&w=3840&q=100)
How UK trade deal will give Indian exports edge over China, Bangladesh, Vietnam
Union commerce minister Piyush Goyal and British business secretary Jonathan Reynolds sign the India-UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA) on Thursday, July 24, 2025. (Photo: ANI)
India and the United Kingdom signed a free trade deal on Wednesday.
The two countries concluded the deal in May after years of negotiation.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his counterpart Keir Starmer have both hailed the deal.
Modi called the development a 'historic day in the bilateral relations'.
'I am delighted that after the hard work of several years, our two nations have signed the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement,' Modi said.
'It is a deal that will bring huge benefits to both of our countries, boosting wages, raising living standards and putting more money in the pockets of working people. It is good for jobs, it is good for business, cutting tariffs and making trade cheaper, quicker and easier,' Starmer added.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But how will the trade deal will give Indian exports an edge over countries like Bangladesh, Vietnam and China?
Let's take a closer look:
What do we know?
Bilateral trade between the two countries was at $55 billion in 2023/24.
However, India comprises under 2 per cent of the UK's imports.
The FTA aims to double bilateral trade to around $120 billion by 2030.
Talks on a separate Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) remain ongoing.
Indian negotiators managed to eliminate tariffs on 99 per cent of Indian exports to the UK.
The deal will boost labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, leather, apparel and footwear, toys, marine products, gems and jewellery.
Many of these currently face tariffs ranging from 4 per cent to 16 per cent.
India could benefit to the tune of $2 billion thanks to the trade deal.
This is because its exports would immediately become competitive over its neighbours including Bangladesh, Vietnam and China in several categories.
In textiles alone, there are 1,143 separate items that could benefit.
Readymade garments or home textiles, carpets, handicrafts and traditional items such as pashmina shawls or Kanchipuram or bandhini sarees will benefit.
India is currently the UK's fourth-largest textile supplier to UK.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
It comprises around six per cent of imports.
Indian officials say India's footwear market could see a huge benefit particularly athleisure, sports shoes, Vellore and Kolhapuri chappals and traditional leather shoes.
A model walks the runway wearing Kolhapuri chappals during the Prada collection show at Milan's Fashion Week Menswear Spring/Summer 2026, in Milan. AFP
India could also increase its share of UK's $30 billion pharma imports.
India's share in 2024 stood at just $1 billion
India could also gain when it comes to generic medicine, ECG and X-ray machines.
India exported chemicals worth $570 million to the UK in 2024.
The Centre is hoping to increase this by 30 to 40 per cent after more than 1,200 chemicals will receive duty-free access.
The gems and jewellery sector, where valued at $940 million, could also benefit.
Much of India's overall gains could come from China.
China
After the British tariffs are done away with, India could become more competitive in exports in which China is currently dominant valued at $1 billion.
This includes categories such as machine parts, coffee, silver jewellery and footwear.
China in 2024 sent machine parts valued at $248.5 million to the UK. India, meanwhile, sent machine parts worth $215.3 million.
India exported coffee worth $12 million to the UK in 2024, while China sent coffee worth $11.1 million.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
India exported coffee worth $12 million to the UK in 2024, while China sent coffee worth $11.1 million. Representation.Pixabay
India could also massively benefit when it come to silver jewellery and footwear.
India's exports to the UK in these categories comprise just a third of China's.
India cut also cut China's lead in the UK when it comes to processed food and baked items.
Indonesia
India could also cut into Indonesia's exports in the UK.
This could potentially impact around 10 per cent of its exports.
It could occur in sports footwear and toys such as tricycles, scooters, and pedal cars.
Thailand and Vietnam
The deal could impact around 3.8 per cent of Thailand's exports – goods worth around $200 million.
India could gain ground on Thailand when it comes to processed food preparations and baked items.
Vietnam could see its imports impacted to the tune of $346.6 million.
Pakistan and Bangladesh
Pakistan and Bangladesh could also take a hit.
Bangladesh could be impacted in about 4.8 percent of its exports to the UK.
However, keeping in mind categories with a tariff gap, that figure could rise to 7.6 per cent.
