
Real or flake? Experts weigh in on whether TikTok's viral ‘caveman method' skin care routine actually works
TikTok creator Tia Zakher has become a viral sensation for her adherence to the trend. The 22-year-old sparked debate about the method after posting videos with visibly flaky skin, apparently a result of the trend. 'What you're seeing is dead skin, that's going to flake off eventually while new healthy skin forms underneath,' she told millions of viewers.
Zakher has her sceptics but, whether or not you believe the videos, what do experts think about the regime, which has been attributed to other celebrities including Alexa Chung and Salma Hayek?
Like many healthcare professionals who have commented on the viral videos, Associate Prof Deshan Sebaratnam, a dermatologist at the Skin Hospital in Sydney, says 'it's not a good idea'.
'The reason being is your body is constantly regenerating itself, your skin is constantly turning over, and old skin cells are being shed. Normally they can fall off, but sometimes they can get stuck together, particularly if your skin's a little bit oilier.'
Sebaratnam said a condition known as terra firma-forme – where those dead skin cells can accumulate like scale – can develop when people don't shower.
'I wouldn't recommend what she's doing,' he said.
Associate professor Yousuf Mohammed, an expert in pharmaceutics and skin toxicology at the University of Queensland, said sebum – the natural, oily substance produced by sebaceous glands in the skin – provides a partial barrier to protect the skin, but if left unwashed for too long can create the perfect atmosphere for certain types of bacteria to grow.
'The caveman technique [might have] worked when we lived in the caves because we didn't have these new kinds of [modern] pollutants around,' he said. 'In today's day and age, we really do need to wash.'
'There's all this misinformation out there that you need a 12-step skincare routine – that's completely not true. But you don't want to take it from one extreme to the other, like this person,' Sebaratnam said.
He recommends in the morning putting sunscreen on, and then at the end of the day a gentle soap-free cleanser, ideally without fragrances or perfumes. 'You don't need to be spending lots of money – the cheap stuff works great.'
Sebaratnam says cleansers are helpful because 'with makeup, with sunscreen, even with your own sweat and oil, you need something a little bit more than just water, because those things are oil-based, and oil and water don't mix, so you need something that can help remove oil-based products.'
'That's really all you need in terms of a very simple skincare routine – you don't need to be doing anything extra on top of that. All sunscreen have moisturiser in-built within them, so you don't need to be putting sunscreen and moisturiser on at the same time,' Sebaratnam said.
From a medical perspective, only people with conditions such as eczema need moisturiser, Sebaratnam said. But there are lots of different factors that motivate people when it comes to their skincare – 'for some people, that's their form of meditation or their form of self-care'.
Sebaratnam says aggressive skin care products can certainly disrupt the barrier function of the skin. 'Even products like soap can strip away natural oils. Anything you put on your skin can disrupt the pH transiently but our skin is resilient and has mechanisms in place to self-regulate this.'
Commercial skincare brands often promote products with active ingredients to target specific concerns like vitamin A for anti-ageing, hyaluronic acid for hydration or vitamin C for brightening. 'There's lots of different products that you can put on your skin but, in particular, a lot of the actives, they'll all cause a small degree of irritation, and then if all of a sudden you're putting 12 of these things on, you know, 12 times a small degree of irritation becomes a big degree of irritation,' Sebaratnam says.
'Be intentional with your skincare. Just because you see someone online using something and it suits them, it doesn't necessarily mean that it's going to help you reach your skincare goals.
'Having a sense of what you want to achieve with your skincare is important, and then you can pick products that suit that.'
For some people whose intention is to use their skincare to pamper themselves, they might want to buy expensive products, often paying for a fancy bottle and fragrance, but the improvement in skin quality the next day is likely to be the same whether you use $150 or $15 cream at night, he says.
Natasha May is Guardian Australia's health reporter
Antiviral is a fortnightly column that interrogates the evidence behind the health headlines and factchecks popular wellness claims
What health trend do you want examined?
Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian.
Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
How you can prolong your life and protect yourself from dementia with these very simple steps - as bombshell new study makes stunning discovery: ROB GALLOWAY
We've all heard it many times before – to get healthier, you need to do 30 minutes of strenuous exercise at least five times a week. I know, maddening if you feel this is beyond you: I see patients' frustration with this advice all the time in A&E.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
My seven-year-old daughter's teacher attacked me over the school lunch I packed. Am I really in the wrong?
