"Reserve Right To Pre-Emptive Strike": Rajnath Singh Briefs US On Op Sindoor
India 'reserves the right to a pre-emptive strike' to defend itself against cross-border terror attacks launched from Pakistan, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh told his United States counterpart, Pete Hegseth, during their 20-minute phone call this week, sources said Wednesday morning.
The remarks - he also underlined Pak's record as a 'safe haven for terrorists' - have been seen as a strong message after President Donald Trump invited Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir to the White House for lunch, and a top American general called for more engagement with Islamabad.
Mr Singh also said India's actions during the 100-hour armed conflict with Pakistan in May - i.e., Operation Sindoor, the military response to the Pahalgam terror attack - were 'measured, non-escalatory, proportionate, and focused', while Pak's response included targeting civilian centres.
"Pak's track record of cross-border terrorism is well known globally... it has become a safe haven for internationally-banned terrorists (and) India's actions during Op Sindoor were non-escalatory, proportionate, and focused on disabling terrorist infrastructure," Mr Singh said.
Glad to speak with the US @SecDef Mr. @PeteHegseth today. Excellent discussion to review the ongoing and new initiatives to further deepen India-US defence partnership and strengthen cooperation in capacity building.
Conveyed my deep appreciation for the unwavering support…
— Rajnath Singh (@rajnathsingh) July 1, 2025
India said Rajnath Singh also 'appreciated the unwavering support extended by the US to India for its fight against terrorism' and discussed 'long-term cooperation in the defence sector'.
The two governments also agreed to build on a 'critical and mutually beneficial partnership'.
This was the third telephonic conversation since January, when Mr Hegseth was appointed.
'India Has Right To...': What Jaishankar Said
Mr Singh's 'India has the right...' message to Mr Hegseth echoes what External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said this week while meeting counterparts from the US, Japan, and Australia.
"The world must display zero tolerance. Victims and perpetrators must never be equated. India has every right to defend its people against terrorism, and we will exercise that right," he said.
READ | "When Terrorism Is Supported By State Against...": Jaishankar At UN
Mr Singh's and Mr Jaishankar's comments, in turn, echo forceful comments by Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Mr Trump in their phone call last month.
The unequivocal messaging has been seen as part of efforts to make it clear to the world that India will no longer respond to terrorist attacks but instead will take a proactive role in protecting itself.
'Terror Dossier' On Pak's Cross-Border Role
India has frequently accused Pakistan of sheltering, funding, and training terrorist groups launching attacks on its soil; after the Pahalgam attack sources told NDTV a dossier had been prepared to highlight intel about Islamabad's links to terror attacks in Russia, England, and other countries.
READ | Pak 'One Of World's Most Dangerous, Terror Trail In Moscow, London'
This was shared with diplomats from friendly and partner nations, and the government sent cross-party delegations to these countries after Op Sindoor, to highlight India's new 'doctrine on terrorism'.
The increasingly assertive anti-terrorism stance was highlighted again last week after India refused to sign a joint statement at a meetinf of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation chaired by China.
Sources said the statement skipped any mention of the Pahalgam terror attack but mentioned incidents in Pak's Balochistan province instead and tacitly blamed India for those incidents.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Brics 2025: 'We don't want an emperor,' says Brazil's Lula; slams Trump tariffs, hints at dollar alternative
AP photo Brazilian President Lula da Silva took a sharp dig at Donald Trump as the Brics summit wrapped up on Monday: "The world has changed. We don't want an emperor". His words came just hours after the US President took to his familiar playbook of tariff threats, warning the bloc of extra duties if they took what he branded as "anti-American" positions. The warning? A 10 per cent tariff against Brics nations -- unless, of course, they looked for their interest rather than American interest! In his trade salvo on Sunday night, Trump said that this administration was preparing to finalise dozens of bilateral deals before a self-imposed July 9 deadline. But the developing powers weren't biting. "This is a set of countries that wants to find another way of organising the world from the economic perspective," Lula said, according to news agency Reuters, adding, "I think that's why the Brics are making people uncomfortable." According to a source familiar with the matter, the White House isn't planning to slap that 10 per cent tariff immediately. But if the bloc's policies appear "anti-American," the trigger could be pulled. At the Rio summit's close, Lula doubled down on his call for a diversified global economy. He took aim at the dollar's dominance in international trade, saying: 'The world needs to find a way that our trade relations don't have to pass through the dollar.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo 'Obviously, we have to be responsible about doing that carefully. Our central banks have to discuss it with central banks from other countries,' he clarified. 'That's something that happens gradually until it's consolidated.' In February, Trump had already warned of '100 per cent tariffs' on the Brics nations if they dared undermine the dollar's role. That same threat seems to have cooled the bloc's ambitions for a common currency, an idea floated last year but quietly parked under Brazil's current presidency. Other Brics members offered a more diplomatic response to Trump's outburst. South African president Cyril Ramaphosa said the bloc 'does not seek to compete with any other power,' and voiced optimism about reaching a trade understanding with the US. Over in Beijing, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning was characteristically measured: 'Tariffs should not be used as a tool for coercion and pressuring,' she said, noting that the Brics favours 'win-win cooperation' and 'does not target any country.' The Kremlin, for its part, reminded reporters that its work within the Brics reflects a "common world view" that "will never be directed against third countries". Without naming the US, the Brics group in Rio, including India, raised "serious concerns" about the rise of tariffs which it said were 'inconsistent with WTO (World Trade Organisation) rules.' The restrictions 'threaten to reduce global trade, disrupt global supply chains, and introduce uncertainty," the group said in a statement even as there was confusion even in Washington about the efficacy of the Trump approach.
