Rajnath Singh talks tough, refuses to sign SCO statement skipping Pahalgam mention
terrorism
and bringing its supporters and enablers to justice, defence minister
Rajnath Singh
on Thursday refused to sign a joint communique of the
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation
(
SCO
) that skipped any mention of the
Pahalgam terror attack
.
Singh was in China for the SCO defence ministers' meeting that ended without a joint statement due to the strong stand taken by
India
on the issue of terrorism, which was objected to by Pakistan, also a member of the body.
"We understand that member countries could not reach consensus on certain issues and hence the document could not be finalised. India wanted concerns on terrorism reflected in the document that was not acceptable to a particular country. As such the joint statement was not adopted," sources said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
12 "Ridiculous" Benefits The VA Never Mentioned
Veteran Deals Today
Install Now
Undo
ET had earlier reported that the Pahalgam terror attack had emerged as a point of contention in the runup to the summit under the Chinese presidency, with India calling for a mention of the April 22 strike in one of the documents, following which Pakistan demanded mention of the Jaffar express incident in the same document.
At the summit, Singh took a stern stand against terrorism and made the point that peace and prosperity cannot co-exist with terrorism and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in the hands of non-state actors and terror groups.
Live Events
Singh said that dealing with these challenges requires decisive action and a united front of all responsible actors. "It is imperative that those who sponsor, nurture and utilise terrorism for their narrow and selfish ends must bear the consequences. Some countries use cross-border terrorism as an instrument of policy and provide shelter to terrorists. There should be no place for such double standards. SCO should not hesitate to criticise such nations," he said, addressing defence ministers, including those from China and Russia.
On the Pahalgam attack, Singh said it is clear from the pattern of the strike that it was carried out by a proxy of UN-designated terror group
Lashkar-e-Taiba
(LeT). He added India exercised its right to defend against terrorism by launching
Operation Sindoor
to dismantle cross-border terror infrastructure.
The minister said India's actions have demonstrated its zero tolerance for terrorism and that epicentres of terror are no longer safe as India will not hesitate to target them.
He added that the perpetrators, organisers, financiers and sponsors of acts of terrorism, including cross-border actors, need to be held accountable and brought to justice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
The Big Beautiful Bill's quiet revolution: Dismantling the federal role in education
While President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' has drawn noisy debate over taxes and immigration, its most transformative, and potentially divisive, legacy may unfold far from the public gaze: Inside America's classrooms. Formally known as the American Prosperity and Freedom Act, the bill runs 940 pages deep. Nestled in its dense legal language is a radical reimagination of how education is funded, who controls it, and what it's meant to teach. More than a fiscal realignment, the bill signals a cultural and institutional recalibration, a blueprint not just for cutting costs, but for shrinking the federal government's role in shaping educational equity and intellectual freedom. Defunding the foundation At the heart of the legislation lies a nearly 20% cut to discretionary funding for the US Department of Education over five years. This is no administrative trimming. Critical lifelines such as Title I grants, designed to level the playing field for students in low-income districts, and IDEA funds supporting students with disabilities face sharp reductions. In real terms, that means fewer teachers, larger class sizes, shuttered after-school programmes, and thinner support for special education. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Hörspezialisten toben: Dieses 89 €-Gerät geht viral Top Trending News Today Mehr erfahren Undo For under-resourced schools already walking a fiscal tightrope, this isn't reform. It's a retreat. And for districts that rely heavily on federal aid to supplement inadequate state budgets, the message is clear: you're on your own. Choice or abandonment? The bill also elevates a longstanding conservative goal, school choice, by creating a federal tax credit scholarship programme. Under the guise of parental empowerment, the initiative incentivizes donations to private school tuition, effectively subsidizing elite alternatives while siphoning funds from the public system. To supporters, this is freedom in action, a mechanism to spark competition and elevate standards. But critics see something far more corrosive: A public school exodus that accelerates segregation, weakens accountability, and hollows out the very system meant to serve all students. If left unchecked, it could reshape education into a two-tiered model, one privately buoyed and publicly neglected. The return of debt-driven futures Perhaps no provision has sparked more alarm among recent graduates than the rollback of Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) and the rollback of income-driven repayment schemes. In their place: Increased reliance on private lenders and corporate partnerships to manage student loans. This pivot represents not just a policy shift but a moral disinvestment in those who choose public service, teachers, social workers, and rural doctors. With no promise of debt relief, many will opt out before they even begin. The future will be more indebted, more risk-averse, and less willing to serve. A curriculum draped in red, white, and blue Education, under Trump's bill, isn't just an economic tool; it's a cultural battlefield. Echoing the rhetoric of the 1776 Commission, the bill allocates $500 million toward 'American Values Curriculum