Industry demands shift in hybrid vehicle market
As Pakistan unveils its long-awaited New Energy Vehicle (NEV) Policy 2025-30, aimed at reducing emissions and fuel dependence, voices from within the auto industry are calling for a shift in how new technologies are priced and positioned in the market.
In a recent interaction with media in Lahore, Syed Asif Ahmed, General Manager Marketing Division at MG Motors, said that while the policy is a step in the right direction, the local Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) market remains largely unaffordable and does not pass on the benefits of technological advancements to the average Pakistani consumer. "HEVs in Pakistan have become a luxury for a niche market," Ahmed remarked. "Despite policy support, the real advantages have not trickled down to car buyers."
He noted that the most expensive HEV SUV in Pakistan – a seven-seater – carries an ex-factory price tag of Rs16 million while five-seater variants range from Rs9.6 to Rs12 million. "The industry must think seriously about affordability," he added, "and consider shifting towards Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs), which are better suited for urban use and offer real electric range."
Unveiled by the Ministry of Industries, the NEV Policy 2025-30 introduces the official classification for EVs, PHEVs and hydrogen-powered vehicles as "New Energy Vehicles", in line with global standards.
Ahmed was also critical of how earlier tax incentives were structured, allowing traditional hybrids to be labelled as NEVs, primarily to benefit large automotive players.
"Unfortunately, these subsidies neither helped the environment nor the people. They only benefited the principal companies and their local partners."
In contrast, PHEVs offer a more meaningful alternative, with pure EV driving capabilities for daily urban commutes and hybrid flexibility for long routes, helping tackle the range anxiety often associated with EVs.
MG Motors has introduced Pakistan's first locally assembled Plug-in Hybrid SUV – the MG HS PHEV. It features a 16.6 kWh lithium-ion battery offering over 52 km of electric-only range, combined with a 1.5L turbocharged engine to deliver 260 HP and 370 Nm of torque, achieving 0-100 km/h in just 7.1 seconds. Priced under Rs10 million, Ahmed described the MG HS PHEV as "the best value-for-money vehicle in its class," offering advanced tech, performance and fuel economy. He informed the media that MG has sold more than 16,000 vehicles in Pakistani market so far out of which approximately 2,000 were PHEVs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
14 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Victory celebration and reality check
Listen to article Pakistani luck is flying these days. It has been blessed with massive success, one after the other. First, Pakistan successfully and comprehensively defeated India in the military conflict. It was an enormous triumph, which laid the foundation for a regional reset. India, which had portrayed itself as the regional power, a rising market and economy in Asia, and a leader of the Global South, had to face a checkmate at the hands of Pakistan. Second, on the diplomatic front, Pakistan achieved many accomplishments. After the war, India sent a delegation to the world to launch a propaganda campaign. It wanted to tag Pakistan with terrorism. Pakistan analysed the situation and sent its own delegation, which outperformed the Indian delegation. The world did not buy the Indian argument, and the Pakistani point of view had wider acceptance. Pakistan maintains a balanced relationship with the world's major powers, including China, the United States, and Russia. There is no need to discuss the China-Pakistan relationship, as everyone is aware that both countries share a deep and enduring brotherhood. However, the recent shift in the Pakistan-US relationship is the talk of the town. The US played a prominent role in halting the war between India and Pakistan. After the truce, President Trump praised Pakistan for its sensible and rational behaviour. He also invited Army Chief General Asim Munir for a meeting at the White House. Both sides reportedly discussed enhancing the relationship in multiple fields. On the other hand, Pakistan and Russia intensified efforts to further enhance and strengthen their bilateral relationship. Russia has shown interest in investing more than $2 billion in reviving and expanding Pakistan Steel Mills. It is a good omen, as Pakistan was looking for opportunities to revive the mill. Also, a breakthrough happened at the SCO defence ministers' meeting, where Russia supported Pakistan's stance on terrorism. Simultaneously, Pakistan played a prominent and leading role in ending the Iran-Israel war. It diligently convinced the US administration that the war in the region had no justification. Therefore, all efforts must be made to end the war and work for peace. These examples collectively indicate that Pakistan has achieved significant success in recent months. However, the country needs to be cognizant that these achievements cannot be sustained without solving domestic challenges. Pakistan continues to face multiple challenges. The economic and governance system