EU drafts plan B to bypass Hungary's veto on Russia sanctions extension
Source: Rikard Jozwiak, Europe Editor for Radio Liberty, as reported by European Pravda
Details: European sanctions are formally outlined in two documents: a decision and a resolution. The texts are nearly identical (countries agree upon and adopt the decision, which is then implemented through the resolution).
It is the resolution that requires unanimous renewal every six months, not the decision: the decision remains in force until a qualified majority votes to repeal it.
Proponents of the idea argue that this mechanism could be used to bypass Hungary's veto and maintain the sanctions.
Sources told Jozwiak that the decision is viewed as "a fallback option, and a temporary one", as Hungary and its allies could challenge it in court, and the decision is not entirely legally flawless.
Other plan B options are also being considered. One proposal suggests that the European Commission could introduce the 17th sanctions package against Russia, with the aim of trading the abandonment of this package for Hungary's agreement to lift its veto on the extension of existing sanctions. This would allow Budapest to claim a formal victory in blocking the new sanctions package.
Another option being discussed is to impose high tariffs on Russia in all relevant areas if the sanctions cannot be extended, which does not require a unanimous decision. However, this cannot be a complete substitute for sanctions, particularly export restrictions.
In addition, the option of imposing identical restrictions at the national level is being explored, similar to the approach taken by some countries regarding individuals removed from the sanctions list due to Hungary's veto. However, this solution is also imperfect, as not all member states have comprehensive national legislation on sanctions and instead rely on the European framework.
In addition to the sanctions issue, Brussels is considering ways to pressure Hungary into unblocking the start of Ukraine's accession talks, which it aims to begin by June at the latest. There is speculation that offering concessions to Hungary regarding some funds suspended due to rule-of-law concerns could serve as leverage in both situations.
Background: Earlier, the Financial Times reported that the EU is growing increasingly impatient with Hungary, which consistently blocks key EU decisions, with some calling for its voting rights to be revoked.
Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Former ambassador to EU: 15 percent tariff can be baked into profit margins
President Trump's first-term ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, brushed off concerns on Sunday about higher prices for Americans following news of the U.S.-EU trade deal, which set tariffs at 15 percent on European goods. In an interview with CNN's Jessica Dean, Sondland was asked to respond to folks who see the 15 percent tariff on imported goods and are worried that, for example, their perfume bottles from France will now be 15 percent more expensive. He said Americans might initially see higher prices, but they will soon adjust as competition returns to the market. 'At 15 percent, I think consumers will initially pay, but I also think that this will be baked into the profit margins — or a reduction of the profit margins — on a lot of these products, because the market will start to pull prices back down again as there's more competition,' he said. Sondland said a 15 percent rate will generate enough revenue to make a dent in the reduction of the annual deficit. 'I think at a 15 percent tariff, it's enough to generate. If everything that we imported bore a 15 percent tariff, that would generate about $450 billion for the United States Treasury, which would make an enormous dent in our annual deficit,' Sondland said. 'If the tariff were 30 or 40 or 50 percent, that would be an absolute shutdown, so that wouldn't work. But 10 to 15, I think we can swallow it, and I think it's going to generate a tremendous amount of money if Congress doesn't piss it away on other things,' he added. Trump and President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen announced a trade deal on Sunday, setting tariffs at 15 percent for European goods, including automobiles. The European Union will purchase $750 billion worth of energy from the U.S. as part of the deal, Trump announced, and agreed to invest in the U.S. $600 billion more than the current investments for other goods. The agreement is lower than the 30 percent tariff Trump had threatened to impose on the EU, which would have begun on Friday, and avoids a trade war with the U.S.'s largest trading partner.