Grants,' with an explicit directive: teach US history through a lens of national pride and exceptionalism. What does that mean in practice? A potential erasure of systemic critique, reduced engagement with marginalized histories, and teacher training programs aligned with ideological litmus tests. Supporters hail it as a corrective to 'anti-American bias.' Detractors warn it edges dangerously close to state-sponsored historical revisionism, where patriotism comes at the cost of intellectual honesty. Knowledge under siege The bill's impact on higher education is equally profound. While STEM fields tied to defence and industry are protected, social sciences and environmental research face a 12% funding cut. This selective pruning risks reorienting universities around military-industrial priorities, undermining the pursuit of knowledge that challenges, questions, and enriches democratic society. PhD programs in climate change, sociology, or public health, already vulnerable, may contract or vanish entirely. The academy's capacity to interrogate power, inequality, or the planet's fragility is quietly being starved. Federal hands off, private hands in Across its many chapters, the Big Beautiful Bill weaves a consistent theme: Less federal protection, more market intervention. Public institutions are pushed toward privatized models. Equity-based funding is exchanged for performance-based incentives. Ideological coherence replaces pedagogical complexity. This isn't merely conservative tinkering. It's the architectural undoing of federal involvement in public education, with consequences that will play out over decades, not news cycles. The fight ahead Already, civil rights organizations are preparing lawsuits to challenge the legality of voucher programmes that may breach public education mandates. States reliant on Title I and IDEA funds are lobbying for carve-outs and concessions. But the scaffolding has shifted. What was once a federal promise, that no child's future would be determined by their ZIP code or income bracket, is now being recast as a local gamble and a parental responsibility. Education reimagined, but for whom? Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' may never draw the fiery protests of immigration bans or the coverage of Supreme Court appointments. But it represents something arguably more enduring: A generational redesign of the American education system, not by consensus, but by calculation. What we're witnessing is not just defunding or deregulating, but a deliberate redefinition of what education is for, who it belongs to, and whose history it must teach. For all its patriotism, the bill risks betraying the most essential American promise, that education, in a democracy, is not a privilege. It is a right. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Sanatan Mahakumbh a call for cultural unity'
Buxar: Former Union minister and senior BJP leader Ashwini Kumar Choubey visited Buxar on Thursday as part of a Janjagran Abhiyan to promote the upcoming Sanatan Mahakumbh, scheduled for July 6 at Gandhi Maidan in Patna. Addressing a press conference, Choubey said the event was more than a religious gathering. "The Mahakumbh is a socio-cultural Mahayagna for national awakening. It aims to revive Sanatan values, promote social harmony and reinforce India's cultural unity," he said. "If Sanatan exists, the nation exists and so do political parties. All Hindus and Muslims in this country are Sanatanis," he added. Choubey confirmed that the event would see participation from Shankaracharyas, Mahamandaleshwars, religious leaders and cultural organisations nationwide. Jagadguru Ramanandacharya Swami Shri Rambhadracharya Ji Maharaj and the heads of major Akhadas and Vedic institutions are also expected to attend. A key highlight will be an ideological seminar on the theme 'Waiting for Lord Parashuram'. "The theme represents an awakened social consciousness, one that stands against injustice, upholds equality and furthers nation-building through Sanatan culture," Choubey said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo He urged people from Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan to attend and bring conches (shankhs) from home. "When thousands of conches are blown together at Gandhi Maidan, it will be a sight to behold," he said. Reiterating an earlier demand, Choubey called for a grand statue of Lord Ram to be installed in Buxar, his Karmabhoomi. He also revealed that renovations of the long-neglected Light and Sound House near Ramrekha Ghat are nearing completion. With Rs 6 crore sanctioned by the ministry of tourism, the site will soon feature a laser and light show based on epics like the Ramayana.
New Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Allahabad HC denies bail to man for posts against PM, Armed Forces during Operation Sindoor
LUCKNOW: The Allahabad High Court has refused bail to a person accused of posting objectionable content on social media against the Prime Minister and the Indian Armed Forces during Operation Sindoor, following the Phalagam massacre. A single-judge bench, comprising Justice Arun Kumar Deshwal, observed that the freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under the Constitution of India does not extend to acts that disrespect the high dignitaries of the country and create disharmony among citizens. Justice Deshwal stated that it had become a trend among certain groups to misuse social media platforms under the guise of freedom of speech by making nasty and unfounded allegations against dignitaries and spreading disharmony and hatred among communities. The petitioner, Ashraf Khan alias Nisrat, had been booked under Sections 152 and 197 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for allegedly posting edited videos on his Facebook account during the recent India-Pakistan face-off following the Phalagam massacre. According to the prosecution, the petitioner, who had moved the High Court seeking bail, allegedly posted a video showing the Prime Minister walking next to a donkey pulling a cart carrying an aircraft, later showing him apologising to Pakistan.
