Savers urged to make their money go further by doing one simple thing
We are living in a time of extreme uncertainty and the anxiety that comes along with it. Against the backdrop of recent high inflation and market turmoil we have wars, AI technology disruption, the cost of living crisis, and economic hardship. It's natural to wonder what effect these world events will have on our long-term investment performance.
While these challenges certainly warrant our attention and deep concern, they don't have to be a reason to panic about markets when you're focused on long-term investing. Imagine it's 25 years ago and the year is 2000.
Devolution – The Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly had recently been established (in 1999), marking a significant shift in UK constitutional politics.
The Millennium Dome – Opened on 1 January 2000 in Greenwich to celebrate the turn of the new millennium.
The US stock market – The Dow Jones Industrial Average had already passed 11,000 in 1999, but in 2000, the tech-heavy NASDAQ peaked above 5,000 before correcting over the next two years.
Tony Blair – Was serving as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, having first taken office in 1997. The internet is in its infancy, Y2K looms, and everyone is worried about the Russian financial crisis.
A stranger offers to tell you what's going to happen over the course of the next 25 years. Here's the big question: Would you invest in the stock market knowing the following events were going to happen? And could you stay invested?
Asian contagion
Russian default
Tech collapse
9/11
7/7
Stocks' 'lost decade'
Great Recession
Global pandemic
Second Russian default
Ukraine invasion
Israeli invasion of Gaza
With everything I just mentioned, what would you have done? Gotten into the market? Gotten out? Increased your equity holdings? Decreased them?
Well, let's look at what happened. From 2000 to now, the world stock market has returned, on average, over 7 per cent a year. A pound invested at the beginning of the period would be worth over £6 now.
These returns are very much in line with what returns have been over the history of the stock market. How can that be? The market is doing its job. It's science.
Investing in markets is uncertain. The role of markets is to price in that uncertainty. There were a lot of negative surprises over the past 25 years, but there were a lot of positive ones as well. The net result was a stock market return that seems very reasonable, even generous. It's a tribute to human ingenuity that when negative forces pop up, people and companies respond and mobilise to get things back on track.
Human ingenuity created incredible innovations over the past 25 years. Plenty of things went wrong, but plenty of things went right. There's always opportunity out there.
Think about how different life is from the way it was in 2000: the way we work, the way we communicate, the way we live. For example, the gross domestic product of the US in 1999 was $10.25 trillion and is projected to grow to over $30.51 trillion in 2025.
I am an eternal optimist, because I believe in people. I have an unshakable faith in human beings' ability to deal with tough times. In 2000, few would have forecast a 7% average return for the stock market. But that remarkable return was available to anyone who could open an investment account, buy a broad-market portfolio, and let the market do its job.
Investing in the stock market is always uncertain. Uncertainty never goes away. If it did, there wouldn't be a stock market. It's because of uncertainty that we have a positive premium when investing in stocks vs. relatively riskless assets. In my opinion, reaping the benefits of the stock market requires being a long-term investor.
By investing in a market portfolio, you're not trying to figure out which stocks are going to thrive, and which aren't going to be able to recover. You're betting on human ingenuity to solve problems.
The pandemic was a big blow to the economy. But people, companies and markets adapt. That's my worldview. Whatever the next blow we face, I have faith that we will meet the challenge in ways we can't forecast.