USA Today
24 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump trade deal with EU leaves Europe relieved − and worried
The Europe trade deal will see the U.S. impose a 15% import tariff on most EU goods − half the threatened rate but much more than Europeans hoped for. BRUSSELS − European governments and companies reacted with both relief and concern on Monday to the framework trade deal struck with President Donald Trump, acknowledging what was seen as an unbalanced deal but one that avoided a deeper trade war. The agreement, announced on July 27 between two economies that account for almost a third of global trade, will see the U.S. impose a 15% import tariff on most EU goods − half the threatened rate but much more than what Europeans hoped for. Many of the specifics of the deal were not immediately known, however. More: Trump and EU reach trade deal ahead of looming deadline "As we await full details of the new EU–U.S. trade agreement, one thing is clear: this is a moment of relief but not of celebration," Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever wrote on X. "Tariffs will increase in several areas and some key questions remain unresolved." Trump said the deal, including an investment pledge topping the $550 billion deal signed with Japan last week, would expand ties between the trans-Atlantic powers after years of what he called unfair treatment of U.S. exporters. It will bring clarity for European makers of cars, planes and chemicals. But the EU had initially hoped for a zero-for-zero tariff deal. And the 15% baseline tariff, while an improvement on the threatened rate of 30%, compares to an average U.S. import tariff rate of around 2.5% last year before Trump's return to the White House. More: Trump considers 'rebates' to US taxpayers from tariff income European Commission chief Von der Leyen, describing Trump as a tough negotiator, told reporters on July 27 that it was "the best we could get." European stocks opened up on July 28, with the STOXX 600 at a four-month high and all other major bourses also in the green. Tech and healthcare stocks led the way. More: TACO or tariffs? Trump's big trade deadline is coming. Here's what to expect "The 15% rate is better than the market was fearing," said Jefferies economist Mohit Kumar. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal, saying it averted a trade conflict that would have hit Germany's export-driven economy and its large auto sector hard. Not the end of the story French government ministers said on July 28 that the deal had some merits − such as exemptions they hoped to see for some key French business sectors such as spirits − but was nevertheless not balanced. Industry minister Marc Ferracci stressed more talks - potentially lasting weeks or months - would be needed before the deal could be formally concluded. "This is not the end of the story," he told RTL radio. European companies, meanwhile, were left wondering whether to cheer or lament the accord. "Those who expect a hurricane are grateful for a storm," said Wolfgang Große Entrup, head of the German Chemical Industry Association VCI. "Further escalation has been avoided. Nevertheless, the price is high for both sides. European exports are losing competitiveness. U.S. customers are paying the tariffs," he said. Stellantis shares were up 3.5% and car parts maker Valeo jumped 4.7% while German pharma group Merck KGaA rose 2.9%, in a sign of relief for those sectors. Among the many questions that remain to be answered, however, is how the EU's promise to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the U.S. and steeply increase energy purchases can be turned into reality. It was not immediately clear if specific pledges of increased investments were made or whether the details still must be hammered out. And while the EU pledged to make $750 billion in strategic purchases over the next three years, including oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and nuclear fuel, the U.S. will struggle to produce enough to meet that demand. While U.S. LNG production capacity is due to almost double over the next four years it will still not be enough to ramp up supplies to Europe, and oil production is expected to be lower than previously forecast this year. Despite the lingering unknowns, analysts stressed the deal still helped decrease uncertainty. Oil prices rose on Monday, as did the euro. "Now that there is more clarity, you would think that not only in the United States, but around the globe, there will be a little bit more willingness to look at investment, to look at expansions, and to look at where the opportunities are," said Rodrigo Catril, senior currency strategist at National Australia Bank.
Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
Auto Part Of U.S./EU Tariff Deal Gets Mixed Reception
President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen meets with U.S. President Donald Trump at ... More Trump Turnberry golf club on July 27, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland. (Photo by) The German auto industry association said agreement between the U.S. and the European Union on a new tariff regime avoided a trade war but will be a financial burden on its carmakers. The German Association of the Automotive Industry (VDA) said in a statement it was a positive that the agreement averted a transatlantic trade war. But the VDA also said the U.S. tariff of 15% on automotive products will cost German automotive companies billions annually. Meanwhile, Volkswagen, BMW and Mercedes stock prices fell more than 1% Monday after news the U.S. and the EU agreed new tariffs on auto imports. Rather than a negative opinion on the deal, the stock price falls reflected their strong reaction last week on expectations a deal would be agreed. The new tariffs are a substantial improvement on the recent increase to 27.5% charged on European auto imports into the U.S. but still four times the previous charge of 2.5%. Last week, the STOXX Europe 600 Automobiles & Parts Index, which tracks European automakers and suppliers, jumped 3.4% on news Japan had agreed a 15% tariff on its auto exports to the U.S. That rally was led by Volkswagen, BMW and Mercedes. On Monday, the index slid 0.2%. Experts had predicted the Japan deal was likely to be the same as that offered to Europe. A Reuters Breakingviews column on the agreement was headlined 'EU's lopsided Trump trade deal will be short-lived'. The column, by Pierre Briancon, said the deal would have at least removed some uncertainty. 'Nevertheless, the tariff level still amounts to capitulation by Brussels. It must be compared not to Trump's threats, but to the 1.47% rate previously applied to European goods crossing the Atlantic. Only two months ago, several EU governments were warning that a 10% across-the-board charge, similar to what the UK had obtained, would be a red line that should trigger some form of response,' Briancon said. 'In addition to the added trade friction, the EU has also promised to import more energy – spending $250 billion a year on American oil and gas – and could invest some $600 billion stateside. That, at least, is Trump's interpretation of the deal. It's unclear whether these figures represent incremental amounts, or what time frame the president had in mind. Fuzzy as they are, these EU pledges at least do not look very binding,' according to Briancon. Not many details The deal, announced by President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Turnberry, Scotland, didn't reveal many details. German automakers had been hoping for additional concessions to increase their production in the U.S. and incentivize investment. Exports from the U.S. of German production would also earn concessions. Volkswagen has talked about adding Audi output in the U.S. BMW is the biggest German auto exporter from the U.S., shipping nearly 225,000 vehicles with a value exceeding $10 billion in 2024. Mercedes is another significant exporter. Volkswagen has a U.S. factory but doesn't export much. Another idea would mean for every German export from the U.S., one import would be allowed free of duty, or at a reduced rate.
