War of words begins as Jairam Thakur slams Jagat Singh Negi over ‘irresponsible statement'
More than two dozens of people have been killed and several missing following cloudburst incidents in Mandi district.
Referring to the alleged statement of Negi, in which he said 'when a tragedy struck in my area then I realised the pain of general public', Thakur said, 'there might be some personal differences between me and the minister but being a part of the state government, the Revenue Minister should not made such irresponsible statement. He should visit the disaster affected areas, especially Seraj'.
The LoP also urged CM Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu to intervene in this matter. Thakur made these remarks during his interaction with media over certain issues including the transfer of a (executive engineer-) XEN-ranked official at Thunag in Mandi during the ongoing relief works. Thakur was in Mandi since July 1 and came to Shimla on Sunday.
Terming the accusations of Thakur 'baseless', Negi accused the former CM of misrepresenting the facts, statements of his opponents in the media.
'Jairam Thakur has some issues with me. His behavior was never appropriate towards me since he was the chief minister and I was in the Opposition. I have been performing my duties being the Revenue, Horticulture and Tribal minister successfully. The entire government is standing like a rock behind the people of Mandi including Seraj in this time of crisis,' the revenue minister said.
Meanwhile, addressing a press conference, Thakur also accused the Congress-led Himachal Pradesh government of 'insensitivity' and 'inaction' in the wake of the recent disaster in Mandi. He claimed that an executive engineer who was doing commendable work on the ground was transferred under pressure from certain political leaders. 'Till date, no senior officer from the state government has been deputed in Mandi,' he alleged.
Thakur claimed that the government's indifference stems from the fact that the disaster occurred in his constituency. 'Recently, I received a call from the Panchayati Raj Minister suggesting that the Panchayati Raj Institute be shifted from Mandi. I challenge the government to show a single crack in that institute due to the disaster. Then why shift it?' he asked.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
13 minutes ago
- Hans India
Revanth for Delhi today to garner MPs' support for 42% BC quota
Hyderabad: Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy will be giving a powerpoint presentation to all the Congress MPs in Delhi on caste census and BC reservations on July 24. During his 3-day visit likely to begin from Tuesday, he will be requesting the Prime Minister Narendra Modi for a discussion in Parliament on 42% reservation for BCs. As part of bolstering the support for the BC reservation in view of 'Chalo Delhi' on July 25, he will be meeting party seniors and MPs from INDI bloc. Along with the CM, Deputy CM Mallu Bhatti Vikarmarka will also be visiting the national capital. Both will be meeting Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi and AICC president Mallikarjun Kharge to brief them about the report on caste census of the State, which was submitted by the expert committee recently. Telangana Congress MPs Convener Mallu Ravi informed the media on Monday in Delhi that CM and Deputy CM will meet Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge in Delhi and will explain to them the caste census and 42% reservation for BCs undertaken in the state and will accept their suggestions and recommendations. During evening hours CM Revanth will give a powerpoint presentation to all Congress MPs in the country at Indira Bhavan on caste census and BC reservations. He said that he will request a discussion in Parliament on 42% reservation for BCs. It may be mentioned here that in March 2025, the Telangana Assembly passed two bills, the Telangana Backward Classes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (reservation of seats in educational institutions and of appointments or posts in services under the State) Bill 2025 and The Telangana Backward Classes (Reservation of seats in Rural and Urban Local Bodies) Bill 2025, in the Assembly. These bills were then sent to the Centre for constitutional amendments. The Governor, Jishnu Dev Varma, forwarded the bills to President Droupadi Murmu for consideration. Recently, the Telangana cabinet decided to proceed with an ordinance to implement the 42% reservation for the upcoming local body elections. The state government justified this increase by citing the results of a recent caste census, which indicated that BCs constitute 56% of Telangana's population. The ordinance intends to amend the Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018, which currently caps reservations at 50%.
