US threatens ICC: Drop Israel war crimes probe or 'all options on the table'
Reed Rubinstein made the threat on Tuesday during a meeting of the Assembly of State Parties (ASP), the ICC's oversight body, in New York.
"We will use all appropriate and effective diplomatic, political and legal instruments to block ICC overreach," the US representative warned.
"Our additional sanctions of June 5 should underscore our resolve," he added, referencing the US's recent move to sanction four ICC judges who issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant last November.
Rubinstein went on to threaten the ICC: "To be clear, we expect all ICC actions against the United States and our ally Israel - that is, all investigations and all arrest warrants - to be terminated," he said.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"If not, all options remain on the table."
The ASP was meeting to discuss a potential amendment to the Rome Statute, the ICC's founding treaty, to expand the court's jurisdiction over the "crime of aggression".
The court has jurisdiction in the 125 countries that recognise its authority.
Exclusive: David Cameron threatened to withdraw UK from ICC over Israel war crimes probe Read More »
But the amendment would empower it to prosecute the crime of aggression if it was commited on the territory of an ICC member state, as is already the case with crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide.
Neither the US nor Israel are parties to the Rome Statute and have long rejected the authority of the court. Rubinstein was permitted to attend and speak at the meeting as an observer.
The court has previously investigated alleged war crimes committed by American forces based in Afghanistan, which is a signatory to the Rome Statute.
Rubinstein claimed that "the ICC has engaged in illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America and our close ally Israel".
He added that the ICC "has wrongfully abused its power and that its malign conduct threatens to infringe US sovereignty and undermine our critical national security and foreign policy work".
And he reminded the ASP of the financial and visa sanctions the US imposed on ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan in February.
Khan, a British citizen, has had his American visa revoked and his wife and children have been banned from travelling to the US. His bank accounts have been frozen in the UK.
Rubinstein, the State Department adviser, has been widely criticised in the US for claiming on social media in February 2024 that the Biden administration had a "massive program to overthrow the Israeli government".
'[The ICC's] malign conduct threatens to infringe US sovereignty and undermine our critical national security and foreign policy work'
- Reed Rubinstein, State Department legal adviser
Challenged on the post during a Senate foreign relations hearing in March, Rubinstein said: "During the Obama administration, the State Department was running money to fund an anti-government operation inside of Israel.
"Many of the same people, who were involved in the Obama administration State Department, came back under President Biden, and it appears to me, based on emails that I obtained through the Freedom of Information Act and that we read, that the same playbook was being run."
Senator Jeanne Shaheen, the committee ranking member, said his statements constituted "conspiracy theories".
Escalating US sanctions
Rubinstein's message to the ASP came a day before the Trump administration announced on Wednesday that it was imposing sanctions on Francesca Albanese, the UN's special rapporteur for Palestine.
The sanctions follow Albanese's scathing report on 30 June, in which she named over 60 companies, including major US technology firms like Google, Amazon and Microsoft, which she said were involved in "the transformation of Israel's economy of occupation to an economy of genocide".
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Wednesday evening that "Albanese's campaign of political and economic warfare against the United States and Israel will no longer be tolerated."
The sanctions will freeze any assets Albanese, an Italian citizen, has in the US and would likely restrict her ability to travel to the US.
US sanctions UN rapporteur Francesca Albanese following 'economy of genocide' report Read More »
On Thursday, UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk urged the "prompt reversal" of the sanctions on Albanese. He said that "attacks and threats against Special Procedures mandate holders, as well as key institutions like the International Criminal Court, must stop".
The ICC is increasingly beleaguered and many experts believe the court itself could soon be targeted by US sanctions if the arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant are not dropped.
Khan, its British chief prosecutor, is currently on leave after attempts failed to suspend him, and pending a United Nations investigation into sexual assault allegations against him, which he denies.
He went on leave in May as he was reportedly preparing new arrest warrants for far-right Israeli ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich over their promotion of illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.
The warrants are now in the hands of two deputy prosecutors, and the court recently ordered that any further warrants cannot be publicised.
