‘Superman' and DC Studios fly to a $122 million opening
DC and Warner Bros. had a lot riding on 'Superman.' While the Walt Disney Co.'s Marvel Studios has had its own share of struggles, the superheroes of DC have recently found mostly kryptonite in theaters. Films like 'Joker: Folie à Deux,' 'The Flash' and 'Shazam! Fury of the Gods' all flopped.
But 'Superman,' written and directed by Gunn, is intended as a new start. It's the first release fully steered by Gunn and Peter Safran, co-heads of DC Studios, since they were handed the keys to DC's superhero cinematic universe.
And while Gunn turned 'Guardians of the Galaxy' into a massive success for Marvel, his irreverent, idiosyncratic touch made the director — once a B-movie filmmaker with Troma Entertainment — an unlikely steward for one of the movies' most bankable and beloved brands.
The roughly on-target opening was the third largest of 2025, and the first DC title to surpass $100 million in its opening weekend since 'Wonder Woman' in 2017.
Ticket sales were relatively soft for 'Superman' overseas. In 78 international markets, it grossed $95 million. In China, it collected just $6.6 million.
As an American icon, 'Superman' inevitably attracted political discourse. Some right-wing commentators criticized the movie as 'woke' after Gunn described the superhero from Krypton as 'an immigrant.' On X, the White House posted an image of President Donald Trump as Superman.
In 'Superman,' which cost about $225 million to make, Gunn steers the Man of Steel in a drastically different tonal direction than in previous iterations from filmmaker Zack Snyder. Skipping the Kansas origin story, the film instead picks up with Superman ( David Corenswet) after his first defeat. Rachel Brosnahan plays Lois Lane and Nicholas Hoult is Lex Luthor.
The 'Superman' debut didn't come close to besting the $166 million launch for Snyder's 'Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice,' in 2016. But it did open higher, not accounting for inflation, than Snyder's 'Man of Steel.' That film debuted with $116 million in 2013.
But while Snyder's films were often unloved by critics, largely good reviews greeted Gunn's 'Superman.' On Rotten Tomatoes, it scored 82% fresh — the best for the franchise since the first two movies with Christopher Reeve: 'Superman' (1978) and 'Superman II' (1980). Audiences gave it an 'A-' CinemaScore.
'Superman' faced sizeable competition too. Last week's top film, 'Jurassic World Rebirth,' slid to second place with $40 million. With 'Superman' soaking up many large-format screens, Universal Pictures' seventh 'Jurassic' film slipped a steep 57% from its opening weekend. Starring Scarlett Johansson, 'Jurassic World Rebirth' got off to a thunderous $318.3 million global start. In two weeks, it's amassed $529.5 million worldwide.
Also still in the mix is Apple Studios' biggest box-office success yet, 'F1.' Joseph Kosinski's Formula One action thriller, starring Brad Pitt, came in third with $13 million in its third weekend. The film, distributed by Warner Bros., has collected $393.4 million globally in three weeks. But it also carries a hefty price tag of roughly $250 million, plus at least $100 million in promotion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Indian film board criticised for cutting ‘overly sensual' Superman kisses
As Indian cinemagoers watched the latest Superman film, many noticed something was amiss. On two occasions as the superhero leaned in for a kiss with Lois Lane, the film suddenly jumped forward, cutting to the aftermath of an embrace. India's censor board had deemed the kissing scenes, including a 33-second smooch, to be 'overly sensual' for Indian audiences and demanded they be cut from the film before its cinematic release. The cuts have prompted an outcry from some viewers, who accused the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) of making arbitrary, overly moralistic demands and having double standards by allowing heavy violence and misogyny to be depicted in Indian films but cutting a kissing scene from a Hollywood film. 'CBFC would allow horrific scenes of violence and sexual assault in a U-certified film that kids are freely allowed to watch, but won't allow consensual kissing in a U/A comic book movie that kids should watch under adult supervision,' one viewer said on social media. Another said: 'So, Superman is NOT allowed to kiss Lois Lane on Indian screens. But all sleazy leading men of Indian films are allowed to pull, grope, assault, stalk, slap, and do whatever they want with their heroines. Are you serious, Indian censor board?' Another fan criticised the jarring interruption caused by the crude cuts. 'The Indian censor board has embarrassed itself with the abrupt cuts they've made to the film. The 'morality' of censorship aside, the way they've managed to mangle the flow is atrocious,' they said. Indian cinema has long had an uncomfortable relationship with on-screen kissing. With the exception of a four-minute kissing scene in the 1933 film Karma, up until the 1990s on-screen caressing was largely kept to hugs or symbolised through imagery such as flowers. While attitudes have relaxed in recent years, the country remains largely conservative and widely religious, particularly outside of urban areas, and more intimate kissing scenes are still subject to the censor's knife. The censor board has also faced accusations of being overly political. The Donald Trump biopic The Apprentice was blocked from cinematic release last year after its director, Ali Abbasi, refused to make cuts demanded by the CBFC. 