Muda offers presidency to Syed Saddiq after acquittal
KUALA LUMPUR: Muda's Central Executive Committee (CEC) has offered the party's presidency back to Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman following his acquittal of corruption charges.
The party's acting president, Amira Aisya Abd Aziz, said the CEC's decision was unanimous.
She said Syed Saddiq, the Muar Member of Parliament, had cleared his name in court.
"He has also consistently defended the dignity and good name of Muda throughout his tenure as an MP," she added.
Syed Saddiq, who is the Muda president, vacated his post during his corruption trial.
"The CEC believes that with Syed Saddiq's return to the party's leadership, he can strengthen Muda, especially in steering the party through the upcoming general election.
"At the same time, the CEC also respects Syed Saddiq's need to consider this offer and has agreed to give him ample space," she said.
Yesterday, Syed Saddiq was acquitted of four charges of abetting criminal breach of trust (CBT), misappropriation of party funds and money laundering.
A three-judge Court of Appeal panel led by Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim allowed the former youth and sports minister's appeal, setting aside his conviction, seven-year prison sentence, RM10 million fine and two strokes of the rotan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysiakini
a day ago
- Malaysiakini
Does DAP CEC meet essential criteria?
LETTER | Lately, there has been criticism over the latest DAP Central Executive Committee (CEC) lineup. Doubts have arisen on whether the appointment of short-lived human resources minister V Sivakumar and Buntong assemblyperson M Thulasi to the DAP CEC would boost the support of the Indian community. To me, such a narrowing down of these two DAP leaders to ethnic support reinforces the ethnocentric dimension of Malaysian politics, which seems to be clueless about what exactly is needed to inspire a real change in the country. The incorporation of these personalities and all those who are in the CEC should be assessed not on whether they are capable of representing a certain community, but whether they are passionately able to address issues related to social justice that transcend sectarian feelings. Here are the following criteria that transcend the sentiments of race and religion, which are also relevant to other political parties that would want to promote the common good. People-centric leaders Are the people in the CEC people-centred and articulate the real needs of the people, or are they obedient to the dictates of certain leaders in the party? Are they able to practise the freedom of conscience on critical issues affecting the life and liberty of Malaysians? Are they able to work with political opponents within and outside the party for the good of the people? Grassroots work Are the people in the CEC genuinely involved in grassroots issues related to services and urban poverty by engaging local and state governments? Is there a push for local government polls, or are they finally accepting the irrationality of ethno-religious justification for denying local government elections? Advocates for sustainability Are CEC leadership and members doing what is right to protect the environment and pursuing sustainable practices? What is happening in the reclamation exercises in Penang reveals the kind of leaders who adhere to neo-liberal economic ideology that is antithetical to sustainable development goals. Advocates for workforce's poorest Are the CEC members involved in advocating labour issues and reforms? It is rare to see DAP leaders speaking out for contract workers or migrant workers who provide services to the government and private sectors, who are not adequately represented when dealing with labour issues. Advocates for constitutional rights Are the CEC leadership and members articulate the objective truths related to the rule of law, human rights and the independence of the judiciary? We can't hear much from the DAP since they became part of the coalition government. Advocates for global justice Are CEC members genuinely concerned about issues such as the Palestinian cause, global hegemony by superpowers, and those that affect the family of nations? I have yet to see intellectuals in the DAP who are able to articulate on global issues that have implications for developing countries, including Malaysia. It is time for the public to assess the DAP on these criteria instead of narrowing down issues to ethnic sentiments, which merely reinforces ethnocentric politics in the country. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
Malaysiakini
a day ago
- Malaysiakini
Does DAP CEC meet essential criteria?