An Australian mum has sparked debate online after revealing a teacher 'attacked' her during a parent-teacher interview over the lunch she packed for her seven-year-old daughter. Posting anonymously to Reddit, the mother explained she had always tried her best to pack a lunch her daughter, who is a picky eater with a history of stomach problems, would eat. 'She's had bowel issues since she was a baby. Some days, dry chips are the only thing she can stomach without vomiting. Getting her to eat anything is a win,' the mum wrote. But at a recent school interview, the teacher criticised her for not packing enough fruit and said her daughter's stomach problems would improve if she stopped eating so much processed food. 'She even told my daughter that she better see fruit in her lunch tomorrow. I just felt like I was being attacked,' the woman wrote, admitting she now feels like 'the worst mum in the world'. The lunchbox in question includes a sandwich, yoghurt, packet of chips, cheese stick and, occasionally, a cookie or brownie. The mum said most days the fruit comes home 'soggy and untouched,' so she's stopped wasting money on it. 'I even got told off for taking her to the corner store some mornings for a lolly - which is just a little thing we do together after I drop the other kids off,' she added. The post quickly divided opinion, with thousands of Reddit users chiming in on whether the teacher had crossed a line - or whether the mum needed a reality check. Many were sympathetic, especially given the child's medical history. 'No teacher should be giving nutritional advice without knowing a child's medical background. If your daughter has documented digestive issues, I'd write a note to the Principal,' one wrote. 'Teachers aren't paediatricians. This woman just stigmatised a kid who already struggles to eat. That's not okay,' another user agreed. But others defended the teacher for speaking up, suggesting her concern came from a genuine place. 'Personally, I want teachers who care about my kids and want the best for them, Maybe the approach wasn't perfect, but it sounds like she's trying to help,' one user wrote. Another added: 'It's very normal for teachers to care about a child's nutrition - they see the impact of poor diets in the classroom every day.' Others pointed to the deeper issue: the child's nutrition itself. 'One parent's shame shouldn't stop a conversation about a child's welfare,' a user said. 'Yes, the teacher could have approached it better. But the real issue here is: what is this child actually eating?' Meanwhile, a few shared their own school lunch horror stories - including one parent who once received a passive-aggressive note from a teacher asking them to stop adding cucumber to sandwiches because it made the bread soggy. As for the mum, she says she felt judged and humiliated in front of her child - and believes the criticism didn't take into account the long struggle she's faced just to get her daughter to eat. 'She's not a bad mum,' one user wrote in support. 'She's just doing what she can. And that should count for something.'


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Medicine shortages put patients at risk, MPs and peers warn
Patients are facing serious harm from persistent and widespread medicine shortages, MPs and peers have warned. A new report from the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on pharmacy called for urgent action to ensure shortages do not become the 'new normal'. It also highlights the impact that shortages are having on patients with the likes of ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder), menopause and diabetes. Writing in the report, Steve Race, chairman of the APPG on pharmacy, said many MPs 'have received a growing volume of correspondence from constituents who are understandably anxious about the availability of their medicines'. 'Whether it is a parent unable to access antibiotics for a sick child, an elderly patient facing delays in obtaining life-sustaining medication, or a pharmacist overwhelmed by the need to source alternatives, the human impact is both visible and deeply troubling,' he wrote. The report said that while medicine shortages are 'not a new phenomenon', they have 'become increasingly severe, persistent, and disruptive' in recent years – leading to consequences for patients, staff and the wider health service. Mr Race said: 'Medicines shortages have moved from isolated incidents to a chronic structural challenge for both the NHS and pharmacy sector. 'As Government continues to recognise and invest in the expanded clinical role of community pharmacy, we must ensure the medicines supply chain underpinning that care is equally robust, resilient and patient-focused. 'Pharmacy is central to NHS recovery and transformation, but frontline teams cannot safely expand clinical services while daily supply disruptions continue to impact the health of patients.' The findings also highlight how shortages severely impact patients with conditions like ADHD, menopause and diabetes. More than nine in 10 pharmacists, GPs and prescribers told an APPG survey ADHD medicines had been affected by shortages. Around three quarters (76%) said HRT and diabetes drugs had been affected, while 44% said antibiotics. One patient with ADHD told the inquiry they had been self-medicating with cannabis due to an ongoing shortage of methylphenidate. The report said: 'These shortages are having a significant impact on patients' ability to access treatments and in some cases are having serious impact on patients' health and well-being.' Mr Race added: 'Medicines security must be treated as a core component of NHS planning, alongside funding, workforce and digital infrastructure. 'Failure to act risks further undermining patient care and destabilising a community pharmacy sector that millions depend upon.' The APPG has laid out a number of recommendations, which includes a number of measures to better support patients. People impacted by shortages, particularly those with chronic conditions, struggle to find information on out of stock drugs, leading to 'frustration, dangerous delays in care, and unnecessary anxiety and harm', it said. It also welcomed work being carried out by the Department of Health and Social Care to potentially change pharmacist prescribing protocols to allow pharmacists to make dose and formulation changes during shortages. Elsewhere, the inquiry found more than eight in 10 pharmacists face daily shortages, with many spending hours every day finding alternative treatment and communicating with distressed patients. One told the APPG they are 'constantly firefighting'. Reacting to the report, Henry Gregg, chief executive of the National Pharmacy Association (NPA), said: 'Pharmacy teams are under enormous pressure but are forced to spend hours hunting down stock for distressed and frustrated patients. 'It is particularly frustrating for pharmacists to be unable to meet a clear need when they have a perfectly safe and effective solution in their pharmacy already. 'MPs are right that it is madness to send someone back to their GP to get a prescription changed, and it risks a patient either delaying taking vital medication or forgoing it altogether, which poses a clear risk to patient safety. 'As the APPG says, the Government must allow pharmacists – who are highly trained health care practitioners – to use their professional judgment to supply an appropriate alternative medication when the prescribed version is unavailable.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'This government inherited ongoing global supply problems, but we have robust measures in place to mitigate disruption for patients. 'We are working to build the resilience of medicine supply chains and prevent future disruption as we get the NHS back on its feet. 'We have recently agreed an extra £617 million of funding over two years with Community Pharmacy England to support the sector and provide patients with more services closer to home as part of our 10 Year Health Plan.'