Pakistani exports could be impacted by between 2.3 per cent to 15 per cent.
Its exports to the UK are currently estimated at $2.14 billion.
Exports in apparel, footwear, and food products such as spices and fish could be impacted.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Exports in apparel, footwear coming from China, Vietnam and Bangladesh could be impacted. File image/AFP
Bangladesh could suffer heavily when it comes to leather and textiles.
'Leather exports are expected to increase their market share in the UK by five percentage points.', an official told The Hindu.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Delay in onboarding lateral hires due to market conditions, will honour offers, TCS tells Chief Labour Commissioner
Skipping an in-person meeting with the Chief Labour Commissioner (CLC) on the delay in onboarding lateral hires and its recent layoffs, IT services company Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) instead communicated via an email Friday that it will honour all the offer letters it has issued, and that such deferments are a common industry practice, depending on project timelines. On August 1, the Chief Labour Commissioner held a meeting to discuss the recent layoff of more than 12,000 TCS workers, and a delay by the company in onboarding over 600 lateral hires. The meeting was sought by the Nascent Information Technology Employees Senate (NITES), which represents workers in the IT services sector. While a representative from the union was present, TCS skipped the meeting, NITES said in a press statement. NITES said TCS in its email to the CLC outlined that deferment was temporary, owing to prevailing market conditions, that it was attempting to keep the delay as minimum as possible, and the positions the company had offered had not been withdrawn. It also added that NITES had no locus standi to intervene in the matter. While the company reiterated its intention to eventually honour the offers, it failed to provide any clear onboarding schedule, offer compensation for the delay, or propose any support mechanism for the affected employees, many of whom remain unemployed, financially strained, and emotionally distressed, NITES said in its statement. TCS did not respond to an immediate request for comment. Last month, TCS, India's largest IT services firm, undertook the first major layoff in the Indian IT sector, slashing 2 per cent of its global workforce — roughly 12,200 jobs. Framed as a push toward building a 'future-ready generation' through 'skilling and redeployment,' the move is, in effect, a sweeping cost-cutting exercise. The axe will fall hardest on mid- and senior-level employees, signalling a tough new chapter in the industry. TCS' decision is expected to create uncertainty in the Indian IT industry, with industry experts anticipating that other major firms may follow suit. The move signals a potential shift in workforce strategies, especially as companies increasingly turn to automation and cost optimisation. As one of the sector's largest employers, TCS' actions could set a precedent, prompting similar measures across the industry and raising concerns among employees about job security and long-term career stability. Soumyarendra Barik is Special Correspondent with The Indian Express and reports on the intersection of technology, policy and society. With over five years of newsroom experience, he has reported on issues of gig workers' rights, privacy, India's prevalent digital divide and a range of other policy interventions that impact big tech companies. He once also tailed a food delivery worker for over 12 hours to quantify the amount of money they make, and the pain they go through while doing so. In his free time, he likes to nerd about watches, Formula 1 and football. ... Read More
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Real estate, infra sectors short of 20 lakh skilled workers; increasingly difficult to provide affordable housing: NAREDCO chair Hiranandani
The real estate and infrastructure sectors are currently short of 20 lakh skilled workers — a gap that could widen to 50 lakh over the next five years, according to Niranjan Hiranandani, chairman of the Hiranandani Group. Speaking at an industry event on Friday, Hiranandani also flagged declining sales in the affordable housing segment, adding that high land costs around city centres must be addressed for developers to build such housing. 'In real estate and infrastructure, we are 20 lakh skilled workers short in India today… On one side we have unemployment, on the other side we have no skilled workers,' he said at a National Real Estate Development Council (NAREDCO) gathering. Hiranandani is also NAREDCO's chairman. 'This is going to grow in the next five years because of real estate and infrastructure growth — the gap will go to 5 million skilled workers. This is (a) disaster because neither the private sector nor the government sector has been able to fulfill (the demand),' Hiranandani added. Earlier, in June, Larsen & Toubro (L&T) chairman S N Subrahmanyan had said the group's construction business is facing a shortage of 25,000-30,000 labourers. 