3 morning routine ideas to embrace every day
PARIS : Do you have a (real) morning routine? It's not just about getting up, downing a quick cup of coffee and putting on some makeup, but a real daily ritual designed to help get your day off to a stress-free start.
Here are three morning routines, recommended by social media or by scientists, which could help boost your energy levels and maintain your mental health in the long term.
The 'slow morning' for a gentle start
Gone are the days of waking up to an aggressive alarm then rushing out of bed. It's time to try a gentler, slower pace, just as you would on vacation.
This is the aim of the 'slow morning' that has been gaining a following on social networks recently.
The idea is simple: take a moment to relax and refocus on yourself, instead of running around as soon as you get out of bed.
This is a morning routine that reduces stress levels and allows you to enjoy the pleasures of daily life to the full, away from the hectic pace of the day ahead.
Conceptualised by American coach and lecturer Hal Elrod in his book 'Miracle Morning', this method is inspired by the 'slow living' philosophy known for its mental health benefits.
Unlike other rituals of this type, there are no specific rules, apart from listening to your own needs.
Morning activities could involve a meditation session, stretching, listening to relaxing music, taking a long, soothing shower, or simply switching off temporarily from social networks.
Achieve more with the '5-to-9' routine
Although totally opposed to the 'slow morning,' the '5-to-9 morning routine' promises similar benefits in terms of well-being.
Originating on social networks, this daily ritual requires strict discipline in terms of nutrition, sleep and physical activity, and is based on the idea that people are more productive in the morning.
The five-nine morning routine involves waking up at 5am to exercise, meditate or read a book before leaving home for the office. (Envato Elements pic)
In concrete terms, it involves waking up at 5am to indulge in all kinds of activities – preferably those beneficial to physical and mental health – before heading off to work.
These include swapping a hurried breakfast for a healthy meal of freshly squeezed juice, smoothies, fresh fruit and other such fare, followed by a workout and/or meditation session, a morning walk, reading a book and taking the time to get ready before leaving home.
This morning routine allows for more peaceful, less stressful evenings, without compromising on a healthy lifestyle.
Contrary to popular belief, some people are naturally more active later in the day. So this morning routine may not be for everyone, especially as it's vital to satisfy your own personal sleep needs.
The magic formula
Research funded by cereal company Kellogg's in honour of their Special K brand and published in 2022, revealed a mathematical formula for getting out of bed on the right foot and being in a good mood all day long.
Specifically, renowned mathematician Anne-Marie Imafidon analysed responses to a survey of 2,000 people in the UK to create a complex formula for a morning routine considered ideal.
According to her research, this would involve waking up at 6:44 am and getting out of bed by 7:12 am at the latest, followed by 21 minutes' physical exercise, a 10-minute shower and 18 minutes having breakfast.
But the beauty of this formula is that it can be used to tailor this routine to individual circumstances.
To find out whether your current routine is beneficial to your well-being, multiply the time spent eating breakfast by two, then add it to the time spent exercising and showering. Keep this first result in mind.
Next, subtract the number of hours spent sleeping from eight, then add one, and multiply this figure by the difference between the time you got up and 7:12 (to which you add another one).
Then take the first result and divide it by the second, and – as a final step – add the number of minutes spent on another morning activity divided by two.
