State Legislative Assembly (SLA). 'The fact that they deal with matters pertaining to Islamic faith, dogma and doctrine – are beside the point and these matters are, in any event, not within our purview (of the Civil Court),' she said. Justice Tengku Maimun said that under Article 121 (1A) of the Federal Constitution, the Shariah Courts have exclusive jurisdiction over matters within their scope. However, if the Shariah Courts act beyond their jurisdiction, they remain subject to judicial review by the Superior Courts. She reiterated that SIS Forum's legal challenge did not question the contents of the fatwa but the way it affected them. This, she said, involved constitutional importance and administrative law, which is for the Superior Courts to determine. The Chief Justice also reminded all judges that judgments of the Federal Court, unless overruled by a later decision of the same court, are binding and failure to abide by them is an affront to the administration of the justice system. In the judgment, Tengku Maimun also said a fatwa, once gazetted, carries the force of law and is not mere suggestion, and it is binding on all Muslims in the state and the Shariah Courts. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
37 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
BN-PH seat talks for Sabah polls 98 per cent complete
TANJONG KARANG: Negotiations for seat allocation between Barisan Nasional (BN) and Pakatan Harapan (PH) for the upcoming 17th Sabah election are 98 per cent complete, said Umno secretary-general Datuk Dr Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki. He said discussions had been held to prevent any overlapping of contested seats between the two coalitions. "This is what we have done in Sabah. Generally, I can say that negotiations for seat allocation between BN and PH are already 98 per cent complete. "This cooperation was what secured us victories in the Mahkota state seat in Johor, Ayer Kuning in Perak, and Nenggiri in Kelantan," he said. He said this during a press conference after opening the Tanjong Karang Umno division delegates' meeting at Dewan Dato Hormat here today. At the same time, Asyraf reminded party members not to become arrogant in their efforts to cooperate with others. "Umno is an open and dynamic party, as long as we never compromise our principles of struggle for religion and race," he said. Asyraf also said Umno leaders had never discussed severing ties with any party ahead of the state election. He said that while there is a possibility Umno may go solo, the party would still contest under the BN banner. "Umno has never contested alone. We began in the first general election in 1955 with a three-party coalition (MIC, MCA and Umno). "The political landscape changed in 1969, resulting in a new cooperation involving 14 parties under BN. "Today, the political landscape is changing once again, and Umno must be wise in charting its direction. "What matters is for Umno to remain strong and stay within the government structure to defend the agenda of Islam and other key matters," he said. It was reported yesterday that Umno deputy president Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan had said that the party is ready to face the Melaka election alone if there was no final decision on cooperation with PH in the state.
Malaysiakini
an hour ago
- Malaysiakini
'JAC nominations not legally binding unless Constitution amended'
Recommendations by the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) will only be legally binding if the Federal Constitution is amended, said Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Azalina Othman Said. Until then, she said the JAC's role is only to screen, evaluate, and recommend candidates to the prime minister.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
JAC Act not binding in judge appointments, says Azalina
KOTA TINGGI: The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) Act 2009 does not hold binding authority in the appointment of judges, according to Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said. She explained that the Act primarily serves to screen, evaluate, and recommend candidates to the Prime Minister, while final appointments must comply with Article 122B of the Federal Constitution. 'The JAC Act is not a final step in the appointment process. It only recommends names, and these recommendations are not binding. For JAC's role to be legally binding, the Constitution would need to be amended,' Azalina told reporters after officiating the 22nd Pengerang UMNO Division Delegates Meeting. She referenced a previous clarification by former Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz, who stated in Parliament that the JAC Act functions as an administrative provision without binding legal effect. Regarding the Malaysian Bar's planned march, Azalina acknowledged their democratic right to protest, provided it remains professional and lawful. 'If they want to march, that is their right. As lawyers, I believe most of them are professionals who understand Article 122B and the JAC Act 2009,' she said. Additionally, Azalina confirmed that the appointment of a new Chief Justice will be finalised after the 269th Conference of Rulers, scheduled from July 15 to 17. This follows concerns raised by PEMBELA chairman Datuk Zainul Rijal Abu Bakar over delays due to recent judicial retirements. – Bernama