Mint
42 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Tariffs: India's pharma, auto, textile sector to be in focus; here's why
US President Donald Trump's tariffs are set to take effect on Friday, August 1. Therefore, the 90-day grace period for reciprocal tariffs that was initially scheduled to end this Wednesday, July 9, has been extended due to stalled negotiations. On Monday, July 7, US President Donald Trump disclosed letters his administration sent to different trading partners notifying them of the reciprocal tariff rates that will be in effect starting August 1, 2025. The first two letters shared by Trump on the social media platform Truth Social indicated that the US will apply a 25% tariff on Japan and South Korea. After a brief pause, the US President also released tariff letters for additional countries including Myanmar, Laos, Thailand, South Africa, Bangladesh, Kazakhstan, Indonesia, Tunisia, Malaysia, Serbia, Cambodia, and Bosnia & Herzegovina. On Monday, Trump announced proposals for a 40% tariff on products imported from Myanmar and Laos, a 36% tariff on goods from Thailand and Cambodia, a 35% tariff on items from Serbia and Bangladesh, a 32% tariff on imports from Indonesia, a 30% tariff on products from South Africa, and a 25% tariff on goods from Malaysia and Tunisia. On Sunday, July 6, Trump announced that he might send out as many as 15 initial letters, warning that US import taxes would return to the higher rates implemented in April if countries fail to reach agreements. On Monday, President Donald Trump announced that the United States is nearing a trade agreement with India. Amidst this backdrop, experts highlight the potential impact that different sectors may experience in India as a result tariffs. Mohit Gulati, the CIO and managing partner of ITI Growth Opportunities Fund, said that, in sectors where India enjoys a near-monopoly or dominant market share—such as certain generics in pharmaceuticals and specialized textiles—India will be in a strong position to dictate terms to US buyers, leveraging its indispensability and global supply chain strength. For these monopolistic exports, the US will have limited alternatives, giving Indian exporters greater pricing and negotiation power. Gulati highlighted that for the broader range of exports, however, the scenario is more nuanced. Key sectors like gems & jewellery, electronics, textiles, and auto components will face both opportunities and challenges as tariffs rise. While some Indian exporters may benefit from rivals like China and Vietnam being hit with even steeper duties, others could see margins squeezed and competitiveness tested. There will be pluses and minuses across the board, with the final impact depending on sectoral dynamics, government support, and the evolving terms of the India-US trade deal. "Ultimately, India's ability to capitalize on its strengths while navigating new tariff barriers will define its export trajectory in the post-tariff pause era,' said Mohit Gulati.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Business-like approach unlikely to succeed': India cautions UNGA over Afghanistan; abstains from voting
India's UN envoy P Harish (File Photo) India and 11 other nations on Monday abstained in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on a draft resolution on Afghanistan, with India's envoy to the UN noting that a 'business as usual' approach is unlikely to deliver outcomes which the global community envisions for the Afghan people. The UNGA adopted the Germany-introduced draft resolution on the situation in the Asian nation. It was passed with 116 votes in favour; two against and 12 abstentions. Explaining India's decision, the country's UN Permanent Representative P Harish said, "Any coherent policy to address a post-conflict situation must combine a mix of policy instruments – incentivising positive behaviour and disincentivising harmful actions. A 'business as usual' approach, without new and targeted initiatives, is unlikely to deliver the outcomes the international community envisions for the Afghan people. " The diplomat added that no new policy instruments have been introduced to address the worsening humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan since August 2021, when the Taliban again took over the reins in Kabul. 'An approach focused only on punitive measures, in our view, is unlikely to succeed. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Beyond Text Generation: An AI Tool That Helps You Write Better Grammarly Install Now Undo The United Nations and the broader international community have adopted more balanced and nuanced approaches in other post-conflict contexts,' Harish asserted. Further, he stressed that New Delhi is closely monitoring the security situation in Afghanistan, and underscored that the international community must direct its coordinated efforts towards ensuring that entities and individuals designated by the UN Security Council no longer exploit the Afghan territory for terrorist activities - a veiled reference to Pakistan. Harish also stressed that India is closely monitoring the security situation in Afghanistan and underscored that the international community must direct its coordinated efforts towards ensuring that entities and individuals designated by the UN Security Council, the Al Qaeda and their affiliates, ISIL and their affiliates, including Lashkar-e-Tayyiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, along with their regional sponsors who facilitate their operations, no longer exploit the Afghan territory for terrorist activities, a reference to Pakistan. Reiterating India's historic ties with the people of Afghanistan and its enduring commitment to meeting their humanitarian and developmental needs, Harish said that while New Delhi remains committed to continued engagement with all relevant stakeholders and broadly supports the international community's efforts towards a stable, peaceful and prosperous Afghanistan, 'India has decided to abstain on this resolution. '