If the number obtained is greater than 37, your routine is considered effective; if not, you'll probably need to make some changes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
5 days ago
- Malay Mail
Floating babies, cosmic radiation and zero-gravity birth: What space pregnancy might actually involve
LONDON, July 24 — As plans for missions to Mars accelerate, so do questions about how the human body might cope. A return trip to the red planet would give more than enough time for someone to become pregnant and even give birth. But could a pregnancy be conceived and carried safely in space? And what would happen to a baby born far from Earth? Most of us rarely consider the risks we survived before birth. For instance, about two thirds of human embryos do not live long enough to be born, with most losses happening in the first few weeks after fertilisation; often before a person even knows they're pregnant. These early, unnoticed losses usually happen when an embryo either fails to develop properly or to implant successfully in the wall of the womb. Pregnancy can be understood as a chain of biological milestones. Each one must happen in the right order and each has a certain chance of success. On Earth, these odds can be estimated using clinical research and biological models. My latest research explores how these same stages might be affected by the extreme conditions of interplanetary space. Microgravity, the near-weightlessness experienced during spaceflight, would make conception more physically awkward but probably wouldn't interfere much with staying pregnant once the embryo has implanted. However, giving birth, and looking after a newborn, would be far more difficult in zero gravity. After all, in space, nothing stays still. Fluids float. So do people. That makes delivering a baby and caring for one a much messier and more complicated process than on Earth, where gravity helps with everything from positioning to feeding. At the same time, the developing foetus already grows in something like microgravity. It floats in neutrally buoyant amniotic fluid inside the womb, cushioned and suspended. In fact, astronauts train for spacewalks in water tanks designed to mimic weightlessness. In that sense, the womb is already a microgravity simulator. But gravity is only part of the picture. Radiation Outside Earth's protective layers, there's a more dangerous threat: cosmic rays. These are high-energy particles — 'stripped-down' or 'bare' atomic nuclei — that race through space at nearly the speed of light. They're atoms that have lost all their electrons, leaving just the dense core of protons and neutrons. When these bare nuclei collide with the human body, they can cause serious cellular damage. Here on Earth, we're protected from most cosmic radiation by the planet's thick atmosphere and, depending on the time of day, tens of thousands to millions of miles of coverage from the Earth's magnetic field. In space, that shielding disappears. When a cosmic ray passes through the human body, it may strike an atom, strip its electrons, and smash into its nucleus, knocking out protons and neutrons and leaving behind a different element or isotope. This can cause extremely localised damage — meaning that individual cells, or parts of cells, are destroyed while the rest of the body might remain unaffected. Sometimes the ray passes right through without hitting anything. But if it hits DNA, it can cause mutations that increase the risk of cancer. Even when cells survive, radiation can trigger inflammatory responses. That means the immune system overreacts, releasing chemicals that can damage healthy tissue and disrupt organ function. In the first few weeks of pregnancy, embryonic cells are rapidly dividing, moving, and forming early tissues and structures. For development to continue, the embryo must stay viable throughout this delicate process. The first month after fertilisation is the most vulnerable time. A single hit from a high-energy cosmic ray at this stage could be lethal to the embryo. However, the embryo is very small — and cosmic rays, while dangerous, are relatively rare. So a direct hit is unlikely. If it did happen, it would probably result in an unnoticed miscarriage. Pregnancy risks As pregnancy progresses, the risks shift. Once the placental circulation — the blood flow system that connects mother and foetus — is fully formed by the end of the first trimester, the foetus and uterus grow rapidly. That growth presents a larger target. A cosmic ray is now more likely to hit the uterine muscle, which could trigger contractions and potentially cause premature labour. And although neonatal intensive care has improved dramatically, the earlier a baby is born, the higher the risk of complications, particularly in space. On Earth, pregnancy and childbirth already carry risks. In space, those risks are magnified — but not necessarily prohibitive. But development doesn't stop at birth. A baby born in space would continue growing in microgravity, which could interfere with postural reflexes and coordination. These are the instincts that help a baby learn to lift its head, sit up, crawl, and eventually walk: all movements that rely on gravity. Without that sense of 'up' and 'down,' these abilities might develop in very different ways. And the radiation risk doesn't go away. A baby's brain continues to grow after birth, and prolonged exposure to cosmic rays could cause permanent damage — potentially affecting cognition, memory, behaviour and long-term health. So, could a baby be born in space? In theory, yes. But until we can protect embryos from radiation, prevent premature birth, and ensure babies can grow safely in microgravity, space pregnancy remains a high-risk experiment – one we're not yet ready to try. — Reuters