LETTER | Lately, there has been criticism over the latest DAP Central Executive Committee (CEC) lineup. Doubts have arisen on whether the appointment of short-lived human resources minister V Sivakumar and Buntong assemblyperson M Thulasi to the DAP CEC would boost the support of the Indian community. To me, such a narrowing down of these two DAP leaders to ethnic support reinforces the ethnocentric dimension of Malaysian politics, which seems to be clueless about what exactly is needed to inspire a real change in the country. The incorporation of these personalities and all those who are in the CEC should be assessed not on whether they are capable of representing a certain community, but whether they are passionately able to address issues related to social justice that transcend sectarian feelings. Here are the following criteria that transcend the sentiments of race and religion, which are also relevant to other political parties that would want to promote the common good. People-centric leaders Are the people in the CEC people-centred and articulate the real needs of the people, or are they obedient to the dictates of certain leaders in the party? Are they able to practise the freedom of conscience on critical issues affecting the life and liberty of Malaysians? Are they able to work with political opponents within and outside the party for the good of the people? Grassroots work Are the people in the CEC genuinely involved in grassroots issues related to services and urban poverty by engaging local and state governments? Is there a push for local government polls, or are they finally accepting the irrationality of ethno-religious justification for denying local government elections? Advocates for sustainability Are CEC leadership and members doing what is right to protect the environment and pursuing sustainable practices? What is happening in the reclamation exercises in Penang reveals the kind of leaders who adhere to neo-liberal economic ideology that is antithetical to sustainable development goals. Advocates for workforce's poorest Are the CEC members involved in advocating labour issues and reforms? It is rare to see DAP leaders speaking out for contract workers or migrant workers who provide services to the government and private sectors, who are not adequately represented when dealing with labour issues. Advocates for constitutional rights Are the CEC leadership and members articulate the objective truths related to the rule of law, human rights and the independence of the judiciary? We can't hear much from the DAP since they became part of the coalition government. Advocates for global justice Are CEC members genuinely concerned about issues such as the Palestinian cause, global hegemony by superpowers, and those that affect the family of nations? I have yet to see intellectuals in the DAP who are able to articulate on global issues that have implications for developing countries, including Malaysia. It is time for the public to assess the DAP on these criteria instead of narrowing down issues to ethnic sentiments, which merely reinforces ethnocentric politics in the country. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
Free Malaysia Today
2 days ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Even with Syed Saddiq, Muda comeback at GE 16 unlikely, say analysts
Muar MP Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman was acquitted of abetting corruption, misappropriation of funds and money laundering by the Court of Appeal earlier this week. PETALING JAYA : Muda is unlikely to stage a comeback in the next general election, even with Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman at the helm following his recent acquittal on corruption charges, analysts say. They say the party, founded five years ago, has missed its opportunity. Syaza Shukri of International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) said Muda was at its peak in the year before the 15th general election (GE15), which was held in November 2022. 'They were hot in 2021 but now people don't seem to remember them. 'They missed the opportunity to attract voters because they lost momentum,' she told FMT. Syaza Shukri. Syaza said Muda has struggled to project a clear identity or establish its purpose. 'People don't know exactly what Muda is fighting for. Right now, it feels more like an NGO,' she said. Syaza also believes Muda suffers from an image problem, largely appearing to be a 'one-man party'. There appears to be a lack of trust in Muda's ability to become an effective third force, she added. Explaining the difference between how Muda and PKR functioned when their respective leaders were confronted with legal jeopardy, Syaza said that in PKR's case, other leaders stepped up to lead when current prime minister Anwar Ibrahim was twice incarcerated. 'Muda tried to do the same with acting president Amira (Aisya Abdul Aziz) but that has not been enough,' she added. Syed Saddiq relinquished his post at the helm of the party after he was convicted by the High Court of abetting criminal breach of trust (CBT), misappropriation of funds and money laundering. On Wednesday, the Court of Appeal unanimously acquitted the Muar MP of all charges. Muda needs veterans and an ally Azmi Hassan. Azmi Hassan of Akademi Nusantara said Muda's strategy of positioning itself from the onset as a platform for disillusioned voters across the political divide, has failed to materialise. 'When Muda was first established, it was to attract younger voters, not specifically from Pakatan Harapan, but from across the board. That was their strategy,' he said when contacted by FMT. However, he noted that Muda failed to resonate with younger, disillusioned voters – particularly among the non-Malays. Azmi said the party may want to reconsider its approach to remain relevant, adding that it needs more than just young leaders. Muda needs a strong ally, he said\ – either Pakatan Harapan (PH) or Barisan Nasional (BN). However, Azmi said both coalitions may be hesitant to collaborate with Muda, fearing the party may not bring sufficient strategic value to the table. James Chin of the University of Tasmania said Syed Saddiq's acquittal presents Muda with an opportunity to rebuild its image. James Chin. 'Muda was able to attract a lot of young people, including many youths from the Chinese community. But what happened was a lot of young people moved away after Syed Saddiq was charged with corruption, including the Malays,' he said. 'Now that he has been discharged by the courts, if he goes back to working with the party, I believe he will be able to recover lost ground.' However, Chin said the party's biggest hurdle remains seat negotiations with potential allies. 'Everything will depend on how well they do. The biggest problem they face is to get PH to give them seats to contest. In the last round, they won only one seat (in Muar).' Chin said that Muda should be given a chance as Syed Saddiq is still capable of attracting young people from across all ethnic groups.
