Kerala couple held for blackmailing IT honcho gets bail (Lead)
The bail has been given based on the Supreme Court guidelines, and strict conditions have also been imposed.
The couple has been asked to cooperate with the police investigation team, and since they have been doing that, the court granted them bail.
Speaking to IANS, a police official attached to the Central Police said that the arrest has been recorded and the case is now under investigation, and all details will be looked into.
Incidentally, the duo, identified as Krishna Raj and his wife Shweta Babu, trapped the IT honcho by blackmailing him and got a sum of Rs 50,000 transferred into their bank account.
They even got him to sign two cheques of Rs 10 crore each in their name.
Shweta was working in the firm belonging to the IT honcho, and she had resigned recently. It was after her resignation that the couple decided to create a false case and started threatening the businessman that if he did not pay Rs 30 crore to Shweta, she would accuse him of being in an extramarital relationship with her and would also accuse him of sexual assault.
Centring around this theme, the couple asked him and two other employees of the firm to meet them.
At the meeting that took place last week, the couple threatened that if the businessman did not pay them Rs 30 crore, things would get out of hand and he would land in jail on charges of sexual assault.
He was asked to transfer Rs 10 crore to them immediately and give two cheques of Rs 10 crore each.
The hapless businessman transferred Rs 50,000 into their account and then prepared two cheques of Rs 10 crore each.
However, later the businessman got in touch with the police and after a tactful operation by them, the couple was trapped and taken into custody.
A search was conducted, and two cheques of Rs 10 crore each signed by the IT firm owner were found in their possession.
Following this, the police got into motion and arrested the two. During the preliminary investigation, the couple confessed to the crime.
Meanwhile, police are continuing the investigation to find out if more people are involved in the case.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Colombian ex-President Alvaro Uribe sentenced to 12 years house arrest for bribery
Alvaro Uribe, the former President of Colombia, received a 12-year house arrest sentence. The conviction relates to witness tampering and bribery charges. The court also imposed a fine and a ban from holding public office. Uribe plans to appeal the decision. The case has sparked varied reactions in Colombia. Some people support Uribe, while others celebrate the sentence. Opponents of former President Alvaro Uribe gather outside the court on the day he was sentenced to 12 years under house arrest for witness tampering and bribery in Bogota, Colombia, Friday, Aug. 1, 2025. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe was sentenced Friday to 12 years of house arrest for witness tampering and bribery in a historic case that gripped the South American nation and tarnished the conservative strongman's sentence, which Uribe said will be appealed, followed a nearly six-month trial in which prosecutors presented evidence that he attempted to influence witnesses who accused the law-and-order leader of having links to a paramilitary group in the 1990s."Politics prevailed over the law in sentencing," Uribe said after Friday's 73, has denied any wrongdoing. He faced up to 12 years in prison after being convicted attorney had asked the court to allow Uribe to remain free while he appeals the verdict. Judge Sandra Heredia on Friday said she did not grant the defense's request because it would be "easy" for the former president to leave the country to "evade the imposed sanction."Heredia also banned Uribe from holding public office for eight years and fined him about $776, of Friday's sentencing, Uribe posted on X that he was preparing arguments to support his appeal. He added that one must "think much more about the solution than the problem" during personal appeals court will have until early October to issue a ruling, which either party could then challenge before Colombia's Supreme former president governed from 2002 to 2010 with strong support from the United States. He is a polarizing figure in Colombia, where many credit him for saving the country from becoming a failed state, while others associate him with human rights violations and the rise of paramilitary groups in the on Monday said she had seen enough evidence to determine that Uribe conspired with a lawyer to coax three former paramilitary group members, who were in prison, into changing testimony they had provided to Ivan Cepeda, a leftist senator who had launched an investigation into Uribe's alleged ties to a paramilitary in 2012 filed a libel suit against Cepeda in the Supreme Court. But in a twist, the high court in 2018 dismissed the accusations against Cepeda and began investigating Penuela Rosales, a supporter of Uribe's party in the capital, Bogota, said she wept and prayed after hearing of the sentence. "It's an unjust sentence. He deserves to be free," she Sergio Andres Parra, who protested against Uribe outside the courthouse, said the 12-year sentence "is enough" and, even if the former president appeals, "history has already condemned him."During Uribe's presidency, Colombia's military attained some of its biggest battlefield victories against Latin America's oldest leftist insurgency, pushing the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia into remote pockets and forcing the group's leadership into peace talks that led to the disarmament of more than 13,000 fighters in 2016.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘Can raze illegal parts, won't leave': Residents stay put in homes declared ‘dangerous' by MCD