Free Malaysia Today
6 days ago
- Free Malaysia Today
WHO raises concern about spread of mosquito-borne Chikungunya virus
The mosquito-borne chikungunya virus can cause high fever, joint pain and long-term disability. (Pixabay pic) GENEVA : The World Health Organisation issued an urgent call for action on Tuesday to prevent a repeat of an epidemic of the mosquito-borne chikungunya virus that swept the globe two decades ago, as new outbreaks linked to the Indian Ocean region spread to Europe and other continents. An estimated 5.6 billion people live in areas across 119 countries at risk from the virus, which can cause high fever, joint pain and long-term disability, Diana Rojas Alvarez, a medical officer at the WHO, told reporters in Geneva. 'We are seeing history repeating itself,' she said, drawing parallels to the 2004-2005 epidemic, which affected nearly half a million people, primarily in small island territories, before spreading around the world. The current surge began in early 2025, with major outbreaks in the same Indian Ocean islands which were previously hit, including La Reunion, Mayotte and Mauritius. An estimated one-third of La Reunion's population has already been infected, Rojas Alvarez said. The virus is now spreading to countries such as Madagascar, Somalia and Kenya, and has shown epidemic transmission in Southeast Asia, including India. Of particular concern is the increasing number of imported cases and recent local transmission within Europe. There have been approximately 800 imported chikungunya cases in continental France since May 1, Rojas Alvarez said. Twelve local transmission episodes have been detected in several southern French regions, meaning individuals were infected by local mosquitoes without having travelled to endemic areas. A case was also detected last week in Italy. Chikungunya, for which there is no specific treatment and which is spread primarily by Aedes mosquito species, including the 'tiger mosquito' which also transmits dengue, and Zika, can cause rapid and large outbreaks. As the mosquitoes bite in the daytime, prevention is key, through the use of insect repellent and long-sleeved clothing.
Malay Mail
6 days ago
- Malay Mail
Study: Negative online messaging driving mental health crisis for Malaysia's LGBT+
KUALA LUMPUR, July 23 — A new study has found that frequent exposure to negative online messages is driving up depression, self-harm, and suicidal thoughts among LGBT+ individuals in Malaysia. The study, titled 'Exposure to negative LGBT-related media messages as a social determinant of mental health inequities for LGBT+ people in Malaysia,' said such messages often aim to indoctrinate the public with harmful ideology and ingrain anti-LGBT+ sentiments, particularly among those with limited or misinformed understanding of these issues. From those surveyed, over three in four respondents reported seeing negative LGBT-related messages on social media 'often' or 'very often' over the past 12 months. Regarding the nature of these messages, over 80 per cent of participants said the content depicted LGBT+ people as criminals or mentally disordered. Furthermore, 71.7 per cent reported messages suggesting this group needed to be 'treated' or advocating for increased legal punishment against them. Impact on mental health The study provides new insights into the mental health ramifications of such media exposure, identifying a path that involves negative expectations of societal rejection and police harassment. 'Our mediation analyses showed that negative LGBT-related messages on newspapers, TV, and social media (respectively can trigger fear in the anticipation of societal rejection, police harassment, and being labelled as mentally ill, all of which contribute to heightened risks of depression, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), and suicidal ideation,' the study read. It also found that this was consistent even after adjusting for various demographic factors. However, the study did not detect a significant relationship between negative media exposure and actual suicide attempts. Sources of negative messaging Politicians and religious leaders were identified as the two most common sources of negative LGBT-related messages, cited by 87.1 per cent and 84.1 per cent of participants, respectively. University lecturers and academic researchers were also noted as sources by a quarter of study participants (24.6 per cent). The study comprised a sample of 757 participants aged 18 to 61 with varying sexual orientations and gender identities. The findings come amid ongoing concerns about public discourse surrounding the LGBT+ community. Most recently, a coalition of civil society groups urged Kelantan police to revise a statement regarding a raid on what was initially described as a 'gay sex party' but was later clarified to be a health outreach event. Media reports following the raid led to harmful and stigmatising remarks that intensified fear among LGBTQ individuals seeking health services.