is in shambles. The government claims that the economy is improving and that the budget will provide a foundation for accelerated economic growth and development, as promised the previous year. But the Economic Survey 2024-25 and the budget for 2025-26 present a bleak picture. The Economic Survey shows that the national GDP grew at a 2.7% rate. However, independent sources are not willing to accept government claims and instead raise questions. They question that, during the first three quarters of FY25, the economy grew at an average annual rate of 1.7%. To achieve a yearly rate of 2.7%, the economy would have had to grow at 5.3% during the last quarter, which is not possible. Apart from that, agriculture, which had provided a significant boost to economic growth in FY24, presented a dismal picture in FY25. A booming sector experienced a sharp decline in production and market share. The growth rate fell to 0.56% in FY25 from 6.25% in FY24, driven by a steep fall in the growth of major crops. Major crops' growth rate fell to -13.26% in 2025, from 11.3% in 2024. Similarly, the large-scale industry is struggling to enter a positive growth trajectory, having demonstrated a negative growth of -1.7%. Social indicators too are pretty disturbing. The World Bank estimates that 44.7% of the population lives below the poverty line, and 16.5% of the population resides in extreme poverty. Poverty is increasing, despite the government's assertions of investing in poverty reduction such as the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP). This raises questions about the effectiveness and sustainability of the BISP. Food insecurity is another constant irritant, and a 2013 study estimated that 58.8% of the population in Pakistan was food insecure. Unfortunately, we have to rely on old data because the government has not updated it. There are fears that food insecurity has increased over the years due to multiple factors. Poor economic conditions and the devaluation of the PKR have substantially impacted people's purchasing power, resulting in fewer resources available to afford healthy food. Additionally, inadequate governance and management of the agricultural sector have led to lower production and reduced availability of quality food. Bad governance is further complicating the situation. The elite class has designed the institutions to ensure the exclusion of common citizens from the governance system without explicitly mentioning it. The system encourages wealth accumulation, and there is no system in place for redistributing wealth or resources. It is deepening the divide between the haves and have-nots. A few influential individuals have all the resources, while millions struggle to make a decent living. Furthermore, the elite have devised an extremely complex business system and environment to strengthen their control over the economic system and resources. This system has given birth to rampant corruption and deep-rooted rent-seeking behaviour. It only works for the powerful or those who can afford to offer bribes. Environmental degradation, particularly climate change, is another issue that is worsening over time. Climate change-related disasters, such as floods and droughts, are regular visitors. Pakistan is still struggling to recover from the impacts of the 2022 floods, and there is a prediction that Pakistan will again face floods. On the other hand, climate change is severely impacting agriculture, which is threatening Pakistan's food security and economy. Farmers are bearing the brunt of climate change. Poor governance and attitude of the government have left farmers vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. In conclusion, Pakistan needs to be mindful that its heyday can be limited if it does not address these issues. The writer is a political economist and a visiting research fellow at Hebei University, China
Express Tribune
14 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Why global giants pulling out
Listen to article The announcement in July 2025 that Microsoft had closed its local office in Pakistan after 25 years sent ripples through a country already struggling to attract foreign investment. The tech giant, which had established its Pakistani presence in the early 2000s and had since played a vital role in licensing, software partnerships, and capacity building, quietly wound down operations and laid off its remaining staff. While Microsoft stated the move was part of a broader global restructuring towards artificial intelligence and regional consolidation, the local business community viewed the decision as a reflection of Pakistan's deteriorating appeal for international firms. But Microsoft's exit is not an isolated case. It is part of a broader trend involving more than two dozen multinational companies (MNCs) that have either exited or substantially scaled down operations in Pakistan over the last three years. These include some of the world's most recognised names across sectors – Shell, Procter & Gamble, Lotte, Siemens Energy, Unilever's Lipton division, and Reckitt Benckiser's health portfolio among them. This steady outflow represents a serious challenge to Pakistan's economic narrative and its efforts to attract and retain foreign