Hans India
13 minutes ago
- Hans India
Indisciplined in party will face stick, warns TG BJP president
Hyderabad: BJP Telangana chief N Ramchander Rao stated that if anyone in the party is indisciplined, disciplinary action will be taken and emphasized that there is no distinction between old and new members, claiming that such differences are narratives created by some individuals. Addressing the media in the national capital on Monday, he affirmed that any leader who harms the party or violates discipline will face consequences. As state president, he aims to resolve any minor issues that arise within the party. He also mentioned that if there are problems concerning leaders and workers, the national leadership will address them. In his first visit to Delhi after assuming office as BJP Telangana State President, he addressed the media, expressing his desire to seek blessings and guidance from the party's central leadership to strengthen the party in the state. During his visit, he met with Sunil Bansal, Arvind Menon, and Nitin Gadkari. He noted that he would meet BJP National President JP Nadda and Union Home & Cooperation Minister Amit Shah in Parliament the following day. Rao criticized Congress party leaders for misleading the people of the country and Telangana, pointing out that while significant issues were being discussed in Parliament, the main opposition leader was absent, making their criticisms of the BJP seem unreasonable. He highlighted that Chief Minister Revanth Reddy had visited Delhi 46 times in the last 19 months. Yet key Congress leaders, including Rahul Gandhi, did not grant him an appointment; on the other hand, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Ministers did. He said that preventing Rahul Gandhi from meeting with Telangana Chief Minister, Revanth Reddy, is an insult to the people of Telangana. Rao also criticized the Congress government for blaming the central government regarding the 42% reservation for backward classes (BCs). A bill was introduced in the Assembly to provide 42% reservation in local body elections, which the BJP fully supported. However, Rao expressed concern about a conspiracy to implement 10% reservation for Muslim minorities even before the ordinance is finalized, stating that the BJP opposes religious and political reservations. Congress leaders have proposed that to grant 42% reservation to Backward Classes (BCs), it should be included in the 9th Schedule of the Constitution. Rao questioned whether legal advice had been obtained during the Cabinet discussions, emphasizing that granting a 42% reservation would exceed the 50% cap imposed by the Supreme Court. He stated that for the increase in BC reservation percentages, amending Section 285 of the Panchayati Raj Act is necessary. Despite this, Rao pointed out that the Congress government is now considering bringing an ordinance on BC reservations without a clear understanding of the 9th Schedule process. He reminded that in 1973, the Supreme Court clarified in the Kesavananda Bharati case that even if a law is included in the 9th Schedule, it is still subject to judicial review. He cited the ongoing pending case regarding the reservation law, included in the 9th Schedule in Tamil Nadu by Jayalalithaa, emphasizing that the final decision has yet to be made. Rao accused the Congress government of misleading the people regarding the 42% BC reservation and asserted that Congress should apologize for deceiving the BC community. He criticized Congress leaders for being aware of the Supreme Court verdict and the need to amend Section 285 but still not engaging in substantive discussions. He advised that the Congress party, instead of blaming the central government, focus on implementing the promised 42% reservation. The BJP, he reiterated, remains against religious reservations.
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Samajwadi Party MP: ‘Congress came to us several times on impeaching Justice Varma … tried to tell them it is BJP's move'
Samajwadi Party MP Javed Ali Khan talks to The Indian Express about his party's stance on the removal of Justice Yashwant Varma, why they won't support the motion if the Opposition's impeachment motion against Justice Shekhar Yadav is not taken up Why did SP MPs not sign the notice on Justice Yashwant Varma's removal? There is no doubt that SP is against corruption. But it was the BJP that first talked about an impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Varma… BJP's objective was not to finish corruption… BJP's objective is to prove itself a champion against corruption. The Opposition parties had given an impeachment motion against Justice Shekhar Yadav (of Allahabad High Court who made a controversial speech at a VHP event last year), which is pending with the Rajya Sabha Chairman… Our stand was that if the government takes up the Opposition's impeachment motion against Justice Shekhar Yadav, then we will support the impeachment motion against Justice Varma. But some of our Opposition parties, in the apprehension that BJP may take a lead on the issue of corruption, moved an impeachment motion against Justice Varma much before the government. The government should take up the impeachment motion against Justice Yadav with the same sincerity and conviction. Because corruption is nothing in comparison to the communalisation of judicial institutions… If the impeachment notice against Justice Varma is adopted and voting happens, what will be SP's stand? We will not support if the impeachment motion is taken up against Justice Varma only. If the government… gives any assurance to take up impeachment motion against Justice Yadav, we will be in support of both motions. A decision will be taken at the time of voting. But when the discussion will happen on Justice Varma, SP will focus on Justice Shekhar Yadav. Doesn't the Opposition appear divided on the impeachment notice? You can say the Opposition appears divided. I can say the Opposition appears… to be rallying behind the BJP (on impeachment notice against Justice Varma). Has SP discussed the matter with Congress or any other Opposition party? Congress approached the SP several times and said we should move a notice for Justice Varma's impeachment before the BJP moves. Several rounds of discussion happened. We tried to convince them that this is BJP's move… The BJP is not ready to talk about Justice Yadav… The SP joined other Opposition parties in Parliament on Monday the issue of Pahalgam terror attack. What is the party's demand? There are two things — Pahalgam and Operation Sindoor. BJP's notice is for a discussion on Operation Sindoor. The Opposition wants a discussion on the Pahalgam attack, which was a security breach… Pahalgam is a failure of the government. Discussion should happen on this matter. Operation Sindoor is an undisputed operation… There should be no debate on it… The BJP wants to take credit for the Army's bravery and success.