I would never try to predict what might happen in the next 25 years. But I do believe the best investment strategy going forward is to keep in mind the lesson learned from that stranger back in 2000: Don't panic. Invest for the long term.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
12 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Economy expected to approach stall speed as tariffs hurt consumers
In the spring, Trump announced a 90-day pause on high double-digit reciprocal tariffs for China and many other countries, easing recession fears and reversing a stock market sell-off. This week, White House officials extended the reprieve to August 1 to provide more time for negotiations. But in recent days, Trump again has ratcheted up his trade threats, unveiling plans for a 50% tariff on imported copper, 50% on all shipments from Brazil and high fees for 14 countries that don't reach a deal with the U.S. by August 1. Already in effect: a 50% levy on metals, 25% on cars and 30% on China, in addition to the blanket 10% charge that appears poised to rise sharply. The Dow Jones Industrial Average tumbled nearly 280 points July 11 on Trump's latest tariff threats. "Risks are intensifying that we may see much higher tariff rates, with consequent effects on inflation and growth," said Jonathan Millar, senior U.S. economist at Barclays. Just 42% of CEOs of small and midsize companies plan to add to their staffs in the next year, lowest on record dating to 2003, according to a June survey by Vistage, a CEO networking group. How close is the US to a recession? Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY-Parthenon, has lowered his odds of a recession this year to 35% from 50% but said the chances of a downturn would climb above 50% if Trump reverts to the tariffs he rolled out in early April. Even without the harsher import fees Trump recently announced, economists have been predicting a notable slowdown in growth the rest the year. "We're carrying much less economic momentum, with a softening labor market trend, inflation about to reaccelerate and income (growth) more subdued," Daco said. Will tariffs lead to inflation? Forecasters have been surprised that tariffs haven't yet had a significant effect on inflation. Daco said that's partly because manufacturers and retailers stocked up on foreign goods in February and March, before the fees took effect. Also, he said, companies have been routing products through bonded warehouses that delay tariff payments. U.S. businesses and foreign exporters have absorbed much of the costs. And higher prices from tariffs don't immediately show up in inflation reports, such as the consumer price index. But all those tactics can delay the inevitable only so long, Daco said. "As inventory buffers thin, bonded warehouse timelines expire and cost absorption runs its course, price pressures will start surfacing more clearly into the second half of 2025," he wrote in a note to clients. Before Trump escalated the trade conflicts, many economists said the levies have pushed the average U.S. tariff rate from about 3% to 15%, a rise that would drive the Federal Reserve's preferred annual inflation measure from 2.7% to about 3.3% by the end of the year. How does immigration affect the economy? Meanwhile, an immigration surge that has bolstered the U.S. labor supply and job growth the past few years "is about to go into reverse," JPMorgan Chase said in a research note last week. The Trump administration is ending provisions that temporarily protected immigrants who lack permanent legal status from deportations for humanitarian reasons. That will likely cause 1.8 million migrants, including about 1.1 million workers, to lose their legal status in the second half of the year, JPMorgan Chase said. Especially affected are industries such as agriculture, construction and hospitality. Already, annual net immigration to the U.S. has slowed from about 3 million the past few years to an annual rate that's set to reach 500,000 by year's end, according to the Congressional Budget Office and economists. That compares to a rate of 900,000 a year before the pandemic. While the slowdown is projected to reduce job growth, forecasters reckoned that would take some time because many immigrants who arrived in recent waves are still settling into jobs. But the spike in deportations could quickly slow America's job engine within months, JPMorgan Chase said. How is the economy doing right now? The economy shrank at an annual rate of 0.5% in the first quarter but forecasters said that was mostly because the flood of imports from companies stocking up had to be subtracted from output (since they're made in foreign countries). Private domestic demand, a more telling measure of the economy's underlying health, increased a solid 1.9%. And economists estimate the government later this month will report 2% growth in the second quarter, according to those surveyed by Wolters Kluwer Blue Economic Indicators. But those forecasters expect quarterly growth to average just 0.7% the second half of the year, in line with Millar's estimate. and above the 0.5% gain Daco projects. That's close to stall speed. From the fourth quarter of 2024 to the fourth quarter of 2025, Millar estimates the economy will grow a meager 0.5%, compared to 2.5% the prior year. Here's a breakdown: Consumer spending Resilient households have propped up the economy the past few years but the threat of higher prices from tariffs has led Americans to rein in their spending, Daco and Millar said. Now, the actual pass-through of the fees into prices will likely have a more tangible impact on consumption, Daco said. Consumers especially have been cutting back on discretionary purchases, such as recreational services, travel and dining out. Income also has moderated, with average annual wage growth falling from about 6% in early 2022 to 3.7% in June. After adjusting for inflation, consumer spending fell 0.3% in May and is expected to rise just 0.7% the second half of the year, according to the Wolters Kluwer survey. Consumption makes up 70% of economic activity. The job market Average monthly job growth has slowed to 130,000 so far this year from 168,000 in 2024. Companies have sharply cut back hiring amid tariff-related uncertainty but remain hesitant to