direct investment. These multinationals were more than just sources of foreign capital – they introduced global standards in corporate governance, technology, and management. Their presence helped modernise local industries and provided the Pakistani workforce with valuable exposure to international business practices, enhancing skills and integrating local talent into global professional networks. In fact, many executives currently serving in the C-suites and boards of local companies began their professional development within these global firms, where they gained the skills, training, and exposure that prepared them for leadership roles. So, this exodus represents not only a loss of investment but also a setback to institutional learning and workforce development. One of the major contributing factors behind this trend has been the persistent depreciation of the Pakistani rupee, which has lost over 50% of its value since 2021. For foreign companies reporting earnings in their home currencies, the sharp devaluation has rendered local operations financially unviable. Equally critical are the severe restrictions on profit repatriation. Due to Pakistan's chronic balance-of-payments crisis, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) imposed strict capital controls that prevented companies from sending profits abroad. At its peak in 2023, over $1 billion in blocked dividends were awaiting clearance, forcing some companies to absorb mounting currency losses on their balance sheets. This fiscal fragility is compounded by an unpredictable policy environment. Political instability, frequent changes in taxation policy, arbitrary regulatory enforcement, and minimal stakeholder engagement have all undermined business confidence. Foreign investors have frequently cited the absence of a consistent economic direction and the growing influence of non-elected institutions in economic decision-making as major deterrents. In some cases, companies reported being blindsided by retrospective tax demands or abrupt changes in import rules, disrupting years of business planning and operations. The government's decision to implement sweeping import restrictions in 2022-2024 in an effort to conserve foreign exchange reserves proved especially damaging. These restrictions severely impacted firms dependent on imported raw materials and machinery. Entire production lines were halted for weeks or even months, with companies unable to procure the necessary inputs. Local assemblers in the automobile sector and multinational consumer goods manufacturers were among the hardest hit. The inability to meet market demand, maintain brand standards, or even retain employment levels pushed many companies to re-evaluate their long-term presence in Pakistan. The consumer market, once considered a growth engine for MNCs in Pakistan, has also weakened. Persistent inflation, which remained above 25% for much of 2023, eroded household purchasing power. The middle class, which had fuelled expansion in sectors like fast-moving consumer goods, health, and retail, saw their consumption shrink dramatically. As a result, demand for higher-end or branded products collapsed, leaving many multinational portfolios unable to meet volume targets necessary for sustainable operations. Further compounding the problem are operational inefficiencies tied to infrastructure and energy. Despite increased electricity generation capacity, power distribution remains unreliable and expensive. Load shedding, inconsistent gas supply, and high industrial tariffs have significantly raised the cost of doing business. Many manufacturing operations have had to rely on backup power generation, adding further to their expenses and reducing competitiveness compared to regional peers. Externally, shifts in global investment flows have not favoured Pakistan. In the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic, multinational corporations have increasingly turned to markets offering more regulatory certainty, proximity to supply chains, and lower operational risk. Countries like Vietnam, India, Bangladesh, and Mexico have benefited from this realignment. Pakistan, in contrast, continues to grapple with geopolitical risks, compliance issues with international financial institutions, and governance concerns. The perception of being a volatile and high-risk jurisdiction has driven many boardrooms to favour exit over perseverance. As stated by the SBP, the cumulative effect of these exits is significant. Foreign direct investment fell to a mere $1.2 billion in FY2023, the lowest in over a decade. The country not only loses capital inflow, jobs, and technology transfer, but also suffers a reputational blow. It becomes harder to attract new investors when existing players are heading for the exit. The departure of long-term multinationals like Shell and Siemens, who had operated in Pakistan for decades, sends a particularly discouraging signal to potential entrants. The growing exodus of MNCs from Pakistan casts a long shadow over the government's initiatives to promote the country's image as an attractive destination for foreign investment. Chief among these is the establishment of the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC), launched