'Affordable housing not possible due to high costs' While he remains bullish on the real estate sector, which he claimed grew by 10 per cent in 2024-25, Hiranandani flagged a dip in affordable housing sales. 'In the affordable housing segment, for the first time in my 45 years in real estate, sales have decreased by 15 per cent. I am talking about the whole country, not just Delhi and Mumbai. This is a big problem that is to be sorted out,' he said. Since 2020, the Indian real estate market has seen rapid premiumisation, with the share of supply priced below Rs 40 lakh shrinking across key cities and most new launches priced above Rs 80 lakh — driven largely by demand for luxury homes above Rs 1.5 crore. Hiranandani said while the PM Awas Yojana 2.0 will provide interest subsidy for 1 crore homes in urban areas, building affordable housing near city centres is difficult due to rising circle rates. 'How do you match rising land prices and giving affordable housing? It is not possible today with inflation in the cost of construction, the tax rates which are there, stamp duty rate, GST rate, local authority rates, etc. You cannot make affordable housing close to the city centre where employment opportunities exist,' he told The Indian Express, calling for the government and local authorities to intervene. 'No dip in pan-India housing sales' In India's top seven residential markets — Delhi-NCR, Mumbai, Bangalore, Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Kolkata — overall sales dropped by 3.5 per cent year-on-year in 2024. In the first half of 2025, sales fell 24.3 per cent, according to data shared by property consultancy Anarock. Hiranandani said there has been no dip in pan-India housing sales. 'If you look at the national level, real housing growth has been more than 10 per cent (in 2024-25). On an annualised basis, it will go up by more than 15 per cent (this fiscal). So it will probably be one of the highest growth years ever,' he said. Aggam Walia is a Correspondent at The Indian Express, reporting on power, renewables, and mining. His work unpacks intricate ties between corporations, government, and policy, often relying on documents sourced via the RTI Act. Off the beat, he enjoys running through Delhi's parks and forests, walking to places, and cooking pasta. ... Read More
The Hindu
13 minutes ago
- The Hindu
House of wars: on Parliament, Operation Sindoor discussion
The government and the Opposition crossed swords in Parliament during a discussion on Operation Sindoor this week. There was unanimity in praising India's armed forces, but there was little common ground beyond that. Operation Sindoor was India's military response to the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, on April 22, 2025, which claimed 26 lives. The elimination of three terrorists behind the attack, just before the parliamentary debate, helped the government's case. It told Parliament that these terrorists were Lashkar-e-Taiba members from Pakistan. The Narendra Modi government's strident approach seeks to change the behaviour of Pakistan and reassure its domestic audience. The success of this approach is debatable and the Opposition sought to put the government on the spot on both counts. A demonstrated willingness to use force against Pakistan in the event of a terrorism incident is a definitive turn in India's strategy, and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) takes pride in that. But there is no evidence yet that it is working though there has been chest thumping around it by the ruling party. The discussion in Parliament barely addressed the implications of this approach, which is being touted as the new normal. The Opposition and the government agreed on the need to punish Pakistan, and also disagreed on who would do it better. The government claimed success in meeting its objectives of launching a military operation and denied that it had acted under pressure in ending the war. Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi demanded a pointed response to repeated claims by U.S. President Donald Trump that he mediated the ceasefire but the Prime Minister evaded a direct response on it. The government contradicts itself when it says that the operation was a success, and that it is continuing. It is also exasperating to hear a party that is now in its eleventh year of uninterrupted power, blame people who passed away decades ago for any challenge that India faces now. There was little self-reflection regarding the lapses that led to the terrorism incident, and whether and how the government plans to address them. The government had sent joint teams including several MPs from the Opposition abroad to garner support for India in the aftermath of the operation, but that sign of statesmanship was a short-lived aberration, as it turns out. The world is changing rapidly and India's capacity to navigate those changes will be largely determined by its own character. Questioning the patriotism of political opponents is an easy route to take to evade tough questions, but the BJP must realise that such an approach has diminishing returns.