lay off workers following severe pandemic-related labor shortages, Millar said. But Daco said more companies are shedding workers through attrition and retirement, as well as targeted layoffs. Tracy Marlowe, CEO of Creative Noggin, a marketing company based in San Antonio, Texas, said sales were flat last year amid election-related uncertainty. After the election, clients began making requests for new campaigns but pulled back again in early 2025 amid Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs. Marlowe had been planning to add a full-time employee to her staff of 20 later this year but has decided to hold off. Clients "are just trying to figure out how to stay alive," she said. "I'll hire once I need somebody." Coping with the Great Recession and the COVID-19 downturn was easier, Marlowe said, because she knew the roadmap for recovery. By contrast, the trade war "has been a constantly changing roller coaster... It makes it very difficult to predict what's next." The immigration crackdown is set to slow job growth further, Daco said. Business investment Business capital spending surged in the first quarter as firms stocked up ahead of tariffs. But the economists surveyed by Wolters Kluwer expect outlays to fall in the second, third and fourth quarters. Companies already leery about ramping up spending amid the uncertainty are likely to hunker down further as the import costs they absorb squeeze profits, Daco said. Housing Housing starts fell 9.8% in May and single-family starts are down 16% since February, according to Oxford Economics. "Elevated interest rates and higher building material costs due to tariffs will make construction less profitable," Oxford said in a research note.
Daily Mirror
12 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Savers urged to make their money go further by doing one simple thing
Multi award-winning Chartered Financial Planner, Certified Coach, author of The Money Plan, and Sunday Mirror columnist We are living in a time of extreme uncertainty and the anxiety that comes along with it. Against the backdrop of recent high inflation and market turmoil we have wars, AI technology disruption, the cost of living crisis, and economic hardship. It's natural to wonder what effect these world events will have on our long-term investment performance. While these challenges certainly warrant our attention and deep concern, they don't have to be a reason to panic about markets when you're focused on long-term investing. Imagine it's 25 years ago and the year is 2000. Devolution – The Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly had recently been established (in 1999), marking a significant shift in UK constitutional politics. The Millennium Dome – Opened on 1 January 2000 in Greenwich to celebrate the turn of the new millennium. The US stock market – The Dow Jones Industrial Average had already passed 11,000 in 1999, but in 2000, the tech-heavy NASDAQ peaked above 5,000 before correcting over the next two years. Tony Blair – Was serving as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, having first taken office in 1997. The internet is in its infancy, Y2K looms, and everyone is worried about the Russian financial crisis. A stranger offers to tell you what's going to happen over the course of the next 25 years. Here's the big question: Would you invest in the stock market knowing the following events were going to happen? And could you stay invested? Asian contagion Russian default Tech collapse 9/11 7/7 Stocks' 'lost decade' Great Recession Global pandemic Second Russian default Ukraine invasion Israeli invasion of Gaza With everything I just mentioned, what would you have done? Gotten into the market? Gotten out? Increased your equity holdings? Decreased them? Well, let's look at what happened. From 2000 to now, the world stock market has returned, on average, over 7 per cent a year. A pound invested at the beginning of the period would be worth over £6 now. These returns are very much in line with what returns have been over the history of the stock market. How can that be? The market is doing its job. It's science. Investing in markets is uncertain. The role of markets is to price in that uncertainty. There were a lot of negative surprises over the past 25 years, but there were a lot of positive ones as well. The net result was a stock market return that seems very reasonable, even generous. It's a tribute to human ingenuity that when negative forces pop up, people and companies respond and mobilise to get things back on track. Human ingenuity created incredible innovations over the past 25 years. Plenty of things went wrong, but plenty of things went right. There's always opportunity out there. Think about how different life is from the way it was in 2000: the way we work, the way we communicate, the way we live. For example, the gross domestic product of the US in 1999 was $10.25 trillion and is projected to grow to over $30.51 trillion in 2025. I am an eternal optimist, because I believe in people. I have an unshakable faith in human beings' ability to deal with tough times. In 2000, few would have forecast a 7% average return for the stock market. But that remarkable return was available to anyone who could open an investment account, buy a broad-market portfolio, and let the market do its job. Investing in the stock market is always uncertain. Uncertainty never goes away. If it did, there wouldn't be a stock market. It's because of uncertainty that we have a positive premium when investing in stocks vs. relatively riskless assets. In my opinion, reaping the benefits of the stock market requires being a long-term investor. By investing in a market portfolio, you're not trying to figure out which stocks are going to thrive, and which aren't going to be able to recover. You're betting on human ingenuity to solve problems. The pandemic was a big blow to the economy. But people, companies and markets adapt. That's my worldview. Whatever the next blow we face, I have faith that we will meet the challenge in ways we can't forecast. I would never try to predict what might happen in the next 25 years. But I do believe the best investment strategy going forward is to keep in mind the lesson learned from that stranger back in 2000: Don't panic. Invest for the long term.