As of July 14, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), as part of its annual survey across its 12 zones in the Capital, has declared 22 houses as 'dangerous' and 320 'in need of repair'. However, despite being issued evacuation notices, residents of several such 'dangerous' houses continue to stay on, refusing to vacate the premises. These 'dangerous' structures are located in areas like Kotla Mubarakpur, Okhla village, Sahyog Vihar, Seelampur, Dariba Kalan, Rohini, Burari, and Jahangirpuri, among others. The Indian Express visited a few such houses, where many residents have refused to leave. At Keshavpuram Zone in Shalimar Bagh in Northwest Delhi, four lower-income group flats in a building constructed by the Delhi Development Authority in BB Block have been declared dangerous by the MCD. All four flats are occupied, with one resident claiming he has a 'stability certificate' issued by a 'structural engineer'. Visible cracks run along the pillars of the building — which has 18 flats — while swollen walls do not allow any door to be shut. A resident of one of the four flats said that several parts of the building have been constructed illegally. 'Two years ago, I had written to various authorities stating that the house has developed cracks… the ceiling of rooms and washrooms has fallen multiple times. They conducted a survey and said either to vacate the house or demolish the illegal parts.' The last evacuation notice was received by the resident on May 22, asking him to vacate the premises within 24 hours. 'But since then, no one has come here to check… We are ready to demolish unauthorised constructions but not vacate the flat,' he added. A resident who stays in a flat on the first floor — also in the list of four dangerous houses — said he had taken the flat on rent in 2009. 'After the building was declared dangerous, we got a survey done by structural engineers, who said the building is safe. Now, we will go and meet the authorities.' Over 17 km away, a narrow road covered with silt and flooded with rainwater leads to an old red-coloured building with visible cracks in the plaster. Located near Piayaao Chowk in Garhi village in East of Kailash, houses, along with shops in the building, have been declared dangerous. The ground floor houses three shops – a pharmacy, a mobile store, and a shop selling bags. Residents live on the above three floors. The pharmacy owner said he did not know that the building had been categorised as dangerous. However, tenants, who have been staying on the second floor for over a year and paying a rent of Rs 10,000, said the notice came two to three months ago. Following this, they were told by the owner that the building had been repaired, they claimed. The owner of the building could not be contacted for a comment. At 766, Chabi Ganj in Kashmere Gate, a two-storey building — housing six-seven flats — stands with half-demolished walls, mattresses and toilet seats buried under the debris. According to the residents, they were issued a notice of evacuation on June 2. Two weeks later, the houses were demolished. Local residents claimed most of the occupants were either given money or land by the builder to vacate the premises. One of the residents, Bharat Kumar, claimed that the building had not been surveyed by the civic authorities. The MCD study, being conducted for over five months now, has surveyed 98.35% or 30,93,678 houses that fall under the civic body's limits. While nine zones have been examined, surveys at Shahdara (North), City-SP, and Karol zones are yet to be completed, said officials. An official from MCD said that once a house is declared dangerous after a survey conducted by a local junior engineer (JE), a 'vacation notice' is served to the occupants as well as the local police. 'The police have to ensure that the building is vacated,' the official said, adding that this should usually happen within a day or sometimes within a week. The official further said that if residents of a 'dangerous' building ask for time to get the premises repaired, the JE has to take a call on this. 'If permission is granted, repair work has to start within a few hours… following which a structure engineer will survey the work and submit a report to the MCD for approval.'
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Forced to name Yogi Adityanath, RSS leaders: Malegaon case witness turns hostile
One of the 39 witnesses who turned hostile in the Malegaon 2008 blast case was Milind Joshirao, Trustee of the Abhinav Bharat Trust, who also ran a lift business. Joshirao told the court that ATS officers Shrirao and Param Bir Singh threatened to torture him and coerced him to name Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and other RSS was picked up by the ATS on October 28, 2008, nearly a month after the blast, and remained in custody until November 7, 2008. He was kept at the ATS office for more than seven days. Despite being a prosecution witness, Joshirao did not support the claims for which he was brought to court, namely, to establish the motive behind the formation of the Abhinav Bharat organisation, allegedly set up by serving army officer Lt. Col. Prasad to the prosecution, a meeting was held in June 2006 at Raigad Fort, attended by Purohit, businessman Ajay Rahirkar, Rakesh Dhawade, and several witnesses, including Milind Joshirao. Dhawade had been discharged by the special court before the trial prosecution claimed that the idea of forming Abhinav Bharat originated with Purohit and was discussed during the Raigad Fort meeting. All attendees reportedly agreed to the proposal and took an oath at the fort to establish Abhinav Bharat and work towards its objectives. The Abhinav Bharat Trust was formed in 2007, according to the was further alleged that the accused aimed to transform India into a 'Hindu Rashtra' called 'Aryavart.' Dissatisfied with the Indian Constitution, they allegedly planned to create their own, form a government in exile and train individuals in guerrilla warfare. The group allegedly intended to eliminate those opposing the formation of a 'Hindu Rashtra'. Purohit was accused of collecting Rs 21 lakh to fund these Public Prosecutor Avinash Rasal cross-examined Joshirao after he was declared hostile by the court. However, even during cross-examination, Joshirao did not make any statements that supported the prosecution's case. He specifically denied attending the Raigad Fort meeting or that any oath was taken to create a separate 'Hindutva Vadi Rashtra'.Instead, he stated, "ATS treated me like an accused and kept me for seven days at their office. The officers pressured me to name five RSS individuals, including Yogi Adityanath, Asimanand, Indresh Kumar, Professor Devdhar, Sadhvi, and Kakaji, in my statement. They assured me I would be released if I did so. When I refused, DCP Shrirao and Additional Commissioner of Police Param Bir Singh threatened me with torture,' as noted by Judge judge further observed that Joshirao's statement 'was written down/recorded solely by an ATS officer.'Considering his testimony in court, the judge stated, 'It clearly indicates that the statement was involuntary. Even if the contents of such a statement are proven by the investigating officer, it may still be insufficient, as it raises doubts regarding its admissibility and the authenticity of such an involuntary statement.'- Ends