with the aim of streamlining approvals, accelerating project timelines, and showcasing Pakistan as an investment-ready destination. While the SIFC has been positioned as a one-window solution to attract foreign capital in sectors such as agriculture, energy, and IT, the sustained flight of established global firms sends a contradictory message to the international business community. The perception that existing investors are being neglected or obstructed undercuts the credibility of new investment outreach. Restoring Pakistan's credibility as an investment destination requires urgent and targeted reforms. A stable macroeconomic framework, unambiguous profit repatriation policies, and transparent regulatory mechanisms are essential. Structural reforms in taxation, energy pricing, and trade policy must be implemented to lower the cost of doing business. Beyond economics, the state must ensure political and legal stability to reassure global investors that their capital will be protected and allowed to grow. THE WRITER IS A FINANCIAL MARKET ENTHUSIAST AND IS ASSOCIATED WITH PAKISTAN'S STOCKS, COMMODITIES AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGY
Business Recorder
15 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Grave policy gaps in sugar sector
EDITORIAL: The Trading Corporation of Pakistan's (TCP) July 15 directive to slash its sugar import tender from 300,000 to just 50,000 metric tonnes is the latest twist in a saga that has completely exposed the confusion, lack of foresight and planning, and utter incompetence that has defined the government's handling of sugar export and import decisions in recent months. More tellingly, it reveals a policy regime designed to reward rent-seeking behaviour rather than protecting the public interest and market stability. As previously detailed in this space, the government, acting under the considerable, and dare one say, pernicious influence of powerful sugar barons, many of whom hold prominent positions within the political mileu, approved the export of roughly 765,000 metric tonnes of sugar during the last fiscal year. The decision was ostensibly based on assurances that only surplus stocks would be exported, ensuring that domestic prices would remain stable. However, what ensued was a shortage of sugar domestically and a sharp price surge, solely benefitting trade. To rein in soaring domestic prices, the government recently decided to allow the tax-concessions on import of sugar. The timing of the import decision, however, highlights a serious lack of planning and coordination among key stakeholders. By the time imported sugar enters the Pakistani market, the local crushing season will be in full swing, risking disruption to the domestic crop's market. Even more critically, importing such large quantities raises questions regarding the pressures that will be brought to bear on our precarious foreign exchange reserves. And given the tax waivers on these imports – wherein the FBR has exempted these from customs duty and reduced the sales tax rate from 18 percent to 0.25 percent – not only is this going to seriously burden the national exchequer, the country will also risk violating the $7 billion IMF programme that mandates it to not grant preferential tax treatments or engage in commodity purchases. While the IMF has made no official comment, there are reports of it privately taking strong exception to the government's haphazard moves that deviate from agreed reforms. It is this pressure, ostensibly, that compelled the TCP to considerably scale back its sugar import tender. The exorbitant prices Pakistani consumers have been forced to pay for sugar reveal not only the folly of the ill-conceived decision to export the commodity in the first place, it also points to deeper, systemic issues related to rampant price manipulation, hoarding, the entrenched political clout of sugar barons, their cartel-like behaviour and the collapse of regulatory oversight. Over the last seven months, there has been a consistent rise in prices of the commodity from Rs140 per kg to around Rs210 per kg even as its international price at current exchange rate levels hovers around the Rs104 per kg mark. Now, despite the government reaching an agreement with mill owners that fixed the wholesale price at Rs165 per kg, media reports indicate that many wholesale outlets have openly defied the agreement, demanding prices far beyond the official rate. As a result, consumers continue to face inflated retail prices that bear little relation to the official ex-factory cost. This encapsulates all that is wrong with the regime governing the trade of agricultural commodities: toothless oversight mechanisms, unchecked power and impunity of entrenched agro-industrial lobbies, and the complete marginalisation of the public interest. It must be noted that sugar is not a staple crop nor does it have substantive strategic value. Given this, it is unacceptable that successive governments have essentially subsidised its growth at the cost of more vital commodities. The government must put an end to the mollycoddling of the sugar sector and enforce discipline and transparency in its regulation. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
