logo
After 18 Years, Apple Is Killing Its 9-Minute Snooze—That Can Only Mean One Thing

After 18 Years, Apple Is Killing Its 9-Minute Snooze—That Can Only Mean One Thing

Gizmodo12-06-2025

For years, it's always been nine more measly minutes. If you don't know what the hell I'm talking about, you've probably never owned an iPhone, or you're one of those freaks who wakes up without a device screaming in your face to do so. If you are in one of those camps, let me explain: for 18 years, Apple has maintained a vice grip on its alarm snooze feature, which grants nine more minutes to your alarm. No more, no less. Just nine minutes. And there's no adjusting that in settings.
No adjusting that until now, that is. As noted by MacRumors, iOS 26, which was just introduced at Apple's WWDC 2025, finally lets you manually set your snooze time, which means one thing: it's time to sleep the f**k in, at least for as much as 15 whole minutes. In normal, non-sleep-related time, six minutes more isn't a lot, but when it comes to waking up, if you're anything like me, six minutes is basically a lifetime. Imagine all the horrible stress dreams about your teeth falling out you could have had in that time. Or heck, you might even luck out and get the one where you're driving a car and the brakes go out. The possibilities are really endless, or at least endless within a 15-minute span.
Not only that, but you can even—if you're a total masochist—set your snooze time to be shorter. As noted by MacRumors, the developer beta allows you to choose anywhere between one and 15 minutes. The world is now your sleepy little oyster, and you are able to shuck it into the future up to 15 minutes at a time. On one hand, it's kind of wild that it's taken this long to give people the option to extend or retract their snooze times, but also very Apple-like. For many years, Apple was known for its definitive design that locked people in, though that's changed as the years have gone by. In today's iOS, you can change app icons, customize wallpapers, and—soon in iOS 26—choose backgrounds for your threads in Messages, and much more. Those are all things that iOS users of yore only dreamed about, and now they're a reality. It's a shift for Apple, but in this case, probably one that most people will welcome.
As for the 9-minute default, well, it'll still have its place as the iOS default and also its own place in history. The 9-minute snooze, if you'll allow me a quick reverie, is a vestige of alarm clock history, originating from GE's Model 7H241 from 1956, which was the first alarm clock with a snooze feature. Why nine minutes exactly? Well, back in the day, clocks had gears, and that meant you had to work around the physical constraints of said gears. GE wasn't able to set 10 minutes exactly due to those constraints—it had to choose nine minutes and change or 10 minutes and change, and ultimately it went with nine. Clearly that decision lasted a lot longer than nine minutes in the long run.
If you're ready to break out of the 9-minute prison Apple has kept you in, you'll have to wait a little bit, though. Currently, iOS 16 is only available via a developer beta, and the first public beta launches next month. The non-beta software should launch in the fall in full, along with Apple's newest-generation iPhones, and once that happens, we can all rest easy—at least for 15 more minutes.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Authors call on publishers to limit their use of AI
Authors call on publishers to limit their use of AI

TechCrunch

timean hour ago

  • TechCrunch

Authors call on publishers to limit their use of AI

In Brief An open letter from authors including Lauren Groff, Lev Grossman, R.F. Kuang, Dennis Lehane, and Geoffrey Maguire calls on book publishers to pledge to limit their use of AI tools, for example by committing to only hire human audiobook narrators. The letter argues that authors' work has been 'stolen' by AI companies: 'Rather than paying writers a small percentage of the money our work makes for them, someone else will be paid for a technology built on our unpaid labor.' Among other commitments, the authors call for publishers to 'make a pledge that they will never release books that were created by machine' and 'not replace their human staff with AI tools or degrade their positions into AI monitors.' While the initial letter was signed by an already impressive list of writers, NPR reports that another 1,100 signatures were added in the 24 hours after it was initially published. Authors are also suing tech companies over using their books to train AI models, but federal judges dealt significant blows to those lawsuits earlier this week.

Visa Inc. (V): 'This Is Your Chance' To Buy, Says Jim Cramer
Visa Inc. (V): 'This Is Your Chance' To Buy, Says Jim Cramer

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Visa Inc. (V): 'This Is Your Chance' To Buy, Says Jim Cramer