Daily Mail
20 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE The ultimate Blair Rich Project: Former PM and his wife install £500,000 James Bond-style 'vanishing' pool at their £4million Grade I-listed country mansion
It's an extravagance found in the homes of the world's supremely rich and famous jetsetters – a James Bond-style 'vanishing' swimming pool. Now Sir Tony Blair is about to join that elite by putting his own £500,000 disappearing pool in his Grade I-listed country mansion. The former Prime Minister, who declared himself a socialist during his political career, is splashing out on a floor that drops and rises at the touch of a button to reveal, or conceal, a swimming pool. Both Sir Tony, 72, and wife Cherie, 70, are said to be keen swimmers and had a £30,000 exercise pool created in the rear garden at their sprawling home at Wotton House, near Aylesbury, in Buckinghamshire, in 2008. Now sources have revealed to The Mail on Sunday that the Blairs have asked specialists Twinscape to install the high-tech bespoke movable floor to create a disappearing swimming pool. It is thought to be costing some £500,000 – small change perhaps for a globe-trotting statesman said to be worth up to £60 million. The Blairs have amassed a huge property portfolio since Sir Tony left office in 2007, including around 40 homes and flats worth about £35 million. Sir Tony spent several years working as a Middle East envoy after leaving Downing Street, but quit in 2015. He set up the Tony Blair Institute For Global Change, which advises international clients on strategy, policy and delivery, and he is thought to make up to £200,000 a time as a keynote speaker. But Sir Tony's wealth is dwarfed by that of his businessman eldest son Euan, 41, said to be worth £350 million in The Sunday Times Rich List and who owns a £22 million, five-storey townhouse in West London, which also has a pool. Twinscape, based in Ipswich, describes itself as 'the industry-leading pioneer behind Hydrofloors', in which a pool floor rises or falls at the touch of a button. It says by using a control panel or touchscreen, the owner can command the floor to sink, transforming a walking area into a swimming pool within minutes. Buckinghamshire Council, when asked whether planning permission had been sought or was required for the pool, said it could not comment on individual cases. The most recent planning application there was 'to install or keep installed an electric line above ground' in the pool house, and was approved this month, according to the council website. Features offered by Twinscape include submersible spa floors, sliding pool floors and flower beds, and disappearing fences. The company is coy about its well-heeled customers, referring only to the exotic locations where it has created its pools, including Kiawah island in South Carolina and Portofino in Italy. Twinscape has also installed its Hydrofloor products in private properties in London and Suffolk. Wotton House was built in the early 1700s but wrecked in a fire a century later. Architect Sir John Soane undertook the rebuild. The seven-bedroom former coach house once belonged to historian Sir Arthur Bryant and later to actor Sir John Gielgud until his death, aged 96, in 2000. Now known as the South Pavilion, it was bought by the Blairs in 2008 for about £4million. They were accused of 'blighting' the estate after moving in by extending the mansion and adding a glass sports pavilion and tennis court. In 2023, they won a two-year planning row with conservation charity The Gardens Trust over plans to extend a guesthouse. The Blairs' current pool is believed to be a 20ft Riptide Trident PRO. It was fitted with powerful jets so users could swim against the current – while staying in the same place. A spokesman for Sir Tony said: 'They are modifying the indoor pool, which does not require planning permission, and changing from a manual to automatic cover.'