'I ran away from Iranian censorship only to meet corporate censorship of the US. Now India. Really?' Abbasi said. 'Censorship seems to be an epidemic at the moment.' Similarly, earlier this year censors in effect banned the release of Santosh, an internationally acclaimed film addressing police violence and misogyny in India, after demanding a list of cuts. Sandhya Suri, the film's director, called the cut requests 'disappointing and heartbreaking'.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
First look at Harry Potter in new TV show
The new child star of Harry Potter has been pictured in character for the first time. Dominic McLaughlin, who will portray the titular role in the TV series, looks every part the Hogwarts student in Potter's famous glasses and uniform. The cast, which also includes Arabella Stanton as Hermione Granger and Alastair Stout as Ron Weasley, are filming at Warner Bros Studios Leavesden in Watford, Hertfordshire. The image of McLaughlin, released by HBO on Monday, is the only one to date of any of the actors in costume as they begin to film Harry Potter, which is scheduled for release on HBO and HBO Max in 2027. The network also announced that further casting had taken place, with Rory Wilmot playing Harry's school friend Neville Longbottom and Amos Kitson taking on the role of his cousin Dudley Dursley. Meanwhile, Sherlock actress Louise Brealey is to play Hogwarts Quidditch coach Madam Rolanda Hooch, and Game Of Thrones star Anton Lesser will be wandmaker Garrick Ollivander. The casting of the three main roles (Harry, Hermonie and Ron) followed an open casting call, announced last year, that saw more than 30,000 children audition for the coveted parts. The same roles previously launched Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint to global fame in the early 2000s through the Harry Potter films. Stanton previously starred in the titular role of Matilda: The Musical on the West End from 2023 to 2024, while McLaughlin acted in Grow, the forthcoming Sky comedy. The Harry Potter series marks Stout's breakout role. Each season of the new show will be a faithful adaptation of the books by JK Rowling, who is also serving as an executive producer of the series. Other stars who have previously been announced include award-winning US actor John Lithgow as Hogwarts headmaster Professor Albus Dumbledore, Welsh comedian and actor Paul Whitehouse as Hogwarts caretaker Argus Filch, and Rivals actress Katherine Parkinson as Molly Weasley.
Time Out
an hour ago
- Time Out
NYC dogs can compete in a Superdog competition in honor of the 'Superman' movie
Your dog is super, of course. But is your dog extra Super, like Krypto in the new Superman movie? Now's the chance to find out, as a Superdog Look-Alike Contest is coming to NYC on Friday July 18 at 2pm in Manhattan West Plaza (385 9th Ave in New York City). Dog parents are invited to bring their furry friends of all breeds and sizes to compete for a $1,000 cash prize; register to participate here. "Whether your pup is a dead ringer for Krypto or just bursts with superhero spirit, this is your chance to show the world the true power of pets," the event organizers at Pumpkin Pet Insurance said in a press release. This tail-wagging celebration will honor the most iconic pup in the DC Universe with some solid prizes. Two lucky dogs will earn top honors: one crowned Best Krypto Lookalike and one recognized as the Most Unique, Unlike-Krypto contestant. Each one will will $1,000, plus a $2,500 donation to the Angel Fund at a veterinary clinic of each winner's choice. A panel of two expert judges will choose the winners, with help from audience reactions. If you haven't seen the new Superman movie yet, Time Out's film critic raves about sparky superdog Krypto. "A mundane-looking white pooch, he's a sidekick whose lack of proper training and licky nature makes him a menace to foes and friends alike," our Phil de Semlyen writes. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Pumpkin 🐶🐱 (@pumpkincares) After a string of celebrity look-alike contests in NYC from Timothée Chalamet to Sean Evans, this contest puts pups in the spotlight. "The Krypto Look-Alike Contest is our way of spotlighting the hero inside every pet," Matt Sherman, Chief Marketing Officer of Pumpkin, said in a press release. "Whether your dog looks exactly like Krypto or simply channels his super-energy—no matter their size or breed—this contest celebrates the amazing role pets play as our everyday heroes." Per the brand, the newly launched PumpkinNow™ shows up for pet parents in minutes when care is critical for their pets. It's an urgent pay service that can cover up to 90 percent of eligible vet bills fast if pets get hurt or sick—even before pet parents have to pay the clinic.