Visa Inc. (NYSE:V) is one of the . Visa Inc. (NYSE:V) is one of the largest financial technology and payment platform providers in the US. Its shares have gained 9.7% year-to-date after facing a tumultuous ride on the stock market. Visa Inc. (NYSE:V)'s stock has lost 5.6% in June after regaining some ground from an earlier 7.3% dip. The shares dipped as the firm suffered in the aftermath of the Senate passing new legislation. This bill introduced federal oversight for stablecoins and led to speculation that retailers could shift to digital currencies and remove the firm from the payments legislation. Commenting on the risk-off sentiment, Cramer shared: 'We've gotta keep going on this Visa. . . Because a lot of our viewers think that these companies are really at risk. I actually think this is your chance to buy them. They're always at risk and they always win.' A financial analyst reviewing stock prices on a graph with a positive outlook. Cramer discussed these trends about Visa Inc. (NYSE:V) later during the day in Mad Money: 'Over the past couple of weeks, Visa and MasterCard, two of my favorite companies, have pulled back sharply from their all-time highs. Wall Street's suddenly worried about the whole payments industry, might be threatened by advances in crypto, especially now that Congress looks like it'll pass its GENIUS Act, which establishes a framework for regulating Stablecoins. Visa fell over 10% from its high, set on June 11, to its low last Friday… This morning I spoke with Visa CEO, Ryan McInerney, and Ryan told me, I think, a story which made me feel like that, that you'd be nuts to be in this, frankly.' While we acknowledge the potential of V as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio

Should You Buy Roku Stock After Its Partnership With Amazon?
Should You Buy Roku Stock After Its Partnership With Amazon?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Should You Buy Roku Stock After Its Partnership With Amazon?

Roku's recent partnership with Amazon makes the streaming specialist more attractive. Although it still faces some headwinds, Roku's long-term prospects remain bright. The stock doesn't look too expensive at current levels, either. 10 stocks we like better than Roku › On June 16, Roku (NASDAQ: ROKU) announced a partnership with Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) that will allow advertisers access to the streaming specialist's ecosystem through Amazon's advertising platform. This agreement represents a significant move forward for Roku. Although the stock has encountered some headwinds over the past year, this new development once again highlights why Roku stock is worth investing in for those focused on the long game. Let's dig deeper into this partnership between Roku and Amazon -- as well as the rest of the former's business -- to understand why. Amazon is a notable player in the connected TV (CTV) market. However, Roku continues to reign supreme -- it holds a leading market share in the U.S. Amazon's size advantage has not allowed it to take over the top spot, and it's now partnering with its longtime rival. Amazon and Roku will combine their respective audiences, comprising 80 million households and more than 80% of CTV accounts in the U.S., and grant advertisers exclusive access to this large ecosystem through Amazon's demand-side ad platform. This is a win for Roku too. Here's why. One significant long-term opportunity for the company is the continued switch from cable to streaming for viewers and advertisers. However, a highly fragmented CTV landscape presented advertisers with several challenges, including difficulties in reaching targeted audiences across various platforms and effectively managing ad frequency. Roku noted in a recent press release: Early tests of this integration have shown significant results. Advertisers using this new solution reached 40% more unique viewers with the same budget and reduced how often the same person saw an ad by nearly 30%, enabling advertisers to benefit from three times more value from their ad spend. In other words, advertisers should get greater returns from the same amount of spending. The deal helps address some pain points they had and helps sell even more companies on the benefits of pouring ad dollars into the kind of platform that Roku offers. It's worth highlighting again that this deal is valuable to every party involved, largely because of Roku's leading CTV ecosystem. It also points to the strength of its network effect. Since the value of Roku's platform only increases as its audience numbers grow, partnerships of this kind could become more common. Roku has encountered some issues in recent years. Its average revenue per user (ARPU) has stalled, while it remains unprofitable. Though the company no longer reports the ARPU metric, management previously attributed poor ARPU growth to the company's expansion efforts in markets outside the U.S., where it is focusing on scale first, rather than monetization. That's the same blueprint it followed in its more mature markets when it sometimes sold its namesake devices at a loss to onboard enough households within its ecosystem. Investors have seen the results of this strategy in the U.S., where Roku already holds a leading market share. This should give investors confidence that it can achieve similar results in other regions. What about the persistent red ink on the bottom line? Investors vastly prefer profitable companies, especially in this uncertain economic and geopolitical environment. But Roku is making strides in this department too. In the company's first quarter, revenue came in at $1.03 billion, up 16% year over year. The company's net loss per share was $0.19, an improvement from the $0.35 per share loss it reported in the prior-year quarter. Roku might not be consistently profitable, but the company is growing its top line at a good clip and making progress on the bottom line. And overall, the company is still in a great position to cash in on the massive long-term shift from cable to streaming. And here's one more thing that makes the stock attractive. Roku's forward price-to-sales ratio is 2.6 as of this writing. In a stock market at all-time highs and valuations reaching unsustainable levels, Roku's modest valuation is especially rare for a growth stock in a leading industry position. For this and all the other reasons, it's worth purchasing the company's shares. Before you buy stock in Roku, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Roku wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Prosper Junior Bakiny has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and Roku. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Buy Roku Stock After Its Partnership With Amazon? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store