'Warning shot over the bows'
A prominent ICC defence counsel, Nicholas Kaufman, told Israel's Kan public radio in a podcast on 8 June that recent US sanctions on four ICC judges were 'meant to be designed to encourage the dropping of the arrest warrants for Prime Minister Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Gallant'.
Kaufman added: 'Accordingly, most commentators believe that [the imposition of sanctions] is a further warning shot over the bows, if I can put it that way, before the sanctioning of the deputy prosecutors who've now taken over from Karim Khan, who has gone out on self-imposed leave because of the allegations of sexual misconduct.'
MEE revealed on 16 June that the British government was lobbying the US against sanctioning the court itself.
Diplomatic sources said the US informed its allies that to avoid facing further sanctions, the court has to permanently close all actions against the US and Israel.
The US also said the ICC must commit to not targeting US nationals and US allies who have not consented to the court's jurisdiction.
If the US sanctions the court as an institution, this would prevent banks and software companies from dealing with it, which could prove an existential threat to the ICC, as it could destroy its ability to function.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
20 minutes ago
- Gulf Today
Trump wants to deport migrants to South Sudan
When I saw the news a few weeks ago that President Donald Trump's administration was trying to deport eight men to South Sudan, I was shocked. I had worked and lived in South Sudan as a diplomat and know the country well. It is on the brink of yet another civil war, and its government has a horrific human rights record. America's own travel warning for the country, updated most recently this March, is Level 4: Do Not Travel. The United States evacuated its nonemergency staff from the embassy earlier this year due to ongoing armed conflict and high levels of violent crime. It advised any Americans who choose to travel there anyway to draft a will, establish a proof of life protocol with loved ones in case they're taken hostage and prepare their family to manage their affairs in the case of their death. These are not warnings the US government issues lightly. Of nearly 200 countries on earth, why choose this as a deportation destination? Only one of the men deported there is from the country. The others have no ties to South Sudan whatsoever — rather, they come from Myanmar, Laos, Vietnam, Cuba and Mexico. None of those are even on the African continent. This puts most of the men on a far, difficult and expensive journey away from anywhere they know. The only purpose would be to punish these individuals and to instill fear in any others considering migrating to the United States. The Statue of Liberty's promise has been turned on its head. South Sudan is one of several countries where this administration seeks to deport migrants, regardless of country of origin. This includes El Salvador, where hundreds have been detained in a notorious prison, but the Trump administration is also considering war-torn Libya, corrupt Equatorial Guinea and authoritarian Rwanda, to name a few. As someone who has worked in South Sudan, I can speak to what migrants could face there specifically, and it isn't pretty. I wrote our annual human rights report on the country and was responsible for assisting American citizens there in need. This means I have documented the detention and prison conditions, the government-perpetrated violence and the futility of its justice system. It also means I worked to help US citizens caught up in it — often detained unlawfully and stuck for weeks or longer in prisons with horrific conditions, usually sick, and with no recourse until they typically bribed their way out. For a place with few comforts to offer, conflict and corruption have also made South Sudan incredibly expensive. Someone without a network for support or any knowledge of the country will only be that much worse off. Neither the US nor the South Sudanese government has indicated what fate awaits these men in the capital city, Juba: Will they be detained or released and what then? Will they have any help securing onward travel? Will they have contact with their families? Will they be able to work to earn enough to support themselves or to earn a ticket out? What conditions — if any — did the US government negotiate for their presence? South Sudan's government is violent, unaccountable and corrupt, so I wouldn't put much faith in its commitments anyway. It also needs money, and I expect that's what it got in return. In April, the US government revoked all South Sudanese visas as punishment for the country after its government refused to accept a deportee who was in fact from the Democratic Republic of Congo. Cooperating probably has more appeal now. Unlike most migrants detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement this year, these eight men are indeed convicted criminals, though many had either finished or were soon to finish serving their sentences. Being sent to an unfamiliar war zone far from their countries of origin, families or communities must feel like another criminal sentence. How and why did this happen? The due process rights of all people — not just citizens — in the United States have been well established by now. The Supreme Court ruled as recently as this May that deportees must be given a proper chance to raise legal objections to their removal to a third country. But, in the case at hand, weeks of legal battles over that right ended in July with the Supreme Court ruling that these deportations could go ahead anyway. Their case has been met with curiosity but little outrage. Perhaps it's because only a few people were affected. Or the criminal convictions make it easier to dismiss inhumane treatment. Or maybe the American public is just growing accustomed to our government treating migrants in this way.
Gulf Today
20 minutes ago
- Gulf Today
Trump's foreign relief cuts are affecting many lives
The White House has hailed H.R. 1, aka the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, as a 'once-in-a-generation piece of legislation' that puts 'America First.' Most of the public debate focused on its extension of lower taxes for the rich, the ballooning federal debt, and massive cuts in Medicaid spending. Yet equally important is what the act will do to America's standing abroad as a champion of the world's neediest people, and the 'soft power' influence that effort provides. The budget act was hardly President Donald Trump's first assault on America's humanitarian leadership. On his inauguration day, he issued two executive orders concerning US refugee programs. One, titled 'Reevaluating and Realigning United States Foreign Aid,' states that the America's 'foreign aid industry and bureaucracy' was not aligned with American interests, and acted in ways antithetical to the country's values. It called for a 90-day pause in development assistance and review of related programs to ensure their 'efficiency and consistency' with US foreign policy. The other, 'Realigning the United States Refugee Admissions Program,' states that the US could not absorb refugees without endangering Americans or compromising their access to taxpayer-funded resources. The Trump administration has indefinitely suspended the US Refugee Admissions Program, which helps resettle refugees in conjunction with private sponsor groups; it is one of the most successful humanitarian programs and public-private partnerships in US history. The administration has also excluded more than 22,000 people already approved for admission, including Afghans who had worked with the US during the war in their homeland. By late March, the White House had helter-skelter canceled 5,341, or about 86%, of US foreign assistance programmes — even though Congress, which has the power of the purse in the federal government, had authorised their funding. Scholars at the Boston University School of Public Health estimate the loss of US aid led to 176,000 deaths during this period, and may exceed 320,000 by year's end. Yet the savings from gutting refugee assistance programs is vanishingly small, a small percentage of the roughly 1% of US spending devoted to international affairs. The Lancet, a British medical journal, reported last month that budget cuts and the shuttering of the US. Agency for International Development — whose programs saved an estimated 91 million lives over the last two decades — could cause 14 million deaths in low- and middle-income countries by 2030. The impact of the US cuts will be felt for generations, undermining the possibility of a constructive immigration policy at home and diminishing US power and standing abroad. Meanwhile, China has exploited the situation by funding aid and humanitarian programmes of its own, particularly in the strategically vital Indo-Pacific, as well as in Africa and South America. I work with the Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS)/USA, a branch of a 45-year-old nongovernmental organisation that has aided refugees from 57 nations. It serves some of the world's neediest people, including unaccompanied children, the severely handicapped and the chronically and terminally ill. Its work, and that of similar NGOs, has promoted a secure and productive world that values human life and dignity. Feed the Future worked in 20 countries to lift 23.4 million people out of poverty, relieve 5.2 million households from hunger, and remove 3.4 million children from the threat of stunted growth caused by malnutrition. In the 2024-2025 school year, JRS Chad served 32,975 Sudanese children in 21 refugee camps, offering them educational support and, by extension, child protection. The US President's Malaria Initiative, launched under the George W. Bush, has helped save 11.7 million lives and has prevented 2.1 billion cases of malaria since 2000, primarily among children under the age of 5 in African countries.
Middle East Eye
35 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Palestinian killed in Israeli drone strike on Khan Younis
A Palestinian has been killed and several others wounded after an Israeli drone strike targeted a tent housing displaced people west of Khan Younis, according to medical officials. The Nasser Medical Complex confirmed the casualties and said the tent was located in the southern Gaza Strip. The area, crowded with families forced to flee earlier offensives, has seen repeated attacks in